ML19340F019

Amend 3 to Environ Rept

ML19340F019
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	01/31/1981
From:	TEXAS UTILITIES CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19340F018	List: ML19340F017 ML19340F019
References
ENVR-810131, NUDOCS 8101160507
Download: ML19340F019 (2)

Text

.- - _ _ .. . __ _ -. _ . - _ . - - _._ - .

] CPSES/ER (0LS)

. COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION

! ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OPERATING LICENSE STAGE JANUARY 1981 AMENDMENT j INSTRUCTION SHEET I

Please remove the old sheets and insert the new sheets.

Remove Insert Front /Back Front /Back CHAPTER 8

T8.1-21 (2 Sheets) T8.1-21 (1 Sheet)

O i

i O

A3-1

-81 0116 0 501

. - - - - - _ - _ _ P me ,

CPSES/ER (0LS)

TABLE 8.1-21 PRINCIPAL BENEFITS OF COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Capacity, MWe 2,300 Average annual electrical energy generation 106MWhr 70% capacity factor 14.1 12.1 3 60% capacity factor 50% capacity factor 10.1 Other products Taxes Average Annual Local (property)(a) $628,651.56 State (a) 19,743.17 Federal (b) 0.00

$648,394.73 Regional Product Value added in value of output of businesses in project area corresponding to direct annual wages of employees, plus induced consumption and investment as result of multiplier effect. (See Section 8.1.4).

Environmental Enhancement Recreational uses of portion of shoreline and waters of Squaw Creek Reservoir. Reduced air pollution due to decrease in dependence upon use of fossil fuels for power generation.

Employment Estimated peak work force of 4,500 construction workers.

Nearly 200 permanent operating employees during life of plant.

(a) Based upon actual taxes paid in 1977 (see Section 8.1.2.3.1).

These values will be renegotiated with local authorities annually for future years.

(b) There is no significant net benefit in the form of increased federal taxes directly attributable to the CPSES project. CPSES is being constructed to replace a corresponding amount of oil and natural gas generation rather than to meet increased demand.

Net income from energy sales and the resultant federal taxes, would not be significantly affected if such demand were to be met by use of existing generating capacity. See Section 1.3.1 4

for further discussion.

AMENDMENT 3 JANUARY 1981 (7) u