SCH12-041, Salem Generating Station, Transmittal of Discharge Monitoring Report for the Month of November 2012

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:47, 22 January 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Salem Generating Station, Transmittal of Discharge Monitoring Report for the Month of November 2012
ML13008A318
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 12/27/2012
From: Bennett J
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, State of NJ, Dept of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Permit Management
References
NJ0005622, SCH12-041
Download: ML13008A318 (79)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:PSEG Nuclear L.L.C.P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08302 EEC27 2 Z0 SCH12-041 CERTIFIED MAIL PSE RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ARTICLE NUMBER: 7004 2510 0005 2135 3020 Nuclear L.L.C.Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Quality Bureau of Permit Management P.O. Box 029 Trenton, N.J. 08625-0029 NEW JERSEY POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT SALEM GENERATING STATION NJPDES PERMIT NJ0005622

Dear Sir:

Attached is an addendum to the Discharge Monitoring Report for the Salem Generating Station for the month of November 2012.This report is required by and prepared specifically for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). It presents only the observed results of measurements and analyses required to be performed by the above agencies. The choice of the measurement devices and analytical methods are controlled by the EPA and the NJDEP, not by the company, and there are limitations on the accuracy of such measurement devices and analytical techniques even when used and maintained as required. Accordingly, this report is not intended as an assertion that any instrument has measured, or that any reading or analytical result represents the true value with absolute accuracy, nor is it an endorsement of the suitability of any analytical or measurement procedure. Sincerely, Jon Bennett Environmental Lab Supervisor -Salem/zZZ7 7 / ,z Attachment (1 Addendum)C Executive Director, DRBC USNRC -Docket numbers 50-272 & 50-311 EXPLANATION OF CONDITIONS November 2012 The following explanations are included to clarify possible deviation from permit conditions. General -The columns labeled "No. Ex" on the enclosed DMR tabulate the number of daily discharge values outside the indicated limits.Data reporting and accuracy reflect the working environment, the design capabilities and reliability of the monitoring instruments and operating equipment. Deviations from required sampling, analysis monitoring and reporting methods and periodicities are noted on the respective transmittal sheet.Results reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report forms are consistent with permit limits, data supplied from contract laboratories, the December 2007 revision of the NJDEP DMR Instruction Manual and specific guidance from DEP personnel. EXPLANATION OF ADDENDUM November 2012 The following addendum is to be included in the November 2012 DMR report sent Dec 20, due to the reports was excluded from the envelope prior to mailing.ATTACHMENT: 000NJPDES Biomonitoring Report Form -Acute Toxicity Determination of Circulating Water Flow at Salem Generating Station Unit 1 Chem File SCH12-041 Maplewood Testing Services 200 Boyden Ave, Maplewood, NJ 07040 tel: 973.761.1981 O PSEG Power LLC October 21,2012 Report No. TP12054 TO: Christopher E. White Nuclear Senior Environmental Specialist Salem Chemistry -PSEG Power

SUBJECT:

DETERMINATION OF CIRC SALEM GENERATING STA CONDUCTED BY: Victor Simpson Sr. Test Engineer, ULATING WATER FLOW AT TION UNIT I Maplewood Testing Services

SUMMARY

On October 3-5, 2012 the Mechanical Systems Performance Group of Maplewood Testing Services conducted a series of test runs at Salem Unit No. 1 to determine the capacities of the circulating wate pumps shown in the table below.Work was performed under the following SAP work orders: 30222694, 30225419, 30225422, 30225420, 30225421, 30222695 Results are as follows:

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS Pump CMS Test Measured Pump Pump Total No. Pump Date Pump Suction Discharge Static Desig. Capacity Head Head Head (gpm) (ft h2o) (ft h2o) (ft h2o)11A A 10/03/12 154801 -8.70 14.50 23.20 11B J 10/03/12 144911 -11.60 12.50 24.10 12A N 10/04/12 154637 -8.70 12.00 20.70 12B L 10/04/12 145407 -6.60 16.75 23.35 13A D 10/04/12 143945 -7.70 16.25 23.95 13B G 10/04/12 159325 -12.00 8.50 20.50 12A-1 (1) N 10/05/12 152376 -8.00 13.25 21.25 12B-1 (1) L 10/05/12 154380 -8.66 14.50 23.16 (1) -Due to questionable initial results, Pump Nos. 12A & 12B were retested.Both sets of data are being reported.Note: Pump suction heads and discharge heads corrected to elevation 100' Christopher E. White Nuclear Senior Environmental Specialist Salem Chemistry -PSEG Power October 21,2012 Report No. TP12054

SUMMARY

(Cont'd)For reporting purposes, shown below is the data pertinent to the injection of Rhodamine WT dye released to the river during testing. Testing is complete at this station.RECORD OF RHODAMINE WT DYE INJECTION Test Pump Injection Pure Number of Total Effluent Date No. Time Dye Pumps in System Concentration Injected Service Flow (2)(start) (stop) (ml) (1000 gpm) (ppb)10/03/12 11A 1109 1135 36.56 11 2035.0 0.20 10/03/12 116 1814 1845 41.66 11 2035.0 0.17 10/04/12 12A 1053 1121 25.58 11 2035.0 0.17 10/04/12 12B 1420 1448 35.06 11 2035.0 0,18 10/04/12 13A 1529 1558 36.16 11 2035.0 0.17 10/04/12 13B 907 936 36.36 12 2220.0 0.16 10105/12 12A-1 (1) 1633 1656 31.15 12 2220.0 0,16 10/05/12 123-1 (1) 1716 1741 31.22 12 2220.0 0.16 10/03/12 11B (3) 1335 1335 13.48 11 2035.0 0.18 10/03/12 11B (3) 1631 1631 48.14 11 2035.0 0,20 10/04/12 12A (3) 929 943 18.80 11 2035.0 0,17 (2) -Total System Flow calculated by multiplying the total number of pumps in service (both units) by the manufacturer's guarantee point flow (185000 GPM)(3) -Aborted runs -for dye injection reporting only TEST METHOD The circulating water flow rate was determined by fluorometry using MTS Mechanical Division Work Instruction TPG-19 Rev. 12 "Water Flow Using The Turner Fluorometer".

Rhodamine WT dye was injected into the bell mouth of each pump using 1/2 inc PVC pipe with a carrier flow of screen wash water at 3 gallons per minute. Christopher E. White Nuclear Senior Environmental Specialist Salem Chemistry -PSEG Power October 21,2012 Report No. TP12054 TEST METHOD (Cont'd)The dye was injected at a known rate using a peristaltic pump and a class A burette to measure rate.The diluted sample was retrieved and monitored by taking a sample from the inlet water box piping.The ratio of the injected concentration to the sample concentration multiplied by the injection flow rate yielded the circulator flow rate.The total static head was obtained by measuring the pump suction head in feet from elevation 100' and the pump discharge head in feet of water at the water box inlet. After correcting for elevation, the total pump head was calculated as the pump discharge head minus the pump suction head.Anthony Hess Supervising Test Engineer MTS Mechanical Division C S. Rund OOONJPDES BIOMONITORING REPORT FORIM/I -ACUTE TOXICITY Permit No.: NJ[ 0005622 ] DSN [ 485 1 Facility name: PSEG Nuclear LLC -Salem Generating Station Facility address: .Artificial Island[ Lower Alloways Creek, NJ 08038 Facility contact person: [ Mr. William Gamon Biags 1 phone #: [ (856) 339-2678 ]Acute toxicity laboratory: New England Bioassay[ 77 Batson Drive ]I Manchester, CT 06042 Acute laboratory certification No.: [ CT405 Test Specifications: Effluent type (e.g., final, predisinfection): [ Final Effluent 1 Test type (check one): Static Renewal (6-hr)______ Renewal (24-hr)_X Flow-throughl__ Test Results: Test starting date: [ 11/27/12 1 Completion date: [ 12/01/12 Test endpoint (check one): LC50_X_ NMAT EC50 LC50/EC50 (% effluent): F > 100% 1 95% Confidence interval: [ NA Highest percent mortality in any test concentration (if applicable): [ 0% .Test concentration: [ NA Test organism: I Sheepshead Minnow (common name)"- f 5 I Cvprinodon variegatus (scientific name)I Ouality Control Summary: Control mortality:. F 5% ]%Temperature maintained within 200 + 2 0 C? Yes X Dissolved oxygen levels always greater than 40% saturation? Yes X Two or more concentrations exhibit a trend deviation? Yes Certification: Accuracy of report certified by: _4 No No No X Date 1/abýorat&-y4'aam~e< Revised 9/96 Test Oranism Data: Test organism source (check one): Cultured Commercial hatcheryX (specify)[ Aquatic BioSystems; Fort Collins, Colorado Test Organism Acclimation: Is the culture water and test dilution water the same, and is the culture water temperature and dilution water temperature identical? Yes No X If yes, proceed to Test Design section.Fish and Grass Shrimp: Initial number of organisms: [ 570]Total acclimation period: [< 1 ] day, Acclimation period to 100 percent dilution water at the specified test temperature and test salinity:[received in ASW at 25 +/- 2 ppt; NEB dripped in fresh ASW at 25 +/- 2 ppt until testing I Number of mortalities: [ 0 ]%Test organism age at start of test (days): [ 10 days Mvsid and Cladoceran: Initial Number of Organisms: Test organism age at start of test (days): Culture water source: Culture. water salinity: Culture water temperature: Dilution water source: Dilution water salinity upon collection: Number of mortalities: [WNA I[N/A[N/A I[N/A[N/A ][N/A j[N/A ][ N/A 1%Test Design: Number of effluent test concentrations: Number of replicates/test concentration: Number of test organisms/replicate: Volume of liquid in test chambers (liters): Flow-through bioassay exchange rate:[[[[{9 2 10 0.5 N/A (](cycles/day) Effluent Sampling: Plant sampling location: [ Outfall 485 (#1. #2, #3. & #4 samples)Effluent type: [. Cooling Water Discharge (checkone): Continuous X Intermittent Effluent sample type: 24-hr. composite X 6-hr composite Grab Other _(Describe) i]Sample Data taken upon Sample Collection Arrival at laboratory Use in Toxicity Test Beginning Ending Date/Time Date/Time D.O. PH Date(s) Time(s)a 11/25/12 1200 11/26/12 1200 9.8 mg/L 7.3 SU 11/27/12 1425 h 11/26/12 1200 11/27/12 1200 10.1 mg/L 6.9 SU 11/28/12 1500h 11/27/12 1200 11/28/12 1200 9.3 mg/L 7.3 SU 11/29/12 1445 h 11/28/12 1200 11/29/12 1200 9.2 mg/L 7.1 SU 11/30/12 1450 h--Indicates time test concentrations were mixed after warming to test temperature Maximum sample holding time (hours): [ < 24 h I Testing location (check one): On-site Remote LaboratoryX_ Revised 9/96 Effluent Sample Adiustments: Were any salinity adjustments made? Yes X No If yes, specify the source of sea salts, brine or water used: f Instant Ocean Artificial Sea Salts (Aquarium Systems; Mentor, OH) ]Were any pH adjustments made? Yes No X If yes, specify the reagent used [ 3 N ECl ], the amount used[. Not required 1 The pH level upon sample collection (initial pH): [7.6 to 7T8 SU]The pH level after the addition of the sea salts (drifted pH) [7.9 to 8.1 SU ]The adjusted pH level [ not required ]Was the effluent sample filtered in any manner? Yes_ No X If yes, please specify the mesh size: N/A .Were any adjustments to the levels of chlorine made? Yes No X If yes, specify the dechlorination agent used [ N/A ] and the amount of reagent used r N/A ]Specify the chlorine levels prior to [< 0.05 mg/L] and after addition of the reagent[ N/A Was an additional control included in the test containing the dechlorination agent? Yes No_X Dilution Water: Effluent receiving water: [ Delaware River Dilution water source: Instant Ocean Artificial Salt Water (25 +/- 1 ppt salinity; 120 mg/L as CaCO 3 Alkalinity)](If reconstituted water is used specify type)If a substitute dilution water (i.e. not the receiving water) was used, had its use been approved by NJDEP in the acute methodology questionnaire? Yes X_ No Collection location: Collection date(s): Test Results: F N/A[ N/A 24 hours 48 hours 72 hours 96 hours LC50/EC50 (% Effluent): [> 100%] [> 100%] [> 100%] [> 100%]Calculation method: [ Observation I NOTE: Attach the statistical printouts used to determine the LC50 value, and the mortality data sheets.Is the calculated LC50/EC50 valid according to the specifications of the method used? Yes X No Miscellaneous: Were any exposure chambers aerated during the test? Yes_ NoX___If yes, specify concentrations and duration, including the lowest percent saturation reached prior to aeration and at what time: N/A Were the test organisms observed for appearance and behavior at least daily? Yes__ X__ No NOTE: Attach a copy of the acute toxicity test bench sheets with observation coded for each day.NOTE: Attach a copy of the raw data sheets for physical-chemical measurements performed during the test to the test report form.Revised 9/96 MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES ANALYSIS REPORT STATION: PARAMETER Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Amnmonia-N Salem Generating Station SAMPLING POINT Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)SAMPLE NO.Inf#1 Eff #1 Inf #2 Eff #2 Inf #3 Eff #3 Inf #4 Eff #4 LAB SAMPLE DATE NO. SAMPLED ANA12000728 11/26/2012 ANA12000729 11/26/2012 ANA12000730 11/27/2012 ANA12000731 11/27/2012 ANA12000732 11/28/2012 ANA12000733 11/28/2012 ANA12000734 11/29/2012 ANA12000735 11/29/2012 RESUL'T<0.100<0.100<0.100<0.100<0.100 0.101<0;100<0.100 DATE 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 TIME 1203 1156 1207 1209 1212 1215 1218 1220 ANALYSIS UNITS mg/L mg/L mg/L mgf/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L BY SAY SAF SAF SAF SAF SAT SAF SAF DILUTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RL 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 Method Numbers: Ammonia: SM4500N1H3 B&D Reported By saf ACUTE TOXICITY TEST REPORT (NOVEMBER 2012)PSEG Nuclear LLC Salem Generating Station Permit No. NJ 0005622 (IDSN 485)12 December 2012 Performed by: New England Bioassay, A division of GZA Geoenvironmental, Inc.77 Batson Drive Manchester, CT 06042 NJ Laboratory Certification Number: CT405 Client: Project Dischar NumberJob Nun Test Nu Test Ma Sample Test Dat Test Dui Test Met Test Spe Name: ge Serial

SUMMARY

PSEG Nuclear LLC Salem Generating Station r1: 485 (#1, #2, #3, & #4 samples)S Number: NJ 0005622 tuber: 05.0044750.00 mber: Influent Acute Toxicity Test: 12-2449 Effluent Acute Toxicity Test: 12-2450 terial: Influent[C32-4829, C32-4831, C32-4833, and C32-4835]Final Effluent -DSN 485[C32-4830, C32-4832, C32-4834, and C32-4836]Dates: 25-26, 26-27, 27-28, and 28-29 November 2012 es: 27 Noyember-l December 2012 ation: 96-h Static Renewal thods: NJDEP Regulations Governing the Certification of Laboratories and Environmental Measurements, 1996 (N.J.A.C. 7:18).cies: Sheepshead Minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus) Source: Aquatic Biosystems, Inc.Age: 10 days old g Water: Delaware River Water: Artificial Saltwater Sheepshead Minnow: Cyprinodon variegatus Influent Acute Toxicity Test Effluent Acute Toxicity Test 24-h LC 5 0: > 100% influent 24-h LC 5 0: > 100% effluent 48-h LC 5 0: > 100% influent 48-h LC 5 o: > 100% effluent 72-h LC 5 0: > 100% influent 72-h LC 5 o: > 100% effluent 96-h LC 5 0: > 100% influent 96-h LC 5 0: > 100% effluent Receivin Dilution Results: MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES ANALYSIS REPORT STATION: PARAMETER Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Ammonia-N Salem Generating Station SAMPLING POINT Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)Aqueous sample 485 (22)SAMPLE NO.Inf #1 EfT#1 Inf #2 Eff #2 Inf #3 Eff #3 Inf #4 Eff #4 LAB SAMPLE DATE NO. SAMPLED ANA12000728 11/26/2012 ANA12000729 11/26/2012 ANA12000730 11/27/2012 ANA12000731 11/27/2012 ANA12000732 11/28/2012 ANA12000733 11/28/2012 ANA12000734 11/29/2012 ANA12000735 11/29/2012 RESULT<0.100<0.100<0.100<0.100<0.100 0.101<0.100<0.100 DATE 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 12/04/2012 TIME 1203 1156 1207 1209 1212 1215 1218 1220 ANALYSIS UNITS mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L BY SAF SAF SAF SAF SAF SAF SAF SAF DILUTION I 1 I 1 RL 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 Method Numbers: Ammonia: SM4500NH3 B&D Reported By saf NOVEMBER 2012 ACUTE TOXICITY TEST REPORT PSEG -Nuclear LLC Salem Generating Station Permit No. NJ 0005622 DSN 485 12 December 2012 INTRODUCTION This report contains results of 96-h static-renewal toxicity tests with sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon variegatus) initiated during November 2012. Acute toxicity testing was performed using four sets of 24-h composite effluent or influent samples collected during 25-29 November 2012 from the Salem Generating Station of PSEG Nuclear LLC in Lower Alloways Creek, New Jersey. The acute toxicity tests were conducted by exposing immature C. variegatus to the effluent or influent samples for a period of 96 h (test dates: 27 Nov-1 Dec 2012). All toxicity test work reported here was performed at New England Bioassay (NEB) in Manchester, CT for PSEG.MATERIALS AND WMETHODS Sample Collection and Handlin, Four 24-h composite samples of final effluent were collected during 25-29 November 2012 from discharge outfall 485 at PSEG's Salem Generating Station in Lower Alloways Creek, NJ. Concurrent with the effluent collection, four 24-h composite samples of influent were also collected. Samples were collected by PSEG MTS staff. Samples for acute toxicity testing (Table 1)were returned to PSEG's Maplewood Testing Facility (MTS) by PSEG personnel; samples were then packed on ice and shipped to NEB by overnight courier (samples #1, #2, #3, #4). Sample receipt dates were 27, 28, 29, and 30 November 2012. Copies of chain of custody documentation are in Appendix A. 2 TABLE 1. DESCRIPTION OF INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT SAMPLES FROM THE SALEM GENERATING FACILITY COLLECTED BY PSEG-MTS STAFF DURING NOVEMBER 2012 FOR STATIC-RENEWAL ACUTE TOXICITY TESTS Sample Sample Date Sample NEB Description (time) Type ID Nos.EFFLUELNT SAMPLES Final Effluent #1 111/25-26/12 24-h Composite C32-4830 (DSN 485) (1200-1200 h)Final Effluent #2 11/26-27/12 24-h Composite C32-4832 (DSN 485) (1200-1200 h)Final Effluent #3 11/27-28/12 24-h Composite C32-4834 (DSN 485) (1200-1200 h)Final Effluent #4 11/28-29/12 24-h Composite C32-4836 (DSN 485) (1200-1200 h)INFLUENT SAMPLES Influent #1 (485) 11/25-26/12 24-h Composite C32-4829 (1200-1200 h)Influent #2 (485) 11/26-27/12 24-h Composite C32-4831 (1200-1200 h)Influent #3 (485) 11/27-28/12 24-h Composite C32-4833 (1200-1200 h)Influent #4 (485) 11/28-29/12 24-h Composite C32-4835 (1200-1200 h) 3 Standard wet chemistry analyses [pH, dissolved oxygen, specific conductivity, salinity, total residual chlorine (TRC), hardness and alkalinity] were performed on influent and effluent samples upon receipt at NEB (Table 2). TRC was measured by using a Fisher CL Titrimeter (Model 397). Salinity of influent and effluent samples ranged from 10 to 11 parts per thousand (ppt). Salinity was adjusted to 25 +/- 1 ppt by addition of Instant Ocean artificial sea salts before use in testing. After salting, the pH of the influent and effluent samples ranged from 7.9 to 8.1; no pH adjustments with 3 N hydrochloric acid were required. Samples were not dechlorinated before use in testing.Test Organisms Test organisms used in acute toxicity testing were sheepshead minnows, Cyprinodon variegatus, obtained from a commercial supplier (Aquatic Biosystems, Fort Collins, CO).Sheepshead minnows (age: 10 days old at test initiation) were acclimated upon receipt to artificial saltwater at a salinity of 25 +/- 2 ppt and a temperature of 200 -2°C until test initiation. Organisms were healthy and free from disease before use in testing. Fish behavior was observed and recorded during testing; raw data sheets are provided in Appendix A.Test Methods Acute test procedures were performed in accordance with the NJDEP document titled"Regulations Governing the Certification of Laboratories and Environmental Measurements" (N.J.A.C. 7:18, 1996, 2003). Sheepshead minnow acute toxicity tests were initiated on 27 November 2012 (Test'Day

0) with samples (effluent or influent) collected during 25-26 November 2012. Tests were renewed for the next three days (Test Days 1, 2, and 3) with samples collected during 26-27 Nov, 27-28 Nov, and 28-29 November 2012.Sheepshead minnows were exposed to nine test concentrations (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100% effluent or influent) plus an artificial saltwater (ASW) control. The ASW was prepared by adding Instant Ocean artificial sea salts (Aquarium Systems, Mentor, Ohio) to Milli-Q prepared deionized water to produce a salinity of 25 +/- 1 ppt. The ASW was stored in a carboy and aerated before use in testing.

4 TABLE 2. INITIAL WET CHEMISTRY RESULTS FOR FINAL EFFLUENT AND INFLUENT SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE SALEM GENERATING STATION IN LOWER ALLOWAYS CREEK, NJ DURING NOVEMBER 2012 Analysis Performed Dissolved oxygen (mgIL)Temperature ('C)pH (SU)Sp. Conductivity (jmhos/cm) Salinity (ppt)TRC (mg/L)(Amperometric method)Hardness (mg/L as CaCO 3)Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO 3)Ammonia, as N (mg/L)*#1 9.8 3.7 7.3 14730 10<0.05 1800 60<0.100 Salem Generating Station Effluent#2 #3 10.1 9.3 3.2 3.6 6.9 7.3 15090 17140 1 10 11< 0.05 < 0.05 <#4 9.2 3.0 7.1 6620 10 0.05 1700 60<0.100 1900 55 0.101 1900 65<0.100 Analysis Performed Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)Temperature (°C)pH (SU)Sp. Conductivity (,amhos/cm) Salinity (ppt)TRc (mg/L)(Amperometric method)Hardness (mg/L as CaCO 3)Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO 3)Ammonia, as N (rag/L)**Ammonia analyses performed by MTS.#1 9.2 3.5 7.3 14850 10<0.05 1700 65<0.100 Salem Generating Station Influent#2 #3 9.8 9.3 2.7 2.8 6.9 7.3 15040 16910 10 10< 0.05 < 0,05 <#4 8.9 3.4 7.4 16820 10<0.05 1700 60<0.100 1900 55<0.100 2000 65<0.100 5 Sheepshead minnow tests contained 10 animals per replicate with two replicates per test concentration, including the control. Test volume per replicate was 500 mL and test solution depth was approximately 6.2 cm in each test chamber. Mean test temperatures and individual temperature readings were 200 +/- 2'C. Effluent and influent salinity was 25 + 1 ppt. Aeration was not required during the 96-h tests. Reference toxicant tests using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) are routinely performed with sheepshead minnows obtained from Aquatic Biosystems, Inc. to monitor organism sensitivity. Statistical Analysis Survival data for fish tests were analyzed for acute adverse effects (death) by determining daily LC 5 o values. The LC 5 0 is a statistically-estimated effluent concentration which is lethal to 50% of test organisms at time of observation. When adequate mortality data were available, LC 5 0 values were determined by using computer packages based on U.S. EPA's 1993 acute guidance manual.RESULTS Results of 96-h static-renewal acute toxicity tests indicated that Salem effluent and influent samples collected during 25-29 November 2012 were not acutely toxic to sheepshead minnows. The 96-h LC 5 0 values for final effluent and influent were > 100% sample (Table 3).Survival of minnows exposed to the 6.25% to 100% effluent concentrations was 100% at 96 h (Table 4). The influent samples collected concurrently with the effluent samples exhibited no significant acute toxicity to sheepshead minnows. Survival of sheepshead minnows was_ 95% in the 6.25% to 100% influent concentrations at 96 h (Table 4).Survival of C. variegatus was _>95% in the artificial saltwater controls at test completion for both the effluent and influent tests. Surviving organisms appeared healthy and were swimming normally in all concentrations for the test duration. Raw toxicity data sheets and printouts for statistical analyses of the acute tests are in Appendix A. 6 TABLE 3. RESULTS OF ACUTE TOXICITY TESTS PERFOPMvIED ON SALEM GENERATING STATION EFFLUENT AND INFLUENT SAMPLES Test Test Test LC 5 o 95%Confidence Species ID No. Day (% effluent) Limits Acute Tests Test Dates: 27 Nov-1 December 2012 Final Effluent C. variegatus 12-2.450 24 h > 1 00a N/Ab 48 h > 100 N/A 72 h > 100 N/A 96 h > 100 N/A Influent C. variegatus 12-2449 24 h > 100 N/A 48 h > 100 N/A 72 h > 100 N/A 96 h > 100 N/A a LC 5 0 values for test days 1 through 4 were determined by observation. b N/A: Not applicable. 7 TABLE 4. SURVIVAL RESULTS FOR 96-H STATIC-RENEWAL ACUTE TOXICITY TESTS WITH FINAL EFFLUENT AND INFLUENT SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING 25-29 NOVEMBER 2012 FROM THE SALEM GENERATING STATION WITH Cyprinodon variegatus (TEST DATES: 27 NOVEMBER-1 DECEMBER 2012)Test Concentration Daily Survival (%)a (% Effluent) 1 2 3 4 Final Effluent ASW CONTROLb 100(0) 95(1) 95(1) 95(1)(ID NO. 12-2450)6.25 100 (0) 100(0) 100 (0) 100 (0)12.5 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)25 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)50 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 1OO(0)60 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0)70 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)80 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)90 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0)100 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)Influent ASW CONTROL' 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0)(ID NO. 12-2449)6.25 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0)12.5 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)25 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0)50 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)60 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)70 95 (1) 95 (1) 95 (1) 95 (1)80 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)90 100(0) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)100 lOO(o) 100(0) 100(0) 100(0)Number outside parentheses represents daily C. variegactus survival parentheses represents number of organisms dead out of 20.b ASW Control: Laboratory-prepared artificial saltwater. as a percentage; number inside 8 Reference Toxicant Testing Reference toxicant tests using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) are routinely conducted with the same cohort of sheepshead minnows obtained from Aquatic Biosystems (AB) to monitor organism sensitivity; sheepshead minnows used in the influent and effluent toxicity tests were obtained from AB. For the November 2012 testing with AB-purchased fish (test dates: 27 Nov-1 December 2012; NEB Test ID No. 12-2473), 96-h survival data were used to calculate a LC 5 0 value for the purchased C variegatus. Per NJDEP, the test was conducted at 20' +/- 10C. The 96-h LC 5 0 was estimated at 4.243 mg/L SDS. Survival of control fish was 100% at test completion (96 h).Copies of statistical summary sheets and cumulative summation-control charts for SDS for AB sheepshead minnows are in Appendix A.CERTIFICATION I certify that the toxicity test data presented in this report were obtained under my direction or supervision in accordance with protocols of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. The information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete./Date Kimberly Wills Z~>Laboratory Manager APPENDIX A NOVEMBER 2012 TESTING (TEST DATES: 27 NOVEMBER-1 DECEMBER 2012)CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS, COPIES OF RAW DATA FORMS, AND STATISTICAL PRINTOUTS FOR ACUTE EFFLUENT AND INFLUENT TOXICITY TESTS WITH Cyprinodon variegatlis Client PSE&G Maplewood Testing Facility Address 200 Boyden Avenue Maplewood, NJ 07040 Test ID No. l -Project No. 0 ýobW 0.Contact Mr. William Gamon Biggs Sample Salem Generating Station Influent Test Type 96-h Static Acute Renewal Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Source Aquatic BioSyster s Lot No. f AP)f (1i-,2 -Age 1 )Days Test Chamber Size 800 mL Test Chamber Volume 500 mL No. Organisms per Test Chamber 10 No. Organisms per Concentration 20 No. Organisms per Control 20 Start Date/Time /I End Date/Time

19. i II/9.@ 1t1.l Aeration Required?

[ ] Yes No; Test Day: Laboratory Control (Dilution Water)Day Lot Number Salinity Alkalinity ppt mg/L as CaCO 3 0 .25 1Zto 21 i7-5 2 a1 3 QfID3) -,4k C Acute Toxicity Results Hour LC 5 0 95% Conf. Limits NOAEC 24-h O-o /oo 0/o 48-h > / 0-O t ,/0 72-h o>, 0_96-h Date: \-\ \ v-k\r Reviewed by: r -ýV \\, I Client PSE&G -Salem Generating Station Sample ID Influent Test Startil 2-1l P( *J- 1!5!Test ID No. "a Project No.,jd/,7D.co Test Species Cyprindon variegatus Test Day 0 (Oh) Test Day 1 24 h) Test Day 2 (48 h) Test Day 3 (72 h)DatelTime:111 j-1Lj JjLj,5 Date/Time: P/ "< Date/Time:lL /:2Ii .',.? Date/Time:J JI&A/i -c .-Conc. Test Dilution Total Test Dilution Total Test Dilution Total Test Dilution Total% Solution Water Vol. Solution Water Vol. Solution Water Vol. Solution Water Vol.Control Q \oO iooo 0 10000 1000 C) CCo o6 (2c 1 '-* t)C 6.25% Z- -s 000 Go0 loo C2oo (oO 1-75-0 tco <c C-7a 12.5% 075 )OOO17 3'ý1 0 iC-' Z-5 ý25 tcO Uý100 25% 290 '-51)O kCDO 75-C) 750 bc, 0 ZG- y5- LCaC)D@Z ý73C 50 1000 50% s gcxi )Ocj: O 5-0 900IC' C?~ 5G00 5500 IcOD 5nt 1 60% IWO 60(D loO )o Lac l)Co Gob o LLOO & (c3 q5 0 t-( ooC 70% -y-o 3 o 100 70-, 300 1000C ýD ý50 L C3D 70C 3() LC)(, -80% 6Ob 2-00 )OO ý0O 700 tooQO ýLOC, o CCo eTO &nJ CqZo" (Coo 90% 0 jc50 ýo OQOC) Lc 9) C) O) -jo b toG- tc0 qcM) CC) toC)e 100% QO 16 0 00to 0 C) 0 [0C C 0 [00tO = 0C.CLoo/ IO~ 0 lO0 to), ©d Aoo 10 Ico ~Xb0 \O2 4 Reviewed by: Date: ýC \\ )1 ,11./Z- Z-- (-. Client PSE&G -Salem Influent Test Start 111gf/li (C 16/51 Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Observations: Hour: nD Test ID 4 Project No. ( 75 U O Date: 11 21 Technician: 77A- .4'NX Date: I. -( ýd Reviewed by: ZX V /~ C, V11\ I .Client Test Start Test Species PSE&G -Salem Influent Cyjprinodon variegatus Test ID No. LýJ_ C, Project No..75 bt44,7,2,> Technician: 6,3 Observations: Hour: Date: U 7/Z Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving A 70% (0 B~f A 80%__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _B A 100% A , Q BI A B A B,____________________________ e///'Date: ID ýReviewed by: 7 I' Client PSE&G -Salem Influent Test Start I )J 1 r, F51 " Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. lJL81/Project No. /)L/L( rfq, 0()Technician: A/4 Observations: Hour: _ -_ _Date: I I Le kI-Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving A to ASW Cont.B _0 A IC)A 1 12.5% 10 B/Q A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _25%B I_A 50%B/)A 1C©60% _ _ _Date: (, -.ý- ( I A,[( )-" Reviewed by: I I Client PSE&G -Salem Influent Test Start I¶I D2710. & Iii 1 Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. L'A Project No. .tJy5, 0 D Technician: /MI Observations: Hour: LýDate: I ct-l L Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving A (70% [_______________________________ B 80%B 10 Ar 90%100%B([C) _______A B A B Reviewed by: Date: Client PSE&G,- Salem Influent TestStart 1ý")i Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. IAA Project No. 6,6, obtfLI 7S1O, CO Technician: ca Observations: Hour: _ _ _ _ _Date: ? z-I, It.7-Conc. Rep. Number ObservationslBehavior % Surviving AS Cont.6.25% D A 12.5% _ __B 10 25% 0 B 1 A 50% D_B 0 60% 0 B 0 Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Date: Date: ý ý, D: Client PSE&G -Salem Influent Test Start 4 19Ifj@Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus ,L/4LIJ Test ID No. 1. /-q%'Lq.Project No. ()&,/LJqI7606Ct> Technician: Kb Observations: Hour: Date: I/ C I9 Reviewed by: D D-Client PSE&2 -Salem Infiuent Test Start I(O-/TFIE5] Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. -Project e)Technician: Observations: Hour: -7 Q.Date: I I__ ___-_ _Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Beh avior% Surviving A ASW __ V- ___________________ Cont.B 10 6.25% A 1 A B 12.5% _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _25% V3_B 105 B A 60% __B 27 Date: tr/) la ýI-)Reviewed by: I j I Client PSE&G -Salem Influent Test Start Arcý I Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No.Project No. 6,N, o6()qL-fL56,o Technician: Pb Observations: Hour: Date: I/ IL Reviewed by: __ _ _ _ _ae Date: I >- ý I ý:ý_ I I -.-), Client PSE&G -Salem Influent Test Start )I/)/5, 162i Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test IDNo. j Project No. 5, &Technician: Observations: Hour: (-,: Date: (.2- / -Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving ASW 10 Cont.B A tw 6,25% t _B A !12.5%B A 25%A 50% A 10 B 60% _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _B _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _/4 Reviewed by: Date: (3+D- f~> Client Test Start Test Species PSE&t(3 -Salem Influent Cyprihodon varieg'atus Test ID No. t-I9 Project No. (5, VP0Lft7Pi5., Pb Technician: 161P)Observations: Hour: q(V Date: Ic111 1 Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving 70% A _0 A 80% A 0 B 10 90o% A I BID 10 % A ID_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _A B A B zx.Iva- h D- I I -)-Reviewed by: Date: 7)I I Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Influent TestStart Ii '5tJI Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. ),;_= _Project No. 95? pD -, Y Test Conc.6.25%Test Hour 0h old new 24h old Z7Z 7, /new 7,3 --48 h old 'C- O new 70 -72 h old (9-4 1Q0-new '-'" 96 h old new xUX~~Date: 1 PJ Reviewed by: I I I ) Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Influent TestStart_______________ Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. Jo-i Project No. D. Ifl L~-4 Date: Iý-IýýReviewed by: Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Influent Test Start II9/ 5 Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No.Project No.6',OtL/L , cq ,cO Reviewed by: Reviwedby: 2te Date: Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Influent TestStart inoL d v a ieg Species -Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. _ _ __Project No.6,iý, 1)/Rv /,ze bDt Date: Reviewed by: Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Influent Test Start Il -._Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No.Project No. 0 bb Test Conc.100%Test Hour O h old Inew 24 h old 72 -7, new '48 h old "..-new 72 h old -7, 7.1 new "7._96 h old new>4 Date: I,)- 1 -'a,-Reviewed by: I I Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Influent TestStart ) r-Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. 19-Project No. (2', L(W/ 76P, 00 Meter Record Sample Salinity and pH Adjustment Sample pH Initial Artificial Final pH 3N HCI pH Hour Tech. Volume Initial Salinity Sea Salt Salinity after salting Volume Final 0 ff 5000 mL 7-L( o 0 ppt Sp, 3 g Z25 ppt 0O .t'mL 9.0 24 A/ll mL -7,-7 10 ppt F63 g z5- ppt ,0 mL _,__48 ý,O bO m L 10 ppt 0 g ppt mO mL 72 a.r)L m(9 mL o~J~ pt ~ g ppt __ __ -L 7- 7 -1 Reviewed by:/>II~ (r>Date: Sample Check-In Form IW4q Client PSE&G Test ID No. -Sample Salem Generating Station Project No. ()15. Sample ID No. C(52 -Lq Collection Date I/61u to Sample Type Influent I Collection Time )9,90 to /4DD Shipment: Container Number Type Size I C. L Preservative: Ice Packs Ice Cubesj, Frozen Cool WarmlMelted Initial Chemistry Data: Analysis Date II7//? Time 0C'30 Technician Y(Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) iZ- Meter# # IA Temperature (°C) 3,-- Meter# cT,'f 0 pH (SU) 7-3 Meter#Conductivity (pmhoslcm) I qU,7) D Meter # j'Salinity (ppt) C) Meter #Total Residual Chlorine (mg/L)Initial < , ). 5 Na 2 S 2 0 3 added (g) -Final _e___D, _Hardness (mgIL as CaCO 3) I OO Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO 3) 3 Meter # 153

Description:

Color 2 Oy'f'- Odor Clarity -Other Sample Storage: NF(- (tCcO, /2-7-Date/Time Volume Removed Purpose Approx. Volume Tech.Disposal:~-Reviewed by: Date: / L/I-" Sample Check-In Form 19qqW Client PSE&G Test ID No.Sample Salem Generating Station Project No, 6 FWqL!. o,DO Sample ID No. 0 .3_ -/i, 1 Collection Date (9 Sample Type Influent 1c9 Collection Time /dO to Shipment: Container NumberL Type ( Size 10L Preservative: Ice Packs Ice Cubes Frozen Y Cool__ Warm/Melted Initial Chemistry Data: Analysis Date 11ta;ila Time 1cct.Technician PDS Dissolved Oxygen (mg1L) q,4B Meter # I A Temperature (°C) Q."7 Meter# 01705 pH (SU) ( Meter # 3 Conductivity (pmhos/cm) 150o4o Meter # (-Salinity (ppt) !O Meter # 15 Total Residual Chlorine (mg/L)Initial 0D, D5 Na 2 S 2 0 3 added (g) -Final 0____op Hardness (mg/L as CaCO 3) 1.760 Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO 3) Meter # 16

Description:

Color n Odor lont Clarity 2 ICK ' Other Sample Storage: tJA) //1 opLý, Date/Time Volume Removed Purpose Approx. Volume Tech, Initial: JUL FD_ _ _ _ _ _Final: 57_.Disposal:/_ V Reviewed by: Date: -,->, (a// v._,/ Sample Check-In Form ,ý, L,4 q Client PSE&G Test ID No. / -Sample Salem Generating Station Project No. 05, I q-fq,5b. DO SamplelDNo. ,.- Collection Date 9/a ý,L to ,j Sample Type lnfluent-k, Collection Time 1 D to Shipment: Container Number \ Type Size JnL_Preservative: Ice Packs Ice Cubes Y Frozen K Cool Warm/Melted Initial Chemistry Data: Analysis Date i .- Time oq5v Technician W-1 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) C, 5 Meter # A Temperature (°C) Aa Meter # k.O\'2)pH (SU) g/ _ Meter #Conductivity (pmhos/cm) gI10 Meter #Salinity (ppt) to Meter # 15D Total Residual Chlorine (mg/L)Initial __ -__ __Na 2 S 2 O 3 added (g) -Final -<O, _ 5 Hardness (mg/L as CaCO 3) I Cp Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO3) ,L Meter # j

Description:

Color -Odor_________ Clarity .DOAA Other Sample Storage: ) (Coco .r(Date/Time Volume Removed Purpose Approx. Volume Tech.{11tiZ61*ý ______ Tei4- CcA'.;.___________ -____ Final: /-'__._Disposal: Reviewed by: Date: Reviewed by: Date: Sample Check-in Form A4 q Sample Check-In Form ~LILFc7 Client PSE&G Sample Salem Generating Station SampleID No. 2 Sample Type Influent t ýb Test ID No.Project No. Collection Date / 1 to I) I :-Collection Time /ok2) to /(.26't Shipment: Container Numberj Type# 0bdL'aLQ Size L-Preservative: Ice Packs Ice Cubes V/Frozen i Cool Warm/Melted Initial Chemistry Data: Analysis Date Time I J()Technician Dissolved Oxygen (mgIL) Meter # Temperature (0 C) Meter # Aj b yrJ-pH (SU) , Meter #1 Conductivity (pmhos/cm) g6 Meter# jI Salinity (ppt) Meter # j0 Total Residual Chlorine (mg/L)Initial <_0, 0_Na 2 S 2 O 3 added (g) -Final <0 _ 05 Hardness (mg/L as CaCO 3) C9OOO Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO 3) Meter # /,8

Description:

AQ .Odor Clarity 0 d Other SampleStorage: NE{: bto3__ P1n (_cJ7 aate/Time Volume Removed Purpose Approx. Volume Tech.I ... Initial: LJL-Disposal: Reviewed by: __ _ , D Date: Control 96-h Length and Wet Weight Measurements Client PSE&G Salem Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. -Control A ID Number 1 2 3 4 5 Wet Weight g 0 0 cJ ~O0g0Oo, DcD%Total Length L+, mm -,1 mm 4. S mm mm LI, 0 mm ID Number 6 7 8 9 10 WetWeight ,OflQ g o ,O3O8) 0, 000V g I, QO(.3 g Total Length -,If mm L4,2- mm 3, mm L4, mm t-, mm Control B ID Number 1 2 3 4 5 WetWeight o'i 0 g &OQ'1S'g093 g a,00 111 g 0,0o'09a Total Length If' 5 mm mm L, mm 4j, 4 mm L,2 mm ID Number 6 7 8 9 10 WetWeight OQOC) & O(. g 0 O,(&)g O, O%/)9g 00O0O10 g QCOOqO:-g Total Length H.J3 mm mm .S mm 2- mm LI mm 76;Reviewed by: Date: U-~ L- ~ NEB SALTWATER SPECIES ACCLIMATION RECORD Allowable Mortality: > 5% mortality = Notify management. Allowable Acclimation: Fish = No more than 50% tank volume water change over a 12 (twelve) hour period.Mysids = Need to be +/- 2 ppt of test dilution water.Water Chemistry Observations I1 Sal. Do Date D.O. p. H. Temp- Alkal. Sl Behavioral organisms Mortalities CommentsITreatment type (mg/L) (SU) (C) (mg/L) (ppt) Feedings observations look stressed?I,~~ ~ A=Normal, #fda AM NOON PM B=Erratic mov.Ye/N ornsm SC=' Deadro o 105 3c NS .0 Client PSE&G Maplewood Testing Facility Address 200 Boyden Avenue Maplewood, NJ 07040 Contact Mr. William Gamon Biggs Sample Salem Generating Station Effluent Test Type 96-h Static Acute Renewal Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Source Aquatic BioSystems Lot No. (__V I__, _ I I___-Age / t) Days Test Chamber Size 800 mL Test Chamber Volume 500 mL Test ID No. 0 2-4#Project No. 064'.T0q.r(50.cX No. Organisms per Test Chamber 10 No. Organisms per Concentration 20 No. Organisms per Control 20 Start Date/Time )!1 /2. " End Date/Time-ILIcL., Q6 Aeration Required? [ ] Yes No; Test Day: Laboratory Control (Dilution Water)Acute Toxicity Results Day Lot Number Salinity Alkalinity ppt mg/L as CaCO 3 o ouý22-oqi 25- )ZoD 0 22 2_0-Q-C( ý a Hour LC 5 0 95% Conf. Limits NOAEC 24-h > tOoCl, /co"/o C-- X 48-h > / /0 7 !olI 72-h > 160'1- / *oy t- go x0 96-h >- /oOý 10 v-Llb 01/1 LIZ Date: I ':-ýReviewed by: I I I Client PSE&G -Salem Generating Station Sample ID Effluent Test Start I t 2-.-k. i I,201 Test ID No.Project No.Test Species Cyprindon variegatus Test Day 0 (Oh) Test Day 1 (24 h) Test Day 2 (48 h) Test Day 3 (72 h)Date/Time:/ )j./ Date/Time: 1//[1/t 1. 5790 Date/Time:ll/l qI[e tLt Date/Time: il4i50J ItsO Conc. Test Dilution Total Test Dilution Total Test Dilution Total Test Dilution Total% Solution Water Vol. Solution Water Vol. Solution Water Vol. Solution Water Vol.Control 0 )O00 ]0 1000 [OOCD 0 L0O O *cb 0 lc (0c.6.25% 93ý O135* GýqZ qý7K 1000) oz'5- 1ý5 D~ ~ Q 3-7$ S 12.5% 125 j 1T /Z05 looo j7, -Woo Is 25% 250 7-5 JOCO 75D 75o [0oC 15-6 Y5-o 9SO -7s 60 50% o 500 tooo "O0 q-0D JCO0 Y o 5 -0b S? two SOO M 60% o0O oo G(0 GOO L0 c )ooo qcb OD D Lo (O 4co tc 70% )? 3 )OO3 700 300 (oo 0b 3oo LcDo 7M 3cO tOpt 80% Fc0 O 2-00 10M0 ý?0 go D (000 5-o0 b 0oo LcWco doo toO 90% 9o0D 10D \2YD 900 (00 10o0 ibb Loo I t O(XD 9WoCoC)100%)GOO 0 10IOCO oo 0[000 1ooo 0 IcOD 0 Sample ID No.LA5 jo 3 1-cu-o,ý ý- -sz,-q,ýI Oq I 2 25a-tbQ~i ... .... .... .....b-It )4Q~-~Reviewed by: Date:/7 I I ,I Client Test Start Test Species PSE&G -Salem Effluent Cyprin6don variegatus Test ID No.Project No. Technician: Observations: Hour: n-0---Date: Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving A .f. £J~'V V~f ASW A 2 Cont.A 6.25%12.5%B 25%B 50%60%BQ A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _60 __ _ _ __ _ __......__ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _~-~? ~-~7 6, Date: Reviewed by:/ 1" 67Y "' I I, H! Client Test Start Test Species PSE&Q -Salem Effluent IJ /grf~q I Ir) o5 C/prin6don variegatus Test ID No. I. 4 Project No. 60 Technician: Observations: Hour: 0 Date:_______112 Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving 70%80%A 100% A 1 A B A B Date: , II ; I Reviewed by: 0, 1 1 1 1 Client P SEG -Salem Effluent Test Start /11E) 1 -fo Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. 1229-qo: Project No. 0 D Technician: 49L-Observations: Hour: 2Z4t Date: 11 Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving ASW Cont, B A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _6.25%B A 10 12.5% 0 A 1(9 25%B 1 A /50%60%B I Rviewed by: 7 77///4Dae Date: I/;)- ý ý -;ý- I i ?-Reviewed by: Client PSE&- Saem Effluent Test Start I!14/q1 /1/ 0 Test Species Cyprinbodon variegatus Observations: Hour: qq-Test ID No.Project No. ( '7,L/ -.US Technician: ____/Date: If j9l (8 Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving 70% A(~B (O 80% _____B ID A B A B Reviewed by: '6 Reviewed by: Date: Date: Client Test Start Test Species PSE&G -Salem Effluent Cy/prinodon variegatus Test ID No. __ "_'_ _ _Project No.Technician: Observations: Hour: Date: it I nIt ZL /Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving ASW Cont.A 6.25% A 10 B 00 12.5%B 10 A L 25% 0 B CD A Z 60%B 0 ,/",) A (Date: I I I ( ( Reviewed by: 6/ tl C' _-' Client PSE&G -Salem Effluent Test Start Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus TestIDNo. Project No. 000bqLHr/.C0 Technician: _ _Observations: Hour: Date: I f [ ((--z3Ax14 Reviewed by: Date: /-- -> Client Test Start Test Species PSr&Q -Salem Effluent Cyprinodon variegatus TestIDNo. Project No,. t)6, pOI(p,/7OC) Technician: _Observations: Hour: -7 A Date: 1 ":L Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving A ASW A__Cont.B 6.25% _ _ _,.12.5% 10 B 1 A 25%b 50% A 1 B 10 60%B Q.... ., : ,. ..Reviewed by: Date:&I'IL- II Client PSE&G- Salem Effluent Test Start )I I Test Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. Project No. 5,,Lr1/VPO Technician: PC Observations: Hour: Date: Reviewed/by: Date: i //-Reviewed by: Client Test Start Test Species PýE&Q- SaJm Effluent I T5-r-f I T2 (o7, I r-)-77 Cy'pr~inh65do variegatus Test ID No. Project No. Oo.t- r5fDt Technician: Observations: Hour: q (Q Date: )IZf fIL.z.Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving 7-Al I 1nsm ck90e< VQzrdkLc T ASW 9 Cont.B A 6.25%B~(12.5%A 25% _... ..10i 50%0 B B 10 60% " ____B / Q _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _11124 I~Reviewed by: Date: I I I I I Client Test Start Test Species P$E&G -Salem Effluent b'prihiodon varie-gatus Test ID No. ),-ýI6O Project No. 05, DC)LLP75b., 6D Technician: _ _Observations: Hour: -(ýDate: _iI !a Conc. Rep. Number Observations/Behavior % Surviving A /0 Bft A IO 80% 0_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _BQ 100%A B A B Reviwedby:ADae /:1>/a-Ilo Reviewed by: Date:/ 111/ý Jýý L_," -___-I I I,' Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Effluent Test Start inodon vegt Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No._________ Project No. A y c112 Reviewed by: Date: C- ~ ~ Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Effluent Test Starti inodon aiegt us Species -Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. i,-2L/5&Project No. 05', -tp75'),4 Test Conc.25%Test Hour 0 h old new 24 h old T7, 1 7I new 7, -48h old '7 , 1 new ". -7 72 h old -(0-, (-L new 5 -96 h old new Reviewed by: Review4 by Date:, 1'ý-(IDJI Dý, Date: I .1 (I Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Effluent TestStart Illi t l o Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. P-d"-"5 P roj ect N o. 050. f , OD Reviewed by: Date: Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Effluent TestStart Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID# /0-,.2q560 Project # OOL-6,cO Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Date: __ -______-______ Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Effluent Test Start _ I___-_______ _)_Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. Project No. , O- Wf76,bC)Test Conc.Dissolved Oxygen (mgIL)Replicate A I B Temperature (oC)Replicate A I B Test Hour Oh old new 90%24 h old Tl ______new , 48 h old new 72 h old 27 3 "73 new 0 jtq, tq, a 19..19.7 (70 F7~1 q~q pH (°C)Replicate-A FB 22d YA7 Y-?-mci -7.q Salintly (ppt)Replicate A B?5 z§2---96 h old-7, -S 7.2- 1 17, 0 new I 4 '~44~ -~4 4 -4 4~4. 44~f Revewe b: 44~~47 >4Date: /a Reviewed by: V V I I I Client PSE&G Sample ID Salem -Effluent TestpStart______________ Species -Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. /6i-4J- 56 Project No. Sample Salinity and pH Adjustment Sample pH Initial Artificial Final pH 3N HCI pH Hour Tech. Volume Initial Salinity Sea Salt Salinity after salting Volume Final 0 fO 5000 mL 77,10 1-0 ppt K ,3 g 25" ppt , mL 13,J 24 /,/ SO-0 mL 10 ppt 76.3 g '-S' ppt 7',Q mL ý,0 48 jbo 5X-)o mL 10 ppt Ka Z Z-5-ppt 7-9 -mL 7-T-72 m L , 1(3 ppt ý'03, g <95 ppt S-N -mL S,\96 ~ _- ~ ->1 Reviewed by: Date: Reviewed by: Date: Sample Check-In Form Client PSE&G Test ID No. 'Sample Salem Generating Station Project No.Sample ID No._0 --,30 Collection Date t/b/Io-to ib1-Sample Type Effluent- ( Collection Time '1oqb to k9Z Shipment: Container Number___ Type ~fj- Size i Preservative: ice Packs Ice Cubes Y\J Frozen _ Cool Warm/Melted Initial Chemistry Data: Analysis Date Ii /Z: ii L Time LO,-Technician I-C)Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) Meter #Temperature (°C) .. Meter #pH (SU) -_ Meter#Conductivity (pmhos/cm) 1 M 7 O Meter# j-Salinity (ppt) Meter #Total Residual Chlorine (mg/L)Initial -OO6 Na 2 S 2 O 3 added (g)Final ___ ___Hardness (mg/L as CaCO 3) L-oc(.Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO 3) (a,) Meter # J3

Description:

Color Odor Clarity CL4 Other Sample Storage: Date/Time Volume Removed Purpose Approx. Volume Tech._________ ,77i Q~ ~ ~ [Initial: ,0L___ __ FInal: 5 -Disposal: Re vie/we Date: Reviewed by:_ Sample Check-In Form Client PSE&G Test ID No,.Sample Salem Generating Station Project No. SampleIDNo. Collection Date iI9Cq 52.. to [ / /.-Sample Type Effluent 9.;.. Collection Time r),OD to I9--&Shipment: Container Number Type (- Size 1O L Preservative: Ice Packs Ice Cubes_Frozen ")4 Cool Warm/Melted Initial Chemistry Data: Analysis Date 11 (ftBsQ Time 1100 Technician 90p Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) 1C, I Meter # i A Temperature (°C) 3. a Meter# O3.1OS pH (SU) ( ,c Meter # 16 Conductivity (pnmhos/cm) 15, OqO Meter # 17 Salinity (ppt), ) Meter # 15 Total Residual Chlorine (mg/L)Initial 0__ , _ _ E Na 2 S 2 0 3 added (g) -Final __ _, _)Hardness (mg/L as CaCO 3) , Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO 3) Meter # -'Description: Color Lc Odor -Clarity_ Other Sample Storage: JFAj ' r -c(Date/Time Volume Removed Purpose Approx. Volume Tech.it/-414 1005 Initial: 10L. {I)--~K~Final: 5".Disposal: Date: Reviewed by:i. , i I= ,/I-~ Sample Check-In Form Client PSE&G Test ID No.Sample Salem Generating Station Project No. e,5L, b Sample ID No. 43q Collection DateJL to!~jj~Sample Type Effluent Collection Time to /Afft Shipment: Container Numberj Typeg%4.L Size \(DL-Preservative: Ice Packs Ice Frozen Cool WarmlMelted Initial Chemistry Data: Analysis Date jtý;)qi\a Time Cqe Technician Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) , Meter# P Temperature (C) , Meter pH (SU) 7.,_ Meter #Conductivity (pmhoslcm) ]LIL Meter #Salinity (ppt) j1 Meter # I,%Total Residual Chlorine (mgIL)Initial 0<,OD Na 2 S 2 O 3 added (g)Final <__ ,0._Hardness (mg/L as CaCO 3)jA2]Q Alkalinity (mg!L as CaCO 3) 65 Meter #Description: Color o Odor V30-1ýClarity Q Other.3 Sample Storage: W "oý J-Date/Time Volume Removed Purpose Approx. Volume Tech.u. ~ :7:72Initial: __ __ __ _ _ __ __ _ _Final: 5 .-_Disposal: ,-- q K/(2 Reviewed by: Date: -, 7- 6-~ U-' Sample Check-In Form Client PSE&G Test ID No.Sample Salem Generating Station Project No. lDO/-J76,0L Sample ID No. J ,, Collection Date ,/ce/Icll. to / -Sample Type Effluent % Collection Time /_07) to /Shipment: Container Number Type "ef Size 1 L,ýPreservative: Ice Packs Ice Cubes V/Frozen j/' Cool Warm/Melted Initial Chemistry Data: Analysis Date J Time /.1/0 Technician Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) 9. Meter# # A Temperature (°C) Meter# -bOy/b pH (SU) Meter # E Conductivity (pmhos/cm) Meter# I'j Salinity (ppt) Meter# # a Total Residual Chlorine (mgIL)Initial <,C_, _ b_Na 2 S 2 0 3 added (g)Final < a c._5 Hardness (mg/L as CaC0 3) C I0 Alkalinity (mg/L as CaC0 3) (0.5 Meter # j

Description:

Color .2, ý -kf--8 ua Odor Aoanj Clarity- Other Sample Storage: (7(21f-Date/Time Volume Removed Purpose Approx. Volume Tech..,0"7.. ; -In itia l: 7 L--__________ ____ __ __ _ ~Final: _ _-Disposal: J~7x7 Date: Reviewed by: 7 Initial Fish Measurements Species: Cyprinodon variegatus Source: Aquatic BioSystems Lot Number: I C-JI* Cl I -Z-1 ID Number 1 2 3 4 5 Wet Weight OCqLf g O.C>ONU g C)0_olq g O-LOC .g_-_ g Total Length mm L. mm L60 mm /-. mm ID Number 6 7 8 9 10 Wet Weight ).g O-DC-07 g OC cf g C-_ 3g0 -C I.(C010_) g Total Length mm mmm L. / m mm Lt-1 mm ID Number 11 12 13 14 15 W etW eight g 0),[4 5-Jg , g .g C9J. ./ g Total Length l 1 5 mm 9 mm LL mm H-3 mm -3 mm ID Number 16 .17 18 19 20 W etW eight -g 9 g-9b g U -Oo ,5Z- g 0 CO C) (Q;-- ? g Total Length '-i mm mm mm mm mm/ 1. /.Reviewed by: Date:>2 Control 96-h Length and Wet Weight Measurements Client PSE&G Salem Species Cyprinodon variegatus Test ID No. 1ý -?4 15OC)Control A ID Number 1 2 3 4 5 Wet Weight Qý0 1 QQII9 DOOqQ 3g QO.C~i(ý,g 0,0OYq9g OX0,09I0g Total Length L4-Lo mm LA -mm Lf, Z_ mm Lf, 3 mm 3 9 mm ID Number 6 7 8 9 10 Wet Weight ),OOO(..c g g 00(f O,00 Total Length Lf i mm mm 0 mm L- Zmm ) mm Control B ID Number 6 7 8 9 10 Wet Weight ,ooc}-g 0(00100g O,Oo0o g 01g00:18g Total Length mm L4,i mm H mm L4,( mm H-3 mm Reviewed by Dae:1 Reviewed by: Date: L NEB SALTWATER SPECIES ACCLIMATION RECORD Allowable Mortality: > 5% mortality = Notify management. Allowable Acclimation: Fish = No more than 50% tank volume water change over a 12 (twelve) hour period.Mysids = Need to be +/- 2 ppt of test dilution water.Water Chemistry _[ Observations Sa.Do D.O. p.H. Temp. Alkal Sal. Behavioral organisms Mortalities CommentsITreatment type (mg/L) (SU) (C)

  • gL) observations look stressed?I, AM NOON PM A = Normal, B = Erratic mov.C = Dead Yes/ No# of dead organisms removed from tank f~JUVlACDkIa

+.~ A-StA~.l. New England Bioassay A division of GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.77 Batson Drive Manchester, CT 06042 Phone: 860-643-9560 Fax: 860-646-7169 Chain of Custody Company Name: P 'xC \- 'Project Name/#: 0)' Q .-Invoice To: PO#: Samples Collected By (Print):. bVw Report To: 5OVc 1 F::V:4o Address: <Zý?q)i' h Or4((Gd 1an fo Phone:h llqI Fax: Email: Chemical Analysis -# SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONS Date Sa no d Time Sampled Composite Grab Attach Permit Specifications 3 4 If you are uncertain of the following test parameters, iglease attach a copy of the appropriate pages from your permit ANALYSIS 1 2 3 4 ANALYSIS T 2 3 4 Stormwater (if yes, proceed to relinquish section) Pimephales promelas ( hours/days) _POTW Effluent Cyprinodon variegatus ( ILA Vs Groundwater Menidia beryllina ( hours/days) Non-Contact Cooling W ater A `; Industrial Effluent V__24 hours Other 48 hoursT- ,- 96 hours Definitive LC50 ' 7 days Pass/Fail (Screening or NOAEL) w e Chronic 20'C -Mysidopsis bahia ( __ hours/days) SALINITY (if saltwater testing) ppt Ceriodaphnia dubia (<24 hrs) Dilution water HARDNESS ( mg/L as CaCOa)Relinquished by: Date: lj\ I h.' .Date: I/ /-Z/. _Zie:)- i'" L'<4-p-Time: .--Relinquished by: Date: Accepted by Date: Time: Time: Relinquished by: Date: Accepted by: Date: Time: Time: REMARKS/NOTES: New England Bioassay A division of GZA Geo Environmental, Inc.77 Batson Drive Manchester, CT 06042 Phone: 860-643-9560 Fax: 860-646-7169 Chain of Custody Company Name: -Project Name/#: nt- U- *1 SO .0 0 Invoice To: PO#: Samples Collected By (Print): _ 'Pý cvla -Amaov ReportTo: , Address: Phone: 1 ', Fax:-Wtd ll~ql Email: Chemical Analysis -# SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONS Date Sa r0 d Time Sampled Composite Grab Attach Permit Specifications 3 4 If you are uncertain of the following test arameters, please attach a copy of the appropriate pages from Lour permit ANALYSIS 1 2 3 4 ANALYSIS 1 2 3 4~V Stormwater (if yes, proceed to relinquish section) Fimephales promelas ( hours/days) POTW Effluent Cyprinodon variegatus ( L1 hours/0 ) V Groundwater Menidia beryllina ( hours/days) Other 48 hours-5OO- ~ 96 hours Y Definitive LC50 v/7 days Pass/Fail (Screening or NOAEL) : f _j_ 1'Chronic 20°C I N~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AET'3AET1": -8f --Daphnia pulex (<24 hrs)Mysidopsis bahia ( hours/days) SALINITY (if saltwater testing) 2 i- ppt Ceriodaphnia dubia (<24 hrs) Dilution water HARDNESS ( mg/L as CaCO)Relinquished by: Date: Ila I.') Accepted by: (.4 ( ) Date:,I Jir , & Q0A vk6 Time: Time: Relinquished by: Date: Accepted by: Date: Time: Time: Relinquished by: Date: Accepted by: Date: Time: Time: REMARKS/NOTES: New England Bioassay A division of GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.77 Batson Drive Manchester, CT 06042 Phone: 860-643-9560 Fax: 860-646-7169 Chain of Custody Company Name: " F-\Project Name/#:. O- ". ( >. LDCA Invoice To: PO#: Samples Collected By (Print): U. .fAccd'o Report To:5 OI(/7(& Fo&'T k'.Address: 00 2.o.q Acf_Phone: f " II(/ Fax: Email: Chemical Analysis -# SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONS Date Sa rro d Time Sampled Composite Grab Attach Permit Specifications I )~~~) ~ 6112- W -1 4..UcW Iodj 3 ERRm 4 If you are uncertain of the following test parameters, please attach a copy of the appropriate pages from your Permi ANALYSIS 1 2 1 3 4 ANALYSIS 12 314 Stormwater (if yes, proceed to relinquish section) Pimephales promelas ( hours/days) POTW Effluent Cyprinodon varlegatus ( I hour dayý)Groundwater Menidia beryllina ( hours/days) ________________- -Z ', .-Non-Contact Cooling Water k" "Hob 4A c Industrial Effluent V/ 24 hours Other 48 hours -ours Definitive LC50 V/ 7 days Pass/Fail (Screening or NOAEL)Qi#. Chronic [20'0 V Mysidopsis bahia ( __ hours/days) SALINITY (if saltwater testing) ppt Ceriodaphnia dubia (<24 hrs) Dilution water HARDNESS ( -mg/L as CaCO 3)Relinquished by: Date: 2 Accepted by: Date: Time: / y Time: Relinquished by: Date: Accepted by: Date: Time: Time: Relinquished by: Date: Accepted by: Date:______________________ Time: ____________________ ITime: REMARKS/NOTES: New England Bioassay A division of GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.77 Batson Drive Manchester, CT 06042 Phone: 860-643-9560 Fax: 860-646-7169 Chain of Custody Company Name: C- GS6 ~sa\' orr" Project Name/#: S--O.,.O-IL.,.O. ) D Invoice To: P0#: Samples Collected By (Print): PRmnccc ,d ,, Report To: f-- _4 Address: , -Q Phone: F(-tS) 10ICi! Fax: Email: Mcipk&W-d 62 i I Chemical Analysis -# SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONS Date Sa rrn d Time Sampled Composite Grab Attach Permit Specifications 3 4 i .It you are uncertain of the following! test parameters, pl1ease attach a copy of the appropriate pagles from your permit NEW ENGLAND BIOASSAY ACUTE TOXICITYDATA FORM COVER SHEET FOR REFERENCE TOXICANT LC50 TESTS CLIENT: ADDRESS: CONTACT SAMPLE TYPE: New England Bioassv 77 Batson Drive Manchester, CT 06040 Kim Wills Reference Toxicant -Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-C. variezatus TEST ID N,,O: ý ý ,ýCOC NO: NA PROJECT NO: 1. STOCK SOLUTION PREPARATION SDS LotNumber: S ,52- 6 -Y)01, SDS Stock Concentration

200 nIL Stock Solution Volume : 1 0 mL SDS Calculated:
0. 2-00 g SDS Weighed: 0 2-o3 g Authorization:

Invertebrate II. TEST SOLUTION PREPERATION Test Sol'n Vol.: J60 -rnL Control 0 mL 1.5 g/L _ 2- _ rnL 3.0 g/L 24 m.L 6.0 g/L H -L 12.5 25.0g L 2 00 mL Vol. Stock Used: 3f' i L Vol. Remaining: E01 b rnL (CaIc ulated Vol. Renakinig: 0U). 0,) mL (Measured) III, DILUTION WATER SOURCE ASW Lot No: C -.," Salinity: 2 sL" ppt Alkalinity: I ZO mg/L as CaCO 3 TYPE OF TEST TEST SETUP (TECH.. INIT.): W-" RESULTS OF Dani r LCs 0 TEST DEFINITIVE rxi SCREEN F 1 RANGE f 1 RENEWAL r I METHOD LC 5 0 (g/L) 95% CONFIDENCE LDIMTS (g/L)TEST SPECIES: Cvorinodon variegatus BINOMIAL DISTiBUTION: NEB LOT : (QAl )l/' MOVING AVERAGE ANGLE: ___ ________AGE: (9 Days 4u PROBIT: ____ ___________ TEST SO LUTION`VOLUM,/E: 700 (niL) TRIMMED SPEARMAN KARBER: ILCLZL) Li ND. ORGANISMS PER TEST CHAMBER: 10 OTHER: NO. ORGANISMS PER CONCENTRATION: 20 NOAEL: NO. ORGANISMS PER CONTROL: 20 NOAEL: NO -OBSERVED -ACUTE -EFFECT LEVEL STARTDATE: .__\__ AT K 0, END DATE: Z 1 2- AT_______COMMENTS REVIEWED BY REVIEED BYDATE: New England Bioassay Reference Toxicity Test Data Sheet NEB Test #: (2 -Lt ý 3 Test Organism: Cvorinodon varieaatus Project #:[0 Hours/~5~Age Facility Name: Date Sampled: New Enqiland Bioassay Test Duration:I-Int 48 Hours Beginning Date: !1 .SOO Date Received: "------Sample ID: Reference Toxicant -SDS Dilution Water Source: NEB Lab Synthetic Hardness: ooin as CaCO3 Conc. Number of Dissolved Temperature pH Sal (mg/L) Surviving Oxygen (OC) ppt Organisms (mg/L).& 0 24 48 72 96 0 24 48 72 96 0 241 48 72 96 0 124 48 72 96 0___ B A D F1 I0 -O -1 .01 7,$ -( 014 " 21,+/- -q a O Z 5 30 -" 77.. 6 10 110~ 10 T0 10 13 (P. 75_ /-9 Wo1 V -1.5 A I O £0 1 0 i-7.0 WoI,_ 21 Iq 1tj qo 7,1) 7 __ 6 __ , 2-5sý~ '6 _ __a _f 7__6. 0 A 0 11C I ()10 7-7-24 7'5 7. _q 25, --1 0 jOto P O C)! 1 .0 ,17, C, TI P ( *,, Mq 1'7 CO I-,1 5 6.0 A ) O 3'XO " M , 1 Iq J5 ,/ __B IQ C1 C) 7, L?12.5 A! t[ '/ D -"7, 7,- 21 t1 q- , S B 1(1 01" T -5 ___25 A 0'?,f ,{ 21 ,1 ,! l B Tech Int. V 1#v Lf~ Etdu"P Ii)3 __LC5O Confidence Interval A-NOEC I Computational Method r So Y~uA Analyst(s) Signature K,) \Q~ CT-TOX: BINOMIAL, MOVING AVERAGE, PROBIT, AND SPEARMAN METHODS SPEARMAN-KARBER TRIM: .00%LC50: 4.243 95% CONFIDENCE LIMITS ARE UNRELIABLE. CONC.mg/L 1.50 3.00 6.00 12.50 25.00 NUMBER EXPOSED 20.20.20.20.20.NUMBER DEAD 0.0.20.20.20.PERCENT DEAD.00.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 BINOMIAL PROB.(%).9537D-04.9537D-04.9537D-04.9537D-04.9537D-04 THE BINOMIAL TEST SHOWS THAT 3.00 AND 6.00 CAN BE USED AS STATISTICALLY SOUND CONSERVATIVE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LIMITS SINCE THE ACTUAL CONFIDENCE LEVEL ASSOCIATED WITH THESE LIMITS IS 99.9998 PERCENT.AN APPROXIMATE LCS0 FOR THIS DATA SET IS 4.243 WHEN THERE ARE LESS THAN TWO CONCENTRATIONS AT WHICH THE PERCENT DEAD IS BETWEEN 0 AND 100, NEITHER THE MOVING AVERAGE NOR THE PROBIT METHOD CAN GIVE ANY STATISCALLY SOUND RESULTS.DATE: 11/27/12 SAMPLE: SDS TEST NUMBER: 12-2473 SPECIES: C.variegatus CONFIDENCE LIMITS UPPER SPAN'0 6.000 3.000 DURATION: 48 h METHOD BINOMIAL D1AA PROBIT SPEARMAN LC50 4.243 LOWER 3.00******* ******* *******4*.243* ******* ******* ******4 ******* ******* **~********* = LIMIT DOES NOT EXIST SPEARMAN-KARBER TRIM: .00%LC50: 4.243 95% CONFIDENCE LIMITS ARE UNRELIABLE. CONC. NUMBER NUMBER PERCENT BINOMIAL mg/L EXPOSED DEAD DEAD PROB.(%)1.50 20. 0. .00 .9537D-04 3.00 20. 0. .00 .9537D-04 6.00 20. 20. 100.00 .9537D-04 12.50 20. 20. 100.00 .9537D-04 25.00 20. 20. 100.00 .9537D-04 THE BINOMIAL TEST SHOWS THAT 3.00 AND 6.00 CAN BE USED AS STATISTICALLY SOUND CONSERVATIVE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LIMITS SINCE THE ACTUAL CONFIDENCE LEVEL ASSOCIATED WITH THESE LIMITS IS 99.9998 PERCENT.AN APPROXIMATE LC50 FOR THIS DATA SET IS 4.243 WHEN THERE ARE LESS THAN TWO CONCENTRATIONS AT WHICH THE PERCENT DEAD IS BETWEEN 0 AND 100, NEITHER THE MOVING AVERAGE NOR THE PROBIT METHOD CAN GIVE ANY STATISCALLY SOUND RESULTS.DATE: 11/27/12 TEST NUMBER: 12-2473 DURATION: 96 h SAMPLE: SDS SPECIES: C.variegatus METHOD LC50 CONFIDENCE LIMITS LOWER UPPER SPAN BINOMIAL 4.243 3.000 6.000 3.000 MAA*******

            • ******* *******PROBIT ******* ******* ******* *******SPEARMAN 4.243 ******* ******* *********** = LIMIT DOES NOT EXIST Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate: Cyprinodon variegatus JAN 2010- NOV 2012 15.0 1 12.01 3.0 0 .0I I I I I I o o N N N N N N Test Date S LCSO -- Moan LCSO .. ..2STD Test ID Date LC 5 c Mean LC 5 0 STD -2STD + 2STD CV %11-195 2/3/2011 4.7 6.4 1.2 3.9 8.8 19.4 11-388 3/9/2011 5.8 6.3 1.2 3.8 8.7 19.7 11-570 4/7/2011 6.5 6.2 1.1 4.0 8.5 18.2 11-854 5/17/2011 8.7 6.3 1.2 3,8 8.7 19.5 11-854 5/17/2011 6.5 6,2 1.2 3.9 8.6 19.0 11-1071 6/22/2011 7.0 6,2 1.2 3.9 8.6 18.7 11-1091 711/2011 7.2 6.3 1.2 3.9 8.6 18.6 11-1454 8/1/11 8,7 6.3 1.3 3.8 8,8 19.9 11-1707 9/2/2011 8.7 6.4 1.3 3,8 9.1 20.4 11-2377 10/19/2011 5.8 6,4 1.3 3.7 9.0 20.6 11-2537 11/9/2011 4.9 6.3 1.3 3.6 9.0 21.2 11-2755 12/13/2011 5.4 6.3 1.3 3.6 9.0 21.4 12-24 1/5/2012 4.2 6,2 1.4 3.4 9.0 22.4 12-243 2/1/2012 4.2 6,2 1.5 3.3 9.1 23.5 12-386 2/29/2012 4.2 6.1 1.5 3,1 9.1 24.7 12-706 4/3/2012 4.6 5.9 1.5 2.9 9.0 25.7 12-976 5/10/2012 6.3 5.9 1,5 3.0 8.9 25.1 12-1274 6/27/2012 8.4 6.0 1.6 2.9 9.2 25.7 12-1305 7/3/2012 8.4 6.1 1.6 2,9 9.4 26.4 12-1505 8/1/2012 8.4 6.1 1.7 2.8 9,5 27.4 12-1811 9/6/2012 8.1 6.3 1.7 3.0 9.6 26.5 12-2143 10/3/2012 5.3 6.3 1.6 3.0 9.6 26.0 12-2445 11/15/2012 5.4 6.3 1.6 3.1 9.6 25.6 12-2473 11/27/2012 4.2 6.3 1.6 3.0 9.6 25.9}}
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=SCH12-041,_Salem_Generating_Station,_Transmittal_of_Discharge_Monitoring_Report_for_the_Month_of_November_2012&oldid=1218493"