ML16053A207

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:28, 27 April 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC - NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Revision 0, Appendix B, EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment
ML16053A207
Person / Time
Site: Northwest Medical Isotopes
Issue date: 02/03/2015
From: McManus G
Northwest Medical Isotopes, Portage
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16053A221 List:
References
NWMI-LTR-2016-002 EDF-3124-0004, NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Rev. 0
Download: ML16053A207 (7)
v • d • e


Text

NWMI-201 6-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix B -EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment B-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0004 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: February 3, 2015 Engineering Design File Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Construction Activities From Construction Equipment Portage Project No.: 3124 Title: NWMI Environmental Report Project 4Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 TEM-9(X02 09I29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 5 2. ProjectfTask:

NWMI Environmental Report 1. Portage Project No.: 3124 3. DCN #4. Title: Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities

5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A *1 6. SSC Safety Category:

N/A 7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated.

Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval (A) Signaures aPrinte Naniel: Author/Design Agent A Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__Independent Review R Project Manager R/A John Belier /////2/3/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) N/A TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0004 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5 Introduction and Purpose To determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated.

Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.Methodology Earthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methods for calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5 (updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100) where: E = Emissions (pound [lb])A = Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)EF = Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)ER = Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)Assumptions Table I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations.

The assumptions include the type of activities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities, and the amount of material moved.Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust Calculations Bulldozing 1 100 N/IA' N/IA'Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120: 1 o, 8...Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1 60 10,886 b 12,000 b Compacting 1 80 N/A' N/A'Moto grading 1 80N/Ac /A a Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.

b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd 3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm 3).SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.N/A = not applicable.

Other assumptions include the following.

  • Silt content: 25 percent* Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42* Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour

[hr]): 8.86 mi/hr* Material moisture content: 20 percent* Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hr Vehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 3 of 5 Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 and Section 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote.

The equations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying the results of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.Table 2. Emission Factors Equations-.9 9 ---S. -9. -.* -S ~* S -S 0.- * -- S Bulldozing 8 c2ompacting 8: Motor grading8 excavatorsb' Loading earth haulers from front loadersb Ulanglf tralfrom 0i.3 (Mj)1.4 0.040 (s)2 5 0.051 (s)2°k(0.0032).*(U/5)l.

3/(M/2)1.4 (0 0032Y'(U/5) 10.75

  • EF<_IS 0.75 EF 5 , 0.6
  • E<0.35 0.105* EFTsp 0.031
  • EFTn, 0.053 Ib/lir lb/VMT lb/ton i!03!5,:0.053 lb/ton i i r .....i I'i *n ............

EF k M s a AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.

b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.= emission factor. S =mean vehicle speed (mi/br).= scaling factor for particle size. TSP = total suspended particulate.

=material moisture content (%) U = mean wind spe (mi/br).= silt content (%). VMT =vehicle miles traveled.Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown in Table 3 through Table 8.Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />)EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)(0.20)'4 8.92E-_ l/h Total =EF<zi0um

  • 100 hr EFTotemission factor.9.19E-01 lb/hr 9.19E+01 lb EF = emission factor.

TEM-9002 09129109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 5 Table 4. Compacting (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />)EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)(0.20)' " 9.19E-01 lb/hr: Tolal 1b05~ = EFi7~ *80'/1V~ hr ff.35E+0l lb EF = emission factor.Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> at 2.5 miles/hour)

I~b i EF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)

Total Ib_<1 o 0= EF<1oum(2.5)(80) 1E.01 lb/V-MT:3.8E a ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)

Total lb<z~u EF~2 s(2~5)(80) 1 .23E-02 2.45E+00 Ib/VMT lb EF = emission factor. VMT = vehicle miles traveled.Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I 3 s lb/ton (M/2)' 4 5.2-2l/ton Total lb<l~n = *I EF = emission factor.8.96E-03 lb/ton Total ...... E~25~m 1 .08E+02 lb EF emission factor.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 09I/29/9 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5 Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)

EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton (M/2)1 4~5.92E,02 lb/ton Total lb.1= EF_<iopx *12,000 I II I= 0.53 '0. O 2)(I3). l ..... ...8.96E-03 lb/ton Total EF~2.=

  • 12,0000 1.08E+02 lb EF =emission factor.Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton (M/2)'.4 Total = EF_<io
  • 24,000 8.96E-03 lb/ton 2.15E+02 lb EF = emission factor.The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction Activities Bulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators
7. lE+02 l.IE-+02 Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02 Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0 Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01 otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)

Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02 a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.References EDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.

NWMI-201 6-RAI-001 Rev. 0 Appendix B -EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment B-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0004 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: February 3, 2015 Engineering Design File Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Construction Activities From Construction Equipment Portage Project No.: 3124 Title: NWMI Environmental Report Project 4Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 TEM-9(X02 09I29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 5 2. ProjectfTask:

NWMI Environmental Report 1. Portage Project No.: 3124 3. DCN #4. Title: Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities

5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A *1 6. SSC Safety Category:

N/A 7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated.

Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval (A) Signaures aPrinte Naniel: Author/Design Agent A Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__Independent Review R Project Manager R/A John Belier /////2/3/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) N/A TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0004 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5 Introduction and Purpose To determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material moved was estimated.

Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.Methodology Earthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methods for calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5 (updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100) where: E = Emissions (pound [lb])A = Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)EF = Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)ER = Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)Assumptions Table I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations.

The assumptions include the type of activities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities, and the amount of material moved.Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust Calculations Bulldozing 1 100 N/IA' N/IA'Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120: 1 o, 8...Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1 60 10,886 b 12,000 b Compacting 1 80 N/A' N/A'Moto grading 1 80N/Ac /A a Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.

b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd 3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMI Radioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm 3).SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.N/A = not applicable.

Other assumptions include the following.

  • Silt content: 25 percent* Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42* Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour

[hr]): 8.86 mi/hr* Material moisture content: 20 percent* Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hr Vehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 3 of 5 Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 and Section 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote.

The equations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying the results of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.Table 2. Emission Factors Equations-.9 9 ---S. -9. -.* -S ~* S -S 0.- * -- S Bulldozing 8 c2ompacting 8: Motor grading8 excavatorsb' Loading earth haulers from front loadersb Ulanglf tralfrom 0i.3 (Mj)1.4 0.040 (s)2 5 0.051 (s)2°k(0.0032).*(U/5)l.

3/(M/2)1.4 (0 0032Y'(U/5) 10.75

  • EF<_IS 0.75 EF 5 , 0.6
  • E<0.35 0.105* EFTsp 0.031
  • EFTn, 0.053 Ib/lir lb/VMT lb/ton i!03!5,:0.053 lb/ton i i r .....i I'i *n ............

EF k M s a AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.

b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.= emission factor. S =mean vehicle speed (mi/br).= scaling factor for particle size. TSP = total suspended particulate.

=material moisture content (%) U = mean wind spe (mi/br).= silt content (%). VMT =vehicle miles traveled.Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown in Table 3 through Table 8.Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />)EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)(0.20)'4 8.92E-_ l/h Total =EF<zi0um

  • 100 hr EFTotemission factor.9.19E-01 lb/hr 9.19E+01 lb EF = emission factor.

TEM-9002 09129109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 5 Table 4. Compacting (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />)EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)(0.20)' " 9.19E-01 lb/hr: Tolal 1b05~ = EFi7~ *80'/1V~ hr ff.35E+0l lb EF = emission factor.Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> at 2.5 miles/hour)

I~b i EF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)

Total Ib_<1 o 0= EF<1oum(2.5)(80) 1E.01 lb/V-MT:3.8E a ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)

Total lb<z~u EF~2 s(2~5)(80) 1 .23E-02 2.45E+00 Ib/VMT lb EF = emission factor. VMT = vehicle miles traveled.Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I 3 s lb/ton (M/2)' 4 5.2-2l/ton Total lb<l~n = *I EF = emission factor.8.96E-03 lb/ton Total ...... E~25~m 1 .08E+02 lb EF emission factor.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004 09I/29/9 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5 Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)

EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton (M/2)1 4~5.92E,02 lb/ton Total lb.1= EF_<iopx *12,000 I II I= 0.53 '0. O 2)(I3). l ..... ...8.96E-03 lb/ton Total EF~2.=

  • 12,0000 1.08E+02 lb EF =emission factor.Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton (M/2)'.4 Total = EF_<io
  • 24,000 8.96E-03 lb/ton 2.15E+02 lb EF = emission factor.The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction Activities Bulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators
7. lE+02 l.IE-+02 Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02 Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0 Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01 otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)

Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02 a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.References EDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16053A207&oldid=1524032"