ML20197E712

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Revised FY84-85 Budget Estimates,Summarizing Budget Category & Program Differences Between NRC 820901 Submittal & OMB Approval & Details of Revised Estimates & Associated Program Impact for FY84
ML20197E712
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/23/1982
From: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Palladino
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20197E584 List:
References
FOIA-85-334 NUDOCS 8605150303
Download: ML20197E712 (20)


Text

O g n arco' UNITED STATES y g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMiss!ON WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 y,

( g 77/jl DEC 2 31937-MEM0PANDUM FOR: Chairman Palladino FROM: William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

REVISED FY 1984-1985 BUDGET ESTIMATES Attached are the revised NRC FY 1984-1985 budget estimates which reflect decisions made by the Commission after reviewing the proposed allocation of the OMB reductions provided in your December 17, 1982 memorandum.

Tnese estimates will be used in the preparation of the FY 1984 President's Budget.

Attach ent 1 summarizes the budget category and program differences between the NRC submission of September 1, 1982 and OMB's approval. Attachment 2 provides the details of the revised budget estimates and associated program

. impacts for FY 1984. The FY 1985 estimates are considered by OMS as a planning target.

Tne FY 1984 President's Budget that NRC will submit to Congress in January 1983 will have two minor structural adjustments as compared to previous submissions.

The OM3 now controls personnel ceilings by total Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) rather than by Permanent FTE and Other Than Permanent FTE which include part-time permanent, consultants, ACRS fellows, and temporaries. Therefore, the

(.ungressional submission will show the total of both with comparability adjustments shown for FY 1982 and FY 1983. Previously, our budget submissions

. .to Congress only included permanent FTEs. The second adjustment is that the program support budget category will now include associated technical equipment. In the past, NRC reflected this type of equipment in a separate line item. OM3 has agreed that a separate line entry is no longer necessary for equipment.

f 8605150303 PDR FOIA 860403 b -h  % VL ADATO85-334 PDR. William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations Attachments:

As stated ,

cc w/ attachments: -

Comissioner Gilinsky ..

Comissioner Ahearne l Comissicner Roberts Comissioner Asselstine b Office Directors Region Administrators l l

O O m

e . -

w -

- A.

-a ee 4

e

. ATTACHMENT 1 S

0 AB7

. [L

Analysis 0148 Action On llRC Bgjet FY 1984-FY 1985 FY 1984 Iludget Estimates

~

~(Dollars In illTilons) ill!C . pres.

fludget Request Difference ,

personnel , $142.5 $145.8V $13.3 pro 9 ram Support 295.2 259.6 -35.6^

Administrative Support 51.5 50.9 -0.6 Travel 10.6 10.5 -0.1 2

Total $499.8 $466.8 $33.0]

FY 1985 Iludget Estimates

, (Dollars In Hillions) ,

tiRC OMB Request Target 01 f ference personnel $142.1 $143.90 $tl.8  !

program Support 285.2 252.1 -33.1 Administrative Support 55.5 53.5 -2.0

, Travel 10.6 10.5 -0.1 Total $493.4 $460.0 $33.4 f

If Includes result of FY 1983 pay Raise and Medicare participation enactaient. flequires $5.5 million in FY 1984 -

Olla funded $3.0 million. The sliortage of $2.5 million made up l>y reduction of $1.8 million from Program Suppof and $0.7 million from Administrative Support and Travel. -

2/ Actually a reduction of $35.5 million due to shortfall addressed in 1/ above. db

,71 l a!

w - '

FY 1983-FY 1985 '-

Summary Budget Data (5 in thcusands, staffing in total FTE)

FY 1983 FY 1984 FY 1985 Blue NRC Result of NRC Result of Book Recuest OMB Mark Chance Recuest OMB Mark Chance PS & Ecuio NRR S 44,647 5~39,390 $ 38,,390 5 - 1,000 $ 35.,560 5 34,680 IE 12,100 14,944 5- 880 14,550 -

294 17,980 18,130 + 150 NMSS 17,970 17,578 17,080 -

498 16,733 16,330 201,400 403 RSS 216,108 182,400 -33,708 207,582 175,800 -31,882-PTS 3,530 4,140 3,940 -

200 4,125 4,040 3,040 85 PDA 3.200 3,040 -

3.040 3,040 -

Subtotal 5282,847 5295,200 5259,500, S-35,700 $285,120 .5252,020 5-33,100 Travel $10,1.0 $10,550 510,550 5- 100 $ 10,650 $ 10,550 5- 100 A0 MIN Support S'8,018 551,450 550,950 5- 5 55,530 500 5 53,530 S- 2,000 Salaries $138,535 5142,500 5145,800 S+3,300 $142,100 $143,900 5+ 1,800 Dollars $479,3uuil 5499,800 5466,600 5-33,000 5493,a00 5460,000 5-33,400 Staffing (3,325) (3,434) (3,371) (3,414) (3,325)

(-63) (-89)

'./' Ccngressicnal recuction of $5,000,000. to be allocated after Appropriation.

9 e

As7 G

e

<v -,---s a ,--n -- ,

[ ,

STAFFlilG TOTAL FTE FY 1983 FY 1984 FY 1985 Sunmary Revised Current OMB Results Olla Results By Program Budget Alloca tion Sub. Of DilB Pres, d Sub. Of OMB OMB d ,)

(8/82)_ (12/82) (8/82)_ Red. Budget (84-83) (8/82) Red. Target (85-ilRR 746 748 747 -17 730 -18 714 -5 709 -21 I&E 970 966 ,

1,032 -6 996' +30 1,021 -31 990 -6

~

I i&lSS -

314 314 316 -10 306 -8 317 -13 304 -2 RES 275 275 261 -11 250 -25 262 -17 245 -5 PTS 386 389 379 -12 367 -22 371 14 357 -10 l

732 729 -7 729 720 ' -2 PDA 731 722 -9 -9 TOTAL .-- 3,423 3,423 .3.434 -63 3,371 -52 3,414 -89 3,325 -46 i'

i I

AB7 1 8

- .y
a

u -

~

g ,.

.-J_

ATTACHMENT 2

. As7

u- -

Program Impacts of OMB Reductions -

FY 1984 Budget

($ in thousands, staffing in total FTE)-

NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION PROGRAMS OMB Result of Decision Unit Submission OMB Mark Pres. Budget Staffing Total 747 -

17 730 Program Support Total 539.390 -51,000 538,390 Ooerating Reactors

- Staffing 312 -

3 307

- Program Support $9,634 -

$200 $9,434 Defer completion of about 40 multi-plant operating reactor licensing actions until FY 1985 or beyond. This will have a small effect on reducing the licensing action invento ry.

i Systematic Safetv Evaluation of Ooeratino Reactor

. - Staffing 41 -

7 34

- Program Support $5,166 -

$300 $4,866 Plan to c:mplete eleven integrated safety assessments for SEP Phase III and eleven NREP reviews in FY 1985 as opposed to FY 1984. This change is consistent with recent planning for a Ccamission decision on SEP Phase III/NREP in mid- FY 1983, rather than early FY 1983 as was planned in the OMB submission.

.0cerator Licensing

- Staffing 43 -

7 36

Program Support $4,840 -

$500 $4,340 Cancel planned NRC administered operator requalification examination program.

Operators would continue to be recualified by the . licensee and NRC would continue to audit the licensee's requalification examinations and procedures. The potential impact of cancelling the NRC program is believed to be minimal as long as a significant number of operators are required to take NRC administered replacement examinations, because of high turnover rates.

S e

AB1

  • I .

Program fmpacts of 0"B Reductions

~ BA-.

FY 1984 Budget -~

~Ji (S in thousands, staffing in total FTE)

INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT PROGRAJ45 Resuits OMB of OMB Decision Unit Submission Mark Pres. Budget Staffing Total 1,002 - 6 996 Program Support Total 514,944 - 5294 514,650 Management Direction and Succort

- Staffing 77 -6 71 The staff year reduction of 6 FTE's would be taken from both Headquarters and

. Regional portions of the Management Direction and Support Decision Unit. The impact would be a reduced capanility'in the Regions and IE Headquarters to handle persennel matters, contract administration, and budgetary matters and would place additional burden on the existing staff.

Reactors Under Construction

- Program Support ' S 3,097 - $294 $ 2,797 The funding reduction of $294K would be taken frem the Headquarters portion of the Reactors Under Construction Decision Unit. This would be acccmplished-by reducing the amount of contractor effort planned for evaluating the Qualification of Safety Related Equipment (QSRE). This reduction is consistent-with current program plans in the QSRE area.

e #

AB7-

- , . - -- .-. , s ~.,-m. ,-, -, 1-~. -- -.,.m-

V

'u -

~

Program Impacts of GMB Reductions

~A.

- ~ ?'.

FY 1984 Sudget (5 in thousands, staffing in total FTE)

NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS PROGRAMS OMB Results of Decision Unit Submission OMB MARK Pres. Budget Staffing Total 316 - 10 306 Program Support Total $17, W - 5566 517, M Fuel Cycle Licensing

- Staffing 36 -1 35 The reduction will require a more reactive approach to reviewing fuel cycle facility operational data rather than systematically trying to seek cut potential problems.

Materials Licensing

- Staffing 48 -2 46 Resources budgeted for documenting licensing policy and procedures for Headquarters to assure that NRC regulations are consistently applied will be revised. Standard review plans and licensing guides will be prepared only for those categories that -

have the largest number of licensees. Guidance for other categories will be provided en an ad hoc basis.

Reactor Safeguards Licensing

, - Prcgram Support $1,170 - $100 $1,070-The reduction will preclude funding for new concepts and ' technology for development of innovative reactor safeguards.

Fuel Cycle Safecuards ~

- Staffing 32 -3 29

- Program Support $2,955 -

$300 $2,655 Safeguards incidents that occur will receive less in depth analysis. Activities in support of rule development, such as preparaticn of guidance documents, resolution of generic issues, and value impact analyses will be reduced in scope. _

I i

As7

~

~

w -

NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS PROGRAMS (Cont'd)

Safeguards Transoortation and Excort Licensing Staffing 17 -

1 16 Program Support $263 - $100 $163 We will reduce the country analyses planned in FY84 in support of NRC export.

licensing activities.

Low level Waste Management Staffing 27 -3 24 The reduction delays the preparation of regulatory guidance for waste not acceptable for near surface disposal one year. It will also reduce our efforts to analyze ongoing waste generation, processing and storage practices. , ,

  • O e

E R

1 l

A87

~

I NUCLEAR REGUL'ATORY RESEARCll -

FY 198'l BUDGET .

(PROGRAM SUPPORT DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 4 RESULTS FY83 FY8'i 0F OMB PRES.

t0E.

. IlEQ,_ BARK DVD.._ ,

REACTOR / FACILITY SAFETY REACTOR & FACILITY ENGINEERING

$ 38.6 $ 112.3 $-2.5 $ 39.8 _

FACILITY OPERATIONS 111.0 17.5 -3.0 lli .5 TilERMAL llYDRAULIC TRANSIENTS 21.8 27.8 -0.1 27.7' SITING & ilEALTil 9.2 11.2 -2.6 8.6  !

RISK ANALYSIS 15.9 19.3 -1.6 17.7 TOTAL

$ 99.5 $118.1 $-9.8 $108.3 REACTOR ACCIDENTS ACCIDENT EVALUATION & MITIGATION 118.7 11 6 . 5 -2.6 113.9

~

LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENTS- 12.0 11.3 11.0

-0._3 ~

LOFT 15.0 17.5 -17.5 0 T0TAL 75.7 75.3 - 2 0 . 11 - 5'i 9 ADVANCED-REACTORS 1 3 . 11 10.2 -0.3 9.9 WASTE MANAGEMENT 12.8 12.5 -3.'2 9.3 '

TOTAL $201.11 $216.1 $-33.7

~$182.li NOTE: ALL COLUMNS INCLUDE Tile DISTRIBUTION OF EQUIPMENT BY D.li.'

A s7 l . -)/

s, Program Imcact of OMB Reductions .

FY 1984 Budget - 7;_d (Dollars in millions; Staffing in Total FTE)

NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH RESULTS FY 83 OMB 0F OMB PRES.

Decision Unit -CONG SUB. MARK BUD.

Program Support Total ,

$201.4 $216.1 $-33.7 $182.4 Reactor & Facility Engineering $ 38.6 $ 42.3 $ -2.5 $ 39.8 The reduction will impact in three areas: degraded piping (aging),

containment, and decommissioning. In the degraded piping program reduction there will be a 6-12 month delay in completion of tests of large diameter piping and in the verification of the predictions of the capability of degraded piping to resist' postulated accident loads.

The reduction in containment will result in deferral of containment penetra-tion studies to provide methods of establishing the ultimate capability of centainments to.contain severe accidents.

The reduction in decommissioning, will preclude: (1) ccmpleting wock, scheduled in FY 1984, on deccamiss.ioning source terms; (2) statistical survey techniques and radiation ' detection practices for certification surveys for license termination, and (3) ccmpletion of investigation of methods for facilitating the decommissioning of reactors to be used during the design, operation and actual deccmmissioning.

Facility Oceratiens $14.0 $17.5 $-3,0 $14.5 The planned NRC level of research relate'd to plant instrumentation an'd control will be reduced, with the industry being encouraged to support more effort to .

confirm the availability of reactor instrumentation during abnormal events.

The 't).S. participation in the international Halden Project on human factors and nuclear fuels research will be reduced. The cut will also necessitate delaying or terminating all planned research work on human factors

, considerations for fuel cycle faci'lities.

e e

e A

~

NUCLhARREGULATORYRESEARCH(cont'd) -

~7a_.

RESULTS 7 FY 83 OMB 0F OMB PRES.

Decision Unit CONG SUS. MARK BUD.

Siting & Health $9.2 $11.2 $-2.6 $8.6 Remaining work tolreduce data on tornado windspeeds and on meteorological dispersion will be terminated. Research on comparative health effects resulting from various types of nuclear and non-nuclear fuel cycles will be deferred. There will be no research or technical assistance to support rulemaking or regulatory guidance on post-accident recovery guidelines, demographic siting criteria, man made hazards to nuclear plants, and off-site, post-licensing changes that affect risk or socioeconcomic factors related to plant construction and operation. Rulemaking, regulatory guidance or response to petitions will have to be addressed on the basis of existing information.

Waste Management $12.8 $12.5 $-3.2 $9.3 In LLW and Uranium Recovery there will be delays in the development of a technical basis for NRC and State license review and regulatory guidance to licensees, on evaluating the effectiveness of various methods of isolating radioactive waste from the public environment.

Risk Analysis $15.9 $19.3 5-1.6 $17.7 This reduction will defer two transportation and material risk programs for one year: (1) the development of methods to assess risk of non-reactor facilities, and (2) the ccmpletion of the Transportation Modal Study intended to determine whether existing standards and methods for transportation of radioactive materials by various modes are approcriate or should be changed.

Additionally, two programs will be deleted: (1) a planned new start to develop methods for risk analysis of materials held by non-reactor licensees, and (2) a program to update the transportation incident data base.

e As/1 A G

%- NUCL' EAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (cont'd) ~

RESUL'TS FY 83 UMB 0F OMB PRES.

Decisien Unit CONG SUB. MARK BUD.

LOFT $15.0 . $17.5 $-17.5 $0 Al' hough there will be no funding contribution to the LOFT Consortium by the NRC in FY 1984, the NRC will continue to be represented on the management board in view of its initial funding contribution. Our objective remains to assure eventual performance of the L2-6 test, and adequate consideration of NRC's needs in the conduct of the overall test program.

Other 595.9 $95.8 $-3.3 $92.5 Additional reductions will be made in Thermal Hydraulic Transients.

Accident Evaluation and Mitigation, Loss of Coolant Accidents and Advanced Reactors cecision units primarily through reduced equipment expenditures and fuel dacage studies. Some of the equipment reduction reflects the anticipa-tien of outside involvement in the Power Burst Facility for FY '.so4.

Staffing Total 275 261 .'11 ,

250 The staffing change will defer seme standards development in Safeguards, Materials and Transportation, Siting and Radiation Protection. These reductions wculd be gradual as major efforts such as Revisions of 10 CFR 20, 10 CFR 60,10 CFR 35, and their associate guidance are completed. This reducticn will also necessitate increased reliance on DOE Laboratory management or other contractual assistance to perform technical oversight duties currently pursued by RES staff.

W 6

9 A87 e

h ,- . - .-- r - - -y -, , - . - - - - - - - - - - , - + - - - , - - - - -

s- ,_

Program Impacts of OMB Reductions .

- pt

. ?i..

FY 1984 Budget (Staffing in total FTE)

COMMISSION OFFICES FY 1983 FY 1984 Reviseo Current OMB Result of Presioent's Change Office Budcet Allocation Submission OM3 Mark Budoet FY 84-FY 83 SECY 37 36 37 -1 36 -

Holding at the FY 1983 level may result in less timely service to the public at our Public Document Room.

ACRS 58 58 58 -2 56 -2 The reduction of 2 FTE in ACRS will reduce their ability to review subjects for the Commissioners and/or will restfict the review of research related activity.

~

ASLAP 19 19 18

-1 17 -2 The reduction will come frem the support staff as the appeal process workload for professional-direct is not expected to drop until FY 1985.

01 42 42 42 -4 38 -4 OI wilf be held at current strength of 38 FTE. This will reduce capability to meet anticipated investigative requirements.

9 e

AO

\

l

s, -

x: ~.

Program Impacts of OMB Reductions FY 1984 Budget (Staffing in total FTE)

EDO OFFICES FY 1983 FY 1984 Revised Current OMB Result of Presioent's Change Office Budget Allocation Submission OM8 Mark Budget FY 84-FY 83 OIP 29 29 29 -1 28 -1 The reduction of 1 FTE may affect the ability to provide timely action on export licenses. -

AE00 34 35 38 -3 35 /- -

HoldingAE00'attheFh1983levelwillhavesomeimpactonthe .

- AEOD event analysis program, particularly the application of pr babilistic risk assessment to event analysis, and the initiation of reviews of operational experience frem a human factor perspective.

l O

A84 e

O

,f ~ i , . .

s_ '

Program Impacts of CMB Reductions _ E503 FY 1984 Budget (Staffing in total FTE)

EDO OFFICES FY 1983 FY 1984

. Revisec Current OMS Result of Presioent's Change Office Budget Allocation Submission OMB Mark Budget FY 84-FY 83 ACM 399 391 397 -7 390 -1 In the Division of Facilities and Operations Support a reduction of two FTE in the travel section may be accommodated by con-tracting out travel reservation and ticketing services. In the Division of Security, a reduction of one FTE will increase response time in completing clearance actions. One FTE in the License Fee Management-Branch may delay the collection of license fees. In the Division of Rules and Records, one FTE w.fil be taken in the Local Public Document Room (LPDR) Branch which would restrict our capability to meet new demands. A reduction of one

~

professional assistant to the Director will affect accomplishing such studies as the Document Control System Requirements and Feasibility Study and the Information Collection Budget Study.

In the Division of Contracts nne FTE would be taken which will delay the processing of ger.cral procurement actions.

A91

u Program Impacts of OMB Redactions e -

FY 19'84 Budget

($ in thousands)

Results OMB of OMB Submission Mark Pres. Budget Administrative Suecort - Total $51,450 -$500 $50,950 The reduction of FTE's in FY 1984 should permit a corresponding reduction in Administrative Support.

m M

.o O

de

/

A81 e

- , . - - , - , , , - , - - --e.----- +

(

STAFFillG .

TOTAL FTE FY 1983 FY 1984 Rev. Current ( I Of18 Resul ts Budget Allocation - Sub. Of Or48 Pres. d Of fice (8/82) (12/82) (8/82) Red. Budget (84-83) ,

!!RR 695 700 643 -7 636 1&E 173 177 177(2) -1 176 -1 titlSS 278 284 260 -4 256 -28 RES- 275 275 261(2) -11 250 -25__

Regional Oper. 905 887 1,007 -23 984 +97 IfiE 797 789 825 -5 820 +31 NRR 51 48 104 -10 94 +46 ritISS 36 30 56 -6 50 +20

  • PTS (ELD /SP) 19 18 19 -1 18 -

PDA (ADI1) 2 2 3 -1 2 -

C0t@t 347 351 341 -8 333 -18 OCt1 32 32 32 32 -

SECY 37 36 37 -1 36 -

  • ACRS 58 58 58 -2 56 -2
  • ASLAP 19 19 18 -1 17 -2 OIA 28 29 28 28 -l
OGC 29 29 29 29 -

OPA 17 18 17 17 -1 OPE 18 18 18 18 -

g- . - _ .

-- ,) --..

EDO 750 749 745 -9 /36- ~ _-J 3_ ,

EDO 18 21 19 +2 21 -

  • El.D 105 105 100 100 -5 OS08UCR 8 9 8 8 -1
  • OIP 29 29 29 -1 28 -l ,
  • OSP 22 22 22 22 -

34 35 38 -3 35 -

RI1 135 '137 132(2) 132 -5 ADl4 399 3,423 391 397(2) -7 390 -l [O) '

TOTAL 3,423 3,434 -63 3,371 -52 .

  • -PTS (I) Coop. allocated by office (2}Comparibility chan9es consistent with FY 1983 allocation , .),f

.) l dtt l' 1140 TOTAL FTE '

~

FY 1985 ~

FY 1983 FY 1984- 0MB Results 4 t Current Proposed Sub. Of OMB OM8 b

. Office Allocation Pres. Budget _ (8/82) Red. Target (85-84) flRR 700 636 575 - 575 -61 II.E 177 176 177 -2 i/S d ,

flMSS 284 256 258 -6 252 -4 RES 275 250 262 -17 '245 -5 Regional Oper. 887 984 1,064 -Q 1,021 +37 IAE 789 820 844 -29 81 5 -5 NRR 48 94 '

139 -5 134 +40 flMSS 30 50 59 -7 52 42

' o PTS 18 18 19 -1 18 .

PDA 2 2 3 -1 2 -

C0:41 351 333 333 -10 323 -10 OCM 32 32 32 32 SECY . 36 36 37 -1 36 oACRS 58 56 58 -3 55 -1 O ASLDP 61 53 46 46 -7 OASLAP 19 17 17 -1 16 -1 OIA 29 28 28 28 OGC 29 29 29 -1 28 -1 OPA 18 17 17 17 OPE 18 18 18 18 OCA , 9 9 9 9 *

  • 01 42 38 42 -4 38 EDO 749 736 745 -11 734 -2 '

.EDO 21 21 19 +2 21 OELD 105 100 100 100 0508UCR 9 8 8 8 0 0lP -2 29 28 29 27 -1 0 0SP 22 22 22 22 0AE00 35 35 38 -3 35 Rrt 137 132 132 132 ADM 391 390 397 -8 389 -1 3,371 3,325 A87

, TOTAL 3,423 3,414 89 -46 .y'

[Ts ---_ _ - _

m