ML18128A268
| ML18128A268 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 04/30/2018 |
| From: | Radiation Safety & Control Services |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| OMY-18-015 | |
| Download: ML18128A268 (29) | |
Text
OMY-18-015 ENCLOSURE2 MAINEYANKEE INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY - DECEMBER 2017
MAINE YAN KEE INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION License Nos. DPR-36 and SFGL-14 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT January- December 2017 April 2018 Prepared by:
Radiation Safety & Control Services 91 Portsmouth Avenue Stratham, NH 03885-2468
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
The Maine Yankee Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) has been in operation since 2001. All fuel has been transferred into dry storage casks and placed at the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the Maine Yankee ISFSI located in Wiscasset, ME was continued for the period January through December 2017 in compliance with the Maine Yankee Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM).
By design, there are no liquid or gaseous effluents associated with the operation of the ISFSI. Therefore, the ODCM only requires monitoring of direct exposure from the facility. TLDs were used to measure direct gamma exposure at nine locations in the vicinity of the ISFSI and one control location 5.2 kilometers away. The results of these measurements showed no significant change in exposure rates and potential doses to members of the public during the monitoring period. The results of the monitoring performed in 2017 also show that operating the Maine Yankee ISFSI results in only a small fraction of the 40 CFR Part 190 and 1O CFR Part 72.104 direct radiation dose lirnit of 25 mrem/year to members of the public.
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 2 of 28
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section
1.0 INTRODUCTION
............................................................................................6 2.0 GENERAL ISFSI AND SITE INFORMATION ................................................7 3.0 PROGRAM DESIGN **1:1*1111**********111*****11111111111111111:1***************11*************1111111m*****l!l**************11D 7 3.1 MONITORING ZONES ........................................................................................... 7 3.2 PATHWAYS MONITORED ...................................................................................... 8
3.3 DESCRIPTION
OF MONITORING PROGRAM ............................................................ 8 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL DATA
SUMMARY
TABLES ............................................ 13 5.0 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS ............................................ 27 5.1 SAMPLING PROGRAM DEVIATIONS ..................................................................... 27 5.2 DIRECT RADIATION PATHWAY ............................................................................ 27
6.0 REFERENCES
- ci**********a***c1111p11ci&111111111111111111111111***1t***********************11*******11******28 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 3 of 28
LIST OF TABLES 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program .................................. ..,9 3.2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Locations ................................. 10 4.1 TLD Measurements by Haif-Year.. 11******************************11********D******************** 14 4.2 TLD Data Summary .................................................................................... 15 4.3 Direct Dose from ISFSI Operations ...........................................................16 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 4 of 28
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Locations (within 0.28 km) ..... 11 3.2 Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (outside 1 km) ........................... 12 4.1 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-02 ........ 11 *********** 11u*******t1*11 ***********11u1m ............. u ********* 18 4.2 Annual Dose Trend at Tlml-04 ****** acuunc*******ia*****************o*************c****n***n*** **** 19 4.3 Annual Dose Trend at TL-l-06 ....................................................................20 4.4 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-08 ....................................................................21 4.5 Annual Dose Trend at Tlml-10 ....................................................................22 4.6 Annual Dose Trend at Tl-l-12 ....................................................................23 4.7 Annual Dose Trend at Tl-1-14 ....................................................................24 4.8 Annual Dose Trend at TL-ia15 ....................................................................25 4.9 Annual Dose Trend at TL-l-16 ....................................................................26 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 5 of 28
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes the findings of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) conducted by Maine Yankee*in the vicinity of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation in Wiscasset, Maine during the calendar year 2017. It is submitted annually in compliance with Appendix A, of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). The remainder of this report is organized as follows:
Section 2: Provides a brief description of the Maine Yankee site and its environs.
Section 3: Provides a description of the overall REMP design. Included is a summary of the requirements for REMP sampling, tables listing routine TLD monitoring locations with compass sectors and distances from the ISFSI, and maps showing the location of each of the TLD monitoring locations.
Section 4: Provides a complete set of TLD data showing measured results (mR) and calculated doses (mrem per year). This section also provides the summarized exposure rate data in the format specified by the NRG Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring (Reference 1 ).
Section 5: Provides the results of the monitoring program. The performance of the program in meeting ODCM requirements is discussed, and the data acquired during the year is analyzed.
Section 6: References MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 6 of 28
2.0 GENERAL ISFSI AND SITE INFORMATION
- The Maine Yankee Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) is located in the town of Wiscasset, Lincoln County, Maine, approximately six miles northeast of Bath, Maine. The site vicinity is rural and lightly populated.
The ISFSI site is located near Bailey Point, a peninsula bounded to the east by the Back River and to the west by a shallow inlet known as Bailey Cove, both of which are part of the Montsweag Bay-Sheepscot River Estuary. Bailey point is an elongated bedrock ridge with flat or gently rolling topography rising to an average elevation of about 25 feet above sea level.
The REMP for the ISFSI began pre-operational measurements in the 4th quarter of 1999, approximately 2 years prior to the initial spent fuel transfer to the ISFSI.
The ISFSI REMP has been in continuous operation since this transfer began.
3.0 PROGRAM DESIGN The REMP for the Maine Yankee ISFSI was designed to provide assurance to regulatory agencies and the public that the station's environmental impact is known and within anticipated limits. The direct dose limit for members of the public from operation of the ISFSI is 25 mrem per year (References 3 and 4 ).
The detailed sampling requirements of the REMP are given in the ODCM. The sampling requirements specified in the ODCM are summarized in Table 3.1 of this report. Details of the monitored locations are shown in Table 3.2, as well as Figures 3.1 and 3.2 of this report.
3.1 Monitoring Zones The REMP is designed to allow comparison of levels of radioactivity in samples from the area possibly influenced by the ISFSI to levels found in areas not influenced by the ISFSI. The first area is called "indicator stations". The second area is called "control stations". The distinction between the two is based on relative direction from the facility and distance. Analysis of survey data from the two zones aids in determining if there is a significant difference between the two areas. It can also help in differentiating between radioactivity or radiation due to releases and that due to other fluctuations in the environment, such as seasonal variations in the natural background.
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 7 of 28 L__
3.2 Pathways Monitored Based on the design of the ISFSI, only the direct radiation exposure pathway is monitored by the REMP. This. pathway is monitored by the collection of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) which are described in more detail below.
3.3 Description of Monitoring Program 3.3.1 Direct Radiation Direct gamma radiation exposure was continuously monitored during 2017 with the use of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). At each monitoring location, these TLDs are sealed in plastic bags and attached to an object such as a tree, fence or utility pole. The TLDs are posted and retrieved on a semi-annual basis.
All TLDs are provided and processed by a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) certified vendor. The TLDs are placed at various locations around the ISFSI. Table 3.2 lists the Station ID Codes, distances and direction of the TLDs from the ISFSI.
3.3.2 Special Monitoring Special samples can be taken that are not required in the ODCM. No special samples were collected in 2017.
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 8 of 28
Table 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Exposure Collection Analvsis Pathway and/or Number of Routine Analysis Analysis Collection Sample Sample Sampling Type Frequency Frequency Media Locations Mode Direct Total Locations: 10 Continuous Semi- Gamma Semi-Radiation (9 around annual dose annual (TLD) perimeter of the site and 1 offsite control location)
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 9 of 28
1 Table 3.2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Locations Station Station Description Zone
. Distance From ISFSI Direction Code From ISFSI (km)
TL-1-02 Spent Fuel StoraQe (I)** 1 < 0.28 N TL-1-04 Spent Fuel StoraQe (I)** 1 < 0.28 NE TL-1-06 Spent Fuel StoraQe (I)** 1 < 0.28 E TL-1-08 Spent Fuel StoraQe (I)** 1 < 0.28 SE TL-1-10 Spent Fuel StoraQe (I)** 1 < 0.28 s TL-1-12 Spent Fuel StoraQe (I)** 1 < 0.28 SW TL-1-14 Spent Fuel StoraQe (I)** 1 < 0.28 w TL-1-15 Spent Fuel StoraQe (I)** 1 < 0.28 WNW TL-1-16 Spent Fuel StoraQe (I)** 1 < 0.28 NW TL-0-36 Wiscasset Fire Station (0) 2 5.2 NW
Figure 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Locations (within 0.28 km)
,A ,
- -
~* .
.!.~ qf~ LITTLE OAK ISLAND WalnB Ycnk.98* ISFS I SITE Plmi with 25 111"'"..ilyr Baiidcry**~
B~se<J o:, '760 Hl)J( .Annu¢.1 Oc:oup0rr,y
~lf~-'~ lr. , !',r.J,t* : , ~ ~
,,. i:,.;.;:...;;_....;.-~*
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 11 of 28
Figure 3.2 Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (outside 1 km)
,. ~,1,*\\
It .
F.
,,,:k.'I.
.r'<<:;,'t \\
,,,.
,I
!'
- ' co~ .,,
- ,I ',
.\ .. l
~***
'{*~,{*~
,.
- ,
p
'{!- .V~
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 12 of 28
4.0 RADIOLOGICAL DATA
SUMMARY
TABLES This section summarizes the analytical results of the environmental samples, which were collected during the monitoring period .
- Data from direct radiation measurements made by TLDs are presented in Table 4.1.
- The summarized TLD measurements, shown in Table 4.2 , are presented in a format similar to that prescribed in the NRC's Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring (Reference 1).
- Table 4.3 presents the estimated direct dose from ISFSI operations as determined by TLD data shown in Table 4.1.
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 13 of 28
Table 4.1 TLD Measurements by Half-Year (mR)
Station iD Direction 1st Half-Year 2nd Half-Year TL-1-02 N 36 46 TL-1-04 NE 37 48 TL-1-06 E 65 62 TL-1-08 SE 39 46 TL-1-10 s 46 50 TL-1-12 SW 47 50 TL-1-14 w 47 50 TL-1-15 WNW 46 62 TL-1-16 NW 47 47 TL-0-36 Control 42 47 TL-0-36a Control Backup 41 44 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 14 of 28
Table 4.2 TLD Data Summary (mR)
Indicator Station With Highest Indicator TLDs Control TLDs Mean Mean Mean Mean (Range) (Range) Station# (Range)
(No. Measurements)* (No. Measurements)* (No. Measurements)*
48.4 43 .5 TL-1-06 63.5 (36 - 65) (41 - 47) (62 - 65)
(18) (4) (2)
- Each "measurement" is based on semi-annual readings .
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 15 of 28
Table 4.3 Direct Dose from ISFSI Operations (mrem) 1st Half-Year 2nd Half-Year NetTLD Calculated Net TLD Calculated Annual Station ID Result Dose Result Dose Dose TL-1-02 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.02 0.02 TL-1-04 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.09 0.09 TL-1-06 23.50 0.87 16.50 0.61 1.48 TL-1-08 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.02 0.02 TL-1-10 4 .50 0.17 4.50 0.17 0.34 TL-1-12 5.50 0.20 4.50 0.17 0.37 TL-1 -14 5.50 0.20 4.50 0.17 0.37 TL-1-15 4 .50 0.17 16.50 0.61 0.78 TL-1-16 5.50 0.20 1.50 0.06 0.26 Max Dose=> 1.48 Note:
Doses based on a 162.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> occupancy in both of the first and second half-years .
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 16 of 28
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Trending A series of graphs of REMP TLD data have been developed and are provided for trending purposes. The trending is developed for each of the indicator locations based on the annual historical doses. The trending is provided for the "real members of the public" based on the guidance provided in the ODCM . The analysis of the trends and associated data shows very small annual doses with minor fluctuations in the data. In this report, the uncorrected TLD results have been summarized and the annual doses ,
calculated for "real members of the public" based upon guidance in the ODCM, have been plotted for trending.
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 17 of 28
Figure 4.1 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-02 Tl-1-02 30.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.S.QO +---------------------
'" 20.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--
- >
~ 15.0Q - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.;. .....,_TL,,1-02 E **1 0.00 +------------------.,.,.......,,,....- - 1im1t 5 .00 -. ..-.~-5= - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - ~
0.17 0. 5 0.08 0.30 0.00 0.14 O.Q7 0.00 0.04 0 .09 0.02 0.00 H~....-i,_.-..,.....,...,...-4*~_.._-4. ......,...,._...,_
. .........,_.,_~.,.......c1~......._,
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 201!5 2017 Year Annual Doses (mrem/yr)
Location 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TL-1-02 0.17 0.55 0.08 0.30 0.00 0.14 0.07 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.02 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 18 of 28
Figure 4.2 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-04 TL-1-04 30.00 . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.00 +--------------------
"' 20.00 -'!---------------------
>
- -"
~ 15.00 - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.--T-l~-,-0-4 e 10.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . .-. , .limit --
5.00 +------- --------------
0 .01 0.12 0 .10 J.: J 0.09 0.13 0.06 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.0;9 0 .00 .~ *- ~ - ~ A - a A T T - ~ ~
- T T Tl~ -
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Annual Doses (mrem/yr)
Location 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TL-1-04 0.01 0.12 0.10 1.45 0.09 0.13 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 19 of 28
-- 1 I
Figure 4.3 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-06 TL-1-06 30.00 . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.00 +--------------------
,.. 20.00 - -- - -- ---------------
<:.
~*1s.oo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
... - t -TL-f.-06.
s 10.00* - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -Hrnit --
Soo
- , *
+.t-"'t"l""-HiA-~
- 1.LJ. * * - -
- ~ n~* ,H- ~-.-4~-~~G,CS
~ -- -
- -..-..,.,.-,.,.
- wn-~m-~ - 1""'"h~
~ . ~ * * ~ 1.15 0.99 1.30 1.28 l .4o 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Annual Doses (mrem/yr)
Location 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TL-1-06 1.21 1.68 2.04 1.65 1.74 1.65 1.15 0.99 1.30 1.28 1.48 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 20 of 28
Figure 4.4 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-08 TL-1-08
'30.00 . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.00 +--------------------
.. 20.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
,::::
.~ 15.0Q + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.-Tl--1--08 -
E .
10.00 +-------------------..-..--*****""'lim-,""'t-5 *00 - o .-3s~ o,,.,,.1""'0- o-.3 o- .1
- o_o_.4_s _ o_. o-.o-4~ 0 .-26
- o-.o o-.1-3-o- .-
02~
0.00 J.-fllld~~. .--,e~~b!-*-ie=!!.......,.....~-... - _ . . ~.....* -,..~~.........
2(XJ7 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016' 2017 Year Annual Doses (mrem/yr)
Location 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TL-1-08 0.35 0.70 0.38 0.70 0.48 0.70 0.04 0.26 0.04 0.13 0.02 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 21 of 28
Figure 4.5 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-10 TL-1-10 30.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.00 +--------------------
... 20.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
f...
15.00 - - - - -- - - - - - - ~- - - - -- ~
-+-TL-J-10 E 10.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . -'"""
lim
_ J,.,..
t-s.oo +--- - - - -o~a=,._~ - - - - -- - - - - - -
0.48 0.49 0.26 * ,., 0.53 0.41 0.23 0.21 0.26 0 .46 0.34 0.00 µ *~~*......~~....~~~.............,.......,..............
. ..........-,
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Annual Doses (mrem/yr)
Location 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TL-1-10 0.48 0.49 0.26 0.85 0.53 0.41 0.23 0.21 0.26 0.46 0.34 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 22 of 28
Figure 4.6 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-12 TL-1-12 30.00 . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.00 +--------------------
.. 20.00 +--------------------
~
~ 15.00 ....... TL-1-12 E 10.00 + - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ----.---nlirr-1,.,..it-s.oo - o .-os- .,o".1"" *~r--
o-.1-o - o=-.=
6 1:---o-,2-,s - o.-
41- 0-.1-3...,.
0 .....
so , .-o- .1 o-.2-s - o- .3- 7~
0.00 . i. . . . ...,..-p.e!!l~e::.-..:......~......~-...- ..:....e:!i~..........~.._..._ ...... .
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Annual Doses (mrem/yr)
Location 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TL-1-12 0.05 0.79 0.10 0.61 0.25 0.41 0.13 0.80 0.19 0.28 0.37 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 23 of 28
Figure 4.7 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-14 TL-1-14 30.00 . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.00 +--------------------
... 20.00 +--------------------
! ...
15.00 - - - ~ -- - -~---------~~
-+-TL-1-14
.E 10.c:io +------------------..,.,..-,.,-- - Hm1t s .oo - 0.-
30_ 0_.s=s- o-.2 o- .4- o--=o...,,.6=1 . 0-.2-s- o. o-.s- =2-o-.4-:'6."- o- .3 o.oo µ ...~~.......-~-~~...........~........~~~~...........
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Annual Doses (mrem/yr)
Location 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TL-1-14 0.30 0.55 0.23 0.40 0.67 0.22 0.28 0.37 0.52 0.46 0.37 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 24 of 28
Figure 4.8 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-15 TL-1-15 30.00 - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.00 1--------------------
... 20.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~
~ 15.00 - - - - - ~ - - - ~ - - ~ ~ - - - - - -
.. ...,._TL-1-15 E 10;00 +------------------. - , ,. . . . , ,. .-
ltm.it s.oo - 0. 0-.6=7~ 0.=
7 6= --'0~.8""1~ 0-. s_7 _ 0_.6_6_ 0_.5_0_ 0_4_ 1_ 0_.2_2_. -0.-69
- -0~..7=-=- 8 0.00 I -A~~.~~~~*~~~*~=-,~~~
-t- ......-A~,....~~~~~.L.,
2007 200a 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201s 2016 2011 Vear Annual Doses (mrem/yr)
Location 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TL-1-15 0.30 0.67 0.76 0.87 0.57 0.66 0.50 0.41 0.22 0.69 0.78 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 25 of 28
Figure 4.9 Annual Dose Trend at TL-1-16 TL-1-16 30;()0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.00 +--------------------
.. 20.00 +--------------------
~
~ 15.00
...
+--------'"----~------------- -+-TL-1-16 E .
10,00 ------------------.- ."""'nm-,,_t_ .,.
5 *00 - 0.-
44- o-.1-r1- o-.
3 o""'.8
"'- 9~ 0-.6 -o .-
45- 0-.3 0. o-.3-0-: _o_.s_a _ o_.2_ 6_
6.bo µ~-~*~~~~-~~~- .......~*~*,~..-..~~~._...__, .
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 year Annual Doses (mrem/yr)
Location 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TL-1-16 0.44 0.77 0.36 0.89 0.66 0.45 0.34 0.59 0.30 0.58 0.26 MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 26 of 28
5.0 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS 5.1 Sampling Program Deviations A sampling program deviation is defined as samples that are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions or to malfunction of sampling equipment. Such deviations do not compromise the program 's effectiveness and in fact are considered insignificant with respect to what is normally anticipated for this Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program .
There was one deviation of the sampling program in 2017. During a routine walk of the site, a Security Force Member observed a small Dry Pak on the ground on the other side of the old access road (northeast of the Protected Area). This was REMP TLD TL-1-06. This TLD was re-attached to a tree at the correct location using a black ultraviolet light resistant tie wrap. Subsequently, the TLD was removed from the tree and placed on a steel post in the same general area as it was previously located. There is no impact on the REMP from this deviation.
5.2 Direct Radiation Pathway 5.2.1 Annual Dose Trends Direct radiation is continuously measured at 9 indicator locations surrounding the Maine Yankee ISFSI , along with 1 control location (Wiscasset Fire Station) using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). These dosimeters are collected every six months for readout at the NVLAP certified dosimetry services vendor.
Review of the data in Figures 4.1 through 4.9 shows no significant difference in annual doses over time at the indicator locations and their relation to the 25 mrem/yr limit.
5.2.2 Direct Doses from ISFSI Operations A dose estimate is the potential dose to any real member of the public that could use portions of the site or be present adjacent to the site for recreational activities throughout the year. Direct exposure above background can be estimated by subtracting the average TLD value of the control station from the indicator location measurements. As in previous years, the 2017 dose estimate assumes a total of 325 hours0.00376 days <br />0.0903 hours <br />5.373677e-4 weeks <br />1.236625e-4 months <br /> occupancy for the dose calculation ; of which 162.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> are MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 27 of 28
used in both the first and second half-years. The most likely location for exposure to a member of the public from the ISFSI is along the Back River, Bailey Cove or Montsweag Bay for boating and fishing and the mud flats in the Cove or Bay exposed at low tides which is worked by clam diggers and worm diggers; however, the time estimates are conservatively applied to all monitoring locations.
Table 4.3 presents the results of the dose calculations . The highest calculated dose is at Station ID number TL-1-06. The maximum calculated annual dose at that location is 1.48 mrem . This value is only 6 percent of the 25 mrem per year limit. It is noted that most of the mud flat region in Bailey Cove that is used by the public is situated further away from this Station . As a result, actual exposures from direct radiation would be much less than the maximum calculated value .
6.0 REFERENCES
- 1. USNRC Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position , "An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program," Revision 1, November 1979.
- 2. Maine Yankee Offsite Dose Calculation Manual , Revision 36 .
- 3. 40 CFR Part 190, "Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation".
- 4. 10 CFR Part 72 .104, "Criteria for Radioactive Materials in Effluents and Direct Radiation from an ISFSI or MRS".
MY 2017 Annual REO Report Page 28 of 28