ML20137J123
| ML20137J123 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/10/1997 |
| From: | Dicus G NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Diaz N, Shirley Ann Jackson, Mcgaffigan E, Rogers K, The Chairman NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137J058 | List: |
| References | |
| 2.206, COMSECY-96-063, COMSECY-96-63, DSI-14, SECY-96-063-C, SECY-96-63-C, NUDOCS 9704030224 | |
| Download: ML20137J123 (1) | |
Text
a us 4 s'og UNITED STATES eeo e e . . . T. , , , ,doDb hh'
[" p( g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 0001 RELEASED g ,p .
%,,,, JANUARY 10, 1997 - -
OFFICE OF THE **********8*** ea ,,,
COMMIS$10NER MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Jackson Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Diaz
-Commissioner McGaffigan FROM: Greta Joy Dicus
SUBJECT:
COMSECY-96-063 - PUBLIC COMMUNICATION INITIATIVES - DSl-14 i
Section 3.11 of the Phase ll " Stakeholder interaction Report" discusses the l
- public comments and Commission Preliminary Views on the subject of i Public Communication initiatives. I have reviewed the information provided j and have concluded that the Commission should continue to focus on early-
! identifications of public concerns and input (option 2), while assuring that
- such efforts are accomplished in a way maximizing effectiveness and l economy (option ia). I also believe the Commission's final views should i make it clear that general public outreach (option 3) is also important and j will be pursued as resources allow.
l l noted one area of public interest on which I have additional comments. I l
found interecting the comments concerning the 2.206 process and the
- potential for an NRC employee to be, in essence, reviewing their own work In responding to a 2.206 petition. While not necessarily appropriate to be l
! addressed in detail by this DSI, these comments should be considered by l the EDO in the ongoing review of the 2.206 process described in the EDO
! memorandum to the Commission dated December 31,1996.
- cc
! ^
! 9704030224 970401
, $S" PDR
.