ML042470272

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:58, 16 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RAI, Bulletin 2003-01
ML042470272
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/2004
From: Scott Wall
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD1
To: Peschel J, Warner M
Florida Power & Light Energy Seabrook
Wall, S. NRR/DLPM 415-2855
References
BL-03-001, TAC MB9612
Download: ML042470272 (5)


Text

September 10, 2004 Mr. Mark E. Warner, Site Vice President c/o James M. Peschel Seabrook Station PO Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874

SUBJECT:

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING BULLETIN 2003-01 (TAC NO. MB9612)

Dear Mr. Warner:

By letter dated August 8, 2003, FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPLE) responded to NRC Bulletin 2003-01, "Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors." During the course of the review of FPLEs response, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that additional information, as delineated in the Enclosure, is needed to complete its review.

The request for additional information was discussed with your staff on September 1, 2004. A response date of October 29, 2004, was mutually agreeable.

If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-2855.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Scott P. Wall, Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-443

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page

Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 cc:

Mr. J. A. Stall Mr. Stephen McGrail, Director Senior Vice President, Nuclear and ATTN: James Muckerheide Chief Nuclear Officer Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Florida Power & Light Company 400 Worcester Road P.O. Box 14000 Framingham, MA 01702-5399 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 Philip T. McLaughlin, Attorney General Mr. Peter Brann Steven M. Houran, Deputy Attorney Assistant Attorney General General State House, Station #6 33 Capitol Street Augusta, ME 04333 Concord, NH 03301 Resident Inspector Mr. Bruce Cheney, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission New Hampshire Office of Emergency Seabrook Nuclear Power Station Management P.O. Box 1149 State Office Park South Seabrook, NH 03874 107 Pleasant Street Concord, NH 03301 Town of Exeter 10 Front Street Mr. Gene F. St. Pierre Exeter, NH 03823 Station Director Seabrook Station Regional Administrator, Region I FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 300 475 Allendale Road Seabrook, NH 03874 King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. M. S. Ross, Managing Attorney Office of the Attorney General Florida Power & Light Company One Ashburton Place, 20th Floor P.O. Box 14000 Boston, MA 02108 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 Board of Selectmen Mr. Rajiv S. Kundalkar Town of Amesbury Vice President - Nuclear Engineering Town Hall Florida Power & Light Company Amesbury, MA 01913 P.O. Box 14000 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 Ms. Deborah Bell Federal Emergency Management Agency James M. Peschel Region I Regulatory Programs Manager J.W. McCormack P.O. & Seabrook Station Courthouse Building, Room 401 FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC Boston, MA 02109 PO Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874 Mr. Tom Crimmins Polestar Applied Technology One First Street, Suite 4 Los Altos, CA 94019

Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 cc:

David Moore Vice President, Nuclear Operations Support Florida Power & Light Company P.O. Box 14000 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 Marjan Mashhadi Senior Attorney Florida Power & Light Company 801 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 220 Washington, DC 20004

Mr. Mark E. Warner, Site Vice President c/o James M. Peschel Seabrook Station PO Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874

SUBJECT:

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING BULLETIN 2003-01 (TAC NO. MB9612)

Dear Mr. Warner:

By letter dated August 8, 2003, FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPLE) responded to NRC Bulletin 2003-01, "Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors." During the course of the review of FPLEs response, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that additional information, as delineated in the Enclosure, is needed to complete its review.

The request for additional information was discussed with your staff on September 1, 2004. A response date of October 29, 2004, was mutually agreeable.

If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-2855.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Scott P. Wall, Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-443

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC SWall MKowal LWhitney BMcDermott, RGN-I PDI-1 Reading CRaynor DSolorio ACRS GMatakas, RGN-I DCollins AWang JHannon OGC Accession Number: ML042470272 OFFICE PDI-2/PM PDI-1/SC(A)

NAME SWall DCollins DATE 9/7/04 9/8/04 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING BULLETIN 2003-01, "POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS" SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-443 By letter dated August 8, 2003, FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPLE or the licensee) responded to NRC Bulletin 2003-01, "Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors," for Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (Seabrook).

During the course of review of the licensees bulletin response, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that it needs the following information:

1. In response to Bulletin 2003-01, the licensee listed a number of existing indications that could indicate the onset of sump blockage, existing operator guidance documents relating to monitoring for sump blockage (e.g. pump motor current, pump flow rate, and pump discharge pressure), and enhanced training for operators and engineering support personnel on the issue of containment sump clogging. However, the licensee's response does not completely discuss the operator training to be implemented; in that, they do not discuss the existing response actions the operators are instructed to take in the event of sump clogging and loss of emergency core cooling systems (ECCS) recirculation capability. Provide a detailed description of how the current emergency operating procedures address sump clogging and a loss of ECCS recirculation capability.
2. The Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) has developed operational guidance in response to Bulletin 2003-01 for Westinghouse and Combustion Engineering type pressurized water reactors. For Seabrook, the licensees response stated that they will monitor the WOG activities and will consider implementation of any issued guidance.

Provide a discussion of the WOG-recommended compensatory measures that have been or will be implemented for the plants. Include a discussion of the evaluations or analyses performed to determine that these compensatory measures are acceptable for Seabrook, and provide technical justification for those WOG compensatory measures not being implemented. Also include a detailed discussion of the procedures being modified, the operator training being implemented, and the schedule for implementing these compensatory measures.

3. NRC Bulletin 2003-01 provides possible interim compensatory measures licensees could consider to reduce risks associated with sump clogging. In addition to those compensatory measures listed in Bulletin 2003-01, licensees may also consider implementing unique or plant-specific compensatory measures, as applicable. Discuss any possible unique or plant-specific compensatory measures that were considered for implementation at Seabrook. Include a basis for rejecting any of these additional measures considered.

Enclosure