ML051400354

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:18, 14 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Draft - Section a Operating (RO & SRO) (Folder 2)
ML051400354
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/25/2005
From: Berry P
FitzPatrick, Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To: Conte R
Operations Branch I
References
50-333/05-301 50-333/05-301
Download: ML051400354 (39)
v • d • e


Text

a b "Entqy Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOBPERFORMANCEMEASURE SIR0 FROM LOI-01-01 TASK TITLE: CTP HEAT BALANCE VERIFICATION APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV: 1 DATE: 3/3/05 NRC K/A SYSTEM NUMBER: G2.1.7 3.7/4.4 JAF TASK NUMBER: JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME: 10 Minutes SUBMITTED: OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

--w-~-----www-m-----~---~-~--ww----m~---rn----------------~rn--~rn---~-w--rn-----

CANDIDATE NAME: S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion: ( ) Simulated (X) Performed Location: ( ) Plant ( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED: TIME TO COMPLETE: Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Unsatisfactory

~ - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~

COMMENTS: (MANDATORY FOR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATOR:

SIGNATURUPRINT Page 1 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST S/RO FROM LOI-01-01 TASK TITLE: CTP HEAT BALANCE VERIFICATION APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update: 3/3/05 By: RWD Date lnt.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Additional Information Questions and Answers Validation

-Procedural Change Required - X None Comments:

Page 2 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SIR0 FROM LOI-01-01 TASK TITLE: CTP HEAT BALANCE VERlFlCATlON APPL. TO JPM NUMBER

1. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A. None II. REFERENCES A. WP-7.3.03, Core Thermal Power Evaluation, Revision 11 111. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A. None IV. SET UP REQUIREMENTS A. Simulator at 75% CTP.
8. 3D Monicore Computer functioning.

V. EVALUATOR NOTES A. If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and not actually performed.

B. The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

VI. TASK CONDITIONS A. None

  • CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 6

SIR0 TASK TITLE: CTP HEAT BALANCE VERIFICATION VII. INITIATING CUE A reactor startup is in progress. Per OP-65, Step 0.24.16, you have been directed to perform a Core Thermal Heat Balance Verification.

VIII. TASK STANDARD The candidate will complete a CTP Heat Balance Verification per RAP-7.3.03 STEP

~-

STANDARD I EVALUATION / COMMENT

1. Obtain and review procedure Candidate obtains and reviews OP-65 and RAP-7.3.03. SAT I UNSAT Candidate determines that the start point is step 9.3 EVALUATOR Hand candidate a blank copy of RAP-7.3.03 Attachment 2

-~

a. Obtain Main Turbine First Stage At any EPIC terminal, candidate obtains the value for SAT / UNSAT 2.

Pressure EPIC point 1299 and records on Attachment 2.

  • CRITICAL STEP*
3. b. Calculate Reactor Power based upon Candidate calculates reactor power using the formula SAT / UNSAT Turbine First Stage Pressure on Attachment 2.
  • CRITICAL STEP*
4. c. Obtain Core Thermal Power from 30- At 3D-Monicore Console candidate demands a Core I SAT I UNSAT Monicore computer.

Power and Flow Log function. *CRITICAL STEP*

5. d. Determine accuracy of the Heat Candidate determines that the 2 values recorded on SAT I UNSAT Balance value. Attachment 2 are within 5% of each other.
  • CRITICAL STEP*

EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

Page 4 of 6

INITIATING CUE A reactor startup is in progress. Per OP-65, Step D.24.16, you have been directed to perfarm a Core Thermal Heat Balance Verification.

Page 5 of 6

VERIFICATION OF CORE THERMAL HEAT BALANCE - Page 1 of 1 DATE/TIME: /

A. F i r s t stage pressure from EPIC 1299: PS ig

% power E. R e a a o r power calculated from h e a t b a l a n c e - f pwer C. T h e two metkods are within 5% of r a t e d power of each o t h e r . YES D. If - N o t within 5%, investigation i n i t i a t e d . YES E. If GREATER THAlo 5%, a n d xnexplained, General Manaqer Plant Operations notified. 0 YES Print Terformed By:

Reviewed By:

REACTOR ZNGINEERING SUPERIKTENDENT I RAP-7.3.03 Rev. No. -- 1 1 CORE THERMAL POWER EVALUATION ATTACHMENT 2 Page -

12 of 15 Page 6 of 6

m Entergv Nuclear Northeast James A. FihPatrick Nuclear Power Plant OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE

~~ -

SIR0 NEW TASK TITLE: DETERMINE HPCI HIGH RPV WATER LEVEL TRIP SETPOINT APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV: 0 DATE: 3/8/05 NRC K/A SYSTEM NUMBER: G2.1.25 2.8 / 3.1 JAF TASK NUMBER: JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME: 10 Minutes SUBMITTED: OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

wwwwwww--~-w-wwwwww-wNwww~ww-ww-NwNNwNwN-w-wN-ww~-wN-www-w~-NNw-m-Nwwww~ww~wNm CANDIDATE NAME: S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion: ( ) Simulated ( X ) Performed Location: ( X ) Plant ( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED: TIME TO COMPLETE: Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Unsatisfactory w ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ - w m ~ w ~ ~ w w w m w ~ w ~ ~ w ~ ~

COMMENTS: (MANDATORY FOR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATOR:

SIGNATURUPRINTED Page 1 of 5

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SIR0 NEW TASK TITLE: DETERMINE HPCl HIGH RPV WATER LEVEL TRIP SETPOINT APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update: 3/8/05 By: RWD Date Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Additional Information Questions and Answers Validation Procedural Change Required X None Comments:

Page 2 of 5

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SIR0 NEW TASK TITLE: DETERMINE HPCl HIGH RPV WATER LEVEL TRIP SETPOINT APPL. TO JPM NUMBER I. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A. None II. REFERENCES A. OP-15, High Pressure Coolant Injection, Revision 50 111. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A. None IV. SET UP REQUIREMENTS A. Obtain a current copy of OP-15, High Pressure Coolant Injection.

V. EVALUATOR NOTES A. If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and actually performed.

B. The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

VI. TASK CONDITIONS A. Reactor pressure is 400 psig.

B. It is necessary to obtain the corresponding HPCl High RPV Water Level Trip Setpoint.

- CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 5

S/RO TASK TITLE: DETERMINE HPCl HIGH RPV WATER LEVEL TRIP SETPOINT VII. INITIATING CUE Reactor Pressure is 400 psig. The Shift Manager has requested that you determine the corresponding HPCl High Reactor Pressure Vessel Level Trip Setpoint.

VIII. TASK STANDARD The candidate will utilize OP-15, Attachment 3, or Simulator Posted Attachment, to accurately determine the HPCl High RPV Level Trip Setpoint that corresponds to Reactor Pressure of 400 psig.

I STEP I STANDARD 1 EVALUATION I COMMENT

1. Obtain and review procedure Candidate obtains and reviews OP-15 or Simulator SAT I UNSAT Posted Attachment. Candidate determines that the start point is Attachment 3, HPCVRCIC High Level Trip Setpoint and Reactor Low Level Scram Setpoint as a Function of Reactor Pressure.
  • 2. Determine High RPV LevelTrip Candidate uses point where 400 psig vertical pressure SAT / UNSAT Setpoint corresponding to Reactor line intersects the HPCI/RCIC High Level Trip Value I Pressure of 400 psig. solid line on graph; and determines a RPV Water Level *CRITICAL STEP in the range of 211.5 inches to 212.5 inches.

I EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

Page 4 of 5

U a?

Y (D

Q) a LT g! In Y-O m

m "Entegy Nuclear Northeast James A. FiiPatrick Nuclear Power Plant OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE SRO NEW TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV: 0 DATE: 3/11/05 NRC WA SYSTEM NUMBER: G 2.2.22 4.1 JAF TASK NUMBER: JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME: 10 Minutes SUBMITTED: OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

wmwcwwwwcwwwwwwwmwwwm--~wwwwmmwwm-~wwmmwwmwwwm~wwwwwww~wwwmmww~www~wwcmwmw~ww~

CANDIDATE NAME: S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion: ( ) Simulated ( X ) Performed Location: ( X ) Plant ( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED: TIME TO COMPLETE: Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Unsatisfactory w m ~ ~ ~ w - ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ w - m w ~ - w w ~ w w w w w w m ~ w w m w w - w m w - - w m w w w w ~ w m w w ~ m w w ~ ~ w w w w ~ w m m w ~ m m w w c w w COMMENTS: (MANDATORY FOR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATOR:

SIGNATURUPRINTED Page 1 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SRO NEW TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update: 3111/05 By: RWD Date Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Additional Information Questions and Answers Validation Procedural Change Required X None Comments:

Page 2 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SRO NEW TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE APPL. TO JPM NUMBER

1. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A. None II. REFERENCES A. Technical Specifications, Section 3.4.6 B. Technical Requirements Manual, Section 3.4.8 and Table 3.4.B-1 111. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A. None IV. SET UP REQUIREMENTS A. Obtain a current copy of Technical Specifications and TRM.

V. EVALUATOR NOTES A. If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and not actually performed.

6. The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

VI. TASK CONDITIONS A. A Reactor Startup was initiated from Cold Shutdown conditions 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ago. Reactor Power is just above 10% CTP with p e r ascension in progress.

B. Verbal notification of reactor water sample results received in Control Room, from Chemistry Technician, with the following parameters:

0 Dose Equivalent Iodine: O.OOO1 pCi / gram 0 Conductivity: 6.1 pmho / cm 0 Chlorides: 0.04 ppm

  • CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 6

SRO TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE VII. INITIATING CUE C. A Reactor Startup was initiated from Cold Shutdown conditions 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ago. Reactor Power is just above 10% CTP with power ascension in progress. Verbal notification of reactor water sample results received in Control Room, from Chemistry Technician, with the following parameters:

Dose Equivalent Iodine: 0.0001 pCl / gram Conductivity: 6.1 pmho I cm Chlorides: 0.04 Ppm A8 the Control Room Supervisor, evaluate compliance with Technical Specifications and the TRM.

VIII. TASK STANDARD The candidate will utilize Technical Specification 3.4.6 and TRM 3.4.6 to evaluate results and determine parameters are acceptable for the given plant condition.

- -~ ~~

STANDARD -(EVALUATION ICOMMENT

1. Obtain and review Technical Candidate obtains and reviews Technical Specifications SAT / UNSAT Specifications (TS) and Technical and TRM. Candidate determines that the start point is Requirements Manual (TRM). TS 3.4.6 and TRM 3.4.8.

EVALUATOR:

Either document section may be obtained / reviewed in any order. Therefore, the subsequent three steps may be performed in any order.

EQUIVALENT 1-131 parameter is in is within LCO specification of 5 0.2 pCi I gram. *CRITICAL STEP*

compliance with specification.

Page 4 of 6

SRO TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE J

STEP STANDARD EVALUATION I COMMENT -

  • 3. Evaluate TRM 3.4.8 to determine if Candidate evaluates TRM 3.4.8 and Table 3.4.8-1 and SAT / UNSAT reported CONDUCTIVITY parameter is determines that reported CONDUCTIVITY concentration in compliance with specifications. (6.1 vmho / cm) is within TRO specificationas *CRITICAL STEP*

referenced to Table 3.4.8-1, Applicability of Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after exceeding 1% RTP during reactor startup value of 510 pmho / cm.

  • 4, Evaluate TRM 3.4.8 to determine if Candidate evaluates TRM 3.4.8 and Table 3.4.8-1 and SAT I UNSAT reported CHLORIDE parameter is in determines that reported CHLORIDE concentration compliance with specifications. (0.04 ppm) is within TRO specification as referenced to *CRITICAL STEP*

Table 3.4.8-1, Applicability of Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after exceeding 1% RTP during reactor startup value of 5 0.1 ppm.

EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

Page 5 of 6

INITIATING CUE A Reactor Startup was initiated from Cold Shutdown conditions 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ago. Reactor Power is just above 10% CTP with power ascension in progress. Verbal notification of reactor water sample results received in Control Room, from Chemistry Technician, with the following parameters:

Dose Equivalent Iodine: 0.0001 pCi 1 gram 0 Conductivity: 6.1 pmho/cm Chlorides: 0.04 ppm As the Control Room Supervisor, evaluate compliance with Technical Specifications and the TRM.

Page 6 of 6

Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE SRO NEW TASK TITLE: Determine Visitor RCA Access Reauirements APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV: 0 DATE: 1/14/05 NRC WA SYSTEM NUMBER: Generic 2.3.4 JAF TASK NUMBER: JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME: 15 Minutes SUBMITTED: OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

m-5---N~--N2----5--m----------5----~--5--mmm---2--5--5----~---5--N-2--~---

CANDIDATE NAME: S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion: ( ) Simulated ( X ) Performed Location: ( X ) Plant ( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED: TIME TO COMPLETE: Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Unsatisfactory

-N~NL~-5--------2----2~---~--N-----2---m~---5----2--2-~--N--~-~-5N--5-~--~- COMMENTS: (MANDATORY FOR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATOR:

SIGNATURE/PRINTED Page 1 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SRO NEW TASK TITLE: Determine Visitor RCA Access Requirements APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update: 1114/05 By: RWD Date Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review - Additional Information Questions and Answers Validation Procedural Change Required X None Comments:

Page 2 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATlON SRO NEW TASK TITLE: Determine Visitor RCA Access Reauirements APPL. TO JPM NUMBER

1. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A. None II. REFERENCES A. AP-07.05, Exposure Monitoring and Radiological Controls for Site & RCA Access, Rev. 10
6. LP-AP, Lesson Plan for Site Administrative Procedures.

111. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A. None IV. SET UP REQUIREMENTS A. None

v. EVALUATOR NOTES A. If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and not actually performed.
6. The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

VI. TASK CONDITIONS A. Task must be performed in an area allowing access to Site Administrative Procedures.

  • CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 6

SRO TASK TITLE: Determine Visitor RCA Access Requirements VII. INITIATING CUE A Technical Representative from The Viking Valve Corporation is arriving tomorrow to evaluate replacing the Main Condenser Pit Foam Fire Suppression System. The evaluation is expected to take approximately 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. You will be the visitor sponsor and visitor escort. Security arrangements have already been completed. He has never been exposed to or monitored for Occupational Radiation Exposure. Identify the individuals Administrative Dose Limits and ensure that all necessary Radiological Protection requirements are completed to expedite getting him to the Turbine Building Foam Room.

VIII. TASK STANDARD The candidate will determine administrative dose limitations and complete documentation to have a dosimeter issued per AP-07.05.

STEP I STANDARD I EVALUATION / COMMENT I. Candidate identifies the need for AP- Candidate obtains and reviews AP-07.05, Exposure SAT / UNSAT 07.05, Exposure Monitoring and Monitoring and Radiological Controls for Site and RCA Radiological Controls for Site and RCA Access.

Access.

2. 6.6.1 Visitor RCA Access Candidate identifies the need to complete Attachment 3 SAT / UNSAT Requirements Form (Attachment 3) to AP-07.05 shall be routed and completed.

I EVALUATOR Page 4 of 6

SRO 4SK TIT ? Determine Visitor RCA Access Requirc nents STEP STANDARD EVALUATION / COMMENT

3. Complete Attachment 3. Candidate fills in the following information SAT / UNSAT 0 TLD Required From: Tomorrow *CRITICAL STEP*

TLD Required To: Tomorrow Reason RCA Access is Required: Evaluate replacement of Main Condenser Pit Foam Fire Suppression System.

+ Check Any Applicable: None EVALUATOR Act as RP Supervisor and accept completed Attachment

3. Request Administrative Dose Limitation. ~
4. Obtain Attachment 5. Candidate reviews Attachment 5 and determines the SAT / UNSAT following Administrative Dose Limits 5.9 Definition of Working Visitor TEDE 0.4 rem/year *CRITICAL STEP*

0 LDE 1.2 rem/year SDENVB 4.0 rem/year SDE/ME 4.0 rem/year TODE 4.0 rem/year EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

Page 5 of 6

co

.c 0

co i

0 2

E tu 0

U CD

.-c W

3 E

0 d

aEntergv Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOBPERFORMANCEMEASURE SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 1 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV: 0 DATE: 3/7/05 NRC WA SYSTEM NUMBER: 2.4.41 4.1 JAF TASK NUMBER: JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME: 10 Minutes SUBMITTED: OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

CANDIDATE NAME: S.S.NUMBER:

JPM Completion: ( ) Simulated ( X ) Performed Location: ( ) Plant ( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED: TIME TO COMPLETE: Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Unsatisfactory NALUATOR:

SIGNATURUPRINT Page 1 of 5

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PIAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 1 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update: 3/7/05 By: RWD Date Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Additional Information Questions and Answers Validation Procedural Change Required X None Comments:

Page 2 of 5

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-OM1 NRC EXAM E-PLAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 1 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER

1. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A. None II. REFERENCES A. JAF Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures IAP-2, Rev. 25 111. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A. None IV. SET UP REQUIREMENTS A. This JPM is completed as followup after the scenario progress has been frozen.

V. EVALUATOR NOTES A. If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and actually performed.

6. The candidate should, at a minimum, identtfy the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

VI. TASK CONDITIONS A. Scenario Terminated

  • CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 5

WI. INITIATING CUE Based on the events that have just occurred determine if the current circumstances warrant classification in accordance with the JAF Emergency Plan and, if so, determine the appropriate classification level.

TASK STANDARD The candidate will evaluate the events and resulting plant conditions from the scenario and declare the E-plan emergency level using IAP-2, Attachment 2.1 STEP STANDARD EVALUATION / COMMENT

1. Obtain/Approach IAP-2, Attachment 2.1 Candidate obtains the procedure or approaches the SAT / UNSAT posted attachment.
2. Recognize the applicable conditions Candidate recognizes that the scenario events included SAT / UNSAT a failure to scram complicated by SRV operations which challenge containment.
3. Confirm the conditions Candidate reviews IAP-2 Technical Bases for expected declarations.

SAT / UNSAT 1I

  • 4. Classify the event Candidate selects SAE-2.2.2 EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

Page 4 of 5

m Y-O In Q)

CI)

Q a

45

=EntergY Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 2 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV: 0 DATE: 3/7/05 NRC WA SYSTEM NUMBER: 2.4.41 4.1 JAF TASK NUMBER: JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME: 10 Minutes SUBMITTED: OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - m ~ - ~ m ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ m ~ ~ ~ m - ~ m - - m m -

CANDIDATE NAME: S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion: ( ) Simulated ( X ) Performed Location: ( ) Plant ( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED: TIME TO COMPLETE: Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Unsatisfactory

- - - m ~ ~ m - ~ ~ - - m ~ m - ~ - ~ ~ - - - ~ - - ~ m m ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

COMMENTS: (MANDATORY FOR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATOR:

SIGNATURE/PRINTED Page 1 of 5

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PIAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 2 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update: 3/7/05 By: RWD Date Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Additional Information Questions and Answers Validation Procedural Change Required X None Comments:

Page 2 of 5

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PIAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 2 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER

1. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A. None II. REFERENCES A. JAF Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures IAP-2, Rev. 25 111. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A. None IV. SET UP REQUIREMENTS A. This JPM is completed as followup after the scenario progress has been frozen.

W. EVALUATOR NOTES A. If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and actually performed.

B. The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

VI. TASK CONDITIONS A. Scenario Terminated

  • CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 5

S/RO/NLO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-03-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN DECLARATIONFOR SCENARIO 2 VII. INITIATING CUE Based on the events that have just occurred determine if the current circumstances warrant classification in accordance with the JAF Emergency Plan and, if so, determine the appropriate classification level.

TASK STANDARD The candidate will evaluate the events and resulting plant conditions from the scenario and declare the E-plan emergency level using IAP-2, Attachment 2.1 I STEP I STANDARD I EVALUATION I COMMENT

1. Obtain/Approach IAP-2, Attachment 2.1 Candidate obtains the procedure or approaches the SAT / UNSAT posted attachment.
2. Recognize the applicable conditions Candidate recognizes that the scenario events included SAT / UNSAT a Reactor Coolant leak to the Primary Containment via a stuck open SRV and failed tailpipe.
3. Confirm the conditions Candidate reviews IAP-2 Technical Bases for expected SAT / UNSAT declarations.
  • 4. Classify the event Candidate selects ALERT 3.1.1 SAT / UNSAT Primary containment pressure cannot be maintained c 2.7 psig due to coolant leakage *CRITICAL STEP*

Page 4 of 5

INITIATING CUE Based on the events that have just occurred determine if the current circumstances warrant classification in accordance with the JAF Emergency Plan and, if so, determine the appropriate classification level.

Page 5 of 5

d s

"Ent64g-y Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 3 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV: 0 DATE: 3/7/05 NRC WA SYSTEM NUMBER: 2.4.41 4.1 JAF TASK NUMBER: JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME: 10 Minutes SUBMITTED: OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

~ m m m ~ m m m - m ~ m m m m m m m m ~ ~ m ~ m ~ m m ~ m m m m m m - m m m m m m m ~ m m m ~ w m m m m ~ - ~ ~ ~ m m m ~ m m m m ~ m m m m - m m ~

CANDIDATE NAME: S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion: ( ) Simulated ( X ) Performed Location: ( ) Plant ( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED: TIME TO COMPLETE: Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Unsatisfactory COMMENTS: (MANDATORY FOR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATOR:

SIGNATURUPRINTED Page 1 of 5

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 3 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update: 3 f f/05 By: RWD Date Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Additional Information Questions and Answers -Validation Procedural Change Required - X None Comments:

Page 2 of 5

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 3 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER

1. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A. None II. REFERENCES A. JAF Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures IAP-2, Rev. 25 111. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A. None IV. SET UP REQUIREMENTS A. This JPM is completed as followup after the scenario progress has been frozen.

V. EVALUATOR NOTES A. If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and actually performed.

B. The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

VI. TASK CONDITIONS A. Scenario Terminated

  • CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 5

SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN DECLARATION FOR SCENARIO 3 VII. INITIATING CUE Based on the events that have just occurred determine if the current circumstances warrant classificationin accordance with the JAF Emergency Plan and, if so, determine the appropriate classificationlevel.

TASK STANDARD The candidate will evaluate the events and resulting plant conditions from the scenario and declare the E-plan emergency level using IAP-2, Attachment 2.1 STEP STANDARD EVALUATION / COMMENT

1. ObtainlAppraach IAP-2, Attachment 2.1 Candidate obtains the procedure or approaches the SAT / UNSAT posted attachment.
2. Recognize the applicable conditions Candidate recognizes that the scenario events included SAT / UNSAT a seismic event at s.089.
3. Confirm the conditions Candidate reviews IAP-2 Technical Bases for expected SAT / UNSAT declarations.
  • 4. Classify the event Candidate selects ALERT-8.4.4 SAT / UNSAT Earthquake felt in-plant based upon a consensus of control room operators on duty I AND JAFNPP Seismic Activity Alarm (EPIC-A-124)

I *CRITICAL STEP*

actuated AND Confirmation of Seismic Event >.08g by NMP-2.

EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

Page 4 of 5

.-t t

0 In Y-O In

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML051400354&oldid=2592989"