ML11346A570

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:48, 20 August 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Watch'S Request to Supplement Petition for Review of Memorandum and Order (Denying Pilgrim Watch'S Requests for Hearing on Certain New Contentions) ASLBP No. 06-848-02-LR, August 11, 2011 (Filed August 26, 2011) and Pilgrim Watch'S Petition
ML11346A570
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 12/12/2011
From: Lampert M
Pilgrim Watch
To:
NRC/OCM
SECY RAS
References
RAS 21524, 50-293-LR, ASLBP 06-848-02-LR
Download: ML11346A570 (2)


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

) ) Entergy Nuclear Generation Co. and

) Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

) Docket No.

50-293-LR ) ) ASLBP No. 06-848-02-LR (Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station)

December 12,2011

PILGRIM WATCH'S REQUEST TO SUPPLEMENT PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (DENYING PILGRIM WATCH'S REQUESTS FOR HEARING ON CERTAIN NEW CONTENTIONS) ASLBP NO.

06-848-02-LR, AUGUST 11, 2011 (FILED AUGUST 26, 2011) AND PILGRIM WATCH'S PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (DENYING PILGRIM WATCH'S REQUESTS FOR HEARING ON NEW CONTENTIONS RELATING TO FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT

) SEPT. 8, 2011 (FILED SEPTEMBER 23, 2011)

Pilgrim Watch requests to supplement the record in its two Petition s for Review currently before the Commission by adding to those records a report (including all the documents cited and hyper-linked to that report) by Congressman Edward Markey titled Regulatory Meltdown How Four Nuclear Regulatory Commissioners Conspired to Delay and Weaken Nuclear Reactor Safety in the Wake of Fukushima , 1dated December 9, 2011 after the Board decisions below and after the request for admission was filed with the Commission

. The Markey report is relevant to all of the five contentions involved in the two requests for review now before the Commission. The first Request for Review concerns clean

-up costs in

1 The report is attached and available on line at: http://markey.house.gov/docs/regulatory_meltdown_report_final_w_attachments.pdf

the event of a severe accident and electric reliablity. The second Requests for Review concern s the probability of an accident, including hydrogen explosions, the effectiveness of the Direct Torus Vent, the duration of an accident requiring modeling, and likely significantly larger offsite consequences.

The attached supplement is filed in fullfillment of Pi lgrim Watch's obligation to suppl ement its filings with pertinent and signficant new information.

Respectfully submitted

Signed electronically by

,

Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332

Tel. 781-934-0389 Email mary.lampert@comcast.net December 12, 2011

December 12, 2011 On December 12, 2011, Pilgrim Watch notified all parties of record via email of its intent to make this filing. Paul Gaukler, representing Entergy, indicated that Entergy objects. Susan Uttal, NRC, objects. Matthew Brock, Assistant Attorney General, Commonwealth of Massachusetts does not object

.