|
|---|
Category:Legal-Exhibit
MONTHYEARML1116406212011-06-13013 June 2011
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Supplemental Attachment to the Declaration of Dr. Gordon R. Thompson
ML1115304492011-06-0101 June 2011
Exhibit 12 in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima
ML1115304462011-06-0101 June 2011
Exhibit 3C in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima
ML1115303392011-06-0101 June 2011
New and Significant Information from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident in the Context of Future Operation of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant
ML1115303452011-06-0101 June 2011
Declaration of Dr. Gordon R. Thompson in Support of Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Contention and Related Petitions and Motions
ML1115304432011-06-0101 June 2011
Exhibit 3B in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima
ML1115304452011-06-0101 June 2011
Exhibit 11 in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima
ML1115304442011-06-0101 June 2011
Exhibit 3A in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima
ML1115304412011-06-0101 June 2011
Exhibit 5 in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima
ML1113905652011-05-12012 May 2011
Fukushima Fallout Regulatory Loopholes at U.S. Nuclear Plants
ML1113905712011-04-28028 April 2011
Transcript of Briefing on the Status of NRC Response to Events in Japan and Briefing on Station Blackout
ML1106009342011-02-0202 February 2011
Official Exhibit - NRC000015-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Testimony of James V. Ramsdell Jr., Concerning the Impact of Specific Meteorological Conditions on the Severe Accident Mitigation Analysis
ML1106009352011-02-0202 February 2011
Official Exhibit - NRC000016-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Rebuttal Testimony of S. Tina Ghosh Concerning Pilgrim Watch'S Application of NUREG-1150 and NUREG-1465
ML1106009322011-02-0202 February 2011
Official Exhibit - NRC000014-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Testimony of Nathan E. Bixler and S. Tina Ghosh Concerning the Impact of Alternative Meteorological Models on the Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis
ML1106008802011-02-0101 February 2011
Official Exhibit - ENT000013-00-BD01 - Rebuttal Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula and Dr. Steven R. Hanna on Meteorological Matters Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch Contention 3
ML1106008822011-02-0101 February 2011
Official Exhibit - ENT000014-00-BD01 - Rebuttal Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula on Source Term Used in the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station SAMA Analysis
ML1106008782011-01-31031 January 2011
Official Exhibit - ENT000011-00-BD01 - URS-TR-10-0003, Rev. 1, ENT-Exposure Index Calculation - Exposure Index Analysis Using MACCS2 and Calmet: Sensitivity Study Supporting the Pilgrim Station SAMA Analysis.
ML1106009382011-01-30030 January 2011
Official Exhibit - PWA000023-00-BD01 - Statement by Bruce A. Egan, Sc.D., Cmm, in the Matter of Entergy Corporation, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application
ML1106009372011-01-30030 January 2011
Official Exhibit - PWA000022-00-BD01 - Declaration of Bruce A. Egan, Sc.D., Cmm, in Support of Pilgrim Watch'S Response Opposing Entergy'S Initial Statement of Position on Pilgrim Watch Contention 3
ML1106008982011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - PWA000016-00-BD01 - NUREG/CR-6853, Comparison of Average Transport and Dispersion Among a Gaussian, a Two-Dimensional, and a Three-Dimensional Model
ML1106008972011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - PWA000015-00-BD01 - Revisiting Goiania - 1987 Radiological Accident in Goiania, Brazil
ML1106009282011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - NRC000011-00-BD01 - Statement of Qualifications for Nathan E. Bixler
ML1106008962011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - PWA000014-00-BD01 - Kamiar Jamali, Use of Risk Measures in Design and Licensing of Future Reactors
ML1106009102011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - NRC000001-00-BD01 - Applicant'S Environmental Report, Attachment E, Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis.
ML1106008792011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - ENT000012-00-BD01 - Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula on Source Term Used in the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analysis
ML1106008722011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - ENT000006-00-BD01 - Er Attachment E, Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis
ML1106008712011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - ENT000005-00-BD01 - LRA Er Section 4.21
ML1106009002011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - PWA000018-00-BD01 - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to State of New York'S Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of NYS Contention 16/16A
ML1106009292011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - NRC000012-00-BD01 - Statement of Qualifications for S. Tina Ghosh
ML1106008662011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - ENT000001-00-BD01 - Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula and Dr. Steven R. Hanna on Meteorological Matters Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch Contention 3
ML1106009302011-01-0303 January 2011
Official Exhibit - NRC000013-00-BD01 - Statement of Qualifications for James V. Ramsdell, Jr
ML1106008692010-12-31031 December 2010
Official Exhibit - ENT000004-00-BD01 - Analysis of Annual Wind Roses and Precipitation within About 50 Miles of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, and Use of Calmet to Calculate the Annual Distribution of Trajectories from the Pilgrim Stati
ML1106008672010-12-30030 December 2010
Official Exhibit - ENT000002-00-BD01 - Declaration of Kevin R. O'Kula in Support of Entergy'S Pre-filed Testimony on Pilgrim Watch Contention 3
ML1106008682010-12-22022 December 2010
Official Exhibit - ENT000003-00-BD01 - Declaration of Steven R. Hanna in Support of Entergy'S Pre-filed Testimony on Pilgrim Watch Contention 3
ML1013304352010-05-12012 May 2010
NRC Staff'S Initial Brief in Response to the Board'S Order (Regarding Deadlines for Submission of Parties)
ML1106009022009-12-31031 December 2009
Official Exhibit - PWA000019-00-BD01 - What'S in the Black Box Known as Emergency Dose Assessment
ML1106008912009-05-31031 May 2009
Official Exhibit - PWA000010-00-BD01 - Jennifer E. Thorp, the Eastern Massachusetts Sea Breeze Study
ML1106009262009-05-31031 May 2009
Official Exhibit - NRC000010-00-BD01 - the Eastern Massachusetts Sea Breeze Study
NRC-2007-0019, FRN the Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Attorney General of California; Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking2008-08-0808 August 2008
FRN the Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Attorney General of California; Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking
ML1112203542008-08-0808 August 2008
FRN the Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Attorney General of California; Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking
ML0810904402008-04-15015 April 2008
Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 11, NUREG-1891 (Sept. 2007, Published Nov. 2007) Excerpt - 3.0.3.1.13 Water Chemistry Control BWR Program
ML0810904752008-04-15015 April 2008
2008/04/15-Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 8, License Renewal Application, Appendix B.0.3
ML0810905332008-04-15015 April 2008
Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 14, Amendment No. 176 Excerpt (3/4.5-7 - 3/4.5-8)
ML0810902922008-04-15015 April 2008
Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 17, Bptip: NUREG-1891, Rev. 1, X I M32, 3.0.3.2.1, Buried Pipes and Tanks Inspection Program, 3-35 to 3-38
ML0810902462008-04-15015 April 2008
2008/04/15-Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 2, Pilgrim License Renewal Application, Pages from Appendix B
ML0811202612008-04-15015 April 2008
Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 23, NUREG-1891 (Sept. 2007, Published Nov. 2007) Excerpt - 3.0.2 Staff'S Review Process
ML0810904382008-04-15015 April 2008
Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 9, NUREG-1891 (Sept. 2007, Published Nov. 2007) Excerpt - 3.0.3.2.16 Service Water Integrity Program
ML0810905242008-04-15015 April 2008
Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 8, Nureg/Cr 6876, Risk Informed Assessment of Degraded Buried Piping Systems in Nuclear Power Plants; Brookhaven National Laboratory; Us NRC, June 2005. from Sections..
ML0810906152008-04-15015 April 2008
Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 28, NRC Region III Report Excerpt - Service Water (SX) System
ML0810906162008-04-15015 April 2008
Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 53, 2-Photographs of Corrosion on Pipes at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
2011-06-13
[Table view] |
Text
l *
~' t"~ ~",
r JMIC Ei'-lL-r GY CO\1M!S: ,,
) ',1 l\()'.JCi!i~c.r 17, 1]71 I
l:otc to
/
E.
P.
Ple2sc lc't Li2 h\Ci~" if yo," concur; if l:ot, \-l,~ 'dill hc!ve to di.scuss it fur::.hc.r and reoch a decision',
l'
'. , .. l.\
Force Rcvicu
~,
i (
J
)
S U1LJ l-:c:~r; D I SCU ~~ S JJ):-!
-+-~.-------------- .. -------------.-----~--.----- .. -
~- -~-.- --- ~. -.- -----. ------------.-
- 1. Def:initic~l: Bypass m~~ns n rath without passinG th::ough the ,:2ter of the suppression pool and therefore without condensing th~
- 2. Consen\lC'nces a) L~rge LOCh - no problem.
b) Small LOCA - slow pressure buildup in dryoell, bypass lets wetwcll pressure follow without cond~nsing steam.
This trouble cases on slowly, but if the prim3ry leak widens and the LOCA severity in-creases (the advertised course of cvc~ts for a big leak starts 5m311) then the bi~
.. /. -
b10,:doh'n p,-essure vill build on the c.:":istin~; pressure built up sJ.O'.;l::.') and the con-taiument would overpr~ssurize.
That could l03~ the torus
~
water source, hence ECeS, as well as leak out fission products.
- 3. Prob2bility a) Small pri~3ry lLak rather probable - alreauy hnd one S10'.7 blowdown (Dresden 2). Another (Honticello) b1m'ldmm occurred through the byp:,ss valve, then through a safety valve. A large leak i~ improbable, but is supposed to be a small one first.
b) GE claim~ two passive failures b) The GE position that this are required for trouble, but is too improbable to any malfunction of 12 vacuum worry about is rejected.
sp~cted in the locus, over ~O y~3rs will set up half th8 accident, rc~dy {or tr6~blc if
- a. s tC0.:~ leak occurs.
c) 0;11)" a limited L',r~f:~ of lc:,-~~ c) Further study is required sizes gets into trouble. for this and other configura-Large L!aks clc;lr the VC.l1ts tions, including sensitivity and assumption va~iations.
postulated bypass. Very snaIl leaks are condensed on the dry>*,cll ,,70.11. Thc "t~:2ched GE cu;::ve subrailted foc E",:~,:h ?
has not been revicw~d very much by REG) shQ";.Js SOt:le troub]-,~
0.05 - 0.5 ft. 2 Other GS containments (s~311er 0= over/
under with ~eepcr vents, or other parameters dif[cre~t).
have problems not yet calcu-latc~ and, in some cases, worse than Ho.tch.
'V "eli ~. - ()~l .DECFIO::S
'r-- ----~-- ----------- --
/
a) Containment spray (particularly torus air s pac e spr<lY) \7C'~i lcl We cnnnot expect an operator 0 condense t 1t c. s t CeliU and L! e ~ -;,:c G.S C. the r,ravcyarc! shift to sort ou the pressure, but at enormous the pros and con~ of turning cost (ruin equipment in dry- oti the containree~t sprny, w~ll, maybe hnve to retire thus ruining his reactor) to reactor). In present designs, cope \*11 lh a trarsicnt he -only contain~cnt spray water is dimly undcrstan2s.
diverted fro:;\ the LPCIS, thus from Eces.
b) Inservice inspection of poten- b) Check the! valve ~.lu [f c~re-tial bypass leakage: corrosion, fully to make sure it cracks in vent pipes, nalfunc- doesn't increas~ (too ~u~~)
tioning valves. The Ha:ch the probability of f<1i1u:::e..
applicant offcrs an elaborate Push for adequate inspection I
scheme to inc~ica::e the' positions of valves and pipes.
of the: valves using rec1u:1cL:mt devices) and to allo~l rC;010te testing of the valves, but nothing in the H.JY of inspection.
DEcr STO:~S ication
--<..A.-______ ._ \
past and prcse~t CE prcss~re- co~~it~cnt to stu2y 2~d fix the problc~ in whatever 40 such ar~ already app~u~2d. way is fou~~. F6r back-Hatch-2 C? is th~ next ACRS fitting. wait until fixQ5 revie\.]. are studied and problem is scope:d.
b) CE wants us and ACRS not to mention the ~roblen publicI;. from nml on for plants They are afraid of delaying affected will have to 'fcss up. Hearings for CP s~0ul~
be satisfied ,;Hh a s<.:itab 1 commitment; if they're not.
maybe that's a suitable spu-::- to CE- to resolve the problel:l. In any event-, th is probably trouble for Vermont Yankee and Pilcri~
hearings; it will have to
)
DECISTO::S faced ~nd a real solutio~
found. All GE prc3sure stippression cases in hearinG
,*lill soon have to Get letters fio~ REG aboutth~ problen; better that they hear from us than from 2~ ACRS letter on. another caSe.
2 CP ACRS letter docs nat mention the problem, thus giving us a li:t c more time. The subject is dis-cussc~ in the ?ublicly aV0.ilaolc Hatch-2 docket as an ::mSiJer to a DRL question.