ML20206G475

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:12, 6 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 12 to License R-80
ML20206G475
Person / Time
Site: 05000157
Issue date: 04/28/1999
From:
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:
Shared Package
ML20206G467 List:
References
NUDOCS 9905100027
Download: ML20206G475 (2)


Text

-

a pn neroq g k "

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.c. 20066-0001

,o

+9*****

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.12 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. R-80 CORNELL UNIVERSITY TRIGA REACTOR DOCKET NO. 50-157

1.0 INTRODUCTION

l By letter dated March 8,1999, Cornell University (licensee) submitted a request for amendment to Facility Operating License No. R-80 for the Cornell University TRIGA Reactor. The amendment would revise the Technical Specifications (TSs) to show changes in the Administrative Controls.

2.0 EVALUATION i

Section 6.1 (b), (c), (d) and Section 6.4 have been revised to reflect the functional replacement of the Office of the Vice President for Research and Advanced Studies with ,

the Office of the Vice Provost for Physical Sciences and Engineering. A recent I reorganization at the upper levels of the University Administration eliminated the Office of the V.P. for Research and Advanced Studies, and consolidated the functions of that office with several others under the newly created Office of the Vice Provost for Physical  !

Sciences and Engineering. These changes in the University's administrative structure have i little impact on the administration of the Ward Laboratory. The staff finds this change I acceptable.

Also, Section 6.1 (d) has been revised to require that the Reactor Supervisor have at least a bachelor's degree in a physical science or engineering discipline, or equivalent  !

knowledge and experience, and at least two years of operating experience. The  !

requirements have been increased, since the previous requirements were that the Reactor i Supervisor have two years of technical training beyond high school, and an unspecified I period of reactor operating experience. The staff finds this acceptable, and notes that the new Reactor Supervisor qualifications meet the requirements of ANSI /ANS Standard 15.4, j l Section 4.3.

9905100027 990428 PDR P ADOCK 05000157 pg

~

l i .

. . ~

.c l

Section 6.2 (c) has been revised by making two changes to the seven member safety committee to (a) make the Reactor Supervisor a voting member of the safety committee,

. and (b) to reduce the required number of faculty members on the committee from five to four. The staff finds this change acceptable, and notes that the composition and organization of the safety committee is in consonance with ANSl/ANS Standard 15.1, Section 6.2.1.

i l Se'ction 6.2 (e) has been revised to preclude the Reactor Supervisor from being the

! chairman of the safety committee. This change is needed since the Reactor Supervisor is

! 'now a member of the safety committee, and the chairman of the safety committee should l be independent of the direct supervision of the reactor. The staff finds this change

! acceptable in addition the addresses for reporting requirements in Sections 6.8 (a) and 6.11 (c) have been changed to take account of reorganizations within the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

. This amendment involves changes in administrative requirements. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or  ;

environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this I amendment.

L 4.0 . CONCLUSION l .The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is a reasonab!e assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the proposed activities, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or the health and safety of the public.

Principal Contributor: Theodore S. Michaels l Date: April 28, 1999 l

1