ML20083G794

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:57, 19 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Application for Amend to License NPF-5,allowing Operation of Traversing in-core Probe for 31 Effective Full Power Days W/ One or More Sys Probes Inoperable
ML20083G794
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 12/21/1983
From: Head G
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20083G799 List:
References
NED-83-139, TAC-53398, NUDOCS 8401040347
Download: ML20083G794 (2)


Text

,

, rw nv ue< Ce 3 N f'- ,ar,

's:'a Gi:fdm E, r60 r

L ,

a 3 Th a r- r;4 5

  • 7M3

:rai 5:

Pt 0" : Bc, e45

,yQ <

, I, ^

vG.--F.s Head

, p, 4, I <

+

December 21, 1983 NED-83-139 Attention: Director of Nuclear Reactor R Mr. John F. Stolzegulation Opere'ing Reactors Branch Division of Licensing .

No ,4 Chief Washington, D. C.U. S.ssion Nuclear Regulatory Commi 20555 NRC POCKET 50-366 OPERATING LICENSE NPF-5 TRAVERSING Gentlemen:

EDWIN INCORE I. HATCH PROBE NUCLEAR 2 SYSTEM PLANT TE UNIT CHNICAL SPFCIFICATION CHANGE OSAL (GPC) hereby prIn accordance with the provisi ,.

Specifications (oposes an amendment to the Edwions of 10 CFR 50.90, Georg would revise Appendix theSystem Limiting A to the Operating Li n I. Hatch Conditi Unit er Company Incore Probe (TIP) cense . 2 Technical ons for Operation )(LCO) of the TThe proposed raversing 31 Effective Full Power Days (EThe proposed amendme inoperable condition. FPD) with oneow operation of the TIP system f operable. or more or up to core thermal The present TIPlimits in the coreThis would system increase probes in an the data i system LCO properly functioning probesfor monitoring actually prevents nue to ofbevarious cor, w that the movable probes may bHe vendor ,

. accuracy for the T after being normalized without General Electric Co.(GE), has uncertainty e aused to obtain flux readings significant would analysis only allowfor the fuel stated change 'oss up to six weeks resulting change innot only minimal operation reducti uppower distribution limits.of accuracy based on the would to 31 GPC's proposed Range Monitors affect EFPD befo Specifications (LPRM's), the requirementons for in systemrenormalization, In accuracy.re addition, this operation operational.cannot every be perfomed 1000 effective full powewhichofisLocal recalibration acco performed Power in r hours,rdance in as with Technical unless all four detectorsmuch arei \as this

'Ihechanges proposed Plant Review Board and fully . - -

safety question. and concluded Safety Review Board have The that they do not probability of occurrence reviewed constitute anthe unreviewed '

or the PDR ADDCK8401040347 P

05000366 031221 consequences of '

~

PDR ' '

A t I

. . = _ _. . _ _ -

Georgia Power d ~

Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U._S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 December 21, 1983 Page Two an ' accident or malfunction of safety-related equipment would not be increased above those analyzed in the FSAR because this change would not involve a system important to safety. The possibility of an accident or malfunction of a different type than analyzed in the FSAR would not result from this change, because the extended use of the TIP system due to this change would not create any new mode of operation outside of that bounded by the FSAR analyses. The margin of safety as defined in the Technical Specifications'would not be reduced by this change because this change would allow for an increase in input data for monitoring of core thermal limits while still maintaining an acceptable accuracy of the system output data.

Instructions for incorporation of these changes (Attachment 1), along with copies of affected Technical Specifications pages are enclosed.

Included with this proposal is a determination of amendment class (Attachment 2).- We have determined this to be one Class III amendment, and have enclosed the appropriate payment.

As required by 10 CFR 50.92, an individual significant hazards analysis is provided for each change to the Technical Specifications (Attachment 3).

Pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.92, J. L. Ledbetter of the 1

Georgia Department of Natural Resources will be sent a copy of this letter and all applicable attachments.

G. F. Head states that he is Vice President of Georgia Power Company and is authorized to execute this oath on behalf of Georgia ' Power Company, and that to the best of his knowledge and belief the facts set forth in this letter are true. ,

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY By: Q, ') ,fla_

'G. F. Head S and subscr bed fore ye this fis g g o g ycb g 983.

! My Commissicn Expires Sept.18,1987 Notary Public CBS/mb Enclosure

xc
H. C. Nix, Jr.

J. P. O'Reilly (Region II)

Senior Resident Inspector J. L. Ledbetter

. _ . . ~ . . _ . _ -. _ _ . _-,