Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Issue dateTitleTopic
ML0402305398 October 2003Comment (7) of Scott Willoughby Regarding Operator Licensing
ML0423903283 July 2004Comment (1) of Charles R. Nobles Regarding Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants' Request of a 20% Power Uprate Increase
ML05112023915 April 2005Comment (3) of Mary Lampert, Deborah Katz, Rochelle Becker, Brendan Hoffman, David Agnew, Jed Thorp and Jim Warren on Federal Register Notice Dated 02/28/2005 Re Station Blackout Risk Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants (Draft), January 200
ML0535001249 December 2005Comments (1) of David L. Deen on Vermont Yankee Draft Environmental Assessment Re Proposed License Amendment to Increase Maximum Reactor Power Level
ML06037001226 January 2006Comment (1) of Wendy Barnard Opposing the Operation of VT Yankee at Its Current Capacity
ML06041005426 January 2006Comment (2) of William M. Coleman, Re Uprate in Vermont Yankee Production Capacity, Findings of No Significant Hazards at Facility
ML06041005626 January 2006Comment (4) Re Entergy Desire to Uprate Vermont Yankee Aged Reactor, Author Against Uprate
ML0604100577 February 2006Comment (5) of Emily G. Lewis Opposing the Vermont Yankee UprateProbabilistic Risk Assessment
ML06041005930 January 2006Comment (7) of Town of Amherst Opposing the Uprate at the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Reactor, Without Requirement of a Prior Independent Safety Assessment
ML0604100627 February 2006Comment (8) of Martha Barnard Opposing Proposed Uprate of VT Yankee Nuclear Power Plant
ML06041006511 January 2006Comment (10) of Joanna and Charles Hamlin Opposing the VT Yankee Proposed Uprate and the Risk Assessments in the Draft Safety Evaluation Released by the NRC Based on Fallacious Assumption That the Reactor Is Brand NewProbabilistic Risk Assessment
ML0604100661 February 2006Comment (11) of Mary Alice Herbert Opposing Proposed Uprate of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant
ML06041006729 January 2006Comment (12) of Peter D'Errico on Risk Assessments in the Draft Safety Evaluation (SE) Released by NRC Regarding Vermont Yankee. NRC Should Revisit Its Decision After Performing an Independent Safety Assessment
ML06041007030 January 2006Comment (13) of Marcia Bourne Expressing Concern About Experimental Power Ascension Test Which Will Be Conducted While the Plant Is on Line Because There Is Significant Uncertainty of the Plant'S Method of Calculating Stress on Steam Dryer
ML0604100718 February 2006Comment (14) of Thomas K Matsuda Opposing Vermont Yankee UprateProbabilistic Risk Assessment
ML06041007230 January 2006Comment (15) of Nita Harrison on NRC Decision for a Power Uprate by Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee. Nrc'S Decision to Allow the Proposed Uprate, Without Independent Safety Assessment, Is Extremely Irresponsible
ML0604100738 February 2006Comment (16) of Annie Demille Opposing the Proposed VT Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Uprate
ML06041007530 January 2006Comment (17) of Janet W. and Walter F. Schwarz, Opposing the 20% Power Uprate at the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant
ML06045004310 February 2006Comment (21) of Emily Monosson on the NRC Ruling on the Vermont Yankee Uprate, Opposes Rule
ML06045004431 January 2006Comment (20) of Dorothy Mciver Re Uprate in Vermont Yankee Production Capacity, Findings of No Significant Hazards at Facility
ML06045004510 February 2006Comment (19) of David Wells Re Uprate in Vermont Yankee Production Capacity, Findings of No Significant Hazards at Facility
ML0604500494 February 2006Comment (18) of Emilie Hamilton Re in Regard to the Open Comment Period Related to the Vermont Yankee Reactor Proposed 20% Uprate
ML0604505249 February 2006Comment (24) of Benjamin C. Forbes Regarding the Vermont Yankee Nuclear and Supporting a Comprehensive Independent Safety Assessment
ML0604505278 February 2006Comment (23) of Jeanne M. Walsh on the Draft Safety Evaluation of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant
ML0604705288 February 2006Comment (22) of Raymond Shadis, Enclosing Petitions and Letters from Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire on Proposed Power Rate Increase at Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Reactor
ML06048037514 February 2006Comment (26) of William C. Pearson Opposing Proposed Entergy Vermont Yankee Uprate
ML0604803785 February 2006Comment (27) of Nancy Crompton Opposing Entergy'S Push to Uprate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power
ML0604803795 February 2006Comment (28) on Proposed Uprate to VT Yankee Power Plant in Vernon, VT
ML0604803803 February 2006Comment (29) Opposing Proposed 20% Uprate for Vermont Yankee
ML0604803825 February 2006Comment (30) of J. Levy and Fellow Residents Opposing Vermont Yankee 20% Power Increase Without an Independent Safety Assessment
ML0604803835 January 2005Comment (31) of Carol E. Cone Opposing Vermont Yankee Proposed 20% Uprate in Power Output, 20 Year License Extension, & Expansion of High-Level Waste Storage Capacity
ML0604803855 February 2006Comment (32) of Allison Page and Alejandro Levins, Regarding Increase of Operations at Vermont Yankee
ML0604803863 February 2006Comment (33) of Mariquita Vitztham, Writing to Urge You to Conduct Comprehensive Independent Safety Assessment on the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Using the Same Methodology Scope That Was Used with the Maine Yankee Reactor
ML0604803875 February 2006Comment (34) of Sue Reed Opposing 20% Uprate to Vermont Yankee Power Plant in Vernon, Vermont
ML0604803974 February 2006Comment (35) of Doris Lake Regarding an Independent Safety Assessment at Vermont Yankee
ML06048039914 February 2006Comment (36) of Lois Barber Opposing Uprate of Vermont Yankee Without Requirement of Prior Independent Safety Assessment
ML0604804006 February 2006Comment (46) of Victor and Mary Burdo Opposing Entergy'S Push to Uprate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power
ML0604804024 February 2006Comment (37) of Kenneth A. Shearer Opposing a 20% Uprate to the VT Yankee Nuclear Plant in Vernon, VT
ML0604804046 February 2006Comment (38) of Robert Santway Re Decision to Approve Uprate at Vermont Yankee Nuclear Reactor
ML0604804076 February 2006Comment (39) of Anne P. Tobey Opposing Vermont Yankee Uprate Without Prior Independent Safety Assessment
ML0604804102 February 2006Comment (40) of Margaret P. Bartenhagen on Proposed Uprate for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. Independent Engineering Assessment of Plant Should Be Required Before an Uprate Is Granted Due to Listed Reason
ML0604804114 February 2006Comment (41) of Teresa Caldwell Opposing 20% Uprate to Vermont Yankee Without Prior Independent Safety Assessment
ML0604804125 February 2006Comment (42) Lou Waronker Opposing the 20% Uprate as Proposed by Entergy, for Vermont Yankee
ML0604804136 February 2006Comment (43) of Sarah Kotkov on Entergy'S Push to Uprate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power
ML0604804168 February 2006Comment (44) of Maureen Ippolito and Jeff Young Opposing Entergy'S Push to Uprate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power
ML06048041815 February 2006Comment (45) of Suzanne Maisner Opposing Entergy'S Push to Uprate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power
ML0605400795 February 2006Comment (47) of Rita Pickette Strongly Objecting to Entergy'S Push to Uprate Aging Vermont Yankee Facility for a 20% Increase in the Production of Electrical Power
ML0605400808 February 2006Comment (48) of Jane Michaud Opposing Entergy'S Proposed Power Uprate at Vermont Yankee
ML0605401068 February 2006Comment (49) of Gyuri Kepes Re Vermont Yankee NRC Open Comment PeriodChernobyl
ML0606000786 February 2006Comment (50) of Jesse Lepkoff Opposing the VT Yankee Proposed Uprate and the Risk Assessments in the Draft Safety Evaluation Released by the NRC
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/Special:Ask"