ML20078A262

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:33, 25 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1 to Procedure 6675-ADM-4500.07, Snec Procedure Development,Change,Requests & Safety Reviews
ML20078A262
Person / Time
Site: Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 10/14/1991
From: Good B
SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20078A208 List:
References
6675-ADM-4500.0, NUDOCS 9501240338
Download: ML20078A262 (22)
v • d • e


Text

i e' l l

9AXTON NUCLEAR Saaton nuc1ea, Ea ,e,aenea1 Co ,o,at an Policy and Procedure Manual Titie 6675-ADM-4500.07 l Revision No. I SNEC Procedure Development, Chance, Requests, and Safety Reviews Applicability / Scope 1 Responsible Office This document is within QA plan scope 6675 X Yes No Safety Reviews Required X Yes

_ Effective Date No 10/14/91 List of Effective Pages Page Revision Page Revision Page Revision Page Revision 1.0 1 E6-1 0 2.0 0 E7-1 0 3.0 0 E8-1 0 .

4.0 0 5.0 0 6.0 .-

0 7.0 8.0 0

/

/ GPUN 0

9.0 1 f DOCUMENT CONTROL 10.0 1 CONTROLLED 11.0 1 12.0 1 ( COPY #9 El-1 O E2-1 0 E2-2 0 E3-1 0 E3-2 0 E4-1 0 E5-1 0 ll Signature.

I Concurring organizational Element l Date criainatorll N {M t b l oriainator l/d ~ &~I/

i l

Concurred ll L b N /t M [ s i Technical Review By I l /O-f-f/

ll l l

ll l I  ;

ll I I

II I I

l ll 1 I

ll l 1

I ll 1 I t iI I I

n I i

Approved ll N M t./4/ , V M VI l Vice President, SNEC By ll l l/d "/W /

l 1.0 3156d 9501240338 950112 6 PDR ADOCK 0500 i

P

-~^

. 1 SAXTON NUCLEAR """*'

Saat - Policy Nuctear Ea - r w atat Corw ration and Procedure Manual i Title 6675-ADM-4500.07 Revision No.

$NEC Procedure Develornnent, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews 0 l

Table of Contents section Page 1.0 PURPOSE 3.0 2.0 APPLICABILITY / SCOPE 3.0 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.0 4.0 PROCEDURE 5.0 4.1 Originating New Procedures 5.0 4.2 Safety and Environmental Reviews t 7.0 4.3 Technical Reviewer Duties 8.0 4.4 Safety Reviewer Duties 9.0

, 4.5 Procedurc Change Requests (PCR) t 9.0 4.6 Temporary Change Notices (TCN) 9.0 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 11.0

6.0 REFERENCES

12.0 7.0 EEHIBITS 12.0 2.0 3156d

SAXTON NUCLEAR Saxt=Policy nuet-r Ex,-tm-tal C=,-ati-and Pro:edure Manual 6675-ADN-4500.07 ,

Title Revision No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Revious 0 1.0 PURPOSE-To establish a procedure to implement the SNEC Document Praparation, Review and  !

Approval Process by identifying the actions necessary for the preparation, review [

and approval of procedures and other types of documents.

2.0 APPLICABILITY /5 COPE This procedure applies to all personnel who prepare, review or approve documents.

that pertain to SKIC activities.

3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Environmental Determination A determination of whether the activity as vutlined by a document 3.1.1 Heets the minimum requirements of Technical Specifications or documents that govern SNEC activities and/or i

3.1.2 Involves any Potential Invironmental Impact, as described in  ;

~

Section 3.5.

3.2 Invironeental Evaluation '

A written assessment of an activity which provides the basis for determining if the activity can be implemented without an environmental impact.

3.3 Safety Reviewer I An individual who performe a safety Review. A Safety Reviewer is a l knowledgeable individual not having direct responsibility for the performance '

of the activities under review and must be independent of the preparation of the document.

3.4 Non-Substative Changes Revisions which do not affect the activities associated with the document or

~

the document's mean 5 or intent. Examples follows 3.4.1 Correction to spelling.

1,4.2 Adding but not deleting sign-off spaces. ,

3.4.3 Blocking in notes, cautions, etc.

3.4.4 Changes in corporate or personal titles which do not reassign i

_ responsibilities and which are not referred to in the Technical Specifications.

3.4.5 Changes to nomenclature or editorial changes which clearly do not change function, meaning or intent.

i .

1 I

3.0 3156d l

SAXTON NUCLEAR SaxtonPolicy nuctear E and portmental corporation Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Revision No. I Title i SNEC Procedure Davelopment, change, Requests, and Safety Reviews 0 1 3.5 Potential Environmental Impect i l

A possible effect or influence on the environment resulting from a proposed J activity, change, facility or process modification, production increase, test or experiment. .The following are examples of potential environmental impacts: ,

3.5.1 A release or potential release to the environment. 1 3.5.2 A change in any systems, components or actions which affect the l control of monitoring of actual or potential releases of I radioactive or nonradioactive materials to the environasat. I 3.5.3 A physical or chemical change in the characteristics of plant effluents, withdrawals or other plant interfaces with the environment.

3.5.4 Disjosal or storage for disposal of radioactive or non-radioactive waste material.

i 3.5.5 Endangering the health and safety of the public or workers.

3.5.6 Endangering the health of plants and animals.

3.5.7 Erosion of the soil or sediment on or surrounding the SNEC site.

3.6 Technical Reviewer An individual who perforres a technical review. The Technical Reviewer must be independent of the preparation of the document.

I 3.7 Safety Determination A determination of whether an activity as implemented by a particular document involves:

3.7.1 Any potential adverse impact on nuclear safety or safe plant operations, or 3.7.2 A change to any of the following:

  • The Technical Specifications /Licensa e The system / component description in the safety Analysis Report (sam),
  • The procedural / operating description in the SAR.

3.7.3 A change which involves a test or experiment not described in the SAR, or 3.7.4 The possibility of an Uareviewed safety Question 4.0 3156d

SAXTON NUCLEAR Saxt= Policy Nuclear E ,-wntal Cormration and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

SNEC Procedure Develotunent, change, Re<ruestis, and Safety Reviews 0 3.8 Safety Evaluation A written assessment of a document which provides the basis for determining whether the activity can be implemented without adversely affecting nuclear safety.

3.9 within the Scope of QA Reference 6.1 provides a listing of SNEC activities which are considered important enough to apply Quality Assurance Program and/or verification requirements.

3.10 Procedure Numbers Until such time as all SNBC Procedures have been renumbered and reference sections changed, procedure numbers starting 9400- and 6675- shall be considered the same (i.a., 9400-ADM-4500.22 referenced in any procedure will be referring to 6675-AD11-4500.22.)

4.0 PROCEDURE 4.1 Originating New Procyfures 4.1.1 The originator shall obtain a document number and Exhibits 2 and 3 of this procedure from the Procedure Coordinator.

4.1.2 SNEC procedures shall be formatted as follows:  ;

4.1.2.1 The cover page shall be in accordance with Exhibit 9.

4.1.2.2 Section 1.0 shall cover the Purpose of the document.

4.1.2.3 Section 2.0 shall cover Applicability / Scope.  !

4.1.2.4 Section 3.0 shall cover Definitions, if necessary.

4.1.2.5 Section 4.0 shall be the Procedure text itself.

s 4.1.2.6 Section 5.0 shall cover Responsibilities.

l 4.1.2.7 Section 6.0 shall list any References.

l 4.1.2.8 Section 7.0 shall contain any Exhibits.

4.1.3 Drafting Procedures  ;

l 4.1.3.1 In order to complete the cover page of the document, decide if the i document is, "within the scope of QA".

4.1.3.2 Write the procedure in single, short steps if possible.

4.1.3.3 obtain cross-disciplinary input as deemed necessary. )

l l

i 5.0 3156d

SAXTON NUCLEAR sxxt = nuclear =x- w ncat Corw Policy and Procedure Manual rati=

6675-ADM-4500.07 Title pavisionNo. ]

SNEC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews 0 4.1.3.4 Provide enough guidance to permit implement 4 tion by the target group.

4.1.3.5 Assure procedure does not conflict with existing approved procedures / programs.

4.1.3.6 Assure procedure c.unplies with the appropriate regulations (e.g.,

Tech Specs or Federat or-State permits / licenses).

4.1.3.7 Provide flexibility in areas where possible while maintaining the intent of the procedure.

4.1.3.8 The Originator may also send drafts for inhouse technical reviewer.

4.1.4 Perform a Safety /Environmentat Determination, (and Evaluations if required) per section 4.2.

4.1.5 Select a Technica1 Reviewer according to the Matrix of Exhibit 4 and submit the package for technical review.

4.1.6 If a safety Evaluation is done, submit the package for a safety Review. Select a safety Reviewer according to the Matrix of Exhibit 4.

NOTE: SNEC Safety Reviews are required for documents / changes if a Safety Ivaluation has been performed. A Safety Review is not required if only an Environment &1 Evaluation has been done.

4.1.7 Determine individuals /groupe that must concur. As a minimum organisations assigned responsibilities in the procedure must concur. Individuais/ groups that must sign for concurrence shall be given a draft copy for review so that their comments may be considered for incorporation into the final draft. External review groups should be given a Document Review Sheet, Exhibit 8.

4.1.8 The originator shalt attempt to resolve the comments made during the review process. Disagreements that cannot be resolved by the originator shall be referred to successively higher levets of authority. If agreement cannot be reached, final resolution shall be deterstted by the party designated to approve in the Review and Approvat Matrix, Exhibit 4.

4.1.9 submit the final draft of the document and the complete package to the Procedure Coordinator. The Procedure Coordinator shalt

  • Transmit the package for typing
  • Obtain the final signatures
  • Forward the document to Document Controls for distribution

\

6.0 3156d l

'4.

SAXTON NUCLEAR .axt =Policy nuclear Ex-r w ntal Corm rati-and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews 0 NOTE: Insure a copy of the entire package has been maintained for departmental procedure records.

4.2 Safety and Envirormental Reviews 4.2.1 Guidance for completing Exhibit 3.

4.2.1.1 The originator / Preparer shall complete the Safety and Environmental Determination Form, (Exhibit 3), for all new documents and for substative changes to existing documents, according to Sections 4.2.2 and 4.2.3.

4.2.1.2 The determinations are to show the reviewers and approvers that potential safety issues and environmental concerns have been recognised by considering:

  • The effect of actions that are outlined in the procedure / document as they pertain to safety or environmental concerns.

I e Compliance with Technical Specifications.

4.2.1.3 If any question on Exhibit 3 is answered yes", the originator shall prepare and attach the appropriate written evaluations to Exhibit 3 per sections 4.2.4 and/or 4.2.5.

4.2.1.4 If the Evaluation does not prove elimination or minimization of the concern, the document / document change cannot be implemented.

4.2.2 Safety Determination Questions 1 and 2 of Exhibit 3 pertain to the Safety Determination as defined in section 3.7.

4.2.2.1 If either question 1 or 2 in answered "yes", then a safety Ivaluation is required. See Section 4.2.4.

4.2.2.2 If question 2 is answered "yes", the document / activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval.

4.2.3 Invironmental Determination Questions 3, 4 and 5 pertain to the Environmental Determination as defined in section 3.1. Environmental Controls personnel should consider the following guidance when performing the Environmental Determination:

4.2.3.1 Question 3 is intended to maintain compliance with any NRC requirements.

4.2.3.2 If the answer to question 3 is "yes", the document cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval.

7.0 3156d

- - - - - r

l J

SAXTON NUCLEAF.axton nuclear Experimental Cor, oration i Policy and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 l Title Revision No.

SNEC Procedure' Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews 0 4.2.3.3 Question 4 is interidsd to determine if a potential Environmental Impact, as defined in Section 3.5, would result from the activity as outlined in the document or document change. Consider whether ,

the document / activity could result in a release of radioactive or I non-radioactive materials to the soil, the atmosphere or the I surface or ground water.

4.2.3.4 Question 5 is meant to prompt the originator to investigate regulations, requirements and agreements beyond those enforced by the NRC. The Environmental Protection Agency, Department of j Transportation and the PL Department of Environmental Resources I have an extensive body of regulations. The document / activity under l review must also comply with thes l

  • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Clean Air Act, Clean ]

Water Act >

  • Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Plan j l

4.2.3.5 Any "yes" answer on questions 3, 4 or 5 requires an Environmental  ;

Evaluation per Section 4.2.5. l l

4.2.4 Safety Ivaluations l The Safety Evaluation shall be a written explanation of all "yes" answers, an explanation of how the activity will be implemented without adversely affecting nuclear safety and any calculations or .

other documents used to support the evaluation. Attach the l Ivaluation to Exhibit 3. i 4.2.5 Environmental Evaluations 4.2.5.1 The Environmental Evaluation shall be a written explanation of all "yes" answers, an explanation of how the activity will be implemented without adversely impacting the environment and any I calculations or other documents used to support the evaluation.  !

Attach the Evaluation to Exhibit 3.

i 4.2.5.2 In performing the Environmental Evaluation consider both  ;

radiological and non-radiological releases.

4.3 Technical Reviewer  !

4.3.1 Review the entire document package including the precedure text, the completed Exhibit 3 and any attached written evaluations. j 4.3.2 Sign the attached documents where required. The signature of the Technical Reviewer signifies concurrence that technical, safety and  ;

environmental considerations have been properly addressed, and thet i all determinations and evaluations are complete and accurate. The  !

. signature also indicates that the Technical Reviewer was independent of the originator and releases the document for further

, processing.

p 8.0 3156d

p l

l 9AXTON NUCLEAR === =cle- E-r-=at C-,-ati-Policy and Procedure Manual r

6675-ADN-4500.07 T ule sRevision No.

SNBC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews 1 l*

4.4 safety Reviewer 1

4.4.1 Review the package to confirm that nuclear safety aspects of the document have been properly addressed and the Safety Evaluation is complete and accurate.

4.4.2 obtain cross-disciplinary inputs and specialist assistance as needed to perform the safety Review.

4.4.3 Sign the attached documents where required. The signature also l attests that the safety Reviewer was independent of toe originator i and the Technical Reviewer.

4.5 Procedure Change Requests A Procedure Change Request (PCR) is used when the change is not required immediately and the change is permanent in nature. Document changes and/or general revisions shall be initiated by use of Exhibit 2, " Procedure change Request Form".

' 4.5.1 The originator of the change shall obtain a tracking number from the Procedure Coordinator. j 4.5.2 The Procedure coordinator shall complete the PCR log, Exhibit 5.

4.5.3 The originator shall complete Exhibit 2, section 1. j 1

l 4.5.3.1 If the answer to question 1 is "no" make the revision and submit  ;

the package for implementing approval. 1 NOTE: Verify that the document has been properly classified. l 4.5.3.2 If the answer to question 1 is "yes", complete Exhibit 3 in accordance with section 4.2.

4.5.3.3 submit all PCR documents for the required reviews in accordance with sections 4.1.5 through 4.1.8. .

4.5.3.4 submit the package tio the Procedure Coordinator for the completion of duties as outlined in section 4.1.9.

NOTE: Ensure a copy of the entire package has been maintained for departmental procedure records.

NOTE: Nonsubstantive revisions only require Originator and Approver signatures. However, the cover page needs to maintain the concurring organisational element status.

Therefore, the concurring signature titles shall be left intact from the old revision. The signature Diocks shall be marked as "N/A". The date of the previous review signature shall be filled in the date line for each concurring title marked as "N/A".

9.0 3156d

SAXTON NUCLEAR

=an on == clear =rP- - ntal C - ration Policy and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

~

SNBC Procedure Development, Chanoe, Requests, and Safety Reviews 1 4.6 Temporary change Notices 4.6.1 Temporary Change Notices (TCN's) provide the ability to make' substantive changes to a procedure in a short amount of time. The use of TCN's shall be' limited to the following cases:

4.6.1.1 When the change is of a temporary nature and should not result in a permanent revision, or 4.6.1.2 When time or program conditions do not permit the use of a PCR.

Nowever, if the change is permanent a PCR shall be submitted,.by the originator of the TCN, and approved within 90 days.

4.6.2 Preparation of TCN's 4.6.2.1 The Originator shall obtain a TCN number from the Procedure Coordinator.

4.6.2.2 The Procedure Coordinator shall complete tho'TCN I.og, Exhibit 6.

4.6.2.3 The originator shall complete Section 2, Part (a) of Exhibit 2.

4.6.2.4 The originator shall also complete Exhibit 3 per section 4.2 for all TCN's to ensure safety and environmental concerns are addressed '

and that the minimum requirements of any implementing documents are-met (i.e., Tech specs, etc.) l 4.6.2.5 In section 2 of Exhibit 2, provide a general description of the change (s). Reforence affacted pages and section numbers.

4.6.2.6 Attach an edited copy of the affected pages of the procedure to Exhibit 2.

4.6.2.7 The review requirements for TCN's are the same as those outlined in f sections 4.1.4 through 4.1.6.  ;

i 4.6.2.4 The originator is responsible for obtaining all review and implementing signatures.

4.6.2.9 The TCN shall become effective with the Implementing Approver I signature. The originator shall then make a working copy of the TCN package for use by the target group.

i 4.6.2.10 The original TCN packet shall be forwarded to the Procedure l Coordinator. A copy shall be transmitted to Document Control for distribution.

i 4.6.3 Cancellation of TCN's i .

4.6.3.1 A TCN is good for a maximum of 90 c'ays and can be cancelled by one of the following:

"* Incorporation into an implemented procedure change 10.0 3156d

!_____________________________________ __ ..-.J

4 MAXTON NUCLEAR sa== ,le- E-r= =alC-9-ati-

.cy and Procedure Manual Title 6675-ADM-4500.07 Revision No.

. sNEC Procedure Development, Change, pequests', and Safety Reviews 1

  • Empiration date Early cancellation by the Originator 4.6.3.2 The originator is responsible for the cancellation of TCN's.

4.6.3.3 The originator is responsible for tracking his/her TCN expiration date.

4.6.3.4 To cancel a TCN, obtain the original package from the Procedure Coordinator and complete Part (b), section 2 of Exhibit 2.

4

'.6.3.5 Porward the cancelled TCN package to the Procedure Coordinator for transmittal to Document control.

4.6.3.6 when a PCR which incorporates a TCN is aporoved, cancel the TCN and submit both packages to the Procedure Coordinator for transmittal to Document Control. ,

.t NOTE: Use the effective date of the new procedure as the cancellation date of the TCN.

4.7 Implementing Approval 4.7.1 The Implementing Aji;p.e d will be as described in Exhibit 4.

4.7.2 The Implementing Approver, along with the originator, will establish the effective date of the document at the time of final signature. .

NOTE: When choosing an effective date consider the time necessary for final distribution.

+

5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES '

5.1 The originator is responsible for . ,

5.1.1 Preparing a technically adequate document.

  • 5.1.2 obtaining applicable technical, safety and cross-disciplinary '

reviews as required.

5.1.3 Resolving any comments made during the review process.  !

5.1.4 Completing the safety / Environmental determination and any required '

evaluations.

5.2 The Technical Reviewer is responsible for' ensuring thats  !

5.2.1 The activities performed in accordance with the document being reviewed are technically correct and concordant with safe plant operations.

[

11.0 3156d

l 9AXTON NUCLEAR Sa ton nucie- E p-aental Corp-atan Fo11cy and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

SNIQ Frocedure Develoosent, Chance, Requests', and Safety Reviews 1 5.2.2 The activities performed in accordance with the document being reviewed meet legally mandated monitoring requirements.

5.3 The Safety Reviewer is responsibie for ensuring that nuclear safety .

considerations have been adequately evaluated and are properly addressed in the Safety Evaluation.

5.4 The implementing Approver is responsible for -

5.4.1 Insuring that the administrative requirements of this procedure  !

have been satisfied.  !

5.4.2 Releasing the document for implementation.

5.5 The Procedure Coordinator is responsibie fors 5.5.1 Maintaining document logs.

5.5.2 Maintaining procedure records.

i 5.5.3 Complying with r'ecord retention and reporting requirements.

5.5.4 Forwarding documents to Document Control for processing.

1

6.0 REFERENCES

r 6.1 SNBC Technical Specifications 6.2 9400-FLN-4542.02, SNBC Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan  ;

, 7.0 EXIIBITS 7.1 Exhibit 1, " Flow Chart for Safety Review and Approval Process" '

7.2 Exhibit 2, " Procedure Change Request Form" 7.3 Exhibit 3, " Safety / Environmental Determination Form" 7.4 unhthat 4, "SEEC Review and Approval Matrix" 7.5 Exhibit 5, " Procedure Change Request Log" .

7.6. Exhibit 6, " Temporary Change Notice Log" 7.7 Exhibit 7-, " Document Review Sheet" 7.8 Exhibit 8, " Document Cover Page" 12.0 3156d

SAXTON NUCLEAR SaxtonPolicy N-te - Exper m atai C= wration and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

SNEC Procedure Develop' er.*., Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews O EXHIBIT 1 Flow CHART FOR SAFETY REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS ,

Prep. Doc New Document or no Substantive Change yes ,

no Safety Determination Env Determination no Nuclear Sataty Related? Potential Env Impact?

yes yes Safety Eval Env Ival Tech -

Tech Tech Tech Review Review Review Review Safety Review I

Approval and Implementation i

El-1 3156d i

SAXTON NUCLEAR Saat- Policy Nucto- ra,--ntat and Procedure Corporation Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews C EXHIBIT 2 PROCEDURE CHANGE REQUEST FORM Is this as New Document If so, complete Section 1 PCR If so, complete Section 1 TCN If so, complete Section 2 section 1 . Circle the appropriate "yes" or "no a answer PCR # Date Procedure No. Rev.

Document

Title:

1) Is this a new procedure of a substantive YES NO revision to the document? See Section 3.4 for examples of nonsubstantive changes.

If the answer is "yes", complete Exhibit 3.

If "no", forward the document for implementing approval.

2) Does this PCR incorprate a TCN7 YES NO If the answer is "yes", what is the TCN # ,

Description of Changes j

1 l

l l

l E2-1 3156d  !

  • l SAXTON NUCLEAR Sa, ton Nuctear Ex- r aentat Corporat an Policy and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews O EKHIBIT 2 (cont'd) section 2 Part (a)

TCN # Iffective Date Procedure No. Rev.

Document

Title:

Reason for Change:

4 Originator initials signifying Exhibit 3 has been completed Expiration Date (not to exceed 90 days)

Part (b)

............................... 2.....................................................

Cancelled Originator signature /Date cancelled by PCR originator Expired (check one)  !

Description of change Originator Date Technical Review Date ,

L Safety Review Date Implementing Approver Date Implementing Approver Date print / sign E2-2 3156d

e SAXTON NUCLEAF Saat- Policy Nucle = Ea-r w atat Corporati-and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Phvision No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews O EXHIBIT 3 r SAFETY /ENVIRONMENTAI. DETERMINSATION FORM

==========================================================================

ATTACH THIS FORM TO EEHIBIT 2 CIRCLE AN ANhWER FOR AI.I. QUESTIONS ,

JUSTIFY AI.L "NO" ANSWERS

============================c=============================================

PROCEDURE # PCR/TCN # f SAFETY DETEKMINATION t

1) Does this document / activity affect YES NO nuclear safety?
2) Does this document / activity involve a YES NO i change to the Tech Specs or SAR7 If both answere are "no" proceeed to questions 3, 4 and 5. No Safety Evaluation is necessary.

If one or both answers are "yes", a Safety Evaluation must be done. See Section 4.2.4.

Questions 3, 4 and 5 must also be completed.

l l '

l

3) Does this document / activity involve a YES NO change to any NRC required environmental ,

montoring program? ,

1 l

l' l

l E3-1 3156d i

SAXTON NUCLEAR s -ton Policy Nocia and - E weri - tat Co m ration Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews O EXPTRIT 3 (Cont'd)

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION

4) Does this document / activity have an YES NO Environmental Impact as defined in section 4.2.3.37 i

i L

5) Does the proposed change or activity YES NO conflict with othat Federal or State regulations 7 see section 4.2.3.4.

I t

I L

i If all answers are "no" forward the document to the Technical Reviewer. I If any answer is "yes" perform an Environmental Evaluation. See Section 4.2.5. submit the package for technical review.

l ATTACH ALL WRITTEN EVALUATIONS TO THIS FORN 1 6

1

[

E3-2 3156d  ;

9 Number SAXTON NUCLEAR s t= auct - ==*rmat 1 c=>=r eta Policy and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

i

$NEC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews 0 EZHIBIT 4 SNEC REVIEW AND, APPROVAL MATRIX Technical Safety Implementing Subject Review Review Approval  ;

Department Plans and Procedures Radiological and Radiological and SNBC General Mgr.

Env Controls Env Controls

1 l

  • Select the Safety Reviews per Section 3.3 24-1 3156d I

l

SAXTON NUCLEAR s. t = nuete.,= m r w at.1 co m r.ei-Policy and Procedure Manual 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title W vision No.

SNEC Procedure Developinent, Change, Requests, and safety Reviews 0 et I

i -

a 5

. 5 l !!

Ei l I

!5 L I k

=

I 1

IE 8

i

=5-1 3156d l

1

4 SAXTON NUCLEAR soton Policy nuctea, E w ri ent.1 Corw .

and Procedure Manual tion 6675-ADM-4500.07 Title Revision No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews 0 n!

ll 8,

2:

sg.

5

$2

  • h eI 8

sE e i

I ,

I E

36-1 3156d

o i

SAXTON NUCLEAR .-soo Felicy ==e1.-

and

,eri-t 1 corpor eton Procedure Manual 6675- Ar7P.-4 500.07~

Title Revision 1.o.

Procedure DeveloDeent, Change, Requests, and Safety Reviews o a

1 i e! -

s 1

. 2 8

5 55

!! s II

- 5 i -

es SE fl 48 5*

I . z.

I I I .

O w i I,.i e-1 I

5

. . a.

s i?

E7-1 3156d 4

4 h h

SAXTON NUCLEAR a s= Policy ==cto-andE-rwat.1corar==1=

Procedure Manual Title 6675-ADM-4500.07 T.evision No.

8 '.c Procedure Development, Change, Requests, and safety Reviews 0 IXXIBIT 4 SAXTON NUCLEAR '"'"""*"' """"'

Esperimental Corporation Policy Title and P W .eure Manual Sovietes me.

App 1& cam 111ty/ scope .

meersastale office 9400 This cocument as within 94 plan scope _ roe No stfective Date Safety Reviews Required ._ Yee No List of Bffeceira Pages Pggg movision Pagg Revisign legg Revision ggg Apriptpa l

ii :touture i c urrtne ornata.ti.ui stamene i D.to orietamtarl! I I '

Concurred ll l l er ll I I ll 1 I '

11 I I ll 1 I ll I I

' 11 I I il I I 11 I I ff I I approved ll 1 i sy ll l I E8-1 3156d ,

l i

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20078A262&oldid=2763235"