(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22278A2962022-10-0505 October 2022 FAQ 22-02- Diablo Canyon Scram - Final Approved ML22276A2402022-10-0303 October 2022 1) FAQ Response Provided by NEI ML22179A0302022-06-22022 June 2022 Plants 1 and 2 - Response to Public Questions Regarding Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Neutron Embrittlement Coupon Testing - June 28, 2022 ML22166A4442022-06-15015 June 2022 Plants 1 and 2 - Response to Public Questions Regarding Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Neutron Embrittlement Coupon Testing - June 15, 2022 ML22206A2602022-05-23023 May 2022 FAQ 22-02- Diablo Canyon Scram - Proposed ML22144A1442022-05-23023 May 2022 FAQ 22-02 - Diablo Canyon Scram ML21060B1842021-03-0101 March 2021 Enclosure 1 - 1-26-21 Diablo Canyon Renewal pre-app Meeting Attendee List ML20141L7102020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 3, Part 2 of 2) ML20141L7092020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 3, Part 1 of 2) ML20141L7142020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 5, Part 2 of 2) ML20141L7152020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488, Parts 1 and 2) ML20141L7162020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2015-0071, Part 1 of 2) ML20141L7132020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 5, Part 1 of 2) ML20141L7122020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 4, Part 2 of 2) ML20141L7112020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2014-0488 4, Part 1 of 2) ML20141L7172020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. (Released Set of 2015-0071, Part 2 of 2) ML20141L7182020-05-14014 May 2020 NRC-2019-000279 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Released Set of New OE Docs (for NRC-2019-000279 Item 2) ML20262G9682020-03-19019 March 2020 Health Order 3.19.2020 ML16314A9642016-11-0909 November 2016 Summary of Hydrodynamic Effect in Spent Fuel Pool Auxiliary Building ML16314A9732016-11-0909 November 2016 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Checking Columns in Auxiliary Building Unit 1 for 7.5M Hosgri Vertical Acceleration ML16314D3162016-11-0909 November 2016 Comment Sheets ML16285A3232016-10-12012 October 2016 ROP PI Frequently Asked Questions (Faqs): 13-07 ML16179A2192016-06-27027 June 2016 LTR-16-0333-1 - Oedo Ticket - Edward D. Halpin, Senior Vice President, Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Letter Request to Suspend NRC Review of Diablo Canyon Power Plant License Renewal Application ML16084A6102016-03-30030 March 2016 MSFHI Tables 1&2 Final 3-24-2016 ML16054A0092016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 8 of 8 ML16054A0072016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Final Response #2, Records Already Publicly Available ML16054A0112016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 3 of 8 ML16054A0142016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 6 of 8 ML16054A0082016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 1 of 8 ML16054A0152016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 7 of 8 ML16054A0102016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 2 of 8 ML16054A0122016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 4 of 8 ML16054A0132016-02-12012 February 2016 FOIA/PA-2015-0294 - Resp 2 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed. Part 5 of 8 ML15344A4322016-01-12012 January 2016 DCPP Section 106 Checklist ML15237A3352015-08-21021 August 2015 Attachment 3 - A.15-02-023 Supplemental Testimony of John Geesman ML15237A3342015-07-14014 July 2015 Attachment 1 - A.15-02-023 Prepared Testimony of John Geesman ML15237A3232015-07-14014 July 2015 Attachment 2 - A.15-02-023 Prepared Testimony of Sam Blakeslee ML15070A6082015-03-11011 March 2015 Response to NRC Request for Info. Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident: Seismic Hazard Screening Report. Part 2 of 2 DCL-15-034, Final Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 Flooding. Part 2 of 22015-03-11011 March 2015 Final Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 Flooding. Part 2 of 2 ML15014A1602015-01-14014 January 2015 Attachment 2 - NRC Working Group Recommendations to Revise the Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue Process ML15014A1532015-01-14014 January 2015 Attachment 1- NEI Comments on NRC Working Group Recommendations to Revise the Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue Process ML14349A3872014-12-11011 December 2014 FOIA/PA-2014-0059 - Resp 2 - Final. Group C (Records Being Released in Part) ML14302A8062014-10-29029 October 2014 Enclosure - Ninety-Day Response to NRC Request for Additional Information - National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 ML13130A2282013-05-10010 May 2013 Safety Injection Issue Summary Pump 2-1 Issue Information DCL-13-021, Performance Demonstration Initiative (POI) Program Alternatives and Their Bases with Respect to ASME Code Section Xi, Appendix Viii Supplement 11 Requirements2013-03-0505 March 2013 Performance Demonstration Initiative (POI) Program Alternatives and Their Bases with Respect to ASME Code Section Xi, Appendix Viii Supplement 11 Requirements ML13078A2972013-03-0505 March 2013 Enclosure 1, Inservice Inspection (ISI) Relief Request REP-1 U2, Revision 2 in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i) ML13078A2932013-03-0505 March 2013 Performance Demonstration Initiative (POI) Program Alternatives and Their Bases with Respect to ASME Code Section Xi, Appendix Viii Supplement 11 Requirements DCL-12-119, Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Unit 2, Part 2 of 32012-11-27027 November 2012 Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Unit 2, Part 2 of 3 ML12333A2692012-11-27027 November 2012 Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Unit 2, Part 3 of 3 ML12333A2662012-11-27027 November 2012 Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Unit 1. Part 2 of 2 2022-06-22
[Table view] |
Text
Comments of the San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace on the NRC meeting on Emergency Preparedness on August 31 and September 1, 2005 Last week was a very strange time to be sitting in a room listening to experts on emergency preparedness tell us how prepared they are to respond to an emergency, while at the same time we were watching the complete and utter failure of FEMA to respond to Hurricane Katrina. We are seeing images and hearing stories of suffering that no one ever imagined would be allowed to happen in the United States. We may never fully know how many lives were lost because of the dangerously slow response of FEMA to the disaster caused by the hurricane. What we do know is that there were steps that could have been taken in advance to mitigate this tragedy. Experts have been warning for years that the levies needed to be upgraded and the wetlands restored to protect New Orleans from just the kind of disaster that we are seeing now. Clearly, in this case, as in the case of protection of the public from potential nuclear disaster, cost savings are put ahead of human life. We were told in the meeting that the distribution of potassium iodide in reactor communities is not "cost effective". This is just one more example of putting cost savings before health and safety. I hope we don't look back at nuclear power plant safety one day after an accident and see all of the things that could have been done to protect the public that were not done because someone thought they were not cost effective.
We heard from many local emergency planners about how prepared they are for a nuclear emergency. I hope they are correct. It was disturbing that many of them did not seem to acknowledge all of the very diverse geographic locations and population densities at each nuclear power plant site. In San Luis Obispo County, we have very limited options if we were ever to need to evacuate. Ijust received my water bill. Inside is a flyer that I enclosed. It is advertising a training class for individuals because the emergency planners here acknowledge that in a large scale disaster the first responders will not be able to get to people for at least 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> so we had better be able to take care of ourselves.
I was surprised to hear the representative from PG&E, Marl: I emke, l express his concerns about the staff at Diablo Canyon having time to take care of all of their responsibilities in the event of an emergency. If he is concerned about staffing levels, then we are very concerned and would like to be reassured that Diablo Canyon has adequate fully trained staff on site at all times.
As a group, the SLO Mothers for Peace was disappointed in the make up of the panel. We were not offered a chance to participate in the panel, nor was anyone from Indian Point or Public Citizen. I was surprised to see that David Lochbaum and Paul Gunter from NIRS were forced to share a seat and participate only half time. The panel and the discussion were heavily weighted toward the industry and the local planners.
The Mothers for Peace strongly supports the proposal by Eric Epstein of TMI Alert to create an ongoing advisory panel on emergency planning made up of representatives of advocacy groups, industry representatives and local planners. A day and a half of discussion is a start, but this is much too large an issue to address in such a short time. We encourage you to form such an advisory group that would meet regularly, both regionally and nationally. We need to take the lessons that we are learning from the tragedy in the Southeast and ensure that we are making serious and realistic emergency plans for the citizens living around nuclear power plants across the country.