(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Comment (4) Submitted by Progress Energy, Tony Groblewski on Proposed Rules PR-19, PR-20 and PR-50, Collection Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language| ML041040007 |
| Person / Time |
|---|
| Site: |
Harris, Brunswick, Crystal River, Robinson  |
|---|
| Issue date: |
04/08/2004 |
|---|
| From: |
Groblewski T
Progress Energy Co |
|---|
| To: |
NRC/SECY/RAS |
|---|
| Ngbea E S |
| References |
|---|
| +adjud/ruledam200505, 69FR08350 00004, PR-19, PR-20, PR-50 |
| Download: ML041040007 (1) |
|
|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML12200A2572012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (178) of Leonard Wheeler Supporting PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML0719201582007-06-27027 June 2007
Comment (23) of Charles A. Tomes on Proposed Rules Pr 50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements
ML0717702482007-06-15015 June 2007
Comment (16) Submitted by Charles A. Tomes on Proposed Rule Pr 50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements
RNP-RA/06-0121, Comment (2) Submitted by Carolina Pwr. and Light Co. (Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.), C.T. Baucom on Direct Final Rule Pr 50 Regarding Criticality Control of Fuel within Dry Storage Casks or Transporation Packages in a Spent Fuel Po2006-12-18018 December 2006
Comment (2) Submitted by Carolina Pwr. and Light Co. (Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.), C.T. Baucom on Direct Final Rule Pr 50 Regarding Criticality Control of Fuel within Dry Storage Casks or Transporation Packages in a Spent Fuel Pool
ML0632400592006-11-16016 November 2006
Comment (4) Submitted by Progress Energy, Robert H. Kitchen, on Supplemental Proposed Rules Pr 2, 50, 51, and 52, Re Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
ML0504002202005-01-24024 January 2005
Comment (298) Submitted by Billy Griffin on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-12, Upgrade the Design Basis Threat Regulations
ML0503102262005-01-24024 January 2005
Comment (198) Submitted by Conservation Council of North Carolina, John D. Runkle, Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-12, Upgrade the Design Basis Threat Regulations
ML0502501512005-01-19019 January 2005
Comment (80) Submitted by Nancy Woods on Petition for Rulemaking PRM 73-12, Upgrade the Design Basis Threat Regulations
ML0410400072004-04-0808 April 2004
Comment (4) Submitted by Progress Energy, Tony Groblewski on Proposed Rules PR-19, PR-20 and PR-50, Collection Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language
ML0407005032004-03-0505 March 2004
Comment (11) Submitted by Progress Energy, Tony Groblewski on Proposed Rules PR-170 and PR-171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2004
ML0326612452003-09-0505 September 2003
Comment (1) of Tony Groblewski on Proposed Generic Communication Method for Estimating Effective Dose Equivalent from External Radiation Sources Using Two Dosimeters
ML0225504142002-09-0606 September 2002
Comment of Terry C. Morton Re Draft Regulatory Guides, DG-1114 - Control Room Habitability at Light-Water Nuclear Power Reactors, and DG-1115 - Demonstrating Control Room Envelope Integrity at Nuclear Power Reactors Request for Comments
2012-07-16
[Table view] |
Text
l- r_
Progress Energy 6 35) DOCKETED PO Box 1551 April 9,2004 (11:14AM) 411 Fayetteville Street Mail Raleigh NC 27602 OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND Serial: PE&RAS04-047 ADJUDICATIONS STAFF April 8,2004 Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attention: Rulemaakings and Adjudications Staff
Subject:
Comments on "Collection, Reporting, or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language" (69 FR 8350, dated February 24, 2004)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Progress Energyparticipated in the industry review of the subject proposed rule amendment, and endorses the comments submitted by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), by letter dated April 8, 2004.
- The proposed change to 10 CFR 19.13 will reduce significantly the number of annual dose reports and achieve cost savings to licensees, while maintaining provisions for providing adequate information to the occupational workforce.
- The proposed change to 10 CFR 20.2104 will continue to provide protection to the radiation worker, while achieving some cost savings to licensees.
Progress Energy encourages the NRC to address the industry comments and proceed with the rulemaking.
Please contact me at (919) 546-4579 if you have any questions.
Sincerely, Tony Groblewski Supervisor - Corporate CMI Regulatory Affairs
_reM0l+e- =5EC4-016
%_1L -. I -Li n
Of