NOC-AE-10002592, Request for Relief from ASME Section Xl Code Requirements for Steam Generator Nozzle Non-Destructive Examination (Relief Request RR-ENG-3-01)

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:50, 13 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Request for Relief from ASME Section Xl Code Requirements for Steam Generator Nozzle Non-Destructive Examination (Relief Request RR-ENG-3-01)
ML102700174
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 09/20/2010
From: Ruvalcaba M
South Texas
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NOC-AE-10002592, RR-ENG-3-01
Download: ML102700174 (4)


Text

Nuclear Operating Company South Texas Promect Electric Generat'n Station P.. Box 289 Wadsworth, Texas 77483 September 20, 2010 NOC-AE-10002592 File No.: G25 10 CFR 50.55a U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2746 South Texas Project Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. STN 50-498, STN 50-499 Request for Relief from ASME Section Xl Code Requirements for Steam Generator Nozzle Non-Destructive Examination (Relief Request RR-ENG-3-01)

In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i), the STP Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) requests relief from the ASME Section Xl code nondestructive examination requirements applicable to the South Texas Project steam generator main steam nozzle inside-radius sections. Due to their flow restrictor-type design, the South Texas Project steam generator main steam nozzles do not contain a high-stress inside-radius section for which the Section Xl volumetric examination is intended. Therefore, compliance with the Section Xl examination requirement is impractical.

There are no commitments in this correspondence.

STPNOC requests NRC review and approval of this relief request by March 1, 2011, to support implementation of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Ten Year Inservice Inspection Plan for the third inspection interval.

If-there are any questions, please contact either Mr. Philip Walker at 361-972-8392 or me at 361-972-7904.

/Marc~o Ruai caba*

Manager, Test and Programs Engineering PLW

Attachment:

Request for Relief from ASME Section Xl Code Requirements for Steam Generator Nozzle Non-Destructive Examination (Relief Request RR-ENG-3-01)

STI: 32733139

NOC-AE-1 0002592 Page 2 of 2 cc: (paper copy) (electronic copy)

Regional Administrator, Region IV A. H. Gutterman, Esq.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 4004 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 Mohan C. Thadani U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mohan C. Thadani Peter Nemeth Senior Project Manager Crain Caton & James, P.C.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North (MS 8 G14) 11555 Rockville Pike C. Mele Rockville, MD 20852 City of Austin Senior Resident Inspector E. Alarcon U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission K. Polio P. 0. Box 289, Mail Code: MN1 16 Richard Pena.

Wadsworth, TX 77483 City Public Service Board C. M. Canady John Ragan City of Austin C. Callaway, Esq.

Electric Utility Department J. von Suskil 721 Barton Springs Road NRG South Texas LP Austin, TX 78704 Richard A. Ratliff Alice Rogers Texas Department of State Health Services

Attachment 1 NOC-AE-1 0002592 Page 1 of 2 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM ASME SECTION Xl CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STEAM GENERATOR NOZZLE NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION (RELIEF REQUEST RR-ENG-3-01)

A. Components Affected (a) Component: Steam generator (b)

Description:

Main steam nozzle, inside-radius section (c) Class: ASME Code Class 2 B. Applicable Code Requirement The applicable code is ASME Section Xl, 2004 Edition (no addenda).

ASME Section Xl, Table IWC-2500-1, Code Category C-B, Item Number C2.22, requires that a volumetric examination of the inside-radius section of nozzles at terminal ends of piping runs be performed in accordance with Figure IWC-2500-4(a), (b), or (d) each inspection interval. The applicable nozzles include those welded to or integrally cast in vessels that connect to piping runs selected for examination under Examination Category C-F, excluding manways and handholes.

C. Basis for Relief from Code Requirements In accordance with the provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii), the STP Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) requests relief from the Section XI code requirement for a volumetric examination of the inside-radius section of the Unit 1 and 2 steam generator main steam nozzles because compliance with the requirement is impractical.

D. Alternative Examination:

No alternative examination is proposed in lieu of the volumetric examination for which relief is requested.

E. Justification for Granting Relief The inside-radius section of main steam nozzles is considered susceptible to flaw initiation and growth due to the high thermal and mechanical stresses associated with the vessel and connected piping systems. Each South Texas Project steam generator main steam nozzle is a one-piece forging with a set of seven holes bored parallel to the nozzle centerline. The design does not correspond to Figure Nos. IWC-2500-4(a), (b), or (d) and does not have a "radius bend". Furthermore, the borehole orientation precludes a meaningful ultrasonic examination in the area of the inner radius. Because of this design configuration, the examination required by Section Xl would not provide any meaningful results. In addition, because the ligaments between the holes distribute the stresses throughout the nozzle forging, the South Texas Project steam generator main steam nozzles have no high-stress inside-radius section.

Attachment NOC-AE-10002592 Page 2 of 2 These design considerations make the code-required inservice inspection impractical for application at the South Texas Project.

F. Implementation Schedule STPNOC requests relief from ASME Section Xl nondestructive examination requirements for the steam generator main steam nozzle inside radius sections for the duration of the third ten-year inservice inspection interval of Units 1 and 2. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is requested to review and approve this relief request by March 1, 2011, to support implementation of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Ten Year Inservice Inspection Plan for the third interval.

G. Precedent Relief from this examination requirement was previously approved by the NRC for the South Texas Project second 10-year interval inservice inspection program by safety evaluation dated December 15, 1999 (ML993570106) for Relief Request RR-ENG-2-2.