ML090570036

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:04, 12 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(OCNGS) - Audit of the Exelon'S Management of Regulatory Commitments
ML090570036
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 02/27/2009
From: Geoffrey Miller
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Pardee C
Exelon Generation Co
Miller, G. Edward, 415-2481
References
RIS-00-017, TAC ME0362
Download: ML090570036 (10)


See also: RIS 2000-17

Text

UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

February 27, 2009 Mr. Charles G.

Pardee President

and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation

Company 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 SUB..OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING

STATION (OCNGS) -AUDIT OF EXELON'S MANAGEMENT

OF REGULATORY

COMMITMENTS (TAC NO. ME0362) Dear Mr. Pardee:

In Regulatory

Issue Summary 2000-17, "Managing

Regulatory

Commitments Made by Power

Reactor Licensees to the NRC Staff," dated

September

21,2000, the U. S.

Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) informed licensees that the Nuclear Energy Institute

document NEI 99-04, "Guidelines

for Managing NRC Commitment

Changes," contains acceptable

guidance for controlling

regulatory

commitments

and encouraged

licensees to use the NEI

guidance or similar administrative

controls to ensure that regulatory

commitments

are implemented and that changes to the regulatory

commitments

are evaluated and, when

appropriate, reported to the NRC. The NRC Office of

Nuclear Reactor Requtation has

instructed

its staff to perform an

audit of licensees'

commitment

management

programs once every 3 years to determine

whether the licensees'

programs are consistent with the industry guidance in NEI 99-04, and

that regulatory

commitments are being

effectively

implemented. An audit of

OCNGS's commitment

management program was

performed

during January and February 2009, including

activities

at Exelon's office in

Kennett Square, PA on February 24, 2009. The NRC

staff concludes, based on the audit, that OCNGS has implemented

an acceptable program for

implementing

and managing NRC commitments. Details of the audit are set forth in the

enclosed audit report. G. dward Miller, Project Man ger Plant Licensing

Branch 1-2 Division of

Operating

Reactor Licensing Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket No. 50-219 Enclosure:

Audit Report cc w/encl: Distribution

via ListServ

UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

AUDIT REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

LICENSEE MANAGEMENT

OF REGULATORY

COMMITMENTS

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING

STATION DOCKET NO. 50-219 1.0 INTRODUCTION

AND BACKGROUND

In Regulatory

Issue Summary 2000-17, "Managing

Regulatory

Commitments

Made by Power Reactor Licensees to the NRC Staff," dated September

21,2000, the U. S.

Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) informed licensees that the Nuclear Energy Institute

document NEI 99-04, "Guidelines

for Managing NRC Commitment

Changes," contains acceptable

guidance for controlling

regulatory

commitments

and encouraged

licensees to use the NEI

guidance or similar administrative

controls to ensure that regulatory

commitments

are implemented and that changes to the regulatory

commitments

are evaluated

and, when appropriate, reported to the NRC. The NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) has instructed

its staff to perform an audit of licensees'

commitment

management

programs once every 3 years to determine

whether the licensees'

programs are consistent with the industry guidance in NEI 99-04, and that regulatory

commitments are being

effectively

implemented.

NEI-99-04

defines a "regulatory

commitment" as an explicit statement

to take a specific action agreed to, or volunteered by, a licensee and submitted

in writing on the docket to the NRC.

NRR guidelines

direct the NRR Project Manager to audit the licensee's

commitment

management

program by assessing

the adequacy of the licensee's

implementation of a sample of commitments

made to the NRC in past licensing

actions (amendments, reliefs, exemptions, etc.) and activities (bulletins, generic letters, etc.). The

audit is to be performed

every 3 years. 2.0 AUDIT PROCEDURE

AND RESULTS An audit of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating

Station (OCNGS) commitment

management

program was performed at the NRC Headquarters

using documentation

provided by the licensee and at the

licensee's

Kennett Square office during the period of January and February 2009. The

audit reviewed commitments

made since the

previous audit in January 2004. The

audit consisted of two major parts: (1)

verification of the licensee's

implementation of NRC commitments

that have been completed, and (2) verification of the licensee's

program for managing changes to NRC commitments.

Enclosure

-2Verification

of Licensee's

Implementation of NRC Commitments The primary focus of this part of the audit is to confirm that the

licensee has implemented

commitments made to the NRC as part of past licensing

actions/activities. For commitments not yet implemented, the NRC

staff determines

whether they have been captured in an

effective program for future

implementation. Audit Scope The audit addressed a sample of

commitments made during the

review period. The audit focused on

regulatory

commitments (as defined

above) made in writing to the NRC as a result of past licensing actions (amendments, exemptions, etc.) or licensing activities (bulletins, generic letters, etc.).

Commitments made in Licensee

Event Reports or in response to Notices of Violation may be included in the sample, but the

review will be limited to verification of restoration of

compliance, not the specific methods used. Before the audit, the NRC

staff searched the

Agencywide

Documents Access and

Management

System (ADAMS) for the licensee's

submittals since the last audit and selected a

representative sample for verification. The audit excluded the

following types of commitments that are internal to licensee processes: Commitments made on the

licensee's own initiative

among internal organizational

components. (Note: the internal

self-assessment

and subsequent transition to the Exelon Passport program was audited as an

indicator of the commitment to the process.) Commitments that pertain to

milestones of licensing

actions/activities (e.g., respond to an NRC request for

additional

information by a certain date).

Fulfillment of these commitments

was indicated by the fact that the

subject licensing

action/activity

was completed. Commitments made as an internal reminder to take

actions to comply with existing

regulatory

requirements such as regulations, technical

specifications, and updated final

safety analysis reports.

Fulfillment of these commitments was indicated by the licensee

having taken timely action in accordance

with the subject requirements. Audit Results Table 1 contains a list of those

documents that were selected for

additional

review during this

audit. The NRC staff found that the

licensee's

commitment

tracking program had captured all the

regulatory

commitments that were identified by the NRC staff before the audit. The NRC staff also reviewed plant

procedures, assessment

recommendations, work orders, corrective

actions, training, qualification

certifications and action requests that had been initiated or revised as a result of

commitments made by the licensee to NRC. The program has a

requirement that the licensee perform an annual

review and assessment

of site and corporate

commitments. The most recent OCNGS annual

review was reviewed by the

-NRC staff. The annual review appeared thorough, addressing over 300 items. It identified isolated concerns with

procedure annotation. Further, the NRC

staff found that appropriate corrective actions were initiated.

2.2 Verification of the Licensee's Program for Managing NRC

Commitment

Changes The primary focus of this part of the audit is to verify that the licensee has

established

administrative controls for

modifying or deleting

commitments made to the NRC. The NRC staff compared the

licensee's

process for controlling

regulatory

commitments to the guidelines

in NEI-99-04, which the NRC has found to be an

acceptable guide for

licensees to follow for managing and changing

commitments. The process used at

OCNGS is contained in 110 -Revision 6, "Commitment

Management." The audit reviewed a sample of

commitment changes that included

changes that were or will be reported to the NRC, and changes that were not or will not be reported to the NRC. The audit also verifies that the

licensee's

commitment

management

system includes a mechanism to ensure

traceability

of commitments

following

initial implementation.

This ensures that licensee personnel are able to recognize that future proposed changes to the

affected design features or operating

practices require evaluation in

accordance with the commitment change control process.

2.2.1 Audit Results Table 1 contains a list of those

documents that were selected for

additional review during this

audit. The NRC staff reviewed the

licensee's procedure LS-AA-110, Revision 6,. Section 6.1 of the procedure lists NEI 99-04 as a reference. The NRC

staff found that LS-AA-11 0

generally follows the

guidance of NEI 99-04 and provides detailed

instructions for making regulatory commitments, tracking

regulatory

commitments, annotating

documents to provide

traceability

of commitments, and for making

changes to commitments.

Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that the procedure used by the

licensee to manage

commitments provides the

necessary attributes for an

acceptable

commitment

management

program. The NRC Staff noted that a

self-assessment had been performed since the last NRC audit and the potential concern identified in the previous NRC audit about the use of multiple

commitment

tracking systems was addressed.

Three recommendations from the self-assessment

were entered into the

commitment tracking program and acted upon. One of the

recommendations that OCNGS

transition to the Passport tracking program (Exelon

fleet-wide

system) from the use of multiple

programs addressed the previous potential concern.

Another recommendation

addressed

verification

of proper annotation after the transfer. Related

procedure

LS-AA-110-1001, Revision 4, "Commitment Tracking Program T&RM for Use with Passport," was also reviewed. The NRC staff also reviewed

documents that had been created or revised as a result of

commitments made by the

licensee to the NRC. The

staff noted that, except as noted below, the revised

documents

have annotations referring to

commitments as part of the

commitment change control process.

These annotations serve to prevent the

commitments

from inadvertently being deleted or altered without having gone through the

commitment

change process. The NRC observed that in response to one

commitment (Item 1 in Table 1)

-emergency

procedures were revised, an operations briefing

developed and the training program augmented. It was

further observed that one of the revised

procedures, 2000-GLN-3200.01 (Plant Specific

Technical

Guidelines for the Symptom Based

Emergency Operating Procedures) was annotated

consistent with the procedural requirements. However, the "EOP Support

Procedure

7" referenced in the

commitment (and referenced by

2000-GLN-3200.01) was not annotated. As a result of

discussions during this audit, an entry was made into the corrective action program to evaluate the annotation

requirements

and determine if there are any extended implications.

3.0 CONCLUSION As discussed above, the

licensee's procedure used to

implement and manage commitments provides the

necessary

attributes for an acceptable

commitment

management

program. 4.0 LICENSEE PERSONNEL

CONTACTED FOR THIS AUDIT Richard Gropp

Calvin Taylor John Hufnagel Pam Cowan Principal Contributor: D. Egan

-Item Source Commitment

Timeframe

Comments 1 Source: 1/24/07 letter 20448, Summary of Commitments. Second item. (ML07031 01010) Oyster Creek [emergency

operations

procedure]

EOP Support Procedure 7 will be revised to direct the

Operator to inject the entire

contents of the Liquid Poison tank in the event that a [loss

of coolant accident]

LOCA is in progress. Include these EOP

changes and their basis in Licensed

Operator Training, and update the EOP User's Guide to include the use of sodium pentaborate for pH control of the

suppression

pool under LOCA conditions.

Upon implementation

of approved amendment.

Procedure

EMG-SP7 -not annotated (revised parent document annotated)

RCMT 189765-48

2 Source: 7/3/08 letter 060, Attachment 2. First item on page 9 and last

item on page 10. (ML0819308020) First item on page 9:

Oyster Creek will

follow the guidelines in Section

11.3.6.5 of NUMARC 93-01, Rev. 3 during refueling within

containment.

Plant procedures will be revised, as

appropriate, to implement

these guidelines. Last item on oaae 10: The

following

secondary

containment

potential

openings will remain closed during refueling activities

under administrative

controls:

  • Ventilation

ductwork below siding

structure

on west side of

Reactor Building (north end of west

wall) * Ventilation

ductwork below siding

structure

on west side

of Reactor Building (south end of west

wall) * Trunion Room Doors to

Turbine Building * Reactor Building

Commodities (flanged) penetration on north RB wall

  • MAC Facility Doors

Upon implementation

of approved amendment. Note: This

License Amendment

Request has not been approved.

The commitments

associated with License

Amendment

Request are being tracked

under Passport Action Requests 642132 and 828005. This issue is still

under review by the NRC. The

commitments

associated

with this License

Amendment

Request will be implemented

as approved by the NRC.

Table 1

-6 Item Source Commitment

Timeframe

Comments 3 Source; 2/2/07 letter 20450, Page 4.

Corrective action planned

item. (ML0703803170) The new pressure switch

performance will be monitored for a year to

determine

if periodic replacement of the pressure switches is

warranted. One year after

[license event report] LER

submittal.

IR 567038 -Actions initiated by the corrective

action program have resulted in

identifying

adverse trends on

[electromagnetic relief valve]

EMRV instruments.

Actions initiated by the [corrective

actions] have resulted in

implementing

replacement

of the pressure switches and control relays and

establishing

routine replacement

[preventative

maintenance]

tasks. 4 Source: 3/28/05 letter 20040, Page 1

of attachment. Item listed (ML0509042340) To ensure that the

Standby Liquid Control system is initiated in the event of a [large break] LOCA, the

Oyster Creek [EOPs] will be revised as required. Within 90 days of NRC issuance of license amendment.

Procedures

EMG-SP7, 3200.01 (refer also to Item 1)

RCMT 189765-48

Table 1

-7 Item Source Commitment

Timeframe

Comments 5 Source: 3/31/05 letter 20062, Attachment

2. Second item. (ML0509600680) Revise the

administrative

procedure for control

of EOP documents (CC-AA-309, Control of Design

Analysis)

to include instructions to use the

appropriate

configuration control process to revise the plant

specific technical

guidelines (PSTG) Appendix C criteria.

CAP 1986-12 was

completed

on 12/02/2004

AD-OC-103, "EOP/SAM [severe accident mitigation] Program Control," includes

annotations associated with

the implementation of this commitment.

  • Section 4.1.3.13 -Any change to a design input, setpoint, used in

Appendix C to the PSTGs shall be

controlled

in accordance with CC-AA-102, "Design Input and

Configuration

Change Impact Screening.

2) * Section 4.1.3.14 -All changes to the calculations

in Appendix C to the PSTGs shall be

controlled

in accordance with Procedure 309, "Control of Design

Analyses." (CM-2) RCMT 620989-05

Table 1

-8 Item Source Commitment

Timeframe

Comments 6 Source: Attachment 3 of Self-Assessment. Page 7, second and third

DC items and Page 10 -DC items. Page 7 * Verification of

proper annotation of

current commitments using

PassPort after data transfer.

(487012-10)

  • Transfer of data to

PassPort and train site on

proper commitment

management.

(487012-10) Page 10 * Lotus Notes

Database currently not site-wide searchable and known

commitments may be missed. (IR 380386)

Actions Completed

IR 487012-10 (references

IR 528865-48)

IR 380386 -01,02,03,04, and 05 Internal actions completed as a result of

self-assessment

7 Commitment

Change Evaluation

Forms. * Commitment

Tracking Numbers08-006, R1,08-002

Procedural

requirements

completed

Attachment 1 from 110 Commitment

changes requiring both the need to inform and not inform NRC

Table 1

Mr. Charles G. Pardee President and

Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation

Company 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING

STATION (OCNGS) -AUDIT OF EXELON'S MANAGEMENT

OF REGULATORY

COMMITMENTS (TAC NO. ME0362) Dear Mr. Pardee: In Regulatory Issue

Summary 2000-17, "Managing

Regulatory

Commitments Made by Power

Reactor Licensees to the NRC Staff," dated

September

21,2000, the U. S.

Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) informed

licensees that the Nuclear Energy Institute

document NEI 99-04, "Guidelines

for Managing NRC Commitment

Changes," contains acceptable

guidance for controlling regulatory

commitments

and encouraged licensees to use the NEI

guidance or similar administrative

controls to ensure that regulatory

commitments are implemented and that

changes to the regulatory

commitments are evaluated and, when

appropriate, reported to the

NRC. The NRC Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation has instructed its

staff to perform an audit of

licensees'

commitment

management programs once every 3 years to

determine

whether the licensees'

programs are consistent with the industry gUidance in NEI 99-04, and that regulatory

commitments are being

effectively

implemented. An audit of

OCNGS's commitment

management program was

performed during January and February 2009, including

activities at Exelon's office in Kennett Square, PA on February 24, 2009. The NRC

staff concludes, based on the audit, that OCNGS has

implemented

an acceptable program for

implementing and managing NRC

commitments. Details of the audit are set forth in the

enclosed audit report.

Sincerely, G. Edward Miller, Project

Manager Plant Licensing Branch

1-2 Division of Operating

Reactor Licensing Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-219

Enclosure:

Audit Report cc w/encl: Distribution

via ListServ DISTRIBUTION:

Public LPL1-2 Reading

Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR

Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2

Resource RidsNrrPMEMiller

Resource RidsNrrLAABaxter

Resource RidsOgc Resource

RidsRgn1 MailCenter

Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr

Resource ACCESSION

No'.. ML090570036 NRR-106 * via email

OFFICE LPLI-2\PM

LPLI-2\PM

LPLI-2\LA

LPLI-2\BC

NAME GMiller DEgan ABaxter HChernoff

DATE 2/27109 02/26/09 02/27/09*

2/27109 OFFICIAL RECORD