ML20137J088

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:45, 17 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Supports Inclusion of Statement That Provides Objectives in Public Communication,Consistent W/Draft Strategic Plan Before Commission Re COMSECY-96-063,DSI-14, Public Communication Initiatives
ML20137J088
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/16/1997
From: Shirley Ann Jackson, The Chairman
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Diaz N, Dicus G, Mcgaffigan E, Rogers K
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20137J058 List:
References
COMSECY-96-063, COMSECY-96-63, DSI-14, SECY-96-063-C, SECY-96-63-C, NUDOCS 9704030217
Download: ML20137J088 (1)


Text

,

i

. a

'. *4v " W,$g UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RELEASED TOTHE PDR a

WASWNGToN, D.C. 2055W * , ;

o, g . . . . . /, , ca o C4AmMAN January 16, 1997 inaiais i

HEMORANDUM T0: Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Dicus Commissioner Diaz  :

Commissioner McGaffigan FROM: Shirley Ann Jackson A

SUBJECT:

COMSECY-96-063; PUBLIC COMMUNICATION INITIATIVES (DSI 14) l In providing the Commission's Final Views on Public Communication Iniatives (DSI 14), I support inclusion of a statement that provides our objective in public communication, consistent with the Draft Strategic Plan before the l Commission, that is, to " Build Public Trust and Confidence." In fulfilling  !

this objective, I support the Commission's Preliminary Views on Public l Communication Initiatives (DSI 13) as Final Commission Views, with the l following additional comments:

General public outreach is important and may become even more so as we consider moving high-level radioactive waste to a centralized interim storage facility or repository, and begin to expand our responsibilities for oversight of DOE facilities. General public outreach should be pursued as resources allow. The development of a plan to implement the Commission's final decision on this DSI should include performance goals and measures to assess the

,- effectiveness of the program, consideration.of the ' experience of the private sector and other public agencies, and consideration of.the comments received

~

suggesting improvements in existing practices. l l

In addition, the ED0 should consider the comments concerning the 2.206 process in the ongoing review of this process. j 1

cc: SECY I EDO OGC '

CIO OPA i

9704030217 970401 f PDR ,