|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARRS-23-073, Request for Partial Site Release2023-06-0707 June 2023 Request for Partial Site Release NMP1L3469, Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits2022-06-30030 June 2022 Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits ML22014A0052022-01-13013 January 2022 COVID-19 Related Request for Exemption from Part 26 Work Hours Requirements RS-21-005, Request for License Amendment to Revise Degraded Voltage Relay Allowable Values2021-01-20020 January 2021 Request for License Amendment to Revise Degraded Voltage Relay Allowable Values RS-21-001, Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping2021-01-0404 January 2021 Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping ML20303A1752020-10-23023 October 2020 Proposed Relief Request from Section XI Repair/Replacement Documentation for Bolting Replacement of Pressure Retaining Bolting U-604712, Submittal of the Snubber Program Plan for the Fourth 10-Year Interval2020-06-24024 June 2020 Submittal of the Snubber Program Plan for the Fourth 10-Year Interval ML19228A0232019-08-15015 August 2019 Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-879 ML18360A4722018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 4: Training Material on Diesel Generator Malfunctions ML18360A4712018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 3: EC 626319, Battery Coping Time Evaluation to Support Inadvertent Isolation of Div. II Air Start Receiver Valves ML18360A4692018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 1: Summary of Exelon Position ML18360A4702018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 2: Response to NRC Questions and Documentation Requests ML18360A4852018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 17: Inconsistencies Between FLEX SE and Choice Letter Assumptions ML18360A4842018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 16: Graph of RPV Water Level ML18360A4832018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 15: FLEX and Cross-tie Training Material ML18360A4732018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 5: Senior Reactor Operator Surveys ML18360A4742018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 6: CPS Shift Manager Surveys Regarding ELAP Scenarios ML18360A4752018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 7: Time Validation - Performance of SBO and Starting of Division 2 Diesel Generator ML18360A4822018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 14: CPS Procedure 4200.01 C002, DC Load Shedding During a 580, Rev 5a ML18360A4812018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 13: Simulator Exercise Guide SE-JIT-42, Loss of AC, Loss of SDC and Lowering RPV Level, Rev 1 ML18360A4802018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 12: Time Validation - Performance of Division 3 DG to Division 2 Bus Cross-tie ML18360A4792018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 11: Procedures and Training Material on Maintaining RPV Pressure Low ML18360A4782018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 10: HEP Evaluation Related to Shutdown Cooling Isolation ML18360A4772018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 9: Procedures on Shutdown Cooling Isolation ML18360A4762018-12-14014 December 2018 Attachment 8: 2017 Training Material on Diesel Generator Air Start Flow Plow RS-15-320, Revised Final Integrated Plan Document - Mitigating Strategies NRC Order, EA-12-0492015-12-14014 December 2015 Revised Final Integrated Plan Document - Mitigating Strategies NRC Order, EA-12-049 RS-15-269, Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors2015-10-23023 October 2015 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors ML15062A1152014-12-22022 December 2014 International Atomic Energy Agency (Iaea), Operational Safety Review Team (Osart) Mission to Clinton Report - 11- 28 August 2014 RS-14-312, Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report2014-11-0303 November 2014 Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report RS-14-277, Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 12014-09-24024 September 2014 Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 1 ML14164A2982014-06-26026 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima DAI-ICHI Nuclear Power Plant Accident ML14176A9612014-06-24024 June 2014 Submittal of Non-Proprietary BWROG Technical Product, BWROGTP-11-006 - ECCS Containment Walkdown Procedure, Rev 1 (January 2011), as Formally Requested During the Public Meeting Held on April 30, 2014 RS-14-112, Reports Associated with Results of Post-Irradiation Examination (Pie) of Global Nuclear Fuel (Gnf) GE14i Isotope Test Assembly (ITA)2014-03-27027 March 2014 Reports Associated with Results of Post-Irradiation Examination (Pie) of Global Nuclear Fuel (Gnf) GE14i Isotope Test Assembly (ITA) ML13338A6562013-12-0909 December 2013 Mega-Tech Services, LLC, Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Clinton Power Station, Unit 1, TAC No.: MF0901 IR 05000352/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000219/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000277/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000254/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000272/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000289/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000373/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000237/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000461/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000454/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee ML13008A2192013-01-31031 January 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000456/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee ML12340A3492012-11-27027 November 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklists, C-1 Through C-143 RS-12-165, 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklists, C-1 Through C-1432012-11-27027 November 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklists, C-1 Through C-143 RS-12-165, 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklist, C-286 Through F-142012-10-30030 October 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklist, C-286 Through F-14 ML12340A3482012-10-30030 October 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklist, C-286 Through F-14 2023-06-07
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARNMP1L3469, Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits2022-06-30030 June 2022 Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits RS-21-005, Request for License Amendment to Revise Degraded Voltage Relay Allowable Values2021-01-20020 January 2021 Request for License Amendment to Revise Degraded Voltage Relay Allowable Values RS-21-001, Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping2021-01-0404 January 2021 Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping U-604712, Submittal of the Snubber Program Plan for the Fourth 10-Year Interval2020-06-24024 June 2020 Submittal of the Snubber Program Plan for the Fourth 10-Year Interval ML19228A0232019-08-15015 August 2019 Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-879 RS-15-320, Revised Final Integrated Plan Document - Mitigating Strategies NRC Order, EA-12-0492015-12-14014 December 2015 Revised Final Integrated Plan Document - Mitigating Strategies NRC Order, EA-12-049 RS-14-312, Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report2014-11-0303 November 2014 Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report RS-14-277, Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 12014-09-24024 September 2014 Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 1 ML14176A9612014-06-24024 June 2014 Submittal of Non-Proprietary BWROG Technical Product, BWROGTP-11-006 - ECCS Containment Walkdown Procedure, Rev 1 (January 2011), as Formally Requested During the Public Meeting Held on April 30, 2014 RS-14-112, Reports Associated with Results of Post-Irradiation Examination (Pie) of Global Nuclear Fuel (Gnf) GE14i Isotope Test Assembly (ITA)2014-03-27027 March 2014 Reports Associated with Results of Post-Irradiation Examination (Pie) of Global Nuclear Fuel (Gnf) GE14i Isotope Test Assembly (ITA) ML13338A6562013-12-0909 December 2013 Mega-Tech Services, LLC, Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Clinton Power Station, Unit 1, TAC No.: MF0901 ML12340A3492012-11-27027 November 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklists, C-1 Through C-143 RS-12-165, 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklists, C-1 Through C-1432012-11-27027 November 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklists, C-1 Through C-143 RS-12-165, 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklist, C-286 Through F-142012-10-30030 October 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklist, C-286 Through F-14 RS-12-165, 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report2012-10-30030 October 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report ML12340A3482012-10-30030 October 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklist, C-286 Through F-14 ML12340A3472012-10-30030 October 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report RS-12-165, 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklist, C-144 Through C-2852012-10-0101 October 2012 12Q0108.60-R-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Checklist, C-144 Through C-285 RS-12-082, Reports Associated with Results of Post-Irradiation Examination (Pie) of Global Nuclear Fuel (Gnf) GE14i Isotope Test Assembly (ITA)2012-05-14014 May 2012 Reports Associated with Results of Post-Irradiation Examination (Pie) of Global Nuclear Fuel (Gnf) GE14i Isotope Test Assembly (ITA) ML0904007952009-02-0404 February 2009 GSI-189 Action Plan, Feb. 09 Update, Publicly Available Version ML0821900132008-08-0707 August 2008 Monthly Operating Reports Second Quarter 2008 ML0636202642006-12-31031 December 2006 Hydraulic Model Study of High Pressure Core Spray Pump Suction to Evaluate the Formation of Air Drawing Vortices and Air Withdrawal ML0636202662006-12-21021 December 2006 Attachment 2, U-603798, Engineering Change Evaluation 363975 Revision 0 U-603798, Attachment 3, U-603798, SA-1578, Revision 3, Significance Determination Process (SDP) Evaluation for CPS HPCS RCIC Storage Tank Suction Vortexing2006-12-21021 December 2006 Attachment 3, U-603798, SA-1578, Revision 3, Significance Determination Process (SDP) Evaluation for CPS HPCS RCIC Storage Tank Suction Vortexing ML0634601312006-12-0707 December 2006 Attachment 11, Exelon/Amergen Response to the Request for Additional Information, EP-EAL-0611, Criteria for Choosing Containment Radiation Monitor Reading Indicative Loss of the RCS Barrier ML0508202832005-03-31031 March 2005 GENE-0000-0023-6259-05NP, Rev 1, Amergen Energy Co, LLC Clinton Power Station BWRVIP-04A Core Shroud Repair Design Submittal to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nrc). ML0508202932005-02-28028 February 2005 GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP, Rev 2, Amergen Energy Co, LLC Clinton Power Station Non-Core Support Structural Components Assessment. ML0508202982005-02-28028 February 2005 GENE-0000-0023-6259-04NP, Rev 0, Amergen Energy Co., LLC Clinton Power Station Unit 1 Core Shroud Repair GE Input to IOCFR50.59 Evaluation by Cps. ML0423901812004-07-16016 July 2004 Holtec International Report No. HI-2033124 Spent Fuel Storage Expansion at Clinton Power Station. RS-04-024, Request for Amendment to Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement Frequencies to Support 24-Month Fuel Cycles in Accordance with the Guidance of Generic Letter 91-042004-05-20020 May 2004 Request for Amendment to Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement Frequencies to Support 24-Month Fuel Cycles in Accordance with the Guidance of Generic Letter 91-04 ML0412109162004-04-22022 April 2004 Technical Evaluation of Extending Division 1 and 2 Inverter Completion Time (CT) ML0802902312004-02-12012 February 2004 Westinghouse Technical Bulletin: Information Regarding Recent Crossflow Ultrasonic Flow Measurement System Performance Observations, TB-04-4 ML0327216212003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix a, Chapter 6, Response of Soil and Rock to Dynamic and Static Loading ML0327216132003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Table of Contents, Appendix a, Attachment A-4, Stratigraphics Cone Penetrometer Test Report ML0327216152003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix a, Attachment A-5, Geovision Suspension Logging Report ML0327216172003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix a, Attachment A-6, TSC, Laboratory Test Results ML0327216192003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix a, Attachment A-7, Results of Resonant Column/Cyclic Torsional Shear Testing ML0327216202003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix a, Geotechnical Report, Table of Contents Through Figure 5-24 ML0327306082003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix B, Seismic Hazards Report, Attachment 1, Table of Contents Through Figure B-1-6 ML0327306092003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix B, Seismic Hazards Report, Attachment 1, Figures B-1-6 Through B-1-11 ML0327306102003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix B, Seismic Hazards Report, Attachment 1, Figures B-1-12 Through Figure B-2-2 ML0327306122003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix B, Seismic Hazards Report, Table of Contents Through Figure 2.1-19 ML0327306132003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Appendix B, Seismic Hazards Report, Figures 2.1-20 Through Plate 1 ML0327306142003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Table of Contents Through Figure 2.1-2 ML0327306152003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Figures 2.1-3 Through 2.4-1 ML0327306162003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Figures 2.4-2 Through 2.4-11 ML0327306172003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Figures 2.4-12 Through 2.4-19 ML0327306182003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Figures 2.4-20 Through 2.5-5 ML0327306192003-09-25025 September 2003 Site Safety Analysis Report for the Exelon Generation Company, LLC Early Site Permit, Figures 2.5-6 Through Chapter 3, Table 3.3-33 RS-03-013, Request for Amendment to TS 3.6.5.1, Drywell & 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program2003-01-29029 January 2003 Request for Amendment to TS 3.6.5.1, Drywell & 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program 2022-06-30
[Table view] |
Text
I S' Non-Proprietary Version GE Nuclear Energy General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125 GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2 CLASS I February 2005 AmerGen Energy Co, LLC Clinton Power Station Non-Core Support Structural Components Assessment Principal Contributor:
Aroon Herlekar, Technical Project Engineer Principal Verifier:
Andrea Howell, Senior Engineer Approval By /
M. R. Schrag, Manager Stress Analysis & Hardware Design
Non-ProprietaryVersion GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2 Revision Status Revision Date DESCRIPTION 0 (Draft) July 2004 Issued for Review and Comments.
0 November 2004 Issued for Use.
I February 2005 Revised to incorporate review comments and added section to address fuel lift.
2 February 2005 Revised to incorporate review comments on
._ Revision 1.
Bars in the left margin note changes for Revision 2.
Non-ProprietaryVersion GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2 NON PROPRIETARY NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE This is a non-proprietary version of the document GENE-0000-0023-6259-3P, which has the proprietary information removed. Portions of the document that have been removed are indicated by an open and closed bracket as shown here [[ ].
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING CONTENTS OF THIS REPORT PLEASE READ CAREFULLY The information contained in this document is furnished for the purpose of obtaining NRC approval of the licensing requirements to repair the core shroud at the Clinton Power Station.
The only undertakings of General Electric Company with respect to information in this document are contained in contracts between General Electric Company and participating utilities, and nothing contained in this document shall be construed as changing those contracts.
The use of this information by anyone other than that for which it is intended is not authorized; and with respect to any unauthorized use, General Electric Company makes no representations or warranty, and assumes no liability as to the completeness, accuracy, or usefulness of the information contained in this document.
Copyright General Electric Company 2005 3
Non-PropridearyVersion GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
- 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE ...................................................................... 5
- 2. NON CORE SUPPORT STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS ASSESSMENT ......... 5 2.1 Fuel .................................. 5 2.2 LPCI Coupling .................................. 6 2.3 Core Spray Piping .................................. 8 2.4 Shroud Head ................................. 10 2;5 Assessment of relocating four Shroud Head Studs ............................ 10 2.6 Fuel Lift Assessment .................................. I
- 3. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 12 4
Non-Proprietary Version GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP
- 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE Cracks were detected at some horizontal welds in the core shroud of the Clinton Power Station (CPS).
Shroud repair has been designed to stnicturallyreplace the horizontal welds HI through H7 at the CPS plant in accordance with the shroud repair design specification 26A6213 (Reference 1).
This report documents the assessment performed to identify the impact of shroud repair on the existing non-core support structures and to demonstrate the adequacy of the affected components. The components evaluated include: (1) fuel, (2) Low Pressure Coolant Injection (LPCI) coupling assembly, (3) core spray piping, and (4) Shroud Head. The assessment of the core support structure component interfaces such as the Top Guide/Shroud interface, and Core Plate/Shroud interface, etc is documented in a separate report, 26A6217 (Reference 2).
- 2. NON CORE SUPPORT STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS ASSESSMENT Analyses have been performed in support of the shroud repair design which incorporates the shroud horizontal weld cracks and the shroud repair. As a result, loads are generated in the existing non-core support structural components. The non-core support structural components are assessed to demonstrate their structural adequacy to withstand the loads generated as a result of shroud repair.
Design of the shroud repair has incorporated increased Reactor Internals Pressure Differentials (RIPDs) over the existing (licensed fuel) based values to account for the Extended Power Uprate (EPU). Since existing fuel lift analyses already accounts for the effects of EPU and GE 14 fuel and shroud repair does not affect the vertical fuel lift loads, there is no need to address the effect of fuel lift loads on the non-core support structural components. It is unchanged from the existing fuel lift assessment.
The approach used to the assessment was to compare the enveloped loads (accelerations, shears, and moments as applicable for all cracked conditions) for the shroud repair installed cases with the loads from the original design basis loads (from appropriate references).
2.1 Fuel Seismic / dynamic analyses performed in support of shroud repair result in inertial acceleration loads for fuel (Table 8.2, Reference 4). The acceleration comparison for the fuel is shown in the Table 2.1-1.
5
Non-ProprietaryVersion GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2 I I I I I I
I _ I_ I _ _ I_ _ - I I_ _ I_ _ I I_ _ I__ _ _
4 + 4 4 4- 4 4
]] Therefore, the fuel remains qualified for the shroud repair.
2.2 LPCI Coupling There are three (3) low-pressure coolant injection (LPCI) coupling assemblies in the Clinton RPV-shroud annulus. The coupling arrangement consists of two 8" Dia. elbows, the upper one connected to the RPV nozzle thermal sleeve and the lower one connected to the shroud just below the flange which seats the top guide/grid. The components connecting the two elbows include fittings welded to the ends of the elbows and a sleeve coupling interface between the elbows. The upper and lower ends of the coupling sleeve are housed inside collars, which are threaded to the fittings. This provides a slip joint at each end of the sleeve. Piston ring seals are included at the collar/sleeve slip joints to minimize leakage flow. Stellite #6 overlay exists at the interface of the sleeve and the collar to provide hard contact surface to facilitate relative motion at the contact. In order to minimize flow-induced vibration effects, a strut is welded to the lower elbow, bracing it to the shroud. The injection point inside the shroud is directed to a location below the top guide/grid.
6
Non-ProprietaryVersion GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revsision 2
[[
Assessment The LPCI coupling is subject to several loading conditions such as pressure, flow loads, dynamic loads, etc. The predominant loads affecting the LPCI coupling as impacted by the shroud repair are assessed, taking into consideration their relative magnitudes and the available stress margins at the governing components/stress locations. Possible impact of shroud repair on the LPCI coupling is in the accelerations due to seismic/dynamic events and the relative anchor movements (thermal and dynamic) between the RPV and shroud attachment points.
I[[
A.I I~~ I:
]]
Anchor Displacements: The anchor displacements do not impose any load in the LPCI coupling attachments, by design, since the coupling has vertically telescoping and laterally swiveling Stellite hard-faced sleeve interface. However, a check is made to ensure that the displacements are within acceptable limits.
]] Therefore, the lateral displacements are acceptable.
]] Thus the dynamic anchor displacement in the vertical direction is not a concern and is acceptable.
7
Non-Proprietait Version GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2
]] Therefore, the horizontal thermal displacement is not a concern.
]] Thus vertical thermal displacement is not a concern. (3) ]
Conclusion As documented above, the LPCI coupling is assessed to be functionally and structurally integral and acceptable in the shroud-repaired condition 2.3 Core Spray Piping The core spray piping is 5 in. diameter schedule 40 pipe (Reference 8). Upon entering the RPV, at the tee, the piping branches circumferentially in both directions. The pipe is routed horizontally through a guide (guide support is attached to the RPV inner wall, with radial restraint only) and is then routed downward in the annulus for approximately 6 feet, at an azimuthal offset of approximately 52° on one side and approximately 1120 on the other of the tee, and is attached radially to the to the shroud. There are two similar, independent loops, and therefore, a common assessment is performed.
Assessment The core spray piping is subject to several loading conditions such as pressure, flow loads, dynamic loads, thermal loads, etc. The predominant loads affecting the core spray piping as impacted by the shroud repair are assessed, taking into consideration their relative magnitudes and the available stress margins at the governing stress locations. Possible impact of shroud repair on the core spray piping is in the accelerations due to dynamic events and the relative anchor movements (thermal and dynamic) between the RPV and shroud attachment points. The seismic/dynamic accelerations and displacements for cracked and uncracked cases, are taken from Reference 4, Table 8.2.
l ]. However, since there are adequate (approximately 43%) stress margins (per Reference 8) these are acceptable.
8
Non-ProprietaryVersion GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2
]] Therefore, the lateral dynamic displacements are acceptable.
]] and thus have large margins. Thus the vertical seismic / dynamic anchor displacement is acceptable.
[[ ]] The change in the horizontal relative thermal anchor movement between the RPV and the shroud will be very small and therefore, not a concern.
]] Thus no further evaluation is required.
Conclusion As documented above, the core spray piping is assessed to be functionally and structurally integral and acceptable in the shroud-repaired condition.
9
Non-ProprietaryVersion GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2 2.4 Shroud Head I=
]] Thus the loads from shroud repair are acceptable.
]] Thus Reference 9 documentation does not require updates for shroud repair results.
1]
2.5 Assessment of relocating four Shroud Head Studs 10
Non-Proprietar'Version GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2
]]
2.6 Fuel Lift Assessment Fuel Lift analysis is reviewed to assess the potential disengagement of fuel from its support which could lead to interference with control rods, and dynamic loads on fuel and core support structure.
Conclusion Based on the above assessment, it is concluded that the current fuel lift loads are still valid for the shroud repair. Also based on Reference 12, it is concluded that Fuel Lift Loads are not required to be added to shroud repair hardware design loads.
11
Non-ProprietaryVersion GENE-0000-0023-6259-03NP Revision 2
- 3. REFERENCES
- 1. Design Specifications -CPS, Shroud Stabilizer Hardware, GENE Document Nos. 26A6213, Rev.
2, and 26A6214, Rev. 1.
- 2. Shroud and Shroud Support Stress Analysis CPS Core Shroud Repair modification, 26A6217, Rev. 0.
- 3. Clinton Power Uprate Rx Intemals evaluation, DRF# B]3-00944 (various indices).
- 4. CPS - Seismic/dynamic Analysis - Core Shroud Repair Modification, GENE-0000-0023-6259-01, Rev. 1.
- 5. GE 14 fuel allowables (DRF # JI 1-038865 Study 19) attachment to e-mail from P. B. Shah dated July 01,2004.
- 6. Core support structure Design Specification and data sheet, GE documents 22A4052, Rev. 8 and 22A4052AB, Rev. 4.
- 7. New Loads Analysis (BWR-6), DRF # 148-B 13-D022 N*3, Index J LPCI coupling adequacy evaluation for BWR-6 218 Standard Plant.
- 8. "Internal Core Spray Line Flaw Evaluation for a Clinton plant", GENE-B13-02083-00-01, Rev.
1.
- 9. Shroud Head Bolt Reduction Calculation-Clinton, DRF # A22-001 10-09, Index 31.8-b.
- 10. E-mail from Mays John to AmerGen CPS staff dated January 15, 2004 regarding requesting the relocation of four shroud head stud at Clinton.
- 11. Fuel Lift Loads Analyses-Clinton EPU & MELLA+ RIPD Evaluation, DRF # A22-00110-09, Index 15. .
- 12. Clinton Fuel Lift Load Requirement for Shroud Repair Tie Rod Design, GE Letter No. dkhO435 from D. K. Henrie to A. Herlekar, dated January 14, 2005.
- 13. Reactor Interface Control Drawing 213A5452 (Revision 7) and data sheet 213A5452CJ (Revision 2).
12