ML20178A623
| ML20178A623 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/26/2020 |
| From: | Nicolas Mertz NRC/OGC |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-341-LA, License Amendment, RAS 55725 | |
| Download: ML20178A623 (6) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of DTE Electric Company (Fermi 2)
Docket No. 50-341-LA June 10, 2020 Oral Argument Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 2 11 Jon Christinidis, Esq. Jon P. Christinidis, Esq. N/A 4 12 at that Ryerson 4 13 as has Ryerson 6 2 that might than might Ryerson 8 22 respondent responding Matthews 9 8 Francis Frances Woods 10 16-17 walk-dogging watch-dogging Collins 10 19 Hedwid Hedwig Collins 10 20 Prince Township Frenchtown Township Collins 12 1 MO ML Sherman 12 4 circulation. circulation loss. Sherman 12 7-8 these materials at the these aging materials as Sherman the 12 10 always already Sherman 12 14 the panels the snap in panels Sherman 12 24 the front loads the drop loads Sherman 13 2 incinerator diesel generator Sherman 13 4 could be an issue by could be initiated by Sherman 13 8 scenario. Decreased scenario, and decreased Sherman 13 10 (Telephonic interference) Degraded NAMs Sherman 13 12 cause filters to block clog filters and block Sherman 13-14 25-1 Just a few years later the Two years later NERC Sherman found the 14 1-2 violation. Writing of violation, writing: Sherman 14 2 were incomplete were: Incomplete Sherman 14 3 records where records; Running Sherman Page 1 of 6
ATTACHMENT - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of DTE Electric Company (Fermi 2)
Docket No. 50-341-LA June 10, 2020 Oral Argument Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 14 4 systems testing was systems to track testing Sherman ineffective. A were both ineffective; A 14 5 records failed to records; A failure to Sherman 14 7-8 and a failure to understand ; and A failure to Sherman ethical standards in the understand applicable environment. standards and requirements.
14 10 analysis' conclusion analysis leading to the Sherman conclusion 15 4 degradation of the dam degradation of the NAM Deer In Water 15 14 whether uncredited or not whether accredited or not Deer In Water 15 21 areal density areal Boron10 density Deer In Water 16 11-12 movement in storage to fuel movement and storage of Deer In Water fuel 16 18 filters in the filters, and the Deer In Water 17 5 the ponds (phonetic) were the coupons were Deer In Water 17 14 mess with - - mess with the movement Deer In Water of rods 18 4 and (telephonic and the inserts Deer In Water interference) 19 18 Now each Notably, each Lighty 20 7 and an Lighty 20 10 LAR to be gleaned LAR could be gleaned Lighty 20 23 function, but more function, more Lighty 21 7 So Petitioner's overarching Thus, Petitioner's Lighty theory, it is overarching theory is 21 25 Francis Frances Woods 22 6 propose admissible propose an admissible Woods Page 2 of 6
ATTACHMENT - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of DTE Electric Company (Fermi 2)
Docket No. 50-341-LA June 10, 2020 Oral Argument Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 22 16 left less Woods 22 24 and both in both Woods 23 23 inserts. All inserts, all Woods 24 11 spent fuel and a spent fuel spent fuel in a spent fuel Woods pool pool 24 16 of presumption presumption Woods 25 9 proceeding proceedings Woods 26 8-9 spent fuel and the spent fuel spent fuel in the spent Woods pool enduring fuel pool and during 28 5 margins margin Woods 28 8 supposed to be challenged proposed to be changed Woods 28 14 it does challenge it does not challenge Woods 28 15 licensing license Woods 31 2 Francis Frances Mertz 31 8 ISFSI construction to ISFSI construction and to Mertz 32 2 pools remain pool remains Mertz 32 3 text, test Mertz 32 14-15 their source partners' Interim Storage Partners Mertz decision decisions 32 16 background that ground Mertz 33 22 set aside demonstrate Wachutka 34 11 those of those are Wachutka 35 16 completing conflating Ryerson 35 17 establishing standard establishing standing Ryerson 37 15 precedence precedents Wachutka Page 3 of 6
ATTACHMENT - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of DTE Electric Company (Fermi 2)
Docket No. 50-341-LA June 10, 2020 Oral Argument Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 39 11 their other two independent our other two Wachutka ACs independent bases 39 20 filing filings Wachutka 40 23 International Interim International and Interim Woods 41 18 or their or the Wachutka 44 19 unusable, discontinued due unusable, due to Deer In Water to 44 22-23 really think of scenarios -- really give you any Deer In Water scenarios because 44 25 is steadily irradiated by gets heavily irradiated by Deer In Water 45 1 gamma irradiated by and gamma radiation and Deer In Water essentially potentially 45 14 enough unknown and of enough knowns and Sherman known unknowns unknown knowns 45 15-16 and if this didn't rest and that this shouldn't Sherman rest 45 20 SUNI SUNSI Collins 46 9 been on been no Lighty 46 16 speculations contradict speculation contradicts Lighty 47 21 MR. WACHUTKA MR. SHERMAN N/A 49 12 Applicants Applicant's Arnold 49 13 Analysis Analyses Arnold 49 22-23 Boraflex there and shoving Boraflex there and Collins more debris and stuff in it, shoving more debris stuff the criticality, in it, that's what the criticality, 50 8 end and Arnold 51 23 4 6 Collins Page 4 of 6
ATTACHMENT - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of DTE Electric Company (Fermi 2)
Docket No. 50-341-LA June 10, 2020 Oral Argument Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 51-52 25-1 know that answer. know the answer. Collins 52 11 graded degraded Sherman 52 19 exasperating exacerbated Sherman 52 22 and changing the , in changes in Sherman 52 23 marking. margin. Sherman 53 5 discussion discussing Arnold 54 7 it's not a this is not even a Deer In Water 55 15 0.95K Effective 0.95 K effective Lighty 55 19 1.5 and above 1.0 and above Lighty 56-57 25-1 Shutdown is Is Arnold 57 2 such than such that Arnold 57 5 energy NRC Wachutka 57 9 10 CFR 50.6(a) 10 CFR 50.68 Wachutka 57 15 roll so Wachutka 58 8 GTE DTE Lighty 58 14 specifically that the specifically the Lighty 58 16 must not be challenged have not been challenged Lighty 59 8 MS. WOODS: (UNKNOWN SPEAKER): N/A 59 10 MS. WOODS: (UNKNOWN SPEAKER): N/A 59 23-24 that's been determined with , it's Jim Sherman with Sherman CRAFT CRAFT, 59 25 GTE DTE Sherman 60 13 a bid has to look they should look Sherman 61 19 learn from see from Sherman 62 2 really be specific really specifically Deer In Water 62 5 going to do that going to create, react-- Deer In Water Page 5 of 6
ATTACHMENT - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of DTE Electric Company (Fermi 2)
Docket No. 50-341-LA June 10, 2020 Oral Argument Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 62 7 DE DTE Deer In Water 62 11 want (telephonic want it necessarily to be Deer In Water interference) dissected 63 17 iterate reiterate Woods 64 10 contention and admissibility contention admissibility Ryerson 65 9 contention, admissibility contention admissibility Ryerson Page 6 of 6