Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Issue date | Title | Topic | |
---|---|---|---|
ML060480387 | 5 February 2006 | Comment (34) of Sue Reed Opposing 20% Uprate to Vermont Yankee Power Plant in Vernon, Vermont | |
ML060480397 | 4 February 2006 | Comment (35) of Doris Lake Regarding an Independent Safety Assessment at Vermont Yankee | |
ML060480399 | 14 February 2006 | Comment (36) of Lois Barber Opposing Uprate of Vermont Yankee Without Requirement of Prior Independent Safety Assessment | Power Uprate |
ML060480400 | 6 February 2006 | Comment (46) of Victor and Mary Burdo Opposing Entergy'S Push to Uprate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power | |
ML060480402 | 4 February 2006 | Comment (37) of Kenneth A. Shearer Opposing a 20% Uprate to the VT Yankee Nuclear Plant in Vernon, VT | |
ML060480404 | 6 February 2006 | Comment (38) of Robert Santway Re Decision to Approve Uprate at Vermont Yankee Nuclear Reactor | |
ML060480407 | 6 February 2006 | Comment (39) of Anne P. Tobey Opposing Vermont Yankee Uprate Without Prior Independent Safety Assessment | |
ML060480410 | 2 February 2006 | Comment (40) of Margaret P. Bartenhagen on Proposed Uprate for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. Independent Engineering Assessment of Plant Should Be Required Before an Uprate Is Granted Due to Listed Reason | |
ML060480411 | 4 February 2006 | Comment (41) of Teresa Caldwell Opposing 20% Uprate to Vermont Yankee Without Prior Independent Safety Assessment | |
ML060480412 | 5 February 2006 | Comment (42) Lou Waronker Opposing the 20% Uprate as Proposed by Entergy, for Vermont Yankee | |
ML060480413 | 6 February 2006 | Comment (43) of Sarah Kotkov on Entergy'S Push to Uprate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power | |
ML060480416 | 8 February 2006 | Comment (44) of Maureen Ippolito and Jeff Young Opposing Entergy'S Push to Uprate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power | |
ML060480418 | 15 February 2006 | Comment (45) of Suzanne Maisner Opposing Entergy'S Push to Uprate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power | |
ML060540079 | 5 February 2006 | Comment (47) of Rita Pickette Strongly Objecting to Entergy'S Push to Uprate Aging Vermont Yankee Facility for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power | |
ML060540080 | 8 February 2006 | Comment (48) of Jane Michaud Opposing Entergy'S Proposed Power Uprate at Vermont Yankee | Power Uprate |
ML060540106 | 8 February 2006 | Comment (49) of Gyuri Kepes Re Vermont Yankee NRC Open Comment Period | Chernobyl |
ML060600078 | 6 February 2006 | Comment (50) of Jesse Lepkoff Opposing the VT Yankee Proposed Uprate and the Risk Assessments in the Draft Safety Evaluation Released by the NRC | |
ML060600080 | 5 February 2006 | Comment (52) of Linda and Robert Hecker Opposing the Proposed 20% Energy Uprate at Vermont Yankee and to Request an Independent Safety Assessment | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
ML060600081 | 22 February 2006 | Comment (53) of Michael Marantz, Opposing the Vermont Yankee Uprate Without an Independent Safety Assessment | |
ML060600083 | 22 February 2006 | Comment (54) of Jesse Peters Opposing the Vermont Yankee Uprate and the Risk Assessments in Draft Safety Evaluation Based Released by NRC Based on the Fallacious Assumption That the Reactor Is Brand New | Power Uprate |
ML060600100 | 23 February 2006 | Comment (55) of Peter Dramondstone on the Vermont Yankee Uprate and an Independent Safety Inspection | |
ML060600108 | 7 February 2006 | Comment (56) of Leslie Read on Whether Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Has Been Properly Evaluated for Safe Operations with the Applied for 20% Power Uprate | Power Uprate |
ML060600113 | 7 February 2006 | Comment (57) of Linda A. Bailey Opposing the NRC Staff'S Conclusion That a Power Uprate at Vermont Yankee in Vernon, VT Would Not Create a Significant Reduction in the Operational Safety Margin of the Plant | Power Uprate |
ML060600115 | 8 February 2006 | Comment (58) of Quinn Kepes Opposing the Vermont Yankee Uprate Without an Independent Safety Assessment | Chernobyl |
ML060600117 | 8 February 2006 | Comment (59) of Imre Kepes on the Vermont Yankee Power Uprate and a Need for an Independent Safety Analysis | Chernobyl Power Uprate |
ML060600120 | 24 February 2006 | Comment (60) of Michael Nix, on P1774 Federal Registry Vol. 71, No. 7, Insist Upon Independent Safety Assessment Before a 20 Percent Uprate Is Allowed at Vernon, VT Nuclear Power Facility | |
ML060900043 | 20 March 2006 | Comment (1) of Ruben Dal Monte P.E., on NUREG 1437, Supplement 27 Draft, Re Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Palisades Nuclear Plant; Draft Report for Comments, Us NRC February 2006 | License Renewal |
ML061110353 | 20 March 2006 | Comment (61) of Eli Kwartler Expressing Extreme Concern Regarding Decision by NRC to Approve Uprate at Vermont Yankee Reactor Without Requirement of Prior Independent Safety Assessment | |
ML061210043 | 2 April 2006 | Comment (5) of A. Hanson, Strongly Opposing the Proposed 20 Year License Extension at Palisades Nuclear Power Plant | License Renewal Earthquake Chernobyl Environmental Justice |
ML061210044 | 2 April 2006 | Comment (4) of N. Hanson, Strongly Opposing the Proposed 20 Year License Extension at Palisades Nuclear Power Plant | License Renewal Earthquake Chernobyl Environmental Justice |
ML061210051 | 10 April 2006 | Comment (3) of Paul C. French, Jr., Supporting Renewing License for Palisades Nuclear Generating Plant for Another 20 Years | |
ML061240206 | 23 April 2006 | Comment (6) of Marguerite Callaghan for Renewal of License for Palisades Nuclear Facility | |
ML061320036 | 1 May 2006 | Comment (7) of Diane Byme, Re While for Safe, New, Nuclear Plants/Technology, Feels in Best Interest of Public for Safety Issues to Close Down Palisades and Not Renew License | Chernobyl |
ML061370509 | 15 May 2006 | Comment (8) of P. Harden Draft Supplement 27 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG 1437, for Palisades Nuclear Plant License Renewal | License Renewal |
ML061460146 | 19 April 2006 | Comment (9) of Morgan Dill, Opposing License Renewal of Palisades | License Renewal Earthquake Environmental Justice |
ML061570020 | 15 May 2006 | Comment (11) of Terry and Laura O'Brien on NUREG-1437, Supplement 27 Re Opposition of the Renewal of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant License | License Renewal |
ML061570022 | 18 May 2006 | Comment (12) of Kevin Kamps on NUREG-1437, Supplement 27, Draft | Environmental Justice |
ML061570025 | 15 May 2006 | Comment (13) of Michael T. Chezik for Renewing License for Palisades Nuclear Plant | License Renewal |
ML061570042 | 18 May 2006 | Comment (10) of Various, on NUREG-1437, Supplement 27 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Palisades Nuclear Power Plant | Boric Acid High winds License Renewal Earthquake Chernobyl Environment Report Inattentive Affidavit Depleted uranium Loss of condenser vacuum |
ML061640114 | 26 May 2006 | Comment (14) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 27: Palisades Nuclear Plant, Van Buren County, Michigan, Draft Report, NUREG-1437 | License Renewal |
ML061650257 | 23 February 2006 | Comment (15) of Connie & Jim Mcallister on Public Meeting to Discuss Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Palisades Nuclear Plant | |
ML061670101 | 12 June 2006 | 2006/06/12-Comment (1) of Mary Lampert, Re Scope of the Environmental Review for Pilgrim'S License Renewal Application | Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Met Tower Aging Management License Renewal Chernobyl Fuel cladding Biofouling Backfit Fatality Siren Potassium iodide |
ML061710104 | 14 June 2006 | 2006/06/14-Comment (2) of Mary Lampert on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch Regarding Scope of the Environmental Review for Pilgrim License Renewal Application - Direct Torus Vent System | License Renewal |
ML061730399 | 14 June 2006 | Comment (3) of Becca King on the Environmental Scoping Process for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application | |
ML061730415 | 20 June 2006 | Comment (4) of Mike Hebert on the Environmental Scoping Process for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application | |
ML061730420 | 19 June 2006 | Comment (5) of Tina Emery-Howe on the Environmental Scoping Process for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application | License Renewal |
ML061730427 | 14 June 2006 | Comment (6) of Jonathan Von Ranson Opposing the Environmental Scoping Process for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application | |
ML061730431 | 14 June 2006 | Comment (7) of Pam Walker on the Environmental Scoping Process for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application | |
ML061740035 | 22 June 2006 | Comment (2) of Thomas Matsuda on the Environmental Scoping Process for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application | |
ML061740289 | 14 June 2006 | Comment (62) of Thomas A. Wilson Opposing Expanding of High Level Radioactive Waste Storage |