Text

Transmittal of 2015 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
	ML16123A174
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/28/2016
From:	Carr E, Grover F; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	LR-N16-0052
	Download: ML16123A174 (135)
	v • d • e

PSEG Nuclear* LLC P.O. Box 236, 'Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 0PSEG Nuclear LLC Technical Specification Section 6.9.1. 7 (Salem)

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.6 (Hope Creek)

LR-N16-0052 APR,28 2016 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk i'f Washington, DC 20555-0001 Hope Creek Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License NPF-57 NRC Docket No. 50 354 Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating Licenses Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311

Subject:

2015 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report As required by Section 6.9.1. 7 of Appendix A to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses DPR-70 and DPR-75 for Salem Generating Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Section 6.9.1.6 of Appendix A to Renewed Facility Operating License NPF- 57 for Hope Creek Generating Station, PSEG Nuclear hereby transmits one copy of the combined 2015 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. This report summarizes the results of the radiological environmental surveillance program for 2015 in the vicinity of the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations. The result of this program for 2015 was specifically compared to the result of the pre-operational program.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1. 7 (Salem)

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.6 (Hope Creek)

LR-N16-0052 Page2 If you have any questions or comments on this transmittal, please contact Ms.

Alison Kraus at (856) 339-7900.

Sincerely, Eric S. Carr Plant Manager Salem Generating Station pjd

Enclosure:

2015 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report cc: Mr. Daniel Dorman, Regional Administrator - Region 1 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Thomas Wengert, Project Manager Hope Creek/Salem USNRC Mr. Justin Hawkins, NRC Senior Resident Inspector- Hope Creek (X24)

Mr. Patrick Finney, NRC Senior Resident Inspector-Salem (X24)

Mr. Thomas MacEwen, Hope Creek Commitment Coordinator (H02)

Mr. Thomas Cachaza, Salem Commitment Coordinator (X25)

Mr. Lee Marabella, Corporate Commitment Coordinator (N21)

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.7 (Salem)

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.6 (Hope Creek)

LR-N 16-0052 Enclosure Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations 2015 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM PSEG Nuclear LLC, SALEM and HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS 2015 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2015

Intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Summary and Introduction, ............................................................................................... 1

11. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ..................................................... 3 A. Objectives of the Operational REMP ................. ~ ................................................. 4

8. Implementation of the Objectives ........................................................................ 4 Ill. Program Description ....................................................................................................... 6 A. Data Interpretation ................................................ , .................. :........................... 6

8. Program Exceptions ............................................................................................ 7 C. Program Changes ............................................................................................... 8 D. Quality Assurance Program ................................................................................ 9 E. Summary of Results: Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ............................ 10 F. Summary of Results: Split Sample Comparison Program ................................ 15 IV. Results and Discussion ............................................................................................... 17 A. Atmospheric ........................,, .............................................................................. 18

1. Air Particulates ........................................................................................ 18

2. Air Iodine ................................................................................................. 19

8. Direct Radiation ................................................................................................. 20 C. Terrestrial .......................................................................................................... 21

1. Milk .......................................................................................................... 22

2. Well Water (Ground Water) .................................................................... 23

3. Potable Water (Drinking Water) .............................................................. 24

4. Vegetables .............................................................................................. 26

5. Fodder Crops .......................................................................................... 27

6. Soil .......................................................................................................... 28

7. Game ...................................................................................................... 28 D. Aquatic ............................................................................................................... 29 1 . Surface Water ......................................................................................... 30

2. Fish ......................................................................................................... 33

3. Blue Crab ................................................................................................ 34

4. Sediment ................................................................................................. 34

5. Oysters .................................................................................................... 36 E. Land Use Survey ............................................................................................... 36 V. Annotations to Previous ARE OR .................................................................................. 37 VI. Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentrations .. 38 VII. Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 38 VI 11. References ................................................................................................................ 39

-i-

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

Appendix A - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary ....*. .'.................. 41 Appendix B - Sample Designation and Locations ............................................................. 55 Appendix C - Data Tables and Figures ............................................................................. 71 Appendix D- Summary of Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ............................ :..... 105

- ii -

LIST OF TABLES Table A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary ..................... 44 Table B-1 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ......................................................... 57 Table B-2 Sampling Locations ................................................................................. 63 Table C-1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Quarterly Composites of Air Particulates .............................................................................................. 73 Table C-2 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Air Particulates ....................... 75 Table C-3 Concentrations of lodine-131 in Filtered Air ............................................. 77 Table C-4 Direct Radiation Measurements - Quarterly Dosimetry Results .............. 79 Table C-5 Concentrations of lodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Milk ..................... 80 Table C-6 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Tritium in Well Water ................................................................................ 82 Table C-7 Concentratior:is of Gamma Emitters in Well Water ................................... 83 Table C-8 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Tritium in Raw and Treated Potable Water (2F3) ..................................... 84 Table C-9 Concentrations of lodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Raw and Treated Potable Water (2F3) ................................................................... 85 Table C-10 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegetables .................................. 86 Table C-11 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fodder Crops .............................. 90 Table C-12 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Soil .............................................. 91 Table C-13 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Game .......................................... 92 Table C-14 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water ............................................. 93 Table C-15 Concentrations of lodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Surface Water ......................................... :............................................................. 94 Table C-16 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Edible Fish .................................. 96 Table C-17 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Crabs ........................................... 97 Table C-18 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment ..................................... 98 Table C-19 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Oysters ........................................ 99 Table C-20 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL ................................................................................................. 100 Table D-1 Analytic's Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ............................ 107 Table D-2 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ................................................................................................... 110

- iii -

LIST OF TABLES (cont'd)

Table D-3 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ............................ 111 Table D-4 GEL 2015 Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Performance Evaluation Results ................................................................................... 112 Table D-5 GEL 2015 Department of Energy Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) Results ............................... 115 Table D-6 2015 GEL ERA Program Performance Evaluation Results ...................... 119 Table D-7 2015 GEL ERA Program (MRAD) Performance Evaluation Results ..................................................................................................... 121 LIST OF MAPS Map B-1 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program On-Site Sampling Locations out to 1 mile ............................................................................. 67 Map B-2 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Off-Site Sampling Locations 1 to 10 miles ............................................................................ 68 Map B-3 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Off-Site Sampling Locations Greater than 10 miles .............................................................. 69 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates - Quarterly Average For All Locations 2005 through 2015 ....................................................... 101 Figure 2

Cesium-137 Activity in Soil 1974 through 2015 (Triennial) ...................... 102 Figure 3 Tritium Activity in Surface Water - Quarterly Average 2005 through 2015 .............................................. : ............................................. 103

- iv -

LIST OF ACRONYMS OR TERMS USED IN THIS TEXT (in alphabetical order)

ARE OR Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

% Percent A Acceptable a posteriori - an "after the fact" limit representing the capability of a a posteriori measurement system a priori - a "before the fact" limit representing the capability of a a priori measurement system AIO Air Iodine Analyte The substance being identified and measured in a chemical analysis APT Air Particulates Bq Bequerels c Control eves Chemical Volume Control System DOE Department of Energy dpm Disintegrations per minute ECH Crabs ERA Environmental Resource Associates ESF Fish ESS Sediment EZA Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc.

FPL Broad Leafy Vegetation FPV Vegetables GAM Game GEL General Engineering Laboratories; Duplicate sample analysis vendor Gr-A Gross alpha Gr-B Gross beta H-3 Tritium HCGS Hope Creek Generating Station IDM Immersion Dose Monitor ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel StoraQe Installation kg Kilogram keV Kilo-electron volts L Liter LLD Lower Limit of Detection LTS Laboratory Testing Services m3 Cubic meter MAPEP Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration ml Milliliter MLK Milk Milli Roentgen - a unit of radiation, used to measure the exposure of mR somebody or something to X-rays and gamma rays, defined in terms of the ionization effect on air.

-v-

Millirem - a unit for measuring amounts of radiation, equal to the effect that mrem one roentgen of X-rays or gamma-rays would produce in a human being. It is used in radiation protection and monitoring.

MWe Megawatt Electric MWt Megawatt Thermal N Not Acceptable NCR Nonconformance Report NE LAC National Environmental Laboratory Conference Notification Documentation of an event into the PSEG Corrective Action Program NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ODCM Offsite Dose Calculation Manual pCi Picocuries PD Passive Dosimeter PE Performance Evaluation PSEG Public Service Enterprise Group PT Performance Testing PWR Potable (drinking) Water - Raw PWT Potable (drinking) Water - Treated QA Quality Assurance REMP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RGPP Radiological Groundwater Protection Program SA Salem SAR Safety Analysis Report SCFM Standard Cubic Feet per Minute SGS Salem Generating Station SOL Soil SOP Standard Operating Procedures Standard Standard Quarter= 92.days Quarter SWA Surface Water TBE Teledyne Brown Engineering; Primary sample analysis vendor TEDA Triethylene-diamine Thermoluminescent Dosimeter - A TLD measures ionizing radiation exposure by measuring the intensity of visible light emitted from a crystal in TLD the detector when the crystal is heated. The intensity of light emitted is dependent upon the radiation exposure.

TS Technical Specifications uCi Microcuries USE PA United States Environmental Protection Agency VGT Fodder Crops w Warning WWA Ground (well) Water

- vi -

I. Summary and Introduction PSEG Nuclear LLC operates Salem Generating Station (SGS) and Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS) (collecti'vely, the Site) and implements a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) in accordance with the Site Offsite Dose Calculation Manuals (ODCMs). The REMP monitors and evaluates the environment surrounding the Site to ensure that there are no adverse impacts to the public or the environment. The results of the REMP are published annually in this Report, the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR). This AREOR provides a summary and interpretation of the data collected from January 1 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period).

The REMP is based on NRG guidance as reflected in the Site ODCMs and establishes sample media, sampling locations, sampling frequency and analytical sensitivity requirements. It also identifies indicator and control locations established for comparison purposes to distinguish plant related radioactivity from naturally occurring or other radioactivity from man-made sources. The environmental monitoring program also verifies the projected and anticipated radionuclide concentrations in the environment and evaluates exposures associated with releases of radionuclides from the Site as described by the ODCM.

This program satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50 and provides surveillance of all appropriate critical exposure pathways to man. The REMP also complies with the following Technical Specifications and ODCM requirements:

Unit Technical Specifications ODCM SGS U1 6.8A.h 3/4. 12.1 6.9.1.7 SGS U2 6.8.4.h 3/4. 12.1 6.9.1.7 HCGS U1 6.8.4.h 3/4. 12.1 6.9.1.6 To demonstrate compliance with the requirements, samples of air particulates, air iodine, milk, surface water, ground (well) water, potable (drinking) water, vegetables, fodder crops, fish, crabs, oysters, game, and sediment were collected and analyzed.

External radiation dose measurements were also made in the vicinity of the Site using passive dosimeters. These environmental media were analyzed for one or more of the following: gamma emitting isotopes, tritium (H-3), iodine-131 (1-131 ),

gross alpha, gross beta and immersion dose-. Measurements made in the vicinity of the Site were compared to background or control measurements and the preoperational REMP study performed before SGS Unit 1 became operational. The results of these analyses were.used to assess the environmental impact of Site operations, thereby demonstrating compliance with the applicable Site Technical Specifications, ODCMs, and Federal regulations.

For the Reporting Period, there were a total of 171 b analyses performed on 1370 environmental samples. Most of the radioactive materials noted in this Report are either natutally occurring in the environment such as K-40 or Be-7, or a result of other non-plant related human activities, such as historical atmospheric nuclear weapons testing or medical wastes from offsite. The majority of the remaining samples did not contain plant related radionuclides above detection limits.

There were two samples that had positive detections for radionuclides that could be attributed to plant related activities. There was one surface water detection of tritium -

at location 12C1 in the October composite sample at a concentration of 257 pCi/L, followed by another surface water tritium detection at location 7E1 in the November composite sample at a concentration of 242 pCi/L. Both positive detections were evaluated and determined that there were no significant dose impacts.

The detection capabilities for environmental samples, required by the Site ODCMs, were achieved for the Reporting Period. Any exceptions to the program are noted in the Report and the associated PSEG corrective action identifier was included in parenthesis.

Based on the results from the Reporting Period, the concentration of plant related radioactive material in the environment that could be attributable to Site operations was only a small fraction of the combination of naturally occurring and man-made radioactivity. The data obtained during the Reporting Period were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, and are lower than the applicable limits. Combined with historical results collected since commercial operation, it can be concluded that the observed results were as expected and therefore, we conclude that the operation of the Site had no significant radiological impact on the environment.

11. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program The Site is located in Lower Alloways Creek Township, Salem County, New Jersey.

SGS consists of two operating pressurized water nuclear power reactors. SGS Unit 1 has a net rating of 1180 megawatt electric (MWe) and SGS Unit 2 has a net rating of 1178 MWe. The licensed core power for both Units is 3459 megawatt thermal (MWt). HCGS consists of an operating boiling water nuclear power reactor, which has a net rating of 1212 MWe. The licensed core power is 3840 MWt.

The Site is located on a man-made peninsula on the east bank of the Delaware River called Artificial Island. The peninsula was created by the deposition of hydraulic fill from dredging operations. The surrounding environment is characterized mainly by the Delaware River Estuary and Bay, extensive tidal marshlands, and low-lying meadowlands. These land types make up vast majority of the land area within five miles of the site, with most of the remaining land used for agriculture.

Since 1968, a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) has been conducted at the Site. Starting in December 1972, a more extensive radiological monitoring program was initiated in preparation for the operation of SGS Unit 1. The operational REMP was initiated in December 1976 when SGS Unit 1 achieved criticality.

An overview of the 2015 REMP is provided in Table B-1, Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.

Radioanalytical data from samples collected under this program were compared with results from the preoperatidnal phase and historical operational results. This Report presents the results from January 1 through December 31, 2015 (The Reporting Period), for the Site REMP.

A. Objectives of the Operational REMP:

The objectives of the Operational REMP as described in the Site ODCMs are:

1. To determine whether any significant increases occur in the concentration of

radionuclides in critical pathways of exposure in the vicinity of Artificial Island.

2. To determine if the operation of the Site has resulted in any increase in the inventory of long lived radionuclides in-the environment.

3. To detect any change in ambient gamma radiation levels.

4. To verify that Site operations do not have detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment.

8. Implementation of the Objectives:

The following describes the actions taken by PSEG Nuclear *LLC to meet the REMP objectives listed above:

1. Sa~ples of various media were selected for monitoring due to the radiological dose impact to humans and other organisms. The selection of samples was based on:

(a) Established critical pathways for the transfer of plant related radionuclides through the environment to man, and (b) Experience gained during the preoperational phase. Sampling locations were determined based on site meteorology, Delaware River Bay estuarine hydrology, local demography, and land uses.

2. Sampling locations are divided into two classes: indicator and control. Indicator stations are those which have the potential to be influenced by Site operations.

Control samples are collected at locations which are believed to be unaffected by Site operations, usually at 15 to 30 kilo_meters (9.3 to 18.6 miles) away from the Site. Fluctuations in the levels of radionuclides and direct radiation at indicator stations are evaluated with respect to analogous fluctuations at control stations. Indicator and control station data are also evaluated relative to preoperational data.

3. Appendix A, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary, describes the coding system which identifies sample type and location and describes and summarizes the analytical results in accordance with Section 6.9.1.7 of the SGS ODCM and Section 6.9.1.6 of the HCGS ODCM. TableA-1 summarizes average, minimum and maximum activities of the indicator locations, control locations and the location with the highest mean using values above the Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC).

4. Appendix B, Sample Designation and Locations, Table B-1 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, lists the types of samples collected, sample frequency, and analysis types.

Table B-2, Sampling locations, station codes, locations, and latitude and longitude coordinates.

5. The sampling locations are also indicated on Maps B-1, Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program On-site Sampling Locations and B-2, Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Off-site Sampling Locations.

111. Program Description A. Data Interpretation Results of analyses are grouped according to sample type and presented in Appendix C, Data Tables. All results above the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) are at a confidence level of+/- 2 sigma. This represents the range of values into which 95% of repeated analyses of the same sample should fall. As defined in NRG NUREG-1301 and NUREG-1302, LLD is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95% probability, with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real signal." The equation for determining LLD is:

LLD= 4.66 *Sb E* V *2.22* Y

exp(-A.~t) 4.66 is the statistical factor from NU REG 1301 and 1302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable,

'A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-1 ), and Lit for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection, or end of the sample collection period, and time of counting (sec).

The LLD is an "a priori' number, which represents the capability of the measurement system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type), and not an after the fact criteria for the presence of activity. All analyses are designed to achieve the required detection limits for environmental sample analysis as described in the Site ODCMs.

The Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) is defined as above with the.

exception that the measurement .is an "a posteriori' (after the fact) estimate of the presence of activity. The MDC should be lower than the required LLD.

The grouped data were averaged and standard deviations calculated. The +/- 2 sigma deviations of the averaged data represent sample and not analytical variability. For reporting and calculation of averages, any positive r~sult above the MDC is considered to be a valid result.

B. Program Exceptions.

During the Reporting Period, the only exceptions to REMP sampling requirements involved Air Sampling Station weekly run times. In all instances, a sufficient sample was collected during the week to meet the required LLD, therefore there were no missed samples Air Sampling Stations REMP air station 15S2 operated approximately 73.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months less than expected the week of 03/30/15 to 04/06/15; 3.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months less than expected the week of 04/06/15 to 04/13/15; and 40 hours4.62963e-4 days 0.0111 hours 6.613757e-5 weeks 1.522e-5 months less than expected the week of 04/13/15 to 04/20/15. All three instances were due to power outages for planned maintenance. During weekly filter change out on 04/20/15 the sampler was observed to be operating normally and no other problems were noted. (Notifications: 20684005, 20687547, and 20686211 )

REMP air station 5D1 operated approximately 15.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months less than expected the week of 06/08/15 to 06/15/15 due to a blown fuse. During weekly filter change out on 06/15/15 the fuse was replaced. The sam*pler was observed to be operating normally following the replacement and no other problems were identified.

(Notification: 20695299)

REMP air station 1F1 operated approximately 36.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months less than expected the week of 06/22/15 to 06/29/15. There was severe weather that week which is believed to have disrupted power to the sampling station. During weekly filter change out on 06/29/15 the sampler was observed to be operating normally and no other problems were identified. (Notification: 20695303)

REMP air station 5D1 operated approximately 5.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months less than expected the week of 06/22/15 to 06/29/15. There was severe weather that week which* is*

believed to have disrupted power to the sampling station. During weekly filter change out on 06/29/15 the sampler was observed to be operating normally and rio other problems were identified. (Notification: 20695504)

REMP air stations 5S1 and 5S2 operated approximately 5.4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months less than expected the week of 07/06/15 to 07/13/15 due to a planned electrical outage for maintenance. The sampler was observed to be operating normally following return to service and no problems were identified. (Notification: 20696790)

REMP air station 14G1 operated approximately 5.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months less than expected the week.of 07/20/15 to 07/27/15. There was severe weather that week which is believed to have disrupted power to the sampling station. During weekly filter change out on 07/27 /15 the sampler was observed to be operating normally and no other problems were identified. (Notification: 20697852)

REMP air station 7S2 operated approximately 45.4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months less than expected the week of 10/12/15 to 10/19/15. The electrical breaker was found tripped and was

.. reset on 10/19/15. Approximately 5.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months of sample was missed the week of

. 10/19/15 to 10/26/15 before power was restored to the sample pump. After the breaker was reset, the sampler was observed to be operating normally and no other problems were identified. (Notification: 20706777)

C. Program Changes The following* enhancements were made to the program during the Reporting Period:

Oyster Samples Although oysters are not harvested for human consumption within five miles of the Site discharge, oysters were added as a Management Audit Sample during the Reporting Period to evaluate ingestion dose from liquid effluents. Two samples were obtained during the New Jersey harvest season and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. The program will be evaluated to determine if continued sampling will add value for the future.

Surface yvater Sample Frequency Surface water sampling frequency was increased to two samples per month in July 2015. The two samples are combined to create a monthly composite sample for analysis; the analysis frequency was not changed.

Passive Dosimeter Type Change The type of passive dosimeter (PD) used for Direct Radiation monitoring was changed from Harshaw type 17 to Panasonic type 20. Both types were installed at all 58 monitored locations during fourth quarter 2014 and the first two quarters of 2015 for side by side comparisons. For the third and fourth quarters of 2015, only Panasonic type 20 dosimeters were used.

D. Quality Assurance Program Teledyne Brown Engineering The results reported by TBE are consistent with the Quality Assurance Program as described in the TBE Quality Assurance Manual and the TBE Procedure Manual.

GEL Laboratories The results reported by GEL Laboratories, LLC are consistent with the Quality System described in GEL's Quality Assurance Manual and the requirements of IS017025:2005.

E. Inter-laboratory Comparison Program Inter-laboratory Comparison Programs are independent checks on the precision and accuracy of laboratory analyses. These checks are performed as part of the REMP and are part of the quality assurance program.

TBE analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices, as appropriate for 139 analyses (Appendix D, Tables D-1 through D-3).

GEL analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices, as appropriate for 429 analyses (Appendix. D, Tables D-4 through D-7).

The PE samples, supplied by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc (EZA), Environmental Resource Associates (ERA), and the Department of Energy's (DOE) Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), we~e evaluated against the following acceptance criteria:

EZA Evaluation Criteria EZA's evaluation report provides a ratio of reported results and EZNs known value. Since flag acceptance criteria values are not assigned by EZA, TBE evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.

ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA),

National Environmental Laboratory Conference (NELAC) performance testing (PT) program requirements, or ERA's standard operating procedure (SOP) for the

. Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document.

DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values. The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag = "A"),

Acceptable with Warning (flag= "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag= "N").

Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is "acceptable with warning" when a mean result falls in the range from +/- 20% to +/- 30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% <bias< 30%). If the mean result is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

Teledyne Brown Engineering TBE participated in inter-laboratory cross-checks during the reporting period, and of the 139 inter-laboratory analyses TBE performed, 130 met the specified acceptance criteria. Eight analyses (APT - Cr-51, Soil Sr-90; U-234/233, Gr A, Water Ni-63; Sr-90; Vegetation Sr-90 samples; and Water natural U;) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons and are being addressed through the TBE Corrective Action Program.

Note: the Department of Energy (DOE) Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) samples are created to mimic conditions found at DOE sites which do not resemble typical environmental samples obtained at commercial nuclear power facilities.

TBE's EZA June 2015 air particulate Cr-51 result of 323 +/- 45.5 pCi was higher than the known value of 233 pCi with a ratio of 1.39. The upper ratio of 1.20 was exceeded. The air particulate sample is counted at a distance above the surface of the detector to avoid detector summing which could alter the results. Cr-51 had the shortest half-life (27.7 days) and the lowest gamma energy (320.08 keV) of this mixed nuclide sample. Additionally, Cr-51 has only one gamma energy and also has a low intensity (9.83 gamma photons produced per 100 disintegrations).

This geometry produces a larger error for Cr-51 and other gamma emitters as any distance from the detector decreases the counting rate and the probability of accurately detecting the nuclide energy. Taking into consideration the uncertainty, the activity of Cr-51 overlaps with the known value at a ratio of 1.19, which would be considered acceptable. (NCR 15-18)

TSE's MAPEP March 2015 soil Sr-90 result of 286 Total Sq/kg was lower than the known value of 653 Sq/kg, exceeding the lower acceptance range of 487 Sq/kg.

The failure was due to incomplete digestion of the sample. Incomplete digestion of samples causes some of the sample to be left behind and is not present in the digested sample utilized for analysis. The procedure has been updated to include a more robust digestion using stirring during the heating phase. The MAPEP September 2014 soil Sr-90 series prior to this study was evaluated as acceptable with a result of 694 and an acceptance range of 601 - 1115 Sq/kg. The MAPEP September 2015 series soil Sr-90 after this study was evaluated as acceptable with a result of 429 and an acceptance range of 298 - 553 Sq/kg. (NCR 15-13)

TSE's MAPEP March 2015 air particulate U-234/233 result of 0.0211 +/- 0.0120 Sq/sample was higher than the known value of 0.0155 Sq/sample, exceeding the upper acceptance range of 0.0202 Sq/sample. Although evaluated as a failure, taking into consideration the uncertainty, TSE's result would overlap with the known value, which is statistically considered acceptable. MAPEP spiked the sample with significantly more U-238 activity (a found to known ratio of 0.96) than the normal U-234/233. Due to the extremely low activity, it was difficult to quantify the U-234/233. (NCR 15-13)

TSE's MAPEP March 2015 air particulate gross alpha result of 0.448 Sq/sample was lower than the known value of 1. 77 Sq/sample, exceeding the lower*

acceptance range of 0.53 Sq/sample. The instrument efficiency used for gross alpha is determined using a non-attenuated alpha standard. The MAPEP filter has the alphas embedded in the filter, requiring an attenuated efficiency. When samples contain alpha particles that are embedded in the sample media, due to the size of the alpha particle, some of the alpha particles are absorbed by the media and cannot escape to be counted. When the sample media absorbs the alpha particles this is known as self-absorption or attenuation. The calibration must include a similar configuration/media to correct for the attenuation. In order to correct the low bias, TSE will create an attenuated efficiency for MAPEP air particulate filters. The MAPEP September series air particulate gross alpha result of 0.47 Sq/sample was evaluated as acceptable with a range of 0.24 - 1.53 Sq/sample. Unlike the MAPEP Samples, air particulate Gross alpha analyses for power plants are not evaluated as a direct count sample. Power plant air particulate filters for gross alpha go through an acid digestion process prior to counting and the digested material is analyzed. (NCR 15-13)

TS E's MAPEP September water Ni-63 result of 11.8 +/- 10.8 Bq/l was higher than the known value of 8.55 Sq/l, exceeding the upper acceptance range of 11.12 Sq/L. The Ni-63 half-life is approximately 100 years. Nickel-63 has no gamma energy and emits only beta particles during decay. Nickel-63 is considered to be a "soft" or low energy beta emitter, which means that is the beta energy is very low.

The maximum beta energy for Ni-63 is approximately 65 kev, much lower than other more common nuclides such as Co-60 (maximum beta energy of 1549 keV).

The original sample was run with a 10 ml aliquot which was not sufficient for the low level of Ni-63 in the sample. The rerun aliquot of 30 ml produced an acceptable result of 8.81 Sq/L. (NCR 15-21)

TSE's MAPEP September air particulate Sr-90 result of 1.48 Sq/sample was lower than the known value of 2.18 Sq/sample, exceeding the lower acceptance range of 1.53 Sq/sample. In the past, MAPEP has added substances (unusual compounds found in DOE complexes) to various matrices that have resulted in incomplete removal of the isotope of interest for the laboratories analyzing the cross checks.

TBE suspects that this may be the cause of this error. Many compounds, if not properly accounted for or removed in the sample matrix, can cause interferences to either indicate lower activity or higher activity. TSE will no longer analyze the air particulate Sr-90 through MAPEP but wi!I participate in the EZA cross check program to perform both Sr-89 and Sr-90 in the air particulate matrix. (NCR 15-21)

TSE's MAPEP September vegetation Sr-90 result of 0.386 Sq/sample was lower than the known value of 1.30 Sq/sample, exceeding the lower acceptance range of 0.91 Sq/sample. In the past, MAPEP has added substances (unusual compounds found in DOE complexes) to various matrices that have resulted in incomplete removal of the isotope of interest for the laboratories analyzing the cross checks.

TBE suspects that this may be the cause of this error. Many compounds if not properly accounted for or removed in the sample matrix can cause interferences to either indicate lower activity or higher activity. (NCR 15-21)

TSE's ERA May water Sr-89/90 results of 45.2 and 28.0 pCi/L, respectively were lower than the known values of 63.2 and 41.9 pCi/L, respectively, exceeding the lower acceptance limits of 51.1 and 30.8 pCi/L, respectively. The yields were on the high side of the TSE acceptance range, which indicates the presence of excess calcium contributed to.the yield, resulting in low results. (NCR 15-09)

TSErs ERA November water natural Uranium result of 146.9 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 56.2 pCi/L, exceeding the upper acceptance limit of 62.4 pCi/L.

The technician failed to dilute the original sample and used the entire 12 ml sample. When the results were recalculated without the dilution and using the 12 ml aliquot, the result of 57 .16 agreed with the assigned value of 56.2. (NCR 15-19)

For the GEL laboratory, 455 out of 461 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Six analyses (one Cs-137 in water, one Ra-228 in water, one U-Total in vegetation, one 1-131 in water, one Sr-89 in water and one Sr-90 in water) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons and are being addressed through GEL's Corrective Action Program:

GE L's ERA First Quarter 2015 Cs-137 in water _result was higher than the ERA known value. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure could not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error with this sample. (Corrective Action CARR 150223-929)

GEL's ERA First Quarter 2015 Ra-228 in water result was higher than the ERA known value. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure could not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error with this sample. (Corrective Action CARR 150223-929)

GEL's ERA Second Quarter 2015 Uranium-Total in vegetation result was higher than the ERA known value. The failure was due to a transcription error when entering the data into the data base. (Corrective Action CARR150519-954)

GEL's ERA Second Quarter 2015 1-131 in water result was lower than the ERA known value. The failure was due to a transcription error when entering the data into the data base. (Corrective Action CARR150519-954)

GEL's ERA Third Quarter 2015 Sr-89 in water result was lower than the ERA known value. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure could not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error with this sample. (Corrective Action CARR150825-971)

GEL's ERA Fourth Quarter 2015 Sr-90 in water result was lower than the ERA known value. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure could not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error with this sample. (Corrective Action CARR151130-993)

F. Summary of Results: Split Sample Comparison Program Duplicate samples were obtained for some samples of air particulates, air iodine, milk, surface water, vegetables, and sediment. These samples were analyzed by GEL as comparison and validation of TBE results (Table C-20).

1. Air Particulates Gross beta was detected by both GEL and TBE in all 52 duplicate weekly air particulate samples. GEL detects significantly higher gross beta results due to different calibration energy sources used by each lab. (80110821)

All four duplicate quarterly composite samples analyzed had positive results for Be-7 and were in agreement within analytical errors at both labs.

2. Air Iodine All 52 weekly duplicate sample results from GEL were less than MDC, which is in agreement with the corresponding weekly sample results from TBE.

3. Milk Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 1*2 quplicate monthly samples and were in agreement within analytical errors for the two labs.

4. Surface Water Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all four GEL results but on only three of the corresponding TBE results. All detections were in agreement within the calculated analytical error for the samples.

5. Vegetables Naturally occurring K-40 was detected by both labs in all 14 duplicate samples analyzed. GEL detected Be-Tin one of the duplicate samples while TBE did not. These results were compared using NRG Inspection Procedure 84525:

Quality Assurance and Confirmatory Measurements for In-Plant Radiochemical Analysis. The NRG ratio based on resolution was used for acceptance criteria and all K-40 results passed. The one result that was detected by GEL but not detected by TBE was also considered acceptable. This is considered an acceptable duplicate sample comparison based on the NRG acceptance criteria.

6. Sediment Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in both sample by both of the laboratories. GEL also detected Ra-226 on both samples, but at levels below the MDC of TBE so a direct comparison could not be performed. Results are in agreement within analytical errors.

IV. Results and Discussion The analytical results of the 2015 REMP samples are divided into categories based on exposure pathways: atmospheric, direct radiation, terrestrial, and aquatic. The ingestion pathway is evaluated under the terrestrial and aquatic categories. The analytical results for the Reporting Period are summarized in Appendix A, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary. The data for individual samples are presented in Appendix C, Data Tables. The data are compared to the preoperational REMP data (1973-1976) and to historical data since site operation commenced. The samples collected and analysis results indicate that the Site REMP was conducted in compliance with the Site Technical Specifications and ODCMs.

The REMP for the Site has historically included samples and analyses not specifically required by the Site ODCMs in addition to those required. Management Audit Samples are samples that are taken to augment the radiological effluent monitoring program, but do not fulfill any regulatory requirement. These analyses are referenced throughout the Report as Management Audit Samples. PSEG continues to collect these samples. The summary tables in this Report include these Management Audit samples and associated analytical results. The following is a list and quantity of the Management audit samples collected in 2015:

Management Audit Sample Type Number of Samples Vegetables 42 Well Water 12 Potable Water (raw and treated) 12/12 Fodder Crops 4 Game 3 Oysters 4 A. Atmospheric Air particulate (APT) samples were collected on glass fiber filters with low-volume air samplers sampling at approximately 1.5 SCFM. Air sample volumes were measured with calibrated dry-gas meters.

Samples fQr .Iodine were collected from the air by adsorption on triethylene-diamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridges connected in series after the air particulate filters.

1. Air Particulates Air particulate (APT) samples were collected weekly at seven indicator locations (16E1, 15S2, 1 F1, 2F6, 501, 5S1 and 7S2), one duplicate station (5S2) and one control location (14G1). Each weekly sample collected was analyzed for gross beta by TBE and GEL. Quarterly composites of the weekly samples from each station were analyzed for specific gamma emitters. The duplicate air station sample was shipped to a laboratory for duplicate analysis (GEL). (Table C-1 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in 359 of 364 of the indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 4E-03 pCi/m 3 to 31E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 13E-03 pCi/m 3 , and in all of the control station samples at concentrations ranging from 4E-03 pCi/m 3 to 33E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average of 13E-03 pCi/m 3 . The maximum preoperational level detected was 920E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 74E-03 pCi/m 3 (Table C-2 and

Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03) [Figure 1 - Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates

.:... Quarterly Average For All Locations 2005 Through 2015].

Gamma Spectroscopy Gamma spectroscopy was performed on each of the 32 quarterly composite samples. Naturally occurring Be-7 was detected and no other gamma emitters were detected in any of the samples.

Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in 27 of 28 indicator station composites at concentrations ranging from 65E-03 pCi/m 3 to 157E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 111 E- .

03 pCi/m 3 , and in the four control station composites ranging in concentration from 75E-03 pCi/m 3 to 116E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 1OOE-03 pCi/m 3 . The maximum preoperational level detected was 330E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 109E-03 pCi/m 3 . (Table C-1 and Reference

[1] RMC-TR-77-03)

2. Air Iodine Filtered air iodine samples (AIO) were collected weekly at seven indicator locations (16E1, 15S2, 1F1, 2F6, 501, 5S1 and 7S1 ), one duplicate station (5S2) and one control location (14G1). The duplicate air station sample was shipped to GEL for duplicate analysis. Each sample was analyzed for 1-131,

.. and none was detected in any indicator or control samples during the Reporting Period. The maximum preoperational level detected was 42E-03 pCi/m 3 . (Table C-3 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

B. Direct Radiation Ambient radiation levels in the environment were monitored at locations on the Site and in the surrounding areas with pairs of passive dosimeters (PD) supplied and analyzed by Mirian Technologies. During this Reporting Period, the type of dosimeter was changed as described in Program Changes. Packets containing these PDs were placed in the owner-controlled area, around the Site at various distances and in each land based meteorological sector. Six were placed in control locations and the balance of measurement locations were placed at areas of interest such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools. The PDs at each location are changed and analyzed quarterly.

A total of 58 Immersion Dose Monitor (IDM) locations were established to monitor for direct radiation during 2015, including 20 on-site locations (1 S1, 2S2, 2S4, 3s1, 4s1, 5's1, 6S2, 1s1, 8S1, gs1, 1os1, 11s1, 12s1, 13s1, 14s1, 15s1, 15s2, 16S1, 16S2, and 16S3), 32 off-site locations within the 10 mile zone (1 F1, 2E1, 2F2,2F5,2F6,3E1,3F2,3F~,4D2,4F2,5D1,5F1,6F1,7F2,8F1,~F1, 10D1, 10F2, 11E2, 11F1, 12E1, 12F1, 13E1, 13F2, 13F3, 13F4, 14D1, 14F2, 15D1, 15F3, 16E1and16F2) and six control locations beyond 10 miles (1G3, 3G1, 3H1, 10G1, 14G1, and 16G1).

Two Type 20 PDs are placed at each location. Each of the legacy Type 17 PDs contained two CaF:Dy and two LiF:Mg, Ti elements, while each Type 20 PD contains three CaSO:Dy elements which monitor for photon exposure. Each PD also contains one LiBO:Mn element which is not used for this application.

The average quarterly dose rate for the off-site dosimeters was 13.8 mR/Standard Quarter. The average quarterly dose rate for site boundary locations, excluding locations 1S1and16S2, was 12.8 mR/Standard Quarter. The control locations had an average quarterly dose rate of 13 ..8 mR/Standard Quarter. Subtracting the -

dose from the control locations from either the onsite or offsite locations indicates that there is no net dose from Site operations. (Table C-4)

The two site boundary locations 1S1 and 16S2 are addressed separately due to dose rates higher than the other site boundary PDs. The ambient radiation levels as measured by the two site boundary locations 1S1 and 16S2 ranged from 24.1 mR/Standard. Quarter to 39.4 mR/Standard Quarter. The doses at these two locations were influenced by the radiation shine from the dry cask storage located in the nearby Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). Assuming a nominal background of 52 mR/year (13 mR/Standard Quarter) and using the highest dose rate from location 16S2, the maximum dose rate above background in these areas was calculated to be of 71.9 mrem/year (131.9 mR/year- 52 mR/year

0.9 mrem/mR).

The nearest resident in the North sector is greater than five miles and the nearest resident in the NNW sector is 4.2 miles from the Site. Dose rates at this distance are near background as indicated above. However, 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 both limit the dose to a real member of the public to 25 mrem in a year to the total body. To demonstrate compliance with these regulations, an individual member of the public is assumed to enter the site boundary area near the ISFSI for 20 days per year. Based on this, the dose that this hypothetical individual would receive was calculated to be 3.9 mrem/year (71.9 mrem/year

20 days I 365 days) which was well below the federal limit for exposure of 25 mrem/year.

The preoperational average for the quarterly PD readings was 4.4 mR/Standard Month or 13.2 mR/Standard Quarter. A review of historic results and direct radiation measurements for the reporting period confirmed that the radiation levels in the vicinity of the Site were similar to previous years.

C. Terrestrial Terrestrial REMP sampling includes the collection of milk, well water, potable water, vegetables, fodder crops and soil samples.

Milk samples (MLK) were taken semi-monthly when cows were on pasture and monthly when cows were not grazing on open pasture from three indicator locations (13E3, 14F4, 2G3) and one control location (3G1). Animals are .

considered on pasture from Apri_I to November of each year. Samples were collected in new polyethylene containers, sodium bisulfite was added as a sample preservative, then the samples were frozen and transported in ice chests to TBE.

Well water samples (WWA) were collected r:nonthly from one location (3E1 ).

Separate raw water (PWR) and treated potable water (PWT) composite samples were collected monthly from one location (2F3). Each monthly composite was made up of daily samples collected by the City of Salem Water and Sewer Department. All samples were collected in new polyethylene containers and shipped to TBE for analysis.

Locally grown vegetables (FPV) were collected at the time of harvest at seven locations (1 F1; 2F9, 3F8, 14F4, 15F4, ~ G1, and 2G2); fodder crops (VGT) were sampled at four locations (13E3, 14F4, 2G3 and 3G1 ); and broad leaf vegetation (FPL) was sampled at seven locations (10D1, 15S2, 16S1, 1G1, 1S1, 3H5 and 7S2). The vegetables and fodder samples are additional samples (Management Audit) taken to enhance the radiological monitoring program. There is no dairy farm within three miles of the Site and there is only one dairy farm within five miles. Therefore, broadleaf vegetation is ~rown, n:iaintained and harvested monthly during the growing season. All samples were weighed, packaged and shipped to TBE for analysis.

1. Milk Milk samples were collected at four local dairy farms; two farms in New Jersey (2G3 and 3G1) and two farms in Delaware (13E3 and 14F4). Each sample was analyzed for 1-131 and gamma emitters.

1-131 was not detected above MDC in any of the 80 samples analyzed. The maximum preoperational level detected was 65 pCi/L, which occurred following a period of atmospheric nuclear weapons tests. {Table C-5 and Reference [1]

RMC-TR-77-03)

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control station milk samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 80 milk samples with concentrations for the 60 indicator station samples ranging from 1, 133 pCi/L to 1,757 pCi/L with an average concentration of 1,350 pCi/L, and the 20 control station sample concentrations ranging from 1,094 pCi/L to 1,480 pCi/L, with an average concentration of 1,276 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2,000 pCi/L with an average concentration of 1,437 pCi/L. {Table C-5 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

2. Well Water (Ground Water)

Although offsite wells in the vicinity of the Site are not directly affected by plant operations, well water samples were collected monthly from one farm (3E1 ).

Samples from this well are considered Management Audit samples.

Gross Alpha Gross alpha activity was not detected above the MDC in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.6 pCi/L. (Table C-6 and'Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in two of 12 well water samples above the MDC with concentrations ranging from 2.7 pCi/L to 2.8 pCi/L, with an average concentration of 2.7 pCi/L. The preoperational results ranged from <2.1 pCi/L to 38 pCi/L, with an average value of 9 pCi/L. (Table C-6 and Reference [1]

RMC-TR-77-03)

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected above the MDC in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 380 pCi/L. (Table C-6 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control station well water samples. Naturally occurring K-40 and Ra-226 were not detected in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational levels detected were 30 pCi/L and 2.0 pCi/L, respectively. (Table C-7 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

3. Potable Water (Drinking Water)

Both raw and treated potable water samples were collected and composited by The City of Salem Water and Sewer Department personnel at the local water treatment facility. Each sample consisted of daily aliquots composited into a monthly sample. The raw water source for this plant is a combination of surface water from Laurel Lake and groundwater from its adjacent wells. These are Management Audit samples as no liquid effluents discharged from the Site directly affect this pathway.

Gross Alpha No Gross alpha activity was detected in any of the_ raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2.7 pCi/L. {Table C-8 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in 11 of the 12 raw water samples and in 11 of the 12 treated water samples. The concer:itrations for the raw samples ranged from 3.1 pCi/L to 7 .6 pCi/L. Concentrations for the treated water ranged from 3.7 pCi/L to 7.8 pCi/L. The average concentration for both raw and treated water was 5.2 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.0 pCi/L with an average concentration of 4.2 pCi/L. {Table C-8 and Reference [1]

RMC-TR-77-03)

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 350 pCi/L with an average of 179 pCi/L. {Table C-8 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03) 1-131 activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data were available for comparison, since 1-131 was not analyzed as a specific radionuclide prior to 1989. However, 1-131 analytical results to date have been below the MDC. (Table C-9 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the potable water samples. Naturally occurring K-40 was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data were available for comparison. Naturally occurring Ra-226 was not detected in any raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected for Ra-226 was 1.4 pCi/L. (Table C-9 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

4. Vegetables There are no farm products that are irrigated with water in which plant effluents have been discharged. The Delaware River at the location of the Site is brackish and therefore is not used for irrigation.

A variety of food products are sampled on and around the Site; however, the variety is dependent on the farmer's preference. These vegetables are collected as Management Audit samples. In addition, broadleaf vegetation was grown by PSEG personnel at four onsite locations and one offsite location in Delaware at 3.9 miles SSW for purposes of REMP sampling. These broadleaf vegetable samples are collected since there are no dairy farms operating within

the five km (three mile) radius of the Site. The closest dairy farm ( 13E3) is located in Odessa, DE at 5.0 miles (7.88 km).

All samples (vegetable and broadleaf) were analyzed for gamma emitters and included asparagus, cabbage, collards, kohlrabi, soy beans, sweet corn, peppers, tomatoes, and peaches. These samples were obtained from 11 indicator stations (81 samples) and three control stations (12 samples). The results for these samples are discussed below.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control station vegetable samples.

Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in one of the 81 indicator station samples at a concentration of 265 pCi/kg (wet), and in one of the 12 control station samples at a concentration of 2634 pCi/kg (wet). No preoperational Be-7 data was available for comparison.

Naturally occurring Ra-226 was detected in one of the 81 indicator station samples at a concentration of 803 pCi/kg (wet). It was not detected in any of the control station samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 81 indicator samples, with concentrations ranging from 1,693 pCi/kg (wet) to 15,380 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 4,079 pCi/kg (wet), and in all 12 control station samples at concentrations ranging from 1,557 pCi/kg (wet) to 5,576 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,411 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 4,800 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2, 140 pCi/kg (wet). (Table C-10 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

5. Fodder Crops Although not required by the Site ODCMs, four samples of silage normally used as cattle feed were collected from three indicator stations and one control station. It was determined that these products could be an element in the food-chain pathway. These fodder crops are collected as Management Audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters. All four locations from which samples were collected are milk sampling stations.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control station fodder crop samples.

Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was not detected in any of the three indicator samples or control station samples. The maximum preoperational level detected for fodder was 4, 700 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,000 pCi/kg (wet).

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all three indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 3, 152 pCi/kg (wet) to 3,678 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,345 pCi/kg (wet), and in the control station sample at a concentration of 1,491 pCi/kg (wet). Preoperational results averaged 7 ,000 pCi/kg (wet). (Table C-11 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

6. Soil Soil is sampled every three years at nine locations and analyzed for gamma emitters. These Management Audit samples were last collected in 2013 and will not be collected again u~til 2016 (Table C-12) [Figure 2 - Cesium-137 Activity in Soil 1974 through 2015 (Triennial)].

7. Game Although not required by the Site ODCMs, three muskrat samples were collected from two indicator stations. The game samples were collected as Management Audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator game samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all three samples at concentrations ranging from 2,709 to 3,555 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,048 pCi/kg (wet). No preoperational data were available for comparison. No other gamma emitters were detected. (Table C-13 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

D.Aquatic This sample set includes edible fish, shoreline and riverbed sediment, surface water, crabs, and oysters.

Surface water samples were collected offshore in new polyethylene containers that were rinsed twice with the sample medium prior to collection. The surface water samples were transported to TBE for analysis.

Edible fish were collected using gill nets while crabs were cau*ght in commercial traps. These samples were processed by separating the flesh from the bone and shell. The flesh was placed in sealed containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests to TBE for analysis.

Sediment samples were taken with a bottom grab sampler and frozen in sealed polyethylene containers before being transported in ice chests to TBE. For the river bottom sediment, a marine GPS was used to locate the correct site and the sampling boat was maneuvered over the area until the correct amount of sample was obtained (grabbed) with the sediment dredge.

Personnel collected and prepared the location 682 shoreline sediment sample (an onsite location). For this location, a square area, measuring one meter on each side was staked out and then divided into a grid of nine smaller boxes, three per side. A one inch deep scoop from the center of each of the small grids was taken.

All the aliquots were combined and the total sample transported in the ice chest to TBE.

Oyster samples are collected by personnel licensed to harvest oysters by the State of New Jersey. Oysters in the vicinity of the plant are not large enough to be sold to the public, so they have been added to the REMP as Management Audit samples. Oysters are collected a*nd shucked, and then the flesh and internal fluids are placed in sealed containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests to TBE for analysis.

1. Surface Water Surface water samples were collected once a month until July and twice a month for the remainder of the Reporting Period at four indicator stations and one control station in the Delaware River Bay Estuary. During the second part of the year, two samples were collected per month, which were combined to create a single monthly composite sample that was then analyzed. One location (11A1) is at the outfall area (which is the area potentially impacted by effluents discharged from the Site into the Delaware River), one location is downstream from the outfall area (7E1 ), and one location is directly west of the outfall area at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River (12C1 ). Two upstream locations are sampled, one in the Delaware River (1 F2) and one at the mouth of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal (16F1 ), the latter being sampled when the flow is from the Canal into the river.

Station 12C1, located directly west of the Site, at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River, serves as the control.. 12C1 was chosen as the control location because the physical characteristics of this station more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the farther upstream location (1 F2). As discussed in the preoperational summary report, due to its tidal nature, there are flow rate and salinity variations in the Delaware Estuary.

These variations account for differences in concentrations of K-40.

Tritium Tritium activity was detected in one of 48 indicator samples with a concentration of 242 pCi/L at location 7E1 and in one of the 12 control samples with a concentration of 257 pCi/L at location 12C1. Evaluation of the samples that had positive tritium activity .are described below. The maximum preoperational level detected wa~ 600 pCi/.L, with an average concentration of 210 pCi/L (Table C-14 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03) [Figure 3 - Tritium Activity in Surface Water - Quarterly Average 2005 through 2015].

The October 2015 composite sample for surface water sampled at location 12C1 (2.5 miles WSW of Site on West Bank of Delaware River) identified tritium activity at 257 pCi/L with a two sigma uncertainty of+/- 126 pCi/L. The MDC for this sample was 184 pCi/L. The dose impact from this concentration is 5.67E-04 mrem/yr to the maximum exposed individual through the consumption of fish. This does not present a significant dose impact.

The individual samples that constitute this composite sample were obtained on 10/6/2015 at 12:50 and 10/19/2015 at 09:25 .. Three analyses were performed on the composite sample with the following activities noted:

Tritium Activity, Two Sigma Minimum detectable pCi/L Uncertainty, pCi/L Concentration (MDC),pCi/L 204 125 186 201 129 193 257 126 184 A correlation was performed to evaluate the relationship between the quantities of radioactive effluent released and the resultant dose to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. An assumption used to correlate the results was that tritium measured at 12C1 was associated with a permitted effluent release that occurred within one day of the composite sample collection. There was one release that occurred from SGS Unit 2 that met this criteria, which was from the #22 Chemical Volume Control System Monitor Tank. The release occurred approximately 17 hours1.967593e-4 days 0.00472 hours 2.810847e-5 weeks 6.4685e-6 months before the composite sample was obtained.

Due to the lack of a local stream flow gauge and uncertainties associated with tidal influences, a very conservative estimate of dilution flow in the Delaware River consisting of measured steam flow and inputs farther upstream from the site was developed. The correlation determined that the actual measured concentration is much less than the potential calculated value. Differences may be due to many unknown factors such as tidal recirculation and various river and tidal mixing factors. (Notification: 20710945)

The November 2015 composite sample for surface water sampled at location 7E1 (4.5 miles SE of Site, West of Mad Horse Creek) identified tritium activity at 242 pCi/L with a two sigma uncertainty of+/- 184 pCi/L. The MDC for this sample was 184 pCi/L. The dose impact from this concentration is 5.34E-04 mrem/yr to the maximum exposed individual through the consumption of fish. This does not present a significant dose impact.

The individual samples that constitute this composite sample were obtained on 11/2/2015 at 08:08 and 11/24/2015 at 12:33. Four analyses were performed on the composite sample, with two positive indications of tritium, with the following activities noted:

Tritium Activity, Two Sigma Minimum detectable pCi/L Uncertainty, pCi/L Concentration (MDC),pCi/L 242 125 184 127 129 < 200 153 128 < 197 216 124 184 A correlation was performed to evaluate the relationship between the quantities of radioactive effluent released and the resultant dose to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. An assumption used to correlate the results was that tritium measured at location 7E1 was associated with a permitted effluent release that occurred within two days of the composite sample collection. There was one release that occurred from SGS Unit 2 that met this

. criteria, which was from the #21 Chemical Volume Control System Monitor Tank. The release occurred approximately 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months before the composite sample was obtained. Due to the lack of a local stream flow gauge and uncertainties associated with tidal influences, a very conservative estimate of dilution flow in the Delaware River was used to evaluate the release consisting of measured steam flow and inputs farther upstream from the site. The correlation determined that the actual measured concentration is similar that the potential calculated value. Differences may be due to many unknown factors such as tidal recirculation/recapture factors, various river and tidal mixing factors, and various other unknown environmental factors. (Notification:

20710945)

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator surface water samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in 26 of the 48 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 35 pCi/L to 147 pCi/L with an average concentration of 83 pCi/L, and in six of the 12 control station samples at concentrations ranging from 43 pCi/L to 167 pCi/L and an average of 99 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected for K-40 was 200 pCi/L with an average concentration of 48 pCi/L. (Table C-15 and Reference [1] RMC-TR 03) 1-131 was not detected in any of the 48 indicator samples. It was not detected in any of the control station samples. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC. (Table C-15)

2. Fish Edible species of fish were collected semi-annually at two indicator stations and one control station and analyzed for gamma emitters in edible flesh. Sample species collected in 2015 were: striped bass, summer flounder, catfish, blue fish, and white perch.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control station fish samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all seven indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 3,549 pCi/kg (wet) to 4,512 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,949 pCi/kg (wet), and all five control station samples at concentrations ranging from 3, 718 pCi/kg (wet) to 5, 145 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 4,428 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 13,000 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,900 pCi/kg (wet). (Table C-16 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

3. Blue Crab Blue crab samples were collected twice during the season at one indicator and one control station. The edible portions were analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control station blue crab samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in the indicator station samples at concentrations of 3, 129 pCi/kg (wet) and 3, 771 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,450 pCi/kg (wet)~ and in both control station samples at concentrations of 3,015 pCi/kg (wet) and 3,868 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,442 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level for K-40 detected was 12,000 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,835 pCi/kg (wet). All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC. (Table C-17 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

4. Sediment Sediment samples were collected semi-annually from six indicator stations and one control station. Location 6S2 is the only shoreline sediment sample location and is directly subjected to tidal fluctuations. The remaining locations are offshore.

Gamma Spectroscopy Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 11 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 2,545 pCi/kg (dry) to 16,840 pCi/kg (dry), with an average concentration of 7,405 pCi/kg (dry), and at both control stations samples at concentrations of 10,070 pCi/kg (dry) and 16,490 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 13,280 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 21,000 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 15,000 pCi/kg (dry).

Gesium-137 was not detected in any of the indicator samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 400 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 150 pCi/kg (dry) (Table C-18 and Reference [1] RMC-TR 03).

Naturally occurring Ra-226 was detected in two of the 11 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 1,615 pCi/kg (dry) to 2,649 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 2, 132 pCi/kg (dry) and in one of the control station samples at a concentration of 1385 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1,200 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 760 pCi/kg (dry).

Naturally occurring Th-232 was detected in 10 of the 11 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 196 pCi/kg (dry) to 920 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 599 pCi/kg (dry), and in both of the control station samples at concentrations of 657 pCi/kg (dry) and 882 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 769 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1,300 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 840 pCi/kg (dry). All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC. (Table C-18 and Reference [1] RMC-TR-77-03)

5. Oysters Oyster samples were collected twice during the season at one indicator and one control station. The edible portions were analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma Spectroscopy No plant related gamma emitters were detected above the MDC in any of the indicator or control station oyster samples.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in the indicator station samples at concentrations of 853 pCi/kg (wet) and 1 *.130 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 992 pCi/kg (wet), and in both control station samples at concentrations of 2,275 pCi/kg (wet) and 1,512 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 1,894 pCi/kg (wet). Both the indicator and control samples obtained in October contained naturally occurring Ra-226. The Ra-226 concentrations were 776 and 846 respectively. There were no preoperational analyses preformed on oysters as there were no significant quantities of oysters or other shellfish within 5 miles of the plant discharge. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC. (Table C-19 and Reference [6] Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2, Environmental Report, Operating License Stage)

E. Land Use Survey A land use survey was conducted during the Reporting Period in each of the 16 meteorological sectors to identify, within a distance of 8 km (5 miles), the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden of greater than 50 m 2 (500 ft2 ) producing broad leaf vegetation. In accordance with the Site ODCMs, the survey was performed using a visual survey, Post Office inquiries, Yellow Pages, and Google Earth mapping software.

A comparison of the identified locations from the 2015 table with the 2014 table shows that there was no change to the nearest milk animal or nearest resident.

However, no vegetable garden larger than 50 m2 (500 ft2 ) with broad leaf vegetation was identified as being present within the 8 km radius. Therefore, dose evaluations do not need to be updated and no changes. to the Site ODCMs are required. The 2015 Land Use Survey results are summarized below:

Milk Nearest Vegetable Animal Residence Garden Meat Animal Meteorological August, 2015 August, 2015 August, 2015 August, 2015 Sector Km (miles) Km (miles) Km (miles) Km (miles)

N None None None None NNE None 8.0 (5.0) None 6.8 (4.2)

NE None 6.2 (3.9) None None ENE None 6.2 (3.9) None None E None None None None ESE None None None None SE None None None None SSE None None None None s None None None None SSW None 6.2 (3.9) None None SW None 6.9 (4.3) None 7.3 (4.6)

WSW None 7.1 (4.4) None None w 7.8 (4.9) 6.5 (4.0) None None WNW None 5.5 (3.4) None None NW None 5.9 (3.7) None None NNW None 6.8 (4.2) None None V. Annotations to Previous AREOR

Page 19 - Air Particulate Gamma Spectroscopy: The air particulate K-40 result listed as 56E-03 pCi/m 3 should be corrected to 32E-03 pCi/m 3 .

Page 31- Surface Water Tritium: The March 2014 Surface Water sample from location 11A1 (0.2 miles SW; in the Salem Outfall area) identified tritium activity at 1760 pCi/L with a two sigma uncertainty of+/- 231 pCi/L (1.76E-06 +/- 2.31 E-07 µCi/ml).

A duplicate sample was analyzed by a different vendor and activity identified was 1780 pCi/L with two sigma uncertainty of+/- 546 pCi/L which validated the first result.

These values do not present significant dose to any exposure pathway.

REMP sample location 11A1 is near the permitted liquid effluent release points for the Site, so a release would need to occur within a few hours of the sample collection to affect that sample location. There were two releases that occurred during this timeframe, one from Salem Unit 2 #22 Chemical Volume Control System Monitor Tank and the second from Hope Creek Circulating Water Dewatering Sump.

A correlation was performed to evaluate. the relationship between the quantities of radioactive effluent released and the resultant dose to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. A conservatively high tritium concentration of 1960 pCi/L was used and it was determined that dose to highest exposed population, Adult, would be less than 0.2% of the Federal limit of 25 mrem/year.

Page 28- Fodder Crop Gamma Spectroscopy: The control station sample Be-7 result listed as 265 pCi/kg (wet) should be corrected to <154 pCi/kg (wet).

Page 34 - Sediment Gamma Spectroscopy: The Cs-137 observed in the indicator sample is attributed to fallout from historical weapons testing.

VI. Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentration The Hope Creek primary coolant results for Dose Equivalent lodine-131, Total Gamma, and Total Beta were reviewed. The specific activity of the primary coolant did not exceed 0.2 microcuries per gram Dose Equivalent 1-131 (DEi). The Total Gamma and the Total Beta activity (microcuries per gram) did not exceed the 100/E-Bar limit. Therefore, Hope Creek did not exceed the Technical Specifications limit specified in section 3.4.5.

VI I. Conclusions The Radiological Environmental Monitori~g Program for the Site was conducted during 2015 in accordance with the Site ODCMs. The required sample analysis LLD values were achieved (See Appendix A and Appendix C) and the REMP objectives were also met. The data collected demonstrates that the Site was operated in compliance with the Site ODCMs' REMP requirements.

The concentration of radioactive material in the environment that could be attributable to Site operations was only a small fraction of the total radioactivity when compared to the concentration of naturally occurring and non-plant related man-made radioactivity in the environment.

Since these results were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, which ran from 1973 to 1976, and with historical results collected since commercial operation, it can be concluded that the operation of the Site had no significant radiological impact on the environment.

VI 11. References

[1] Radiation Management Corporation. "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Preoperation Summary - 1973 through 1976". RMC-TR-77-03, 1978.

[2] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual"- Salem Generating Station. Revision 27.

[3] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual"- Hope Creek Generating Station. Revision 27.

[4] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: NUREG-1301, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors", published April 1991.

[5] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: NUREG-1302, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Boiling Water Reactors", published April 1991.

[6] U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Docket NOS. 50-272/50-311, "Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2, Environmental Report, Operating License Stage".

APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

Intentionally left blank SAMPLE DESIGNATION PSEG identifies samples by a three part code. 1) The first two letters are the program station identification code. Because of the proximity of SGS and HCGS, a common environmental surveillance program is conducted using the identification code "SA". 2)

The next three letters are for the media sampled:

AIO = Air Iodine IDM = Immersion Dose (PD)

APT= Air Particulates MLK= Milk ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab PWR = Potable Water (Raw)

ESF = Edible Fish PWT =Potable Water (Treated)

ESS = Sediment SWA = Surface Water WWA =Well Water EOY = Oysters

3) The last three or four symbols are a location code ba.sed on direction and distance from the site center point The midpoint of a line between Salem Unit 1 & 2 containments was used as the site center point. Of these, the first two represent each of sixteen angular sectors centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction as follows:.,

2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENE, 5=E, 6=ESE, ?=SE, 8=SSE, 9=S, 10=SSW, 11=SW, 12=WSW, 13=W, 14=WNW, 15=NW and 16=NNW.

The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the plant:

S = On-site location E = 4-5 miles off-site A= 0-1 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site C = 2-3 miles off-site H = > 20 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g.,

1,2,3. For example; the designation SA-WWA-3E1 would indicate a sample in the SGS and HCGS program (SA), consisting of well water (WWA), which had been collected in sector number 3, centered at 45 degrees (north east) with respect to the midpoint between SGS Units 1 and 2 at a radial distance of 4 to 5 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance E). The number 1 indicated that this is sampling station number 1 in that particular sector.

TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NONROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED {LLD)* MEASUREMENTS I.AIRBORNE AIR PARTICULATE GR-B 416 10 13 (359/364) SA-APT-16E1 14 (50/52) 13 (52/52) 0 (E-3 pCi/m 3 ) (4/31) 4.1 MILES NNW (6/31) (4/33)

GAMMA 32 BE-7 NA 111 (27/28) SA-APT-7S1 124 (3/4) 100 (4/4) 0 (65/157) 0.12 MILES SE (94/146) (75/116)

K-40 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 50 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 60 <LLD <LLD 0 AIR IODINE GAMMA 416 3

(E-3 pCi/m ) 1-131 70 <LLD <LLD 0 II. DIRECT TLD-DIRECT RADIATION QUARTERLY 232 NA 14.1 (208/208) SA-IDM-16S2 33.0 (4/4) 13.8 (24/24) 0 (mR/standard quarter) (9.2/39.4) 0.6 MILES N OF SITE (28.3/39.4) (10.1/16.1)

Ill. TERRESTRIAL MILK 1-131 80 <LLD <LLD 0 (pCi/L)

GAMMA 80 K-40 NA 1331 (60/60) SA-MLK-14F4 1374 (20/20) 1276 (20/20) 0

( 1133/1757) 7.6 MILES WNW (1133/1757) (1094/1480)

TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NONROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED {LLD}* MEASUREMENTS MILK (cont'd) CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (pCi/L)

CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BALA-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0 RA-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0 WELL WATER GR-A 12 3 <LLD NA 0 (pCi/L)

GR-B 12 4 2.5 (2/12) SA-WWA-3E1 2.7 (2/12) NA 0 (2.2/2.7) 4.2 MILES NE (2.2/2.7)

H-3 12 200 <LLD NA 0 1-131 12 <LLD NA 0 GAMMA 12 K-40 NA <LLD NA 0 MN-54 15 <LLD NA 0 C0-58 15 <LLD NA 0 TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NONROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* MEASUREMENTS FE-59 30 <LLD NA 0 WELL WATER (cont'd) C0-60 15 <LLD NA 0 (pCi/L)

ZN-65 30 <LLD NA 0 ZRNB-95 15 <LLD NA 0 CS-134 15 <LLD NA 0 CS-137 18 <LLD NA 0 BALA-140 15 <LLD NA 0 RA-226 NA <LLD NA 0 POTABLE WATER GR-A 24 3 <LLD NA 0 (pCi/L)

GR-B 24 4 5.2 (22/24) SA-PWT-2F3 5.6 (22/24) NA 0 (3.1/7.8) 8.0 MILES NNE (3.7/7.8)

H-3 24 200 <LLD NA 0 1-131 24 <LLD NA 0 TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NONROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* MEASUREMENTS POTABLE WATER (cont'd) GAMMA 24 (pCi/L) K-40 NA <LLD NA 0 MN-54 15 <LLD NA 0 C0-58 15 <LLD NA 0 FE-59 30 <LLD NA 0 C0-60 15 <LLD NA 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD NA 0 ZRNB-95 15 <LLD NA 0 1-131 10 <LLD NA 0 CS-134 15 <LLD NA 0 CS-137 18 <LLD NA 0 BALA-140 15 <LLD NA 0 TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NONROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* MEASUREMENTS POTABLE WATER (cont'd) RA-226 NA <LLD NA 0 (pCi/L)

VEGETATION GAMMA 93 (pCi/kg wet) BE-7 NA 265 (1/81) SA-FPV-1G1 C 2634 (1/5) 2634 (1/12) 0 10.9 MILES NNE K-40 NA 4079 (81/81) SA-FPV-14F4 15380 (1/1) 2411 (12/12) 0 (1693/15380) (1557/5576) 1-131 60 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 60 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 80 <LLD <LLD 0 RA-226 NA 803 (1/81) SA-FPL-1S1 803 (1/78) <LLD 0 0.57 MILES N TH-232 NA <LLD <LLD 0 FODDER CROPS GAMMA 4 (pCi/kg wet) BE-7 NA <LLD NA 0 K-40 NA 3344.7 (3/3) SA-VGT-2G3 3678 (1/1) 1491 (1/1) 0 (3152/3678) 11.8 MILES NNE TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NONROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* MEASUREMENTS 1-131 60 <LLD <LLD 0 FODDER CROPS (cont'd) CS-134 60 <LLD <LLD 0 (pCi/kg wet)

CS-137 80 <LLD <LLD 0 RA-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0 TH-232 NA <LLD <LLD 0 GAME GAMMA 3 (pCi/kg wet) BE-7 NA <LLD NA 0 K-40 NA 3048 (3/3) SA-GAM-5C1 3555 (1/1) NA 0 (2709/3555) 3.14 MILES ENE 1-131 60 <LLD NA 0 CS-134 60 <LLD NA 0 CS-137 80 <LLD NA 0 SURFACE WATER H-3 60 200 242 (1/48) SA-SWA-1201 C 257 (1/12) 257 (1/12) 0 (pCi/L) 2.5 MILES WSW 1-131 60 <LLD <LLD 0 TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NON ROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (cont'd) GAMMA 60 (pCi/L) K-40 NA 83 (26/48) SA-SWA-7E1 110 (8/12) 99 (6/12) 0 (35/147) 4.5 MILES SE (83/147) (43/167)

MN-54 15 <LLD <LLD 0 C0-58 15 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 30 <LLD <LLD 0 C0-60 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD <LLD 0 ZRNB-95 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BALA-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0 TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NONROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED {LLD)* MEASUREMENTS FISH GAMMA 12 (pCi/kg wet) K-40 NA 3949 (7/7) SA-ESF-12C1 C 4428 (5/5) 4428 (5/5) 0 (3549/4512) 2.5 MILES WSW (3718/5145) (3718/5145)

MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 C0-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 C0-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 130 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 150 <LLD <LLD 0 RA-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0 BLUE CRABS GAMMA 4 (pCi/kg wet) K-40 NA 3450 (2/2) SA-ECH-11A1 3450 (2/2) 3442 (2/2) 0 (3129/3771) 0.2 MILES SW (3129/3771) (3015/3868)

MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NONROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD}* MEASUREMENTS BLUE CRABS (cont'd) C0-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 (pCi/kg wet)

FE-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 C0-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 130 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 150 <LLD <LLD 0 RA-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0 SEDIMENT GAMMA 13 (pCi/kg dry) BE-7 NA * <LLD <LLD 0 K-40 NA 7405 (11/11) SA-ESS-7E1 13680 (2/2) 13280 (2/2) 0 (2545/16840) 4.5 MILES SE (13530/13830) (10070/16490)

CS-134 150 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 180 <LLD <LLD 0 TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY REPORTING PERIOD: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LOCATIONS MEAN LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED (UNIT OF TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN** NAME MEAN** MEAN** NONROUTINE MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED {LLD)* MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT (cont'd) RA-226 NA 2132 (2/11) SA-ESS-7E1 2132 (2/2) 1385 (1/2) 0 (pCi/kg dry) (1615/2649) 4.5 MILES SE (1615/2649)

TH-232 NA 599 (10/11) SA-ESS-16F1 818 (2/2) 769 (2/2) 0 (196/920) 6.9 MILES NNW (715/920) (657/882)

OYSTERS GAMMA 4 (pCi/kg wet) K-40 NA 1130 (1/2) SA-EOY-7H1 1895 (2/2) 1895 (2/2) 0 (1130) 19 MILES SE (1510/2280) (1510/2280)

MN-54 130 <LLD 0 C0-58 130 <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD 0 C0-60 130 <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD 0 CS-134 130 <LLD 0 CS-137 150 <LLD 0

LLD LISTED IS THE LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION WHICH WE ENDEAVORED TO ACHIEVE DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD.

- MEAN CALCULATED USING VALUES ABOVE LLD ONLY. FRACTIONS OF MEASUREMENTS ABOVE LLD ARE IN PARENTHESES.

Intentionally left blank APPENDIX B SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS Intentionally left blank TABLE 8-1 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (Program Overview)

SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS DIRECT RADIATION Fifty-eight routine monitoring stations with two or .

Quarterly Gamma dose/ quarterly more dosimeters placed as follows:

Dosimeters (IDM) An inner ring of stations, one in each land based meteorological sector in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY.

An outer ring of stations, one in each land based meteorological sector in the 6-8 km (3.4 - 6.4 miles) range from the site ;< 1> and The balance of the stations placed in areas of special interest such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools and in six areas beyond 1O miles to serve as control stations.

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS ATMOSPHERIC

a. Air Particulate 3 samples from close to the Site Boundary: 5S1, 7S1, Continuous sampler Gross Beta I weekly (APT) 16S1. operation with sample Gamma isotopic analysis I One duplicate sample from close to the site boundary: collection weekly or more quarterly composite 5S2. frequently if required by dust loading 3 Samples in different land based sectors: 1F1, 2F6, 5D1.

b. Air Iodine lodine-131 I weekly 1 Sample from the vicinity of a community having a (AIO) highest annual average ground level D/Q: 16E1.

1 Sample from a control location; for example 15 - 30 km distant (9.3 - 18.6 miles) and in the least prevalent wind direction: 14G1.

3. TERRESTRIAL

a. Milk Samples from milking animals in 3 locations within 5 km Semi-monthly Gamma scan I semi-monthly (MLK) distance (3.1 miles) having the highest dose potential. If (when animals are on lodine-131 I semi-monthly there are none, then 1 sample from milking animals in pasture) each of 3 areas between 5 - 8 km distant (3.1 - 5.0 miles) where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem Gamma scan I monthly Monthly per yr: 13E3, 14F4, 2G3<2 >. lodine-131 I monthly (when animals are not on 1 Sample from milking animals at a control location pasture) 15 - 30 km distant (9.3 - 18.6 miles): 3G1.

TABLE 8-1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

b. Well Water (Ground) Although wells in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS are not directly Monthly Gamma scan I monthly affected by plant operations so sampling is not required by Gross alpha I monthly (WWA)

SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of 3E1 farm's well are Gross beta I monthly collected as management audit samples. Tritium I monthly

c. Potable Water (Drinking Although no potable water samples are required as liquid Monthly (composited Gross alpha I monthly Water) effluents discharged from SGS/HCGS do not directly affect weekly) Gross beta I monthly (PWR, PWT) this pathway and it is not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, Tritium I monthly one raw and one treated water sample from a public water supply (City of Salem Water and Sewer Department) are Gamma scan I monthly collected: 2F3 as management audit samples. lodine-131 I monthly

d. Vegetables Although the Delaware River'at the location of SGS/HCGS Monthly (during growing Gamma scan I on collection (FPL, FPV) is a brackish water source and is not used for irrigation of season) food products and so sampling is not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of vegetables are collected as management audit samples from various locations during harvest: 2F9, 1G1, 2G2 and 3H5. In addition, broad leaf vegetation is collected from 1OD1 and 1G1 as well as being planted & collected onsite (1 S1, 781, 15S2, 16S1).

This is in lieu of having a milk farm within 5 km (3.1 miles) of the Site<2>.

TABLE 8-1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

e. Fodder Crops Although not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of Annually (at harvest) Gamma scan I on collection crops normally used as cattle feed (silage) were collected (VGT}

from milk farms as management audit samples: 14F4, 3G1, 2G3, 13E3 .

f. Soil . Although not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of Every 3 years Gamma scan I on (SOL) soil are collected as management audit samples: 6S2, (2010-2013-2016) collection 2F9,5F1,1001, 16E1, 13E3, 14F4,2G3,3G1 (no samples collected in 2015).

4. AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT Gamma scan I monthly Semi-Monthly

a. Surface Water One sample upstream: 1F2. Tritium I monthly**

One sample downstream: 7E1.

(SWA) One sample outfall: 11A1.

One sample cross-stream (mouth of Appoquinimink River):

12c1<3>.

And an additional location in the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal: 16F1.

b. Edible Fish One sample of each commercially and recreationally Semi- Gamma scan (flesh} I on important species in vicinity of plant discharge area: 11A1. annually collection (ESF)

One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge: 12C1(3>, and an additional location downstream: 7E1.

TABLE B-1 (cont'd}

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

c. Blue Crabs One sample of each commercially and recreationally Semi-annually Gamma scan (flesh) /on important species in vicinity of plant discharge area 11A1. collection (ECH)

One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge 12c1<3 .

d. Sediment One sample from downstream area: 7E1. Semi-annually Gamma scan I on collection (ESS) One sample from cross-stream area and control location:

12c1<3>_

One sample from outfall area: 11A1.

One sample from upstream, the C & D Canal: 16F1.

One sample from shoreline area: 6S2.

One sample from Cooling Tower Slowdown discharge:

*15A1.

One sample south storm drain discharge line: 16A1.

TABLE 8-1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

e. Oysters<4 > One sample near plant discharge area (Hope Creek Oyster Twice per year, once near Gamma scan (flesh and (EOY) Bed Area, approximately 2 miles SE of Site) as a start and once near end of liquids) I on collection management audit sample NJ harvest season One sample in area not influenced by plant discharge (Bennies Oyster Beds Area, approximately 19 miles SE of Site) as a management audit sample

Except for Passive Dosimeters, the quarterly analysis is performed on a composite of individual samples collected during the quarter.

- Technical Specifications and ODCM require quarterly analysis but it was decided to analyze surface waters on a monthly basis for tritium as a program enhancement (1) Range of 3.4- 6.4 miles based on ODCM Appendix E REMP Sample Locations Table and Figures (20686360).

(2) While these milk locations are not within the 5 km range, they are the closest farms in the Site vicinity.

Since broad leaf vegetation is acceptable in lieu of milk collections, gardens were planted and harvested at four locations on Site (1S1, 7S1, 15S1, 16S1) and one in Delaware (10D1).

(3) Station 12C1 was made the operational control (1975) for aquatic samples since the physical characteristics of this station more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the upstream location originally chosen. This is due to the distance from Liston Point, which is the boundary between the Delaware River and Delaware Bay. As discussed extensively inthe SGS/HCGS Pre-operational reports, the sampling locations further upstream show significantly lower background levels due to estuarine tidal flow. *

(4) Oysters were added to the REMP as a management audit sample in 2015. The oysters from the indicator location (7C1) are impacted .by bacteria and are considered too small to be sold to the public. The oyster sample locations are not listed in the ODCM TABLE B-2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Specific information about the individual sampling locations are given in Table B-1. Maps B-1 and B-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the Site. A Portable Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to provide the coordinates of sampling locations.

All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year.

STATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED CODE STATION LOCATION DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

1S1 0.55 mi. N side of road near ISFSI pad. 39-28.260 75-32.222 IDM, FPL 2s2 0.40 mi. NNE; lamp pole 65 near HC switch yard 39-28.98 75-32.10 IDM 2S4 0.60 mi. NNE; in the equipment laydown area 39-28.110 75-31.992 IDM 3S1 0.58 mi. NE; behind refrigeration building 39-28.140 75-31.678 IDM 4S1 0.60 mi. ENE; site access road near intersection to TB-02 39-28.023 75-31.544 IDM 5S1 0.86 mi. E; site access road 39-27.668 75-31.187 IDM, AIO, APT 5S2 0.86 mi. E; site access road, duplicate sample 39-27.668 75-31.187 AIO,APT 6S2 0.23mi. ESE; area a~ound helicopter pad 39-27.719 75-31.912 IDM, ESS, SOL 7S1 0.12 mi. SE; station personnel gate 39-27.720 75-32.15 IDM, AIO, APT, FPL 8S1 0.12 mi. SSE; fuel oil storage 39-27.676 75-32.055 IDM 9S1 0.12 mi. S; fuel oil storage 39-27.636 75-32.091 IDM 10S1 0.14 mi. SSW; circulating water building 39-27.700 75-32.160 IDM 11S1 0.09 mi. SW; circulating water building 39-27.719 75-32.225 IDM 12S1 0.09 mi. WSW; outside security fence 39-27.756 75-32.236 IDM 13S1 0.09 mi. W; outside security fence 39-27.801 75-32.267 IDM 14S1 0.1 O mi. NNW; outside security fence 39-27.893 75-32.280 IDM 15S1 0.57 mi. NW; near river and Hope Creek barge slip 39-28.161 75-32.525 IDM, FPV 15S2 0.59 mi. NW; near river and Hope Creek barge slip 39-28.12 75-32.32 IDM, AIO, APT, FPL 16S1 0.57 mi. NNW; on road near fuel oil storage tank 39-28.215 75-32.432 IDM, FPL 16S2 0.60 mi. NNW; near security firing range 39-28.16 75-32.17 IDM, FPL 16S3 1.0 mi. NNW; consolidated spoils facility 39-28.350 75-32.550 IDM 11A1 0.20 mi. SW; Salem outfall area 39-27.59 75-32.25 ESS, SWA, ECH, ESF 11A1A 0.15 mi. SE; Located in the plant barge slip area 39-27.41 75-32.02 Alternate SWA TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SAMPLING LOCATIONS

.All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every ~ear (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED CODE STATION LOCATION DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

15A1 0.65 mi. NW; Hope Creek outfall area 39-27.67 75-32.19 ESS 16A1 0.24 mi. NNW; South Storm Drain outfall 39-28.24 75-32.58 ESS 5C1 3.14 mi. ENE; site access road, near 5D1 air sampler 39-28.250 75-28.430 GAM 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank of Delaware River 39-27.22 75-34.08 ESS, SWA, ECH, ESF 12C1A 3.7 mi. WSW; Located at the tip of Augustine Beach Boat Ramp 39-30.17 75-34.48 Alternate SWA 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE; Alloway Creek Neck Road 39-29.292 75-28.175 IDM 5D1 3.5 mi. E; local farm along Salem/HG access road. 39-28.396 75-28.334 IDM, AIO, APT 10D1 3.9 mi. SSW; Taylor's Bridge Spur, DE 39-24.613 75-33.733 IDM, FPL, SOL 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW; Bay View, DE 39-29.26 75-35.521 IDM 1501 3.8 mi NW; Route 9, Augustine Beach, DE 39-30.125 75-35.28 lbM 2E1 4.4 mi. NNE; local farm, NJ 39-31.380 75-30.428 IDM 3E1 4.2 mi. NE; local farm, NJ 39-30.098 75-28.646 IDM,WWA 7E1 4.5 mi. SE; River Bank 1.0 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 39-25.08 75-28.64 ESS, SWA, ESF 7E1A 8.87 mi. SE; Located at the end of Bayside Road, NJ 39-22.57 75-24.24 Alternate SWA 11E2 5.0 mi. SW; Route 9, DE 39-24.328 75-35.546 IDM 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW; Thomas Landing, DE 39-26.862 75-36.968 IDM 13E1 4.2 mi. W; Diehl House Lab, DE 39-27.989 75-36.735 IDM 13E3 5.0 mi. W; local farm, DE 39-27.17 75-37.30 MLK, FPL, VGT, SOL 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW; Port Penn, DE 39-30.762 75-34.580 IDM, AIO, APT, SOL 1F1 5.8 mi. N; Fort Elfsborg, NJ 39-32.693 75-31.124 IDM, AIO, APT, 1F2 7.1 mi. N; midpoint of Delaware River 39-33.08 75-32.54 SWA 2F2 8.5 mi. NNE; Salem Substation, Salem NJ 39-34.522 75-28.120 IDM 2F3 8.0 mi. NNE; City of Salem Water and Sewage Department, NJ 39-33.40 75-27.18 PWR,PWT 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE; Salem High School, Salem, NJ 39-33.448 75-28.514 IDM 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE; PSE&G Training Center, Salem NJ 39-33.713 75-28.819 IDM, AIO, APT 2F9 7.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm , Tilbury Rd, Salem, NJ 39-33.55 75-29.30 FPV, SOL TABLE B-2 {cont'd)

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED CODE STATION LOCATION DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

2F10 9.2 mi. NNE; Local Farm, South Broadway (Rt 49) Pennsville, NJ 39-35.35 75-29.35 FPV,FPL 3F2 5.1 mi. NE; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 39- 30.410 75-27.578 IDM 3F3 8.6 mi. NE; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ 39-32.616 75- 24.735 IDM 3F6 6.5 mi. NE; Local Farm, Salem/Hancocks Bridge Road, NJ 39-32.03 75-28.00 FPV 3F7 7.2 mi. NE; Local Farm, Beasley Neck Road, RD#3, NJ 39-32.07 75-25.46 FPV 3F8 9.3 mi. NE; Circle M Orchard, NJ 39-33.987 75-25.468 FPV 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ 39-29.953 75-26.076 IDM 5F1 6.5 mi. E; *canton, NJ 39-28.360 75-25.031 IDM,SOL 6F1 6.4 mi. ESE; Stow Neck Road, NJ 39-26.396 75-25.148 IDM 7F2 9.1 mi. SE; Bayside, NJ 39-22.971 75-24.261 IDM 8F1 9.7 mi. SE; Woodland Beach, DE 39-19.933 75-28.463 IDM 9F1 5.3 mi. S; off Route #9, DE 39-23.042 75-32.95 IDM 10F2 5.8 mi. SSW; Route #9, DE 39-23.034 75-34.152 IDM 11F1 6.2 mi. SW; Taylor's Bridge, DE 39-24.766 75-37.632 IDM 12F1 9.4 mi. WSW; Townsend Elementary"School, DE 39-23.778 75-41.311 IDM 13F2 6.5 mi W;* Odessa, DE 39-27.297 75-39.372 IDM 13F3 9.3 mi. W; Redding Middle School, Middletown, DE 39-27.215 75-42.543 IDM 13F4 9.8 mi. W; Middletown, DE 39-26.857 75-43.111 IDM 14F2 6.7 mi. WNW; Route 13 and Boyds Comer Rd, DE 39-29.979 75-39.042 IDM 14F4

7.6 mi. WNW; local farm, DE 39-30.44 75-40.52 MLK, VGT, SOL 15F3 5.4 mi. NW, Port Penn Rd. at Pole Bridge Rd., DE 39-30.987 75-36.586 IDM 15F4 7.0 mi. NW; local farm; Port Penn Road; DE 39-31.21 75-38.31 FPV 16F1 6.9 mi~ NNW; C&D Canal, DE 39-33.55 75-34.25 ESS,SWA 16F1A 6.84 mi. NNW; Located at the C&D Canal Tip, DE 39-33.34 75-33.56 Alternate SWA

\ .

TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED CODE STATION LOCATION DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

16F2 8.1 mi. NNW; Delaware City Public School, DE 39-34.314 75- 35.429 IDM 1G1 10.9 mi. NNE; Route 49, South Broadway, NJ 39-37.113 75-30.178 FPV 1G3 19 mi. N; N. Church Street Wilmington, DE 39-44.287 75-32.512 IDM 13.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm; Pointers Auburn Road (Route 540),

2G2 39-38.19 75-26.10 FPV Salem, NJ 2G3 11.8 mi. NNE; Local Milk Farm, NJ 39-36.21 75-24.53 MLK, VGT, SOL 11.3 mi. NNE; large family garden; Route 45 & Welchville Road, 2G4 39-36.02 75-25.21 FPV Mannington, NJ 3G1 17 mi. NE; local farm, NJ 39-35.913 75-16.804 IDM, MLK, VGT, SOL 9G1 10.3 mi. S; Local Farm, Woodland Beach Road., Smyrna, DE 39-18.47 75-33.50 FPV 9G2 10.7 mi. S; Local Farm, Woodland Beach Road, Smyrna, DE 39-18.39 75- 34.11 FPV 10G1 12 mi. SSW; Smyrna, DE 39-18.223 75-36.095 IDM 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW; Route 286, Bethel Church Road, DE 39-31.290 75-46.495 AIO,APT,IDM 16G1 15 mi. NNW; Wilmington Airport, DE 39-40.637 75-35.570 IDM 3H1 32 mi. NE; National Park, NJ 39-51.599 75-11.96 IDM 3H5 25 mi. NE; Farm Market, Route 77, NJ 39-41.040 75-12.380 FPV 7C1* 2 mi SE; Hope Creek Bed, near mouth of Hope Creek 39-26.611 75-30.328 EOY 7H1* 19 mi SE; Bennies Oyster Bed, near Nantuxent Cove 39-15.500 75-17.500 EOY NOTE: All station locations are referenced to the midpoint of the two Salem Units' Containments. The coordinates of this location are: Latitude N 39° - 27' - 46.5" and Longitude W 75° - 32' -10.6".

Vegetable samples are not always collected in consecutive years from the same farmer due to crop rotation.

Oysters were added to the REMP as a management audit sample in 2015. The oyster5 from the indicator location (7C1) are impacted by bacteria and are considered too small to be sold to the public. The oyster sample locations are not listed in the ODCM.

MAP B-1 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS OUT TO 1 MILE 13 9

Sources Esri Lonne, NAVTEQ, TomTom lnlermap, *nc.remenl P Corp.,

GEBCO. USGS, 0 , NPS, NRCAN . GeoBase. IGN. K~aster NL.

Ordnance Survey, sri Japan. METI, Esn Chma (Hong Ko). ). swisstopo, and the GIS User ommumty N

e Salem and Hope Creek t

~ Generating Stations NORMANDEAU 1 Mile ODCM Locations ASSOCIATES

--====----

1 ................ 1 c-........ i.

0. 12S O.Z5 0.5Mil.es Date: Revised:

10/1 9/ 201 5 MAP B-2 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1TO10 MILES Sources Esn omie, NAl/TEO Tom Tom In ermap 1 rement P Corp GEBCO USGS f AO NPS NRCAN Geo6ase IGN Ka sler L Ordnance Survey\ Esn Japan lllETI. Esn Ch"" (Hong Kong\ swi.-topo and the GIS User Communly N Salem and Hope Creek t

Generating Stations REMP Locations between f and fO miles

--===----

US LS SW'°5:

Date:

10116 120 15 Revised :

MAP B-3 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS GREATER THAN 10 MILES h ..Y11 l

t h--f th

lf' I f1U1 I I ,.,.,.,...-

(HI \I\ ... '4/ LI '""I*t .'

, S.l fl l ffl ,f I

........u.

H 111 t"o..fl T r fl o r~

N Salem and Hope Creek t

r- ~ Generating Stations NORMANDEAU REMP locations ASSOCIATES over 10 miles

......=====-..........* ~,., O.te:

10/ 16120 15 Revised:

Intentionally left blank APPENDIXC DATA TABLES AND FIGURES Intentionally left blank TABLE C-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES, 2015 3

Results in Units of 1E-3 pCi/m +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION ID START STOP Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-APT-14G1 (C) 12/29/14 - 03/30/15 107 +/- 31 < 32 < 2 < 1 03/30/15 - 06/29/15 101 +/- 37 < 23 < < 2 06/29/15 - 09/28/15 116 +/- 27 < 19 < <

09/28/15 - 12/28/15 75 +/- 25 < 26 < <

AVERAGE* 100 +/- 35 SA-APT-15S2 12/29/14 - 03/30/15 124 +/- 41 < 46 < 3 < 3 03/30/15 - 06/29/15 129 +/- 41 < 32 < 2 < 2 06/29/15 - 09/28/15 116 +/- 34 < 8 < 2 < 2 09/28/15 - 12/28/15 123 +/- 32 < 34 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 123 +/- 11 SA-APT-16E1 12/29/14 - 03/30/15 94 +/- 27 < 31 < 2 <

03/30/15 - 06/29/15 146 +/- 39 < 36 < 2 < 2 06/29/15 - 09/28/15 110 +/- 28 < 25 < <

09/28/15 - 12/28/15 65 +/- 28 < 43 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 104 +/- 67 SA-APT-1F1 12/29/14 - 03/30/15 122 +/- 28 < 34 < 2 < 2 03/30/15 - 06/29/15 107 +/- 35 < 40 < 2 < 2 06/29/15 - 09/28/15 117 +/- 41 < 39 < 3 < 3 09/28/15 - 12/28/15 92 +/- 27 < 31 < 2 <

AVERAGE* 109 +/- 26 SA-APT-2F6 12/29/14 - 03/30/15 123 +/- 38 < 34 < 2 < 2 03/30/15 - 06/29/15 116 +/- 43 < 44 < 2 < 2 06/29/15 - 09/28/15 157 +/- 30 < 33 < 2 < 2 09/28/15 - 12/28/15 65 +/- 21 < 22 < 2 <

AVERAGE* 115 +/- 76 SA-APT-5D1 12/29/14 - 03/30/15 100 +/- 24 < 17 < 1 <

03/30/15 - 06/29/15 132 +/- 37 < 32 < 2 < 3 06/29/15 - 09/28/15 127 +/- 45 < 39 < 3 < 2 09/28/15 - 12/28/15 90 +/- 29 < 22 < 2 <

AVERAGE* 112 +/- 41 (C) CONTROL STATION

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES, 2015 Results in Units of 1E-3 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION ID START STOP Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-APT-5S1 12/29/14 - 03/30/15 89 +/- 23 < 27 < 2 < 2 03/30/15 - 06/29/15 80 +/- 26 < 27 < 2 < 1 06/29/15 - 09/28/15 94 +/- 28 < 16 < 2 < 2 09/28/15 - 12/28/15 104 +/- 38 < 36 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 92 +/- 20 SA-APT-7S1 12/29/14 - 03/30/15 94 +/- 39 < 36 < 2 < 2 03/30/15 - 06/29/15 131 +/- 36 < 23 < 2 < 2 06/29/15 - 09/28/15 146 +/- 29 < 29 < 2 <

09/28/15 - 12/28/15 < 51 < 44 < 2 < 3 AVERAGE* 124 +/- 27

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES, 2015 3

Results in Units of 1E-3pCi/m .+/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL GROUP I START STOP SA-APT-14G1 SA-APT-1F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-501 SA-APT-5S1 SA-APT-7S1 12/29/14 - 01/05/15 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 01/05/15 - 01/12115 9 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 01/12/15 - 01/19/15 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 01/19/15 - 01/26/15 9 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 5 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 01/26/15 - 02102115 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 02/02/15 - 02109/15 18 +/-4 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 02/09/15 - 02/17/15 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 02/17/15 - 02123/15 17 +/-4 20 +/- 4 23 +/- 4 18 +/-4 20 +/- 4 24 +/- 4 02/23/15 - 03/02115 19 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 03/02/15 - 03/09/15 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 03/09/15 - 03/16/15 8 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 03/16/15 - 03/23/15 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 03/23/15 - 03/30/15 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 03/30/15 - 04/06/15 11 +/-3 17 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 04/06/15 - 04/13/15 5 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 7 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 6 +/- 3 04/13/15 - 04/20/15 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 04/20/15 - 04/27/15 9 +/-3 9 +/- 3 6 +/- 2 8 +/- 2 6 +/- 2 9 +/- 3 04/27/15 - 05/04/15 4 +/- 3 4 +/- 2 6 +/- 3 <4 4,+/- 2 4 +/- 2 05/04/15 - 05/11/15 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 05/11/15 - 05/18/15 16 +/-3 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 05/18/15 - 05/26/15 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 2 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 - 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 05/26/15 - 06/01/15 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 9+/- 3 11 +/- 3 06/01/15 - 06/08/15 4 +/- 2 <4 5+/-2 <4 5 +/- 3 5 +/- 3 06/08/15 - 06/15/15 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/-4 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 06/15/15 - 06/22115 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 06/22/15 - 06/29/15 9 +/- 3 12 +/-4 10 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 6 +/- 2 06/29/15 - 07/06/15 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 07/06/15 - 07113/15 14 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 9+/- 3 13 +/- 3 07/13/15 - 07/20/15 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 07/20/15 - 07/27/15 18 - +/- 3 12 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 07/27/15 - 08/03/15 12 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 08/03/15 - 08/10/15 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 08/10/15 - 08/17/15 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 08/17/15 - 08/24/15 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 08/24/15 - 08/31/15 17 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 08/31/15 - 09/08/15 29 +/-4 27 +/-4 26 +/- 4 29 +/- 3 25 +/- 4 24 +/- 3 09/08/15 - 09/14/15 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 09/14/15 - 09/21/15 21 +/- 3 22 +/- 3 22 +/- 3 26 +/-4 26 +/- 4 24 +/- 4 09/21/15 - 09/28/15 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 09/28/15 - 10/06/15 10 +/- 2 8 +/- 2 8 +/- 2 11 +/- 3 8 +/- 2 7+/-2 10/06/15 - 10/12115 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10/12/15 - 10/19/15 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 4 10/19/15 - 10/26/15 19 +/- 3 8 +/- 2 18 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 10/26/15 - 11/02115 12 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11/02/15 - 11/09/15 21 +/-4 19 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 11/09/15 - 11/16/15 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 11/16/15 - 11/23/15 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11/23/15 - 11/30/15 19 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11/30/15 - 12107/15 15 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 12/07/15 - 12114/15 33 +/- 5 22 +/-4 25 +/- 4 28 +/-4 27 +/- 4 27 +/- 4 12/14/15 - 12121/15 9 +/- 3 10 f 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 12/21/15 - 12/28/15 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 AVERAGE* 13 +/- 11 13 +/- 9 13 +/- 10 13 +/-7 13 +/- 10 13 +/- 10 TABLE C-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES, 2015 3

Results in Units of 1E-3pCi/m .:!:2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD GROUP I START STOP SA-APT-15S2 SA-APT-16E1 12/29/14 - 01/05/15 17 +/- 3 18+/- 4 01/05/15 - 01/12115 16 +/- 3 17+/- 3 01/12/15 - 01/19/15 16 +/- 3 14+/- 3 01/19/15 - 01/26/15 10 +/- 3 11+/- 3 01/26/15 - 02102115 12 +/- 3 13+/- 3 02/02/15 - 02/09/15 22 +/-4 18+/- 4 02/09/15 - 02117/15 16 +/- 3 16+/- 3 02/17/15 - 02123115 23 +/-4 26+/- 4 02/23/15 - 03/02/15 18 +/-3 18+/- 3 03/02115 - 03/09/15 14 +/- 3 18+/- 3 03/09/15 - 03/16/15 11 +/- 3 8+/- 3 03/16/15 - 03/23/15 14 +/- 3 13+/- 3 03/23/15 - 03/30/15 13 +/- 3 16+/- 3 03/30/15 - 04/06/15 15 +/- 5 14+/- 3 04/06/15 - 04/13/15 8 +/-3 8+/- 3 04/13/15 - 04/20/15 12 +/-4 12+/- 3 04/20/15 - 04127115 10 +/- 3 6+/- 3

' 4 +/- 2 < 3 04/27/15 - 05/04/15 05/04/15 - 05/11/15 16 +/-4 13+/- 3 05/11/15 - 05/18/15 13 +/- 3 16+/- 3 05/18/15 - 05/26/15 11 +/-2 14+/- 3 05/26/15 - 06/01/15 11 +/- 3 7+/- 3 06/01/15 - 06/08/15 5 +/- 3 < 4 06/08/15 - 06/15/15 12 +/- 3 10+/- 3 06/15/15 - 06/22115 9 +/- 3 12+/- 3 06/22/15 - 06/29/15 7 +/- 3 7+/- 3 06/29/15 - 07/06/15 13 +/-3 11+/- 3 07/06/15 - 07113/15 12 +/- 3 11+/- 3 07/13/15 - 07120115 12 +/- 3 10+/- 3 07120115 - 07/27/15 13 +/- 3 14+/- 3 07/27/15 - 08/03/15 12 +/- 3 16+/- 3 08/03/15 - 08/10/15 12 +/- 3 11+/- 3 08/10/15 - 08/17/15 9 +/- 3 11+/- 3 08/17/15 - 08/24/15 15 +/-3 12+/- 3 08/24/15 - 08/31/15 13 +/- 3 15+/- 3 08/31/15 - 09/08/15 27 +/-4 31+/- 4 09/08/15 - 09/14/15 12 +/-4 13+/- 4 09/14/15 - 09/21/15 24 +/-4 25+/- 4 09/21/15 - 09/28/15 1() +/- 3 10+/- 3 09/28/15 - 10/06/15 9 +/- 3 11+/- 3 10/06/15 - 10/12115 12 +/- 3 12+/- 3 10/12/15 - 10/19/15 15 +/-4 12+/- 3 10/19/15 - 10/26/15 13 +/- 3 12+/- 3 10/26/15 - 11/02115 19 +/- 3 15+/- 3 11/02/15 - 11/09/15 15 +/- 3 20+/- 4 11/09/15 - 11/16/15 8 +/-3 8+/- 3 11/16/15 - 11/23/15 17 +/- 3 17+/- 3 11/23/15 - 11/30/15 20 +/- 3 19+/- 3 11/30/15 - 12107/15 19 +/-4 14+/- 3 12/07/15 - 12/14/15 30 +/-4 30+/- 4 12/14/15 - 12/21/15 14 +/- 3 10+/- 3 12/21/15 - 12128/15 10 +/- 3 11+/- 3 AVERAGE* 14 +/- 11 14+/- 11 TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR, 2015 3

Results in Units of 1E-3pCi/m .+/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL GROUP I START STOP SA-AI0-14G1 SA-AI0-1F1 SA-AI0-2F6 SA-AI0-501 SA-AI0-5S1 SA-AI0-7S1 12/29/14 - 01/05/15 < 28 < 31 < 30 < 30 < 30 < 26 01/05/15 - 01/12/15 < 52 < 51 < 51 < 49 < 53 < 54 01/12/15 - 01/19/15 < 33 < 32 < 32 < 30 < 32 < 33 01/19/15 - 01/26/15 < 48 < 56 < 54 < 53 < 56 < 47 01/26/15 - 02/02/15 < 59 < 52 < 53 < 49 < 54 < 60 02/02/15 - 02/09/15 < 41 < 66 < 66 < 62 < 66 < 40 02/09/15 - 02/17/15 < 40 < 44 < 44 < 44 < 45 < 43 02/17/15 - 02/23/15 < 26 < 35 < 33 < 31 < 34 < 26 02/23/15 - 03/02/15 < 32 < 20 < 22 < 22 < 21 < 30 03/02/15 - 03/09/15 < 43 < 39 < 42 < 38 < 39 < 43 03/09/15 - 03/16/15 < 38 < 35 < 37 < 38 < 34 < 34 03/16/15 - 03/23/15 < 24 < 40 < 39 < 41 < 38 < 23 03/23/15 - 03/30/15 < 29 < 26 < 27 < 25 < 23 < 26 03/30/15 - 04/06/15 < 47 < 47 < 47 < 47 < 17 < 51 04/06/15 - 04/13/15 < 45 < 43 < 38 < 46 < 45 < 44 04/13/15 - 04/20/15 < 47 < 69 < 63 < 64 < 65 < 44 04/20/15 - 04/27/15 < 58 < 38 < 37 < 34 < 21 < 54 04/27/15 - 05/04/15 < 69 < 60 < 65 < 68 < 66 < 66 05/04/15 - 05/11/15 < 42 < 18 < 32 < 36 < 34 < 41 05/11/15 - 05/18/15 < 39 < 45 < 44 < 48 < 46 < 42 05/18/15 - 05/26/15 < 26 < 37 < 14 < 40 < 38 < 28 05/26/15 - 06/01/15 < 43 < 37 < 35 < 40 < 38 < 46 06/01/15 - 06/08/15 < 59 < 40 < 38 < 16 < 40 < 60 06/08/15 - 06/15/15 < 29 < 15 < 15 < 19 < 16 < 32 06/15/15 - 06/22/15 < 30 < 31 < 30 < 33 < 31 < 31 06/22/15 - 06/29/15 < 36 < 57 < 42 < 49 < 44 < 38 06/29/15 - '07/06/15 < 9 < 21 < 21 < 22 < 23 < 18 07/06/15 - 07/13/15 < 40 < 17 < 43 < 48 < 48 < 45 07/13/15 - 07/20/15 < 64 < 30 < 28 < 28 < 30 < 63 07/20/15 - 07/27/15 < 30 < 29 < 27 < 28 < 28 < 30 07/27/15 - 08/03/15 < 25 < 48 < 18 < 49 < 46 < 64 08/03/15 - 08/10/15 < 21 < 22 < 20 < 21 < 20 < 22 08/10/15 - 08/17/15 < 34 < 36 < 13 < 36 < 33 < 35 08/17/15 - 08/24/15 < 21 < 18 < 17 < 18 < 17 < 22 08/24/15 - 08/31/15 < 44 < 65 < 60 < 53 < 60 < 45 08/31 /15 - 09/08/15 < 47 < 61 < 56 < 51 < 57 < 49 09/08/15 - 09/14/15 < 25 < 24 < 22 < 22 < 21 < 27 09/14/15 - 09/21/15 < 37 < 24 < 24 < 26 < 26 < 40 09/21/15 - 09/28/15 < 51 < 40 < 39 < 38 < 39 < 53 09/28/15 - 10/06/15 < 17 < 22 < 21 < 19 < 22 < 47 10/06/15 - 10/12/15 < 27 < 37 < 36 < 15 < 36 < 29 10/12/15 - 10/19/15 < 21 < 22 < 21 < 22 < 21 < 31 10/19/15 - 10/26/15 < 32 < 23 < 23 < 8 < 22 < 36 10/26/15 - 11/02/15 < 41 < 26 < 26 < 30 < 27 < 40 11/02/15 - 11/09/15 < 31 < 14 < 36 < 40 < 36 < 32 11/09/15 - 11/16/15 < 33 < 30 < 29 < 31 < 29 < 36 11/16/15 - 11/23/15 < 15 < 61 < 61 < 37 < 62 < 40 11/23/15 - 11/30/15 < 54 < 50 < 43 < 48 < 45 < 55 11/30/15 - 12/07/15 < 34 < 34 < 36 < 37 < 33 < 37 12/07/15 - 12/14/15 < 31 < 45 < 45 < 43 < 18 < 29 12/14/15 - 12/21/15 < 36 < 53 < 48 < 54 < 45 < 38 12/21/15 - 12/28/15 < 39 < 46 < 46 < 42 < 42 < 38 AVERAGE

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY USING STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 70E-3 pCi/m 3 TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR, 2015 3

Results in Units of 1E-3pCi/m .:!:.2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD GROUP I START STOP SA-AI0-1582 SA-AI0-16E1 12/29}14 - 01/05/15 < 26 < 28 01/05/15 - 01/12/15 < 54 < 56 01/12/15 - 01/19/15 < 33 < 35 01/19/15 - 01/26/15 < 46 < 51 01/26/15 - 02/02/15 < 58 < 62 02/02/15 - 02/09/15 < 41 < 42 02/09/15 - 02/17/15 < 42 < 43 02/17/15 - 02/23/15 < 28 < 27 02/23/15 - 03/02/15 < 32 < 32 03/02/15 - 03/09/15 < 46 < 43 03/09/15 - 03/16/15 < 37 < 36 03/16/15 - 03/23/15 < 25 < 23 03/23/15 - 03/30/15 < 29 < 29 03/30/15 - .04/06/15 < 37 < 45 04/06/15 - 04/13/15 < 44 < 44 04/13/15 - 04/20/15 < 58 < 41 04/20/15 - 04/27/15 < 56 < 62 04/27/15 - 05/04/15 < 66 < 62 05/04/15 - 05/11/15 < 44 < 41 05/11/15 - 05/18/15 < 42 < 39 05/18/15 - 05/26/15 < 28 < 26 05/26/15 - 06/01/15 < 45 < 44 06/01/15 - 06/08/15 < 60 < 65 06/08/15 - 06/15/15 < 32 < 30 06/15/15 - 06/22/15 < 31 < 32 06/22/15 - 06/29/15 < 38 < 38 06/29/15 - 07/06/15 < 18 < 18 07/06/15 - 07/13/15 < 44 < 42 07/13/15 - 07/20/15 < 62 < 65 07/20/15 - 07/27/15 < 31 < 31 07/27/15 - 08/03/15 < 61 < 62 08/03/15 - 08/10/15 < 21 < 22 08/10/15 - 08/17/15 < 33 < 35 08/17/15 - 08/24/15 < 21 < 22 08/24/15 - 08/31/15 < 45 < 46 08/31/15 - 09/08/15 < 49 < 50 09/08/15 - 09/14/15 < 28 < 27 09/14/15 - 09/21/15 < 42 < 41 09/21/15 - 09/28/15 < 58 < 55 09/28/15 - 10/06/15 < 51 < 49 10/06/15 - 10/12/15 < 31 < 29 10/12/15 - 10/19/15 < 24 < 22 10/19/15 - 10/26/15 < 34 < 23 10/26/15 - 11 /02/15 < 43 < 41 11/02/15 - 11/09/15 < 34 < 38 11/09/15 - 11/16/15 < 38 < 34 11/16/15 - 11/23/15 < 40 < 39 11/23/15 - 11/30/15 < 60 < 57 11/30/15 - 12/07/15 < 40 < 35 12/07/15 - 12/14/15 < 30 < 44 12/14/15 - 12/21/15 < 36 < 38 12/21/15 - 12/28/15 < 14 < 39 AVERAGE

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY USING STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 70E-3 pCi/m 3 TABLE C-4 DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - QUARTERLY DOSIMITRY RESULTS*, 2015 Results in units of mR/standard quarter STATION ID ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC DOSE mR/~r SA-IDM-1G3 (C) 56. 15.0 14.1 13.2 14.0 SA-IDM-3G1 (C) 60.8 16.1 16.1 14.6 14.0 SA-IDM-10G1 (C) 57.2 14.5 13.6 14.8 14.3 SA-IDM-14G1 (C) 59.2 15.0 15.1 14.5 14.6 SA-IDM-16G1 (C) 51.4 13.0 13.1 12.7 12.6 SA-IDM-3H1 (C) 47.2 12.4 10.1 12.7 12.0 SA-IDM-1S1** 117.7 35.0 31.4 27.2 24.1 SA-IDM-2S2 54.0 15.2 13.1 13.7 12.0 SA-IDM-2S4 58.9 17.3 15.1 12.0 14.5 SA-IDM-3S1 46.1 12.4 10.6 11.0 12.1 SA-IDM-4S1 49.2 12.4 13.6 11.7 11.5 SA-IDM-5S1 47.5 13.4 11.1 12.0 11.0 SA-IDM-6S2 61.2 16.6 15.6 15.5 13.5 SA-IDM-7S1 50.6 14.5 13.6 11.4 11.1 SA-IDM-8S1 42.6 12.4 9.2 10.4 10.6 SA-IDM-9S1 44.3 12.4 10.1 10.6 11.2 SA-IDM-1 OS1 45.9 12.4 12.1 11.3 10.1 SA-IDM-11S1 41.6 11.8 10.1 10.1 9.6 SA-IDM-12S1 55.3 16.6 12.6 12.8 13.3 SA-IDM-13S1 59.9 18.2 13.6 13.7 14.4 SA-IDM-14S1 62.2 18.2 12.6 15.9 15.5 SA-IDM-15S1 45.6 12.9 11.1 11.3 10.3 SA-IDM-15S2 52.2 15.0 12.6 13.1 11.5 SA-IDM-16S1 55.2 14.5 14.1 14.1 12.5 SA-IDM-16S2** 131.8 39.4 33.9 30.2 28.3 SA-IDM-16S3 48.4 12.4 11.6 11.8 12.6 SA-IDM-402 57.6 15.5 14.1 14.8 13.2 SA-IDM-5D1 51.9 13.7 12.6 14.0 11.6 SA-IDM-1001 57.9 14.5 15.1 14.8 13.5 SA-IDM-14D1 51.2 13.0 12.1 13.4 12.7 SA-IDM-15D1 62.8 15.9 15.1 15.4 16.4 SA-IDM-2E1 54.1 14.0 13.6 13.2 13.3 SA-IDM-3E1 46.4 11.7 11.1 11.4 12.2 SA-IDM-11E2 57.7 14.5 14.1 15.6 13.5 SA-IDM-12E1 59.2 15.5 15.1 14.7 13.9 SA-IDM-13E1 49.0 12.6 12.1 12.3 12.0 SA-IDM-16E1 54.2 14.8 12.1 14.2 13.1 SA-IDM-1F1 69.5 18.7 17.1 17.8 15.9 SA-IDM-2F2 50.3 15.0 11.6 12.0 11.7 SA-IDM-2F5 57.1 15.5 14.6 13.5 13.5 SA-IDM-2F6 53.5 14.5 13.1 12.8 13.1 SA-IDM-3F2 50.1 14.0 12.1 11.6 12.4 SA-IDM-3F3 50.3 13.4 12.1 12.0 12.8 SA-IDM-4F2 48.4 13.1 10.1 12.2 13.0 SA-IDM-5F1 50.9 13.6 11.6 12.7 13.0 SA-IDM-6F1 45.3 12.0 10.1 11.4 11.8 SA-IDM-7F2 51.0 14.0 11.3 12.8 12.9 SA-IDM-8F1 59.3 15.0 15.1 14.6 14.6 SA-IDM-9F1 63.9 18.0 16.1 15.6 14.2 SA-IDM-10F2 56.9 14.5 13.1 15.0 14.3 SA-IDM-11F1 60.4 14.5 16.1 15.3 14.5 SA-IDM-12F1 56.0 14.0 13.1 14.5 14.4 SA-IDM-13F2 54.7 14.0 13.1 13.9 13.7 SA-IDM-13F3 56.8 14.0 14.1 14.7 14.0 SA-IDM-13F4 58.9 15.5 14.1 14.7 14.6 SA-IDM-14F2 61.8 15.5 16.1 15.7 14.5 SA-IDM-15F3 60.9 15.5 14.6 15.7 15.1 SA-IDM-16F2 50.2 13.0 11.6 12.8 12.8 (C) CONTROL STATION

QUARTERLY ELEMENT TLD RESULTS BY MIRION TECHNOLOGIES

- SAMPLE RESULTS ARE AFFECTED BY THE ISFSI, INDPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION TABLEC-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK, 2015 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <-----GAMMA EMITTERS--:...--->

STATION ID START STOP 1-131 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 01/04/15 - 01/05/15 < 0.5 1121 +/- 159 <8 <9 < 15 < 167 SA-MLK-13E3 01/04/15 - 01/05/15 < 0.6 1392 +/- 183 <7 <6 < 13 < 204 SA-MLK-14F4 01/04/15 - 01/05/15 < 0.5 1374 +/- 137 <5 <7 < 9 < 146 SA-MLK-2G3 01/04/15 - 01/05/15 < 0.3 1228 +/- 125 <4 <6 <7 < 139 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 02/01/15 - 02/02/15 < 0.5 1274 +/- 143 <5 <6 <9 < 122 SA-MLK-13E3 02/01/15 - 02/02/15 < 0.4 1400 +/- 142 <6 <6 < 10 < 137 SA-MLK-14F4 02/01/15 - 02/02/15 < 0.5 1337 +/- 101 <4 <4 <6 < 104 SA-MLK-2G3 02/01/15 - 02/02/15 < 0.6 1312 +/- 107 <4 <4 <6 < 107 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 03/01/15 - 03/02/15 < 0.5 1233 +/- 156 <9 < 10 < 12 < 265 SA-MLK-13E3 03/01/15 - 03/02/15 < 0.5 1176 +/- 165 <8 <8 < 14 < 204 SA-MLK-14F4 03/01/15 - 03/02/15 < 0.8 1346 +/- 184 <8 <8 < 12 < 186 SA-MLK-2G3 03/01 /15 - 03/02/15 < 0.7 1283 +/- 195 <8 <9 < 10 < 217 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/05/15 - 04/06/15 < 0.4 1101 +/- 161 <6 <7 < 11 < 174 SA-MLK-13E3 04/05/15 - 04/06/15 < 0.6 1365 +/- 180 <8 <9 < 14 < 201 SA-MLK-14F4 04/05/15 - 04/06/15 < 0.3 1419 +/- 160 <7 <8 < 10 < 185 SA-MLK-2G3 04/05/15 - 04/06/15 < 0.4 1376 +/- 139 <6 <6 <8 < 127 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/26/15 - 04/27/15 < 0.3 1296 +/- 153 <5 <6 < 13 < 123 SA-MLK-13E3 04/26/15 - 04/27/15 < 0.4 1413 +/- 138 <5 <7 < 13 < 137 SA-MLK-14F4 04/26/15 - 04/27/15 < 0.3 1496 +/- 157 <5 <6 <9 < 136 SA-MLK-2G3 04/26/15 - 04/27/15 < 0.7 1210 +/- 113 <4 <5 < 10 < 97 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/10/15 - 05/11/15 < 0.8 1458 +/- 155 <6 <5 <10 < 157 SA-MLK-13E3 05/10/15 - 05/11/15 < 0.9 1250 +/- 134 <6 <7 <9 < 140 SA-MLK-14F4 05/10/15 - 05/11/15 < 0.6 1133 +/- 196 <5 <7 < 14 < 151 SA-MLK-2G3 05/10/15 - 05/11 /15 < 0.6 1298 +/- 180 < 10 < 11 <14 < 236 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/25/15 - 05/26/15 < 0.3 1269 +/- 137 <2 <3 <6 < 52 SA-MLK-13E3 05/25/15 - 05/26/15 < 0.3 1179 +/- 108 <4 <4 <8 < 107 SA-MLK-14F4 05/25/15 - 05/26/15 < 0.3 1483 +/- 111 <4 <4 <9 < 106 SA-MLK-2G3 05/25/15 - 05/26/15 < 0.3 1388 +/- 156 <6 <6 < 12 < 141 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/07/15 - 06/08/15 < 0.7 1452 +/- 137 <5 <5 <6 < 143 SA-MLK-13E3 06/07/15 - 06/08/15 < 0.7 1240 +/- 125 <4 <6 <9 < 112 SA-MLK-14F4 06/07/15 - 06/08/15 < 0.6 1305 +/- 125 <5 <6 <8 < 140 SA-MLK-2G3 06/07/15 - 06/08/15 < 0.8 1277 +/- 147 <7 <8 < 13 < 188 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/21/15 - 06/22/15 < 0.5 1290 +/- 182 <6 <8 <12 < 157 SA-MLK-13E3 06/21/15 -06/22/15 < 0.5 1616 +/- 158 <5 <7 <9 < 159 SA-MLK-14F4 06/21/15 -06/22/15 < 0.5 1295 +/- 168 <7 <9 < 13 < 209 SA-MLK-2G3 06/21/15 -06/22/15 < 0.5 1601 +/- 201 <6 <9 < 12 < 191 (C) CONTROL STATION

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L TABLEC-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK, 2015 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <------GAMMA EMITTERS----->

STATION ID START STOP 1-131* K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 07/05/15 - 07/06/15 < 0.5 1259 +/- 130 <5 <4 <6 < 111 SA-MLK-13E3 07/05/15 - 07/06/15 < 0.5 1421 +/- 155 <4 < 5. <9 < 130 SA-MLK-14F4 07/05/15 - 07/06/15 < 0.5 1375 +/- 120 <5 <5 <6 < 137 SA-MLK-2G3 07/05/15 - 07/06/15 < 0.6 1280 +/- 144 <6 <7 < 13 < 131 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 07/19/15 - 07/20/15 < 0.4 1243 +/- 153 <7 <7 < 13 < 139 SA-MLK-13E3 07/19/15 - 07/20/15 < 0.4 1245 +/- 174 <6 <7 < 12 < 188 SA-MLK-14F4 07/19/15 - 07/20/15 < 0.4 1319 +/- 157 <7 <7 <10 < 162 SA-MLK-2G3 07/19/15 - 07/20/15 < 0.5 1279 +/- 147 <7 <6 < 12 < 167 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 08/02/15 - 08/03/15 < 0.4 1392 +/- 187 <7 <8 < 12 < 162 SA-MLK-13E3 08/02/15 - 08/03/15 < 0.4 1314 +/- 165 <7 <6 < 11 < 181 SA-MLK-14F4 08/02/15 - 08/03/15 < 0.4 1456 +/- 177 <7 < 10 <8 < 223 SA-MLK-2G3 08/02/15 - 08/03/15 < 0.9 1283 +/- 141 <5 <5 <7 < 138 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 08/16/15 - 08/17/15 < 0.3 1283 +/- 178 <7 <8 < 11 < 206 SA-MLK-13E3 08/16/15 - 08/17/15 < 0.4 1272 +/- 195 <9 < 11 < 14 < 212 SA-MLK-14F4 08/16/15 - 08/17/15 < 0.3 1475 +/- 202 <7 <9 < 14 < 199 SA-MLK-2G3 08/16/15 - 08/17/15 < 0.4 1198 +/- 213 <9 <9 < 11 < 225 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 09/07/15 - 09/08/15 < 0.4 1286 +/- 252 <7 <8 < 11 < 206 SA-MLK-13E3 09/07/15 - 09/08/15 < 0.6 1312 +/- 216 <8 < 10 < 10 < 241 SA-MLK-14F4 09/07/15 - 09/08/15 < 0.6 1321 +/- 194 <7 <9 < 11 < 164 SA-MLK-2G3 09/07/15 - 09/08/15 < 0.6 1194 +/- 204 <9 < 12 < 15 < 229 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 09/20/15 - 09/21/15 < 0.4 1162 +/- 192 <9 < 10 < 15 < 173 SA-MLK-13E3 09/20/15 - 09/21/15 < 0.3 1460 +/- 176 <8 <7 < 10 < 196 SA-MLK-14F4 09/20/15 - 09/21/15 < 0.3 1368 +/- 152 <8 <8 <8 < 179 SA-MLK-2G3 09/20/15 - 09/21/15 < 0.4 1396 +/- 187 <7 <7 <7 < 185 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 10/05/15 - 10/06/15 < 0.7 1104 +/- 189 <7 < 11 < 14 < 213 SA-MLK-13E3 10/05/15 - 10/06/15 < 0.6 1198 +/- 254 <6 < 11 <6 < 286 SA-MLK-14F4 10/05/15 - 10/06/15 < 0.6 1192 +/- 231 <13 < 10 <14 < 310 SA-MLK-2G3 10/05/15 - 10/06/15 < 0.4 1284 +/- 242 <8 <9 < 12 < 264 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 10/18/15 - 10/19/15 < 0.7 1094 +/- 230 <9 < 11 < 11 < 241 SA-MLK-13E3 10/18/15 - 10/19/15 < 0.9 1426 +/- 212 <8 <9 < 11 < 234 SA-MLK-14F4 10/18/15 - 10/19/15 < 0.8 1308 +/- 206 <9 <9 <13 < 227 SA-MLK-2G3 10/18/15 - 10/19/15 < 1.0 1149 +/- 181 <8 <8 <7 < 166 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 11/01/15 - 11/02/15 < 0.7 1480 +/- 222 <10 <8 < 12 < 272 SA-MLK-13E3 11/01/15 - 11/02/15 < 0.6 1471 +/- 220 <9 <9 <13 < 211 SA-MLK-14F4 11/01/15 - 11/02/15 < 0.8 1432 +/- 194 <6 <8 < 13 < 191 SA-MLK-2G3 11/01/15 - 11/02/15 < 0.9 1259 +/- 172 <7 <6 < 12 < 204 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 11/15/15 - 11/16/15 < 0.7 1451 +/- 203 <9 < 11 < 12 < 195 SA-MLK-13E3 11/15/15 - 11/16/15 < 0.9 1532 +/- 178 <7 <7 <5 < 169 SA-MLK-14F4 11/15/15 - 11/16/15 < 0.7 1757 +/- 177 <7 <7 <8 < 169 SA-MLK-2G3 11/15/15 - 11/16/15 < 0.6 1684 +/- 219 <7 <9 <9 < 225 SA-MLK-3G1(C) 12/06/15 - 12/07/15 < 0.5 1451 +/- 203 <9 < 11 < 12 < 195 SA-MLK-13E3 12/06/15 - 12/07/15 < 0.5 1485 +/- 162 <8 < 11 <13 < 250 SA-MLK-14F4 12/06/15 - 12/07/15 < 0.5 1297 +/- 238 < 11 < 10 <14 < 263 SA-MLK-2G3 12/06/15 - 12/07/15 < 0.6 1271 +/- 139 <8 < 10 < 11 < 203 ANNUAL AVERAGE 1331 +/- 260

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L TABLE C-6 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN WELL WATER*, 2015 Results in units of pCi/liter +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION PERIOD SA-WWA-3E1 START STOP Gr-A Gr-B H-3 01/19/15 - 01/19/15 < 2.6 < 2.7 < 170 02/17/15 - 02/17/15 < 1.2 < 2.3 < 163 03/25/15 - 03/25/15 < 0.8 <2.5 < 174 04/23/15 - 04/23/15 < 2.6 < 2.5 < .199 OS/11/15 - 05/11/15 < 1.7 2.8 +/- 1.6 < 178 06/22/15 - 06/22/15 < 0.7 < 2.2 < 169 07/17/15 - 07/17/15 < 1.4 < 2.2 < 194 08/24115 - 08/24/15 < 2.5 < 2.5 < 185 09/14/15 - 09/14/15 < 1.4 < 2.4 < 190 10/28/15 - 10/28/15 < 2.9 < 2.5 < 187 11/20/15 - 11/20/15 < 1.6 < 2.7 < 191 12/09/15 - 12/09/15 < 2.7 2.7 +/- 1.6 < 189 AVERAGE** 2.7 +/- 0.1 -

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-7 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER*, 2015 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <----GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID START STOP 1-131** K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa140 Ra-226 SA-WWA-3E1 01/19/15 - 01/19/15 < 0.2 < 107 <5 <4 < 9 <5 < 9 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 6 < 132 02/17/15 - 02/17/15 < 0.4 < 130 < 5 <4 < 10 <5 <9 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 5 < 147 03/25/15 - 03/25/15 < 0.5 < 31 <4 <4 < 8 <4 <8 <4 < 3 < 4 < 8 < 72 04/23/15 - 04/23/15 < 0.6 < 47 < 5 <4 < 11 < 4 < 10 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 6 < 125 05/11/15 - 05/11/15 < 0.3 < 94 <7 < 6 < 14 < 4 < 9 < 5 < 6 < 6 < 10 < 148 06/22/15 - 06/22/15 < 0.5 < 85 < 5 < 5 < 10 < 6 < 10 <6 < 5 < 5 < 7 < 109 07/17/15 - 07/17/15 < 0.5 < 67 < 3 <<4 < 7 < 3 < 7 <4 < 3 < 4 < 7 < 90 08/24/15 - 08/24/15 < 0.5 < 93 < 6 < 5 < 10 <7 < 13 < 7 < 5 < 7 < 8 < 151 09/14/15 - 09/14/15 < 0.7 < 32 < 10 < 8 < 16 <7 < 16 <6 < 5 < 7 < 13 < 176 10/28/15 - 10/28/15 . < 0.7 < 26 < 3 < 3 < 7 <4 < 7 <4 < 3 < 4 < 5 < 117 11/20/15 - 11/20/15 < 0.5 < 108 < 5 < 4 < 9 <4 < 10 < 6 < 4 < 4 < 6 < 126 12/09/15 - 12/09/15 < 0.3 < 122 < 5 < 5 < 11 < 8 < 10 < 6 < 5 < 7 < 10 < 175 AVERAGE**

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-8 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER*, 2015 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION ID START STOP GR-A GR-B H-3" SA-PWR-2F3 12/29/14 - 02/02/15 < 1.8 5.0 +/- 1.9 < 169 02/02/15 - 03/02/15 < 3.0 3.6 +/- 1.9 < 195 03/02/15 - 03/31/15 < 1.0 7.6 +/- 2.1 < 185 03/31/15 - 04/30/15 < 1.2 5.0 +/- 1.8 < 180 04/30/15 - 06/01/15 < 1.7 3.4 +/- 1.9 < 165 06/01/15 - 06/29/15 < 1.3 < 2.5 < 169 06/29/15 - 07/31/15 < 2.1 5.7 +/- 1.9 < 184 07/31/15 - 08/31/15 < 2.0 3.8 +/- 2.1 < 194 08/31/15 - 09/30/15 < 2.3 3.1 +/- 1.7 < 189 09/30/15 - 10/30/15 < 1.3 6.4 +/- 1.4 < 183 10/30/15 - 11/30/15 < 2.4 4.4 +/- 1.9 < 192 11/30/15 - 01/04/16 < 2.0 4.3 +/- 1.7 < 192 AVERAGE** 4.7 +/- 2.7 SA-PWT-2F3 12/29/14 - 02/02/15 < 1.8 6.8 +/- 2.0 < 167 02/02/15 - 03/02/15 < 2.8 5.8 +/- 2.0 < 191 03/02/15 - 03/31 /15 < 1.0 7.8 +/- 2.1 < 184 03/31/15 - 04/30/15 < 1.3 5.1 +/- 1.9 < 183 04/30/15 - 06/01/15 < 1.7 6.3 +/- 2.1 < 172 06/01/15 - 06/29/15 < 1.3 5.1 +/- 2.0 < 168 06/29/15 - 07/31/15 < 2.2 5.6 +/- 2.0 < 181 07/31/15 - 08/31/15 < 2.1 5.9 +/- 2.3 < 190 08/31/15 - 09/30/15 < 2.3 3.7 +/- 1.7 < 193 09/30/15 - 10/30/15 < 1.3 4.8 +/- 1.3 < 180 10/30/15 - 11/30/15 < 2.5 4.2 + 2.0 < 188

.11/30/15 - 01/04/16 < 1.9 < 2.2 < 193 AVERAGE** 5.6 +/- 2.4

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-9 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131** AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER, 2015*

Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <--GAMMA EMITTERS-->

STATION ID START STOP 1-131 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-PWR-2F3 12/29/14 02/02/15 < 0.3 < 68 <4 <5 <8 < 3 <8 <5 <5 <4 <7 < 135 SA-PWT-2F3 12/29/14 02/02/15 < 0.5 < 73 <4 <4 <9 < 5 <8 <4 <3 <4 <7 < 99 SA-PWR-2F3 02/02/15 03/02/15 < 0.4 < 22 <3 < 3 < 8 < 3 <7 <4 <4 < 4 < 6 < 89 SA-PWT-2F3 02/02/15 03/02/15 < 0.5 < 107 <5 < 5 < 12 < 6 < 13 < 5 < 5 < 6 < 10 < 97 SA-PWR-2F3 03/02/15 03/31/15 < 0.4 < 46 <5 <4 <9 < 4 <9 <4 <4 < 5 <6 < 113 SA-PWT-2F3 03/02/15 03/31/15 < 0.4 < 100 <5 < 6 < 10 < 5 < 11 < 5 <5 < 5 <6 < 139 SA-PWR-2F3 03/31/15 04/30/15 < 0.3 < 47 <2 < 2 < 5 < 2 <4 <2 <2 <2 < 5 < 56 SA-PWT-2F3 03/31/15 04/30/15 < 0.2 < 17 <2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 4 <2 <2 <2 <5 < 45 SA-PWR-2F3 04/30/15 06/01/15 < 0.5 < 41 <2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 5 <3 <2 < 3 <4 < 57 SA-PWT-2F3 04/30/15 06/01/15 < 0.4 < 42 < 5 < 4 < 11 < 4 < 11 <6 < 5 <5 <8 < 121 SA-PWR-2F3 06/01/15 06/29/15 < 0.4 < 31 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 3 < 6 <3 < 3 < 3 < 8 < 83 SA-PWT-2F3 06/01/15 06/29/15 < 0.3 < 23 <2 <3 < 6 < 3 < 5 < 3 <2 < 2 < 6 < 61 SA-PWR-2F3 06/29/15 07/31/15 < 0.3 < 24 <2 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 3 <2 < 2 < 5 <. 52 SA-PWT-2F3 06/29/15 07/31/15 < 0.2 < 58 <2 < 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 3 <6 < 75 SA-PWR-2F3 07/31/15 08/31/15 < 0.5 < 123 < 7 < 5 < 12 < 7 < 17 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 8 < 178 SA-PWT-2F3 07/31/15 08/31/15 < 0.5 < 63 <6 < 5 < 14 < 6 < 17 < 7 < 7 <7 < 7 < 187 SA-PWR-2F3 08/31/15 09/30/15 < 0.5 < 133 <5 < 6 < 10 < 5 < 9 < 5 <6 < 8 < 7 < 156 SA-PWT-2F3 08/31/15 09/30/15 < 0.7 < 43 <6 < 5 < 11 < 6 < 10 < 6 <5 < 5 < 9 < 150 SA-PWR-2F3 09/30/15 10/30/15 < 0.6 < 93 <4 < 5 < 8 < 4 < 10 < 5 <5 < 5 < 7 < 126 SA-PWT-2F3 09/30/15 10/30/15 < 0.5 < 56 <6 < 6 < 14 < 7 < 13 < 6 <5 < 6 < 11 < 107 SA-PWR-2F3 10/30/15 11/30/15 < 0.7 < 140 <9 < 8 . < 13 < 9 < 12 <7 <6 < 7 < 10 < 174 SA-PWT-2F3 10/30/15 11/30/15 < 0.8 < 135 <6 < 5 < 14 < 8 < 16 < 7 <7 < 7 <8 < 190 SA-PWR-2F3 11/30/15 01/04/16 < 0.5 < 87 <5 < 4 < 10 < 6 < 11 < 6 <5 <6 <8 < 143 SA-PWT-2F3 11/30/15 01/04/16 < 0.5 < 40 <4 <4 <9 < 4 < 9 <4 < 3 < 4 <7 < 97 AVERAGE

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD &ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L.

TABLEC-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETABLES, 2015 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <----GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPV-2F9* 04/27/15 Asparagus < 71 3785 +/- 168 < 30 < 7 <7 < 205 < 28 AVERAGE** 3785 +/- 0 SA-FPV-1G1(C)* 05/03/15 Asparagus < 48 2880 +/- 144 < 14 < 5 < 6 < 119 < 17 SA-FPV-2G2(C)* 05/10/15 Asparagus < 93 2289 +/- 178 < 34 < 10 < 11 < 213 < 39 AVERAGE** 2585 +/- 836 SA-FPL-3H5(C)* 07/22/15 Cabbage < 123 2052 +/- 306 < 26 < 14 < 15 < 322 < 66 SA-FPV-1 G1 (C)* 07/22/15 Com 2634 +/- 399 5576 +/- 659 < 45 < 20 < 27 < 632 < 111 SA-FPV-1 G1 (C)* 07/22/15 Peppers < 130 1645 +/- 291 < 25 < 15 < 16 < 343 < 67 SA-FPV-1 G1 (C)* 07/22/15 Tomatoes < 134 2471 +/- 317 < 25 < 16 < 15 < 421 < 56 SA-FPL-10D1 07/15/15 Cabbage < 209 3604 +/- 461 < 38 < 22 < 24 < 523 < 84 SA-FPL-1 OD1 07/15/15 Collards < 139 4568 +/- 386 < 26 < 14 < 13 < 284 < 62 SA-FPL-10D1 07/15/15 Kohlrabi < 245 3155 +/- 503 < 54 < 24 < 23 < 650 < 100 SA-FPL-15S2* 07/15/15 Cabbage < 237 4174 +/- 504 < 38 < 23 < 23 < 402 < 99 SA-FPL-15S2* 07/15/15 Collards < 222 5556 +/- 631 < 49 < 20 < 28 < 520 < 102 SA-FPL-15S2* 07/15/15 Kohlrabi < 175 3885 +/- 394 < 28 < 15 < 16 < 381 < 64 SA-FPL-16S1 07/15/15 Cabbage < 166 3738 +/- 406 < 32 < 22 < 19 < 489 < 82 SA-FPL-16S1 07/15/15 Collards < 239 4899 +/- 541 < 43 < 19 < 22 < 431 < 103 SA-FPL*1S1 07/15/15 Cabbage < 152 2677 +/- 354 < 28 < 17 < 18 < 366 < 73 SA-FPL-1S1 07/15/15 Collards < 136 3138 +/- 422 < 25 < 15 < 17 < 309 < 71 SA-FPL-1S1 07/15/15 Kohlrabi < 129 4993 +/- 349 < 29 < 15 < 16 < 279 < 65 SA-FPL-7S2* 07/15/15 Cabbage < 147 6075 +/- 480 < 26 < 14 < 17 < 297 < 60 SA-FPL-7S2* 07/15/15 Collards < 174 8225 +/- 550 < 35 < 20 < 20 < 487 < 90 SA-FPL-7S2* 07/15/15 Kohlrabi 265 +/- 161 8631 +/- 590 < 36 < 21 < 23 < 440 < 96 SA-FPL-1G1* 07/22/15 Caobage < 123 2612 +/- 355 < 25 < 14 < 14 < 344 < 65 SA-FPV-2F9* 07/22/15 Com < 134 2707 +/- 368 < 30 < 16 < 19 < 360 < 70 SA-FPV-2F9* 07/22/15 Peaches < 134 1805 +/- 265 < 27 < 14 < 18 < 330 < 58 SA-FPV-2F9* 07/22/15 Tomatoes < 129 2497 +/- 275 < 27 < 15 < 15 < 351 < 61

. MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION TABLEC-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETABLES, 2015 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <----GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPL-3H5(C)* 07/22/15 Peppers < 133 2016 +/- 315 < 21 < 12 < 14 < 383 < 65 SA-FPL-3H5(C)* 07/22/15 Com < 176 2542 +/- 445 < 33 < 17 < 18 < 504 < 85 SA-FPL-3H5(C)* 07/22/15 Tomatoes < 200 2356 +/- 340 < 41 < 26 < 25 < 485 < 99 SA-FPV-3F8* 07/22/15 Peach < 102 1835 +/- 220 < 19 < 11 < 12 < 247 < 43 AVERAGE** 1450 +/- 91 3993 +/- 3770 SA-FPV-2G2(C)* 08/05/15 Tomatoes < 39 1669 +/- 96 < 20 <4 <4 < 78 < 16 SA-FPV-2G2(C)* 08/05/15 Peppers < 53 1557 +/- 107 < 27 < 5 <6 < 106 < 23 SA-FPV-2G2(C)* 08/05/15 Com < 43 1878 +/- 100 < 22 <4 <4 < 92 < 16 SA-FPV-15F4* 08/05/15 Tomatoes < 51 2119 +/- 122 < 25 < 5 <5 < 115 < 21 SA-FPV-15F4* 08/05/15 Peppers < 41 2081 +/- 105 < 21 <4 <4 < 102 < 18 SA-FPV-15F4* 08/05/15 Com < 49 2527 +/- 115 < 25 < 5 <5 < 109 < 19 SA-FPL-1001 08/31/15 Cabbage < 163 2910 +/- 405 < 30 < 15 < 17 < 339 < 62 SA-FPL-10D1 08/31/15 Collards < 309 3415 +/- 694 < 58 < 29 < 31 < 627 < 104 SA-FPL-10D1 08/31/15 Kohlrabi < 256 3041' +/- 461 < 54 < 24 < 25 < 551 < 110 SA-FPL-15S2* 08/31/15 Cabbage < 266 4466 +/- 578 < 51 < 25 < 31 < 549 < 108 8A-FPL-15S2* 08/31/15 Collards < 282 5935 +/- 587 < 57 < 31 < 34 < 662 < 127 SA-FPL-15S2* 08/31/15 Kohlrabi < 187 3710 +/- 505 < 44 < 18 < 25 < 434 < 81 SA-FPL-16S1 08/31/15 Cabbage < 243 2784 +/- 526 < 46 < 23 < 23 < 573 < 79 SA-FPL-16S1 08/31/15 Collards < 192 4486 +/- 528 < 35 < 17 < 21 < 418 < 72 SA-FPL*16S1 08/31/15 Kohlrabi < 249 3908 +/- 582 < 55 < 26 < 31 < 604 < 115 SA-FPL-1S1 08/31/15 Cabbage < 212 2383 +/- 413 < 47 < 23 < 25 < 570 < 84 SA-FPL-1S1 08/31/15 Collards < 272 3783 +/- 631 < 53 < 25 < 30 803 +/- 451 < 112 SA-FPL-1S1 08/31/15 Kohlrabi < 235 3528 +/- 439 < 52 < 23 < 27 < 577 < 103 SA-FPL-7S2* 08/31/15 Cabbage < 201 4854 +/- 486 < 43 < 24 < 27 < 474 < 106 SA-FPL-7S2* 08/31/15 Collards < 269 8472 +/- 688 < 54 < 23 < 29 < 582 < 123 SA-FPL-7S2* 08/31/15 Kohlrabi < 232 8500 +/- 652 < 53 < 26 < 30 < 711 < 114 AVERAGE** 4050 +/- 3802 803 +/- 0

. MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION TABLEC-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEG ET ABLES, 2015 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <---GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPL-10D1 09/30/15 Cabbage < 294 2383+/- 561 < 56 < 31 < 35 < 705 < 126 SA-FPL-1 OD1 09/30/15 Collards < 278 4256+/- 670 < 54 < 35 < 34 < 755 < 130 SA-FPL-1 OD1 09/30/15 Kohlrabi < 199 3060+/- 478 < 32 < 17 < 21 < 509 < 82 SA-FPL-15S2* 09/30/15 Cabbage < 245 3615+/- 516 < 51 < 25 < 31 < 661 < 107 SA-FPL-15S2* 09/30/15 Collards < 265 5365+/- 776 < 55 < 25 < 34 < 702 < 141 SA-FPL-15S2* 09/30/15 Kohlrabi < 235 4078+/- 577 < 38 < 19 < 24 < 582 < 90 SA-FPL-16S1 09/30/15 Cabbage < 346 3047+/- 601 < 56 < 30 < 32 < 772 < 110 SA-FPL-16S1 09/30/15 Collards < 258 3616+/- 653 < 46 < 28 < 34 < 747 < 128 SA-FPL-1S1 09/30/15 Cabbage < 196 2290+/- 341 < 38 < 22 < 22 < 531 < 86 SA-FPL-1S1 09/30/15 Collards < 336 4548+/- 781 < 54 < 30 < 34 < 886 < 154 SA-FPL-1S1 09/30/15 Kohlrabi < 172 4661+/- 401 < 30 < 17 < 20 < 417 < 101 SA-i=PL-7S2* 09/30/15 Cabbage < 205 3299+/- 563 < 44 < 23 < 26 < 667 < 117 SA-FPL-7S2* 09/30/15 Collards < 290 5798+/- 793 < 58 < 37 < 39 < 804 < 126 SA-FPL-7S2* 09/30/15 Kohlrabi < 222 3931+/- 551 < 46 < 31 < 29 < 670 < 103 AVERAGE** 3853+/- 2055 SA-FPV-14F4* 10/17/15 Soy Beans < 144 15380+/- 731 < 24 < 15 < 19 < 359 < 81 SA-FPL-1 OD1 10/28/15 Cabbage < 128 2285+/- 328 < 28 < 15 < 19 < 368 < 72 SA-FPL-10D1 10/28/15 Collards < 203 ,3075+/- 487 < 43 < 21 < 28 < 523 < 93 SA-FPL-1 OD1 10/28/15 Kohlrabi < 324 4319+/- 630 < 57 < 34 <30 < 616 < 128 SA-FPL-15S2* 10/28/15 Cabbage < 284 4625+/- 585 < 51 < 26 < 34 < 653 < 112 SA-FPL-15S2* 10/28/15 Kohlrabi < 143 3267+/- 436 < 25 < 14 < 15 < 407 < 45 SA-FPL-16S1 10/28/15 Cabbage < 208 2316+/- 451 < 31 < 19 < 19 < 507 < 57 SA-FPL-16S1 10/28/15 Collards < 221 3007+/- 435 < 42 < 23 < 22 < 567 < 96 SA-FPL-16S1 10/28/15 Kohlrabi < 207 5754+/- 484 < 42 < 23 < 24 < 462 < 97 SA-FPL-1S1 10/28/15 Cabbage < 192 1917+/- 345 < 39 <19 < 21 < 482 < 84 SA-FPL-1S1 10/28/15 Collards < 193 3247+/- 404 < 39 < 17 < 20 < 504 < 79 SA-FPL-1S1 10/28/15 Kohlrabi < 95 3474+/- 241 < 17 <8 <9 < 237 < 53 SA-FPL-7S2* 10/28/15 Cabbage < 185 4081+/- 545 < 32 < 19 < 24 < 377 < 79 SA-FPL-7S2* 10/28/15 Collards < 228 5497+/- 633 < 43 < 22 < 25 < 529 < 116 SA-FPL-7S2* 10/28/15 Kohlrabi < 135 4694+/- 423 < 30 < 13 < 16 < 366 < 72 AVERAGE** 4463+/- 6457

. MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION TABLEC-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETABLES, 2015 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <---GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPV-1F1* 11/04/15 Soy beans < 145 12750 +/- 668 < 26 < 16 < 20 < 317 < 85 SA-FPL-1 OD1 11/30/15 Cabbage < 309 1693 +/- 523 < 60 < 30 < 26 < 590 < 125 SA-FPL-1001 11/30/15 Collards < 303 3122 +/- 510 < 58 < 34 < 33 < 871 < 142 SA-FPL-10D1 11/30/15 Kohlrabi < 240 2424 +/- 451 < 43 < 23 < 26 < 477 < 99 SA-FPL-15S2* 11/30/15 Cabbage < 266 4226 +/- 636 < 55 < 31 < 33 < 652 < 119 SA-FPL-15S2* 11/30/15 Kohlrabi < 194 2805 +/- 369 < 36 < 20 < 22 < 523 < 77 SA-FPL-16S1 11/30/15 Collards < 235 3953 +/- 643 < 53 < 30 < 28 < 691 < 113 SA-FPL-16S1 11/30/15 Kohlrabi < 221 4669 +/- 427 < 40 < 25 < 26 < 444 < 111 SA-FPL-1S1 11/30/15 Cabbage < 313 1927 +/- 493 < 50 < 28 < 31 < 790 < 138 SA-FPL-1S1 11/30/15 Collards < 348 3641 +/- 737 < 59 < 37 < 35 < 996 < 175 SA-FPL-1S1 11/30/15 Kohlrabi < 229 2344 +/- 474 < 42 < 25 < 26 < 579 < 105 SA-FPL-7S2* 11/30/15 Cabbage < 331 2937 +/- 624 < 50 < 35 < 36 < 748 < 108 SA-FPL-7S2* 11/30/15 Collards < 383 4641 +/- 851 < 54 < 29 < 31 < 766 < 140 SA-FPL-7S2* 11/30/15 Kohlrabi < 288 2909 +/- 512 < 55 < 32 < 28 < 730 < 143 AVERAGE** 3860 +/- 5455

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION TABLE C-11 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FODDER CROPS*, 2015 Results in units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <--GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID DATE TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-VGT-3G1 (C) 12/23/15 Silage < 173 1491 +/- 315 < 46 < 12 < 18 < 425 < 67 SA-VGT-13E3 12/23/15 Silage < 221 3152 +/- 420 < 60 < 16 < 19 < 421 < 62 SA-VGT-14F4 12/23/15 Silage < 197 3204 +/- 442 < 47 < 15 < 18 < 431 < 57 SA-VGT-2G3 12/28/15 Silage < 207 3678 +/- 437 < 36 < 19 < 18 < 434 < 78 AVERAGE** 2881 +/- 1913 (C) CONTROL STATION

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-12 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SOIL Soil is sampled every three years. Last collection date was in 2013.

Next collection date is due in 2016.

TABLE C-13 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GAME*, 2015 Results in units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2 sigma /

COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE <---------GAMMA EMITTERS----->

STATION ID DATE Be-7 1-131 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-GAM-13E3 02/01/15 Muskrat < 96 < 56 2879 +/- 233 <8 < 8 SA-GAM-3E1 02/13/15 Muskrat < 68 < 17 2709 +/- 240 < 7 < 10 SA-GAM-5C1 01/21/2015 Muskrat < 64 < 12 3555 +/- 193 < 7 < 8 AVERAGE** 3048 +/- 895

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-14 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER, 2015 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL INDICATOR START STOP SA-SWA-12C1 (C) SA-SWA-11A1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1F2 SA-SWA-7E1 01/06/15 - 01/06/15 ' < 174 < 177 < 175 < 176 < 178 02/04/15 - 02/04/15 < 159 < 190 < 161 < 162 < 160 03/04/15 - 03/04/15 < 184 < 186 < 183 < 187 < 186 04/09/15 - 04/09/15 < 189 < 175 < 174 < 177 < 171 05/04/15 - 05/04/15 < 170 < 174 < 175 < 174 < 169 06/04/15 - 06/04/15 < 183 < 183 < 183 < 183 < 180 07/09/15 - 07/21/15 < 183 < 184 < 189 < 183 < 187 08/06/15 - 08/19/15 < 179 < 190 < 182 < 182 < 181 09/11/15 - 09/23/15 < 191 < 190 < 189 < 191 < 189 10/06/15 - 10/19/15 257 +/- 126 < 190 < 186 < 189 < 189 11/02/15 - 11/24/15 < 189 < 188 < 188 < 187 242 +/- 125 12/07/15 - 12/22/15 < 185 < 184 < 182 < 182 < 186 AVERAGE** 257 +/- 126 242 +/- 125 (C) CONTROL STATION

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2015 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <----GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD 1-131* K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Bala-140 SA-SWA-16F1 01/06/2015 < 0.4 35+/- 22 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 <3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 3 02/04/2015 < 0.5 62 +/- 39 < 2 < 2 < 5 <2 <4 < 2 <2 <2 < 5 03/04/2015 < 0.8 90+/- 56 < 3 <4 < 8 <4 <8 <4 < 3 <4 <4 04/09/15 < 0.3 < 15 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 2 < 1 < 2 <4 05/04/15 < 0.6 39+/- 22 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 2 <2 <2 < 5 06/04/15 < 0.4 < 62 <6 <6 < 13 <5 < 12 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 10 07/09/15 < 0.6 44+/- 27 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 < 2 < 2 <2 <4 08/06/15 < 0.8 < 35 <4 <4 < 9 <4 < 8 < 5 <4 <5 <7 09/11/15 < 0.4 60+/- 28 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 2 < 2 < 2 <4 10/06/15 < 0.7 < 67 <5 <5 < 11 <6 < 12 <6 < 5 <6 < 8 11/02/15 < 0.9 < 36 <4 <4 < 6 <3 < 8 <4 <4 <4 <6 12/07/15 < 0.6 41 +/- 13 < 1 < 1 <2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 <2 AVERAGE** 53 +/- 38 SA-SWA-1F2 01/06/2015 < 0.5 < 25 <3 <3 <6 <3 < 5 < 3 <2 < 3 < 6 02/04/2015 < 0.7 42 +/- 25 < 2 <2 <4 <2 < 3 <2 < 1 < 2 <4 03/04/2015 < 0.6 < 33 < 4 <5 <8 <5 < 8 < 5 <4 < 5 < 10 04/09/15 < 0.4 < 12 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 3 05/04/15 < 0.7 81 +/- 30 < 1 < 1 < 3 <2 < 3 <2 < 1 < 1 <4 06/04/15 < 0.4 < 35 < 4 <4 < 10 < 4 <8 < 5 <4 <4 <6 07/09/15 < 0.6 < 17 < 2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <2 <2 <4 08/06/15 < 0.7 < 23 < 3 <4 < 9 < 3 < 6 <4 <4 <4 < 6 09/11/15 < 0.5 < 24 < 2 <2 < 6 <2 <5 <2 <2 <2 < 6 10/06/15 < 0.9 < 46 < 4 < 5 < 8 <3 < 12 < 5 < 5 <6 < 9 11/02/15 < 0.7 < 44 < 4 <4 < 8 < 4 <8 <4 <4 <4 <7 12/07/15 < 0.5 < 11 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 <3 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 3 AVERAGE** 61 +/- 56

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANALYZED TOAN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2015 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <----GAMMA EMITTERS----->

STATION ID PERIOD 1-131* K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 SA-SWA-7E1 01/06/15 < 0.5 83 +/- 33 < 2 < 2 <5 < 2 <4 < 2 < 2 <2 < 5 02/04/15 < 0.6 104 +/- 28 < 2 < 2 <5 < 2 <4 < 2 < 2 <2 <5 03/04/15 < 0.7 < 38 < 3 <4 < 7 < 3 <6 <4 < 4 <4 <6 04/09/15 < 0.4 93 +/- 31 < 2 <2 < 5 < 2 <4 < 2 < 2 <2 < 5 05/04/15 < 0.7 91 +/- 59 < 3 <3 < 6 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 3 <3 < 6 06/04/15 < 0.5 < 51 < 6 <6 < 12 < 6 < 12 < 6 < 6 < 7 < 9 07/09/15 < 0.6 < 18 < 2 <2 <4 < 2 <4 <2 < 2 < 2 <4 08/06/15 < 0.8 123 +/- 64 < 4 <4 < 7 <4 < 8 < 5 <4 <4 < 8 09/11/15 < 0.5 147 +/- 35 < 2 <2 <5 <2 <4 < 2 <2 <2 < 5 10/06/15 < 0.7 132 +/- 56 <4 < 3 < 8 < 4 < 9 <4 <5 < 5 < 7 11/02/15 < 0.9 < 32 <4 <4 < 7 < 3 <7 <4 <4 <4 < 8 12/07/15 < 0.5 110 +/- 15 < 1 < 1 <2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 2 AVERAGE** 110 +/- 44

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-16 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN EDIBLE FISH, 2015 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2 sigma COLLECTION <---GAMMA EMITTERS--->

SJAJ!QN IQ PFRIQQ K-4Q Mn-§4 Qp-§6 Fe-5§1 Co-HQ ?nrlJ§ G§-13 4 Cs-1 37 Ra-22§ SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 04/27/15 3718 +/- 812 < 49 < 53 < 114 < 53 < 97 < 54 < 52 < 1072 04/27/15 5145 +/- 998 < 55 < 57 < 135 < 52 < 120 < 50 < 58 < 1352 09/29/15 4467 +/- 988 < 34 < 91 < 136 < 53 < 105 < 42 < 56 < 857 09/30/15 4463 +/- 973 < 79 < 97 < 257 < 63 < 177 < 69 < 65 < 1150 11/05/15 4346 +/- 876 < 70 < 77 < 148 < 78 < 178 < 67 < 77 < 1494 AVERAGE* 4428 +/- 1014 SA-ESF-11A1 04/27/15 3665 +/- 1137 < 65 < 82 < 173 < 65 < 146 < 80 < 75 < 1456 04/27/15 4399 +/- 1273 < 64 < 62 < 141 < 61 < 154 < 67 < 65 < 1787 11/05/15 4414 +/- 1076 < 93 < 86 < 161 < 70 < 167 < 92 < 92 < 1736 AVERAGE* 4159 +/- 856 SA-ESF-7E1 04/27/15 3549 +/- 1187 < 70 < 75 < 160 < 81 < 137 < 62 < 75 < 1334 04/27/15 3552 +/- 733 < 44 < 43 < 98 < 41 < 101 < 44 < 56 < 858 11/03/15 3549 +/- 1200 < 74 < 80 < 164 < 85 < 117 < 75 < 72 < 1692 11/05/15 4512 +/- 1240 < 42 < 65 < 116 < 51 < 94 < 62 < 54 < 1228 AVERAGE* 3791 +/- 962 (C) CONTROL STATION

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-17 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CRABS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2 sigma COLLECTION <---GAMMA EMITIERS-->

STATION ID PERIOD K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 SA-ECH-12C1 (C) 07/20/15 3015 +/- 1155 < 85 < 88 < 226 < 99 < 165 < 86 < 90 < 1732 09/02/15 3868 +/- 953 < 66 < 66 < 152 < 66 < 107 < 70 < 67 < 1648 AVERAGE* 3442 +/- 1206 SA-ECH-11A1 07/20/15 3771 +/- 891 < 45 < 60 < 120 < 48 < 108 < 60 < 56 < 1177 09/02/15 3129 +/- 1001 < 69 < 74 < 138 < 66 < 135 < 56 < 49 < 1503 AVERAGE* 3450 +/- 908 (C) CONTROL STATION

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-18 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS It;.! SEDIMENT, 2015 Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry)+/- 2 Sigma COLLE6116N <---GAMMA EMinERs------>

STATION ID PERIOD Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-ESS-12C1 (C) 06/29/15 < 465 10070 +/- 957 < 38 < 44 1385 +/- 911 657 +/- 143 11/25/15 < 1001 16490 +/- 2849 < 106 < 122 < 1953 882 +/-237 AVERAGE* 13280 +/- 9079 1385 +/- 0 769 +/- 318 SA-ESS-11A1 06/29/15 < 414 2545 +/- 625 < 35 < 33 < 853 261 +/- 110 11/25/15 < 425 4215 +/- 843 < 42 < 45 < 1170 196 +/- 83 AVERAGE* 3380 +/- 2362 229 +/- 91 SA-ESS-15A1 06/29/15 < 311 5060 +/- 607 < 29 < 34 < 606 446 +/- 88 11/25/15 < 852 5682 +/- 1548 < 105 < 103 < 2080 734 +/- 245 AVERAGE* 5371 +/- 880 590 +/- 407 SA-ESS-16A1 06/29/15 < 364 3920 +/- 623 < 31 < 35 < 767 616 +/- 104 11/25/15 < 550 2998 +/- 801 < 61 < 58 < 1047 516 +/- 127 AVERAGE* 3459 +/- 1304 566 +/- 141 SA-ESS-16F1 06/29/15 < 787 9942 +/- 1371 < 74 < 83 < 1613 715 +/- 170 11/25/15 < 1493 16840 +/- 3016 < 125 < 172 < 3737 920 +/- 319 AVERAGE* 13391 +/- 9755 818 +/- 290 SA-ESS-6S2 11/30/15 < 354 2896 +/- 742 < 34 < 39 < 809 < 269 AVERAGE* 2896 +/- 0 SA-ESS-7E1 06/29/15 < 502 13530 +/- 1116 < 51 < 49 1615 +/- 868 763 +/- 164 11/25/15 < 703 13830 +/- 1839 < 65 < 80 2649 +/- 1635 822 +/- 203 AVERAGE* 13680 +/- 424 2132 +/- 1462 792 +/- 83 (C) CONTROL STATION

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-19 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN OYSTERS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2 sigma COLLECTION <---GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-EOY-7H1 (C) 06/22/15 2280 +/- 957 < 79 < 69 < 184 < 66 < 135 < 72 < 72 10/20/15 1510 +/- 716 < 52 < 67 < 141 < 51 < 116 < 40 < 56 AVERAGE* 1895 +/- 1088 SA-EOY-7C1 06/22/15 < 293 < 55 < 61 < 120 <48 < 107 <47 < 51 10/20/15 1130 +/- 702 < 48 < 70 < 123 < 43 < 117 < 54 < 55 AVERAGE* 1130 +/- 702 (C) CONTROL STATION

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-20 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL Sample Date Name Collected Nuclide Result 2 Sigma Units Type 3

SA-APT-5S2 26-Mar-15 BE-7 1.03E-01 +/- 2.72E-02 pCi/m Air Sample Composite 3

SA-APT-5S2 25-Jun-15 BE-7 6.71E-02 +/- 1.97E-02 pCi/m Air Sample Composite 3

SA-APT-5S2 24-Sep-15 BE-7 1.05E-01 +/- 2.32E-02 pCi/m Air Sample Composite 3

SA-APT-5S2 24-Dec-15 BE-7 8.61E-02 +/- 1.48E-02 pCi/m Air Sample Composite SA-MLK-14F4 5-Jan-15 K-40 1.40E+03 +!- 1.60E+02 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 2-Feb-15 K-40 1.51E+03 +/- 9.01E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 2-Mar-15 K-40 1.45E+03 +/- 5.69E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 6-Apr-15 K-40 1.53E+03 +/- 6.40E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 11-May-15 K-40 1.45E+03 +!- 5.12E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 8-Jun-15 K-40 1.46E+03 +/- 5.92E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 6-Jul-15 K-40 1.47E+03 +/- 5.44E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 3-Aug-15 K-40 1.41 E+03 +/- 5.23E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 8-Sep-15 K-40 1.46E+03 +/- 6.31E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 6-0ct-15 K-40 1.49E+03 +/- 6.82E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 2-Nov-15 K-40 1.39E+03 +/- 5.70E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-MLK-14F4 7-Dec-15 K-40 1.42E+03 +/- 5.14E+01 pCi/L Milk SA-SWA-11A1 4-Mar-15 K-40 1.51E+02 +/- 2.96E+01 pCi/L Surface Water SA-SWA-11A1 4-Jun-15 K-40 5.43E+01 +/- 2.64E+01 pCi/L Surface Water SA-SWA-11A1 23-Sep-15 K-40 1.25E+02 +/- 2.58E+01 pCi/L Surface Water SA-SWA-11A1 22-Dec-15 K-40 1.11E+02 +/- 2.52E+01 pCi/L Surface Water SA-FPL-1001 30-Nov-15 BE-7 3.10E+02 +/- 1.30E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-1001 30-Nov-15 K-40 2.37E+03 +/- 3.03E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-15S2 15-Jul-15 K-40 3.66E+03 +!- 4.10E+02 pCi/Kg Kohlrabi SA-FPL-16S1 15-Jul-15 K-40 3.78E+03 +/- 4.76E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-16S1 30-Sep-15 K-40 2.76E+03 +/- 1.90E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-16S1 30-Sep-15 K-40 3.06E+03 +!- 1.92E+02 pCi/Kg Collards SA-FPL-1G1 22-Jul-15 K-40 3.06E+03 +/- 4.63E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-3H5 22-Jul-15 K-40 1.76E+03 +/- 2.66E+02 pCi/Kg Cabbage SA-FPL-7S2 30-Sep-15. K-40 5.61E+03 +/- 2.81E+02 pCi/Kg Collards SA-FPV-2G2 10-May-15 K-40 1.76E+03 +!- 1.31 E+02 pCi/Kg Asparagus SA-FPV-1G1 22-Jul-15 K-40 1.68E+03 +/- 1.79E+02 pCi/Kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-2F9 22-Jul-15 K-40 2.14E+03 +/- 2.00E+02 pCi/Kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-2F9 22-Jul-15 K-40 1.75E+03 +/- 1.60E+02 pCi/Kg Peaches SA-FPV-2F9 22-Jul-15 K-40 2.28E+03 +/- 2.20E+02 pCi/Kg Corn SA-FPV-3H5 22-Jul-15 K-40 2.37E+03 +/- 2.01E+02 pCi/Kg Corn SA-ESS-11A1 29-Jun-15 K-40 2.94E+03 +/- 3.91E+02 pCi/Kg Sediment SA-ESS-11A1 29-Jun-15 RA-226 2.30E+02 +!- 6.09E+01 pCi/Kg Sediment SA-ESS-11A1 25-Nov-15 K-40 3.97E+03 +/- 3.56E+02 pCi/Kg Sediment SA-ESS-11A1 25-Nov-15 RA-226 3.07E+02 +/- 4.84E+01 pCi/Kg Sediment

- 100 -

FIGURE 1 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY INAIR PARTICULATES - QUARTERLY AVERAGE FOR ALL LOCATIONS 2005 THROUGH 20151 30.0 25.0 ~

20.0 C")

~

0 c.

CQ Cjl 15.0 *-

~

w 0

10.0 :

5.0 0.0 I 1- 2013 data includes temporary sampling locations

- 101 -

FIGURE2 CESIUM-137 ACTIVITY IN SOIL 1974 THROUGH 2015 (TRIENNIAL) 800 700 ,.

600 500 400 .-

~

Cl

i (J

Q,;

300 200 100 0

1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 Soll Is sampled every three years. Last samples were taken In 2013. Annual values are an average of the results from the nine soil sample sites.

- 102 -

FIGURE 3 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER *QUARTERLY AVERAGE 2005 THROUGH 2015 10000.00 ...---------------------------------------------~

Effluent Discharge near time of sampling: 03-05-14 _ . ,

1000.00 +----------------------------------------------!

Effluent Discharge near time of sampling: 05-11-12 _ . . *

..J u

Q.

o

Note: For purposes of this chart, when there was no positive indication of tritium, the maximum LLD was displayed. :

L-------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

Surface Water Tritium, pCi/L <>Maximum Lower Limit of Detection, pCi/L

- 103 -

Intentionally left blank

- 104 -

APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM

- 105 -

Intentionally left blank

- 106 -

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 107 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TSE/Analytics Evaluation {d)

March 2015 E11181 Milk Sr-89 oCi/L 88.9 97.2 0.91 A Sr-90 pCi/L 12.2 17.4 0.70 w E11182 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 61.3 65.1 0.94 A Ce-141 pCi/L 104 113 0.92 A Cr-51 pCi/L 265 276 0.96 A Cs-134 pCi/L 138 154 0.90 A Cs-137 pCi/L 205 207 0.99 A Co-58 pCi/L 178 183 0.97 A Mn-54 pCi/L 187 188 0~99 A Fe-59 pCi/L 182 177 1.03 A Zn-65 pCi/L 345 351 0.98 A Co-60 pCi/L 379 405 0.94 A E11184 AP Ce-141 pCi 107 85.0 1.26 w Cr-51 pCi 261 224 1.17 A Cs-134 pCi 74.6 77.0 0.97 A Cs-137 pCi 99.6 102 0.98 A Co-58 pCi 99.8 110 0.91 A Mn-54 pCi 99.2 96.9 1.02 A Fe-59 pCi 109 119 0.92 A Zn-65 pCi 188 183 1.03 A Co-60 pCi 200 201 1.00 A E11183 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 82.9 85.4 0.97 A E11185 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1950 1900 1.03 A June 2015 E11234 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 94.9 92.6 1.02 A Sr-90 pCi/L 14.3 12.7 1.13 A E11238 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 93.2 95.9 0.97 A Cr-51 pCi/L 349 276 1.26 w Cs-134 pCi/L 165 163 1.01 A Cs-137 pCi/L 143.0 125 1.14 A Co-58 pCi/L 82.0 68.4 1.20 A Mn-54 pCi/L 113 101 1.12 A Fe-59 pCi/L 184 151 1.22 w Zn-65 pCi/L 269 248 1.08 A Co-60 pCi/L 208 193 1.08 A E11237 AP Cr-51 323 233 1.39 N (1)

Cs-134 139 138 1.01 A Cs-137 111 106 1.05 A Co-58 54.0 57.8 0.93 A Mn-54 96.8 84.9 1.14 A Fe-59 162 128 1.27 w Zn-65 198 210 0.94 A Co-60 178 163 1.09 A E11236 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 93.9 80 1.17 A

- 107 -

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 108 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (bl TBE/Arialytics Evaluation (d)

June 2015 E11238 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1890 1790 1.06 A September 2015 E11289 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 95.7 99.1 0.97 A Sr-90 pCi/L 15.4 16.4 0.94 A E11290 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 94.9 99.9 0.95 A Ce-141 pCi/L 228 213 1.07 A Cr-51 pCi/L 499 538 0.93 A Cs-134 pCi/L 208 212 0.98 A Cs-137 pCi/L 270 255 1.06 A Co-58 pCi/L 275 263 1.05 A Mn-54 pCi/L 320 290 1.10 A Fe-59 pCi/L 255 226 1.13 A Zn-65 pCi/L 392 353 1.11 A Co-60 pCi/L 350 330 1.06 A E11292 AP Ce-141 pCi 104 85.1 1.22 w Cr-51 pCi 262 215 1.22 w Cs-134 pCi 86.1 84.6 1.02 A Cs-137 pCi 93.0 102 . 0.91 A Co-58 pCi 106 105 1.01 A Mn-54 pCi 117 116 1.01 A Fe-59 pCi 94.8 90.2 1.05 A Zn-65 pCi 160 141 1.13 A Co-60 pCi 146 132 1.11 A E11291 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 85.9 81.7 1.05 A E11293 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2090 1800 1.16 A E11294 Soil Ce-141 pCi/kg 209 222 0.94 A Cr-51 pCi/kg 463 560 0.83 A Cs-134 pCi/kg 231 221 1.05 A Cs-137 pCi/kg 311 344 0.90 A Co-58 pCi/kg 245 274 0.89 A Mn-54 pCi/kg 297 302 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/kg 248 235 1.06 A Zn-65 pCi/kg 347 368 0.94 A Co-60 pCi/kg 328 344 0.95 A December 2015 E11354 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 96.2 86.8 1.11 A Sr-90 pCi/L 14.8 12.5 1.18 A E11355 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 95.1 91.2 1.04 A Ce-141 pCi/L 117 129 0.91 A Cr-51 pCi/L 265 281 0.94 A Cs-134 pCi/L 153 160 0.96 A Cs-137 pCi/L *. 119 115 1.03 A Co-58 pCi/L 107 110 0.97 A Mn-54 pCi/L 153 145 1.06 A Fe-59 pCi/L 117 108 1.08 A Zn-65 pCi/L 261 248 1.05 A Co-60 pCi/L 212 213 1.00 A

- 108 -

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 109 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (bl TB ElAnalytics Evaluation (d)

December 2015 E11357 AP Ce-141 oCi 89.9 84.0 1.07 A Cr-51 pCi 215 184 1.17 A Cs-134 pCi 103 105 0.98 A Cs-137 pCi 76.6 74.8 1.02 A Co-58 pCi 76.2 71.9 1.06 A Mn-54 pCi 91.4 94.4 0.97 A Fe-59 pCi 78.6 70.3 1.12 A Zn-65 pCi 173 162 1.07 A Co-60 pCi 138 139 0.99 A E11422 AP Sr-89 pCi 98.0 96.9 1.01 A Sr-90 pCi 10.0 14.0 0.71 w E11356 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 74.9 75.2 1.00 A E11358 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2160 1710 1.26 w E11353 Soil Ce-141 pCi/kg 252 222 1.14 A Cr-51 pCi/kg 485 485 1.00 A Cs-134 pCi/kg 319 277 1.15 A Cs-137 pCi/kg 292 276 1.06 A Co-58 pCi/kg 193 190 1.02 A Mn-54 pCi/kg 258 250 1.03 A Fe-59 pCi/kg 218 186 1.17 A Zn-65 pCi/kg 457 429 1.07 A Co-60 pCi/kg 381 368 1.04 A (1) AP Cr Cr-51 has the shortest half-life and the weakest gamma energy of the mixed nuclide sample, which produces a large error.

Taking into account the error, the lowest value would be 119% of the reference value, which would be considered acceptable. NCR 15-18 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.

(d) Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W-Acceptable with warning, reported result falls within 0. 70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N =Not Acceptable, reported result falls outside the ratio limits of< 0. 70 and> 1.30.

- 109 -

TABLE D-2 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP}

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 1OF1)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Ran~e Evaluation (c)

March 2015 15-MaW32 Water Am-241 Ball 0.632 0.654 0.458 - 0.850 A Ni-63 Bq/L 2.5 (1) A Pu-238 Bq/L 0.0204 0.0089 (2) A Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0.9 0.8 0.582 - 1.082 A 15-MaS32 Soil Ni-63 Bq/kg 392 448.0 314- 582 A Sr-90 Bq/kg 286 653 487- 849 N (3) 15-RdF32 AP Sr-90 Sq/sample -0.0991 (1) A U-234/233 Sq/sample 0.0211 0.0155 0.0109 - 0.0202 N (3)

U-238 Sq/sample 0.095 0.099 0.069-0.129 A 15-GrF32 AP Gr-A Sq/sample 0.448 1.77 0.53- 3.01 N (3)

Gr-B Sq/sample 0.7580 0.75 0.38-1.13 A 15-RdV32 Vegetation Cs-134 Sq/sample 8.08 7.32 5.12 - 9.52 A Cs-137 Sq/sample 11.6 9.18 6.43 -11.93 w Co-57 Sq/sample -0.0096 (1) A Co-60 Sq/sample 6.53 5.55 3.89- 7.22 A Mn-54 Sq/sample 0.0058 (1) A Sr-90 Sq/sample 0.999 1.08 0.76 -1.40 A Zn-65 Sq/sample -0.108 (1) A September 2015 15-MaW33 Water Am-241 Bq/L 1.012 1.055 0. 739 - 1.372 A Ni-63 Bq/L 11.8 8.55 5.99-11.12 N (4)

Pu-238 Bq/L 0.727 0.681 0.477 - 0.885 A Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0.830 0.900 0.630-1.170 A 15-MaS33 Soil Ni-63 Bq/kg 635 682 477- 887 A Sr-90 Bq/kg 429 425 298- 553 A 15-RdF33 AP Sr-90 Sq/sample 1.48 2.18 1.53-2.83 N (4)

U-234/233 Sq/sample 0.143 0.143 0.100 - 0.186 A U-238 Sq/sample 0.149 0.148 0.104-0.192 A 15-GrF33 AP Gr-A Sq/sample 0.497 0.90 0.27 -1.53 A Gr-B Sq/sample 1.34 1.56 0.78-2.34 A 15-RdV33 Vegetation Cs-134 Sq/sample 6.10 5.80 4.06- 7.54 A Cs-137 Sq/sample 0.0002 (1) A Co-57 Sq/sample 8.01 6.62 4.63- 8.61 w Co-6.0 Sq/sample. 4.97 4.56 3.19-5.93 A Mn-54 Sq/sample 8.33 7.68 5.38-9.98 A (1) False positive test. Sr-90 Sq/sample 0.386 1.30 0.91 -1.69 N (4)

(2) Sensitivity evaluation. Zn-65 Sq/sample 6.07 5.46 3.82 - 7.10 A (3) Water Ni-63 extremely low activity was difficult to quantify; AP & Vegetation Sr-90 was lost during separation, possible from substance added by MAPEP NCR 15-21.

{a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

{b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

{c) DOE/MAPEP evaluation: A=acceptab/e, W=acceptab/e with warning, N=not acceptable.

- 110 -

TABLE D-3 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 1OF1)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance MonthNear Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Limits Evaluation (c)

Mav 2015 RAD-101 Water Sr-89 oCi/L 45.2 63.2 51.1 - 71.2 Nm Sr-90 pCi/L 28.0 41.9 30.8-48.1 N (1)

Ba-133 pCi/L 80.6 82.5 63.9- 90.8 A Cs-134 pCi/L 71.7 75.7 61.8 - 83.3 A Cs-137 pCi/L 187 189 170 - 210 A Co-60 pCi/L 85.7 84.5 76.0-95.3 A Zn-65 pCi/L 197 203 183 - 238 A Gr-A pCi/L 26.1 42.6 22.1 - 54.0 A Gr-B pCi/L 28.8 32.9 21.3 -40.6 A 1-131 pCi/L 23.5 23:8 19.7 -28.3 A U-Nat pCi/L 6.19 6.59 4.99- 7.83 A H-3 pCi/L 3145 3280 2770-3620 A November 2015 RAD-103 Water Sr-89 pCl!L 40.9 35.7 26.7-42.5 A Sr-90 pCi/L 29.3 31.1 22.7 - 36.1 A Ba-133 pCi/L 31.5 32.5 25.9-36.7 A Cs-134 pCi/L 59.65 62.3 50.6-68.5 A Cs-137 pCi/L 156 157 141 -175 A Co-60 pCi/L 70.6 71.1 64.0-80.7 A Zn-65 pCi/L 145 126 113-149 A Gr-A pCi/L 38.2 51.6 26.9-64.7 A Gr-B pCi/L 42.0 36.6 24.1 - 44.2 A 1-131 pCi/L 24.8 26.3 21.9 - 31.0 A U-Nat pCi/L 146.90 56.2 45.7 - 62.4 N (2)

H-3 pCi/L 21100 21300 18700 - 23400 A (1) Yield on the high side of acceptance range indicates possibility of calcium interference. NCR 15-09 (2) Technician failed to dilute original sample. If dilulted, the result would have been 57.1, which fell within the acceptance limits. NCR 15-19 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit

- 111 -

Table D-4 GEL 2015 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

.PT Quar:ter"i Repor:t Sample Sample Unit Analyte I ""GEL. 'Known Acdiptance Evaluation Provider Year Number [,' Media 't{uclide: value Range/, Ratio M , ~

Date . *value '

EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11174 Cartridge pCi lodine-131 8.01E+01 7.74E+01 1.03 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11175 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9.75E+01 1.05E+02 0.93 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11175 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.10E+01 1.44E+01 0.77 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L lodine-131 9.60E+01 9.75E+01 0.98 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 2.13E+02 2.11E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 5.88E+02 5.55E+02 1.06 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.71E+02 1.91E+02 0.90 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 2.59E+02 2.53E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.64E+02 2.72E+02 0.97 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 2.43E+02 2.40E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L lron-59 3.14E+02 2.95E+02 1.06 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 4.67E+02 4.53E+02 1.03 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11176 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 4.81E+02 4.98E+02 0.97 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L lodine-131 9.92E+01 9.67E+01 1.03 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 1.40E+02 1.39E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 3.95E+02 3.66E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.12E+02 1.26E+02 0.89 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.69E+02 1.67E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.78E+02 1.80E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 1.66E+02 1.59E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L lron-59 2.14E+02 1.95E+02 1.10 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 3.25E+02 2.99E+02 1.09 Acceptable EZA 1st/2015 5/21/2015 E11177 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 3.23E+02 3.28E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11216 Cartridge pCi lodine-131 8.92E+01 8.01E+01 1.11 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11217 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9.13E+01 8.26E+01 1.11 Acceptable EzA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11217 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.16E+01 1.27E+01 0.91 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L lodine-131 1.05E+02 9.59E+01 1.10 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 2.70E+OO Not Pres. - Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 2.70E+02 2.76E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.46E+02 1.63E+02 0.9 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 1.31E+02 1.25E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 7.18E+01 6.84E+01 1.05 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.02E+02 1.01E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L lron-59 1.51E+02 1.51E+02 1.00 Acceptable

- 112 -

Table D-4 (cont'd)

GEL 2015 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS PT Quar:ter/ Report Sample Sample

Unit AnalYte"/

GEL Known Acceptance .

Evaluation Provider Year Date Number Media Nuclide. value ~angel Ratio EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 2.63E+02 2.48E+02 1.06 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11218 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.96E+02 1.93E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11219 Water pCi/L lodine-131 9.53E+01 9.34E+01 1.02 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11219 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 3.47E+02 2.93E+02 1.18 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11219 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.63E+02 1.73E+02 0.94 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11219 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.34E+02 1.33E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11219 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 7.21E+01 7.26E+01 0.99 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11219 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 1.17E+02 1.07E+02 1.1 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11219 Water pCi/L lron-59 1.76E+02 1.61E+02 1.09 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11219 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.85E+02 2.64E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2015 8/6/2015 E11219 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.10E+02 2.05E+02 1.03 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11310 Cartridge pCi lodine-131 8.21E+01 8.15E+01 1.01 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11311 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 8.79E+01 9.91E+01 0.89 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11311 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.07E+01 1.64E+01 0.65 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L lodine-131 9.61E+01 9.99E+01 0.96 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 2.15E+02 2.13E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 5.82E+02 5.38E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.89E+02 2.12E+02 0.89 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 2.43E+02 2.55E+02 0.95 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.50E+02 2.63E+02 0.95 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 3.02E+02 2.90E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L lron-59 2.30E+02 2.26E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 3.62E+02 3.53E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11312 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 3.42E+02 3.30E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L lodine-131 1.00E+02 9.67E+01 1.03 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 2.05E+02 1.99E+02 1.03 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 5.42E+02 5.02E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.75E+02 1.98E+02 0.89 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 2.40E+02 2.38E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.45E+02 2.46E+02 1.00 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 2.88E+02 2.71E+02 1.06 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L lron-59 2.31E+02 2.11E+02 1.10 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 3.75E+02 3.30E+02 1.14 Acceptable

- 113 -

Table D-4 (cont'd)

GEL 2015 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

pr Quarter'/ . Report Sample

. Sample

.Anal~e/ Gf'iL Known Acceptance Provider, Year Date Number

'Media Unit ,

'. Nuclide Value value' :Range/. Ratio .

Ev11l,u,ljtio'n EZA 3rd/2015 11/15/2015 E11313 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 3.11E+02 3.08E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11412 Cartridge pCi lodine-131 7.73E+01 7.98E+01 0.97 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11413 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9.41E+01 8.61E+01 1.08 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11413 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 9.74E+OO 1.25E+01 0.78 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L lodine-131 1.01E+02 9.12E+01 1.11 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 1.36E+02 1.29E+02 1.06 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 2.79E+02 2.81E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.45E+02 1.60E+02 0.91 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 1.15E+02 1.15E+02 1.00 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.53E+02 1.45E+02 1.06 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L lron-59 1.19E+02 1.08E+02 1.10 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 2.69E+02 2.48E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11414 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.12E+02 2.13E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L lodine-131 1.05E+02 9.26E+01 1.13 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 1.27E+02 1.12E+02 1.14 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 2.60E+02 2.44E+02 1.07 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.25E+02 1.39E+02 0.90 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.12E+02 9.95E+01 1.13 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 9.73E+01 9.56E+01 1.02 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 1.41E+02 1.26E+02 1.12 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L lron-59 1.11E+02 9.34E+01 1.19 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.43E+02 2.15E+02 1.13 Acceptable EZA 4th/2015 2/18/2016 E11415 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.92E+02 1.85E+02 1.04 Acceptable

- 114 -

Table D-5 GEL 2015 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RESULTS 1,,,. -,1 ;;ii:'

PT >Quarter I ~eport , "' *sample :,J\nalyfe i ..~EL, Known .~cci)ptance -.

, sample-Number '.;Unit .; Eval_uation Provider , Year 'Date': . Medi~ .. .. 'Nuclide *Value_ *value ** ,;~ange!'Ratio 1 "

MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP GrF32 Filter Sq/sample Gross Alpha 1.52 1.77 0.53-3.01 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP GrF32 Filter Sq/sample Gross Beta 0.844 0.75 0.38-1.13 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Americium-241 114 97 68-126 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Cesium-134 639 678 475-881 Acceptable False Pas MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Cesium-137 -0.279 - Test Acceptable False Pas MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Cobalt-57 0.369 - Test Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Cobalt-60 852 817 572-1062 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg lron-55 330 205 Sens. Eval. Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Manganese-54 1280 1198 839-1557 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Nickel'63 481 448 314-582 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Plutonium-238 80.3 83.9 58.7-109.1 Acceptable Plutonium-MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg 69.1 70.8 49.6-92.0 Acceptable 239/240 MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Potassium-40 684 622 435-809 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Strontium-90 601 653 457-849 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Technetium-99 694 867 607-1127 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg U-234/233 58 53 36.8-68.3 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Uranium-238 204 201 141-261 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS32 Soil Bq/Kg Zinc-65 1190 1064 745-1383 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Americium-241 0.657 0.654 0.458-0.850 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 20.8 23.5 16.5-30.6 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Cesium-137 19.7 19.1 13.4-24.8 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Cobalt-57 30 29.9 20.9-38.9 Acceptable False Pos MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 0 Acceptable Test MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 633 563 394-732 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-1 ~-GrW32 Water Bq/L lron-55 8.81 6.88 4.82-8.94 Acceptable False Pos MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Manganese~54 0.314 Acceptable Test False Pas MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 0.35 Acceptable Test MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 0.0103 0.0089 Sens.Eva!. Acceptable Plutonium-MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L 0.77 0.832 0.582-1.082 Acceptable 239/240 False Pas MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 0.159 Acceptable Test MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Stronlium-90 8.49 9.48 6.64-12.32 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Technetium-99 2.9 3.18 2.23-4.13 Acceptable Uranium-MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L 0.146 0.148 0.104-0.192 Acceptable 234/233

- 115 -

Table D-5 (cont'd)

GEL 2015 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RESULTS

PT *Quarter I * .:~eport ,,;" y .\

Sample ;~rial}'.tel GEL Known.* Acceptance*

Prov.ider*'. :Year Date .. ~a~ple Number'. Media *. rY~it **Nuclide .. '

value* itaiue Range/ Ratio

Evaluation

'.~*j MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 0.918 0.97 0.68-1.26 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 19.6 18.3 12.8-23.8 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 1.05 1.066 0.320-1.812 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW32 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 3.22 2.79 1.40-4.19 Acceptable 0.0103-MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter ug/sample Uranium-235 0.014 0.015

Acceptable 0.0191 MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter ug/sample Uranium-238 7.65 7.96 5.57-10.35 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter ug/sample Uranium-Total 7.96 8 5.58-10.36 Acceptable 0.0477-MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter ug/sample Americium-241 0.0657 0.068 Acceptable 0.0885 MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample Cesium-134 1.06 1.15 0.81-1.50 Acceptable False Pos MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample Cesium-137 0.0166 - Test Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample Cobalt-57 1.59 1.51 1.06-1.96 Acceptable False Pos MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample Cobalt-60 0.016 - Test Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample Manganese-54 0.998 1.02 0.71-1.33 Acceptable 0.0000 False Pos MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample Plutonium-238 5

- Test Acceptable Plutonium- 0.0593-MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample 0.0788 0.0847 Acceptable 239/240 0.1101 False Pos MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample Strontium-90 -0.025 - Test Acceptable Uranium- 0.0109-MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample . 0.017 0.0155 Acceptable 234/233 0.0202 MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample Uranium-238 0.0958 0.099 0.069-0.129 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdF32 Filter Sq/sample Zinc-65 0.867 0.83 0.58-1.08 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 llfegetation Sq/sample Americium-241 0.116 0.11 0.076-0.140 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 llfegetation Sq/sample Cesium-134 6.44 7.32 5.12"9.52 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 llfegetation Sq/sample Cesium-137 9.3 9.18 6.43-11.93 Acceptable False Pos MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 Vegetation Sq/sample Cobalt-57 0.037 - Test Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2Q15 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 Vegetation Sq/sample Cobalt-60 5.68 5.55 3~89-7.22 Acceptable False Pos MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 Vegetation Sq/sample Manganese-54 0.009 - Test Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 Vegetation Sq/sample Plutonium-238 0.084 0.085 0.060-0.111 Acceptable Plutonium-MAPEP 2hd/2015 El/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 Vegetation Sq/sample 0.0898 0.094 0 .066-0 .122 Acceptable 239/240.

MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15~RdV32 Vegetation Sq/sample Strontium-90 0.852 1.08 0.76-1.40 Acceptable Uranium- 0.0153-MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 Vegetation Sq/sample 0.023 0.022 Acceptable 234/233 0.0283 MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 Vegetation Sq/sample Uranium-238 0.129 0.128 0.090-0.166 Acceptable False Pos MAPEP 2nd/201fr 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-RdV32 llfegetatibn Sq/sample Zinc-65 ti.0058 - Test Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-SrF-32 Filter Sq/sample Strontium-89 41.7 47.5 33.3-61.8 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-SrF-32 Filter Sq/sample Strontium-90 0.749 1.06 0.74-1.38 Acceptable MAPEP 2nd/2015 6/16/2015 MAPEP-15-XaW-32 Water Bq/L lodine-129 1.72 1.49 1.04-1.94 Acceptable MAPEP 4th /2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-GrF33 Filter Sq/sample Gross Alpha 0.999 0.9 0.27-1.53 Acceptable

- 116 -

Table D-5 (cont'd)

GEL 2015 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RES ULTS PT

1 Quarter I Provider:, i i Year R~port

Date Sample 1f::!uinber

'Sam,p' ,

le.

Media'.

1

, ,Unit Analyte/

Nuclide

~

GEL

f """

'Vajue' Known value";,,,

,Acceptance i, ,Range/ .Ratio Evaluation MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-GrF33 Filter Sq/sample Gross Beta 1.57 1.56 0.78-2.34 Acceptable Americium-MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg 61.7 49.5 34.7-64.4 Warning 241 MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Cesium-134 933 1010 707-1313 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Cesium-137 861 809 566-1052 Acceptable MA PEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Cobalt-57 1240 1180 826-1534 Acceptable MA PEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Cobalt-60 2.45 1.3 Sens. Eval. Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg lron-55 557 555 389-722 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Manganese-54 1450 1340 938-1742 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Nickel-63 625 682 477-887 Acceptable MA PEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Plutonium-238 100 97.5 68.3-126.8 Acceptable Plutonium-MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg 76.7 80.4 56.3-104.5 Acceptable 239/240 MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Potassium-40 687 599 419-779 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Strontium-90 403 425 298-553 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Technetium-99 639 631 442-820 Acceptable MA PEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg U-234/233 59 56 39-73 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Uranium-238 208 220 154-286 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Zinc-65 761 662 463-861 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 Bq/L Americium- 1.03 0. 739-1.372 Acceptable MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water 1.055 241 MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 21.2 23.1 16.2-30.0 Acceptable False Pos MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Cesium-137 0.00355 Acceptable Test MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Cobalt-57 21 20.8 14.6-27.0 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 17.5 17.1 12.0-22.2 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 212 216 151-281 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L lron-55 12.7 13.1 9.2-17.0 Acceptable MA PEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Manganese-54 15.9 15.6 10.9-20.3 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 8.7 8.6 5.99-11.12 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 0.607 0.681 0.477-0.885 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 Plutonium- 0.843 0.9 0.630-1.170 Acceptable MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L 239/240 MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 210 214 150-278 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 4.06 4.8 3.36-6.24 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Technetium-99 7.27 7.19 5.03-9.35 Acceptable Uranium-MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L 1.13 1.14 0.80-1.48 Acceptable 234/233 MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 1.18 1.18 0.83-1.53 Acceptable MA PEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaW33 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 14.7 13.9 9.7-18.1 Acceptable MA PEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW33 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 0.425 0.429 0.129-0.729 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-GrW33 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 3.59 3.52 1.76-5.28 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2015 12/3/2015 MAPEP-15-MaS33 Soil Bq/Kg Potassium-40 687 599 419-779 Acceptable

- 117 -

Table D-5 (cont'd)

GEL 2015 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RESULTS Notes:

False Pos Test - The MAPEP program uses false positive testing to identify laboratory results that indicate the presence of a particular radionuclide in a MAPEP sample when, in fact, the actual activity of the radionuclide is far below the detection limit of the measurement. Not Acceptable ("N") performance, and hence a false positive result, is indicated when the range encompassing the result, plus or minus the total uncertainty at three standard deviations, does not include zero (e.g., 2.5 +/- 0.2; range of 1.9 to 3.1 ). Statistically, the probability that a result can exceed the absolute value of its total uncertainty at three standard deviations by chance alone is less than 1%. MAPEP uses a three standard deviation criterion for the false positive test to ensure confidence about issuing a false positive performance evaluation. A result that is greater than three times the total uncertainty of the measurement represents a statistically positive detection with over 99% confidence.

Sens. Eval - Sensitivity evaluations are routinely performed to complement the false positive tests. In a sensitivity evaluation, the analyte is present at or near the detection limit, and the difference between the reported result and the MAPEP reference value is compared to the propagated combined total uncertainties.

The results are evaluated at three standard deviations. If the observed difference is greater than three times the combined total uncertainty, the sensitivity evaluation is "Not Acceptable". The probability that such a difference can occur by chance alone is less than 1%. If the participant did not report a statistically positive result, a "Not-Detected" is noted in the text field of the MAPEP performance report. A non-detect is potentially a false negative result, dependent upon the laboratory's detection limit for the radionuclide.

- 118 -

Table D-6 2015 GEL ERA PROGRAM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS PT Quarter/

Report sa*mp1e* Sample*

GEL Knowll*. Acceptance .

~rovider; .. Year Date Number Media" .I** . tl~it :Analvte /Nuclide Value value*:* . Ranae/ Ratio Evaluation ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water pCi/L Barium-133 73.2 67.6 56.4-74.4 Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Cesium-134 51.9 51.3 41.3-56.4 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 142 124 112-139 Not Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Cobalt-60 62.7 62.4 56.2-71.2 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 107 98.7 88.8-118 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Gross Aloha 67.2 62.3 32.6-77.3 Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 43.2 48.9 33.1-56.0 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water PCi/L Gross Aloha 66.7 62.3 32.6-77.3 Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Radium-226 16.1 16.8 12.5-19.2 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water pCi/L Radium-226 16.9 16.8 12.5-19.2 Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Radium-226 16.8 16.8 12.5-19.2 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water pCi/L Radium-228 4.50 5.12 3.07-6.85 Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Radium-228 7.40 5.12 3.07-6.85 Not Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water pCi/L Uranium (Natl 11.0 10.6 8.27-12.2 Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water ua/L Uranium <Nat\ mass 16.4 15.5 12.1-17.9 Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Uranium (Natl 11.3 10.6 8.27-12.2 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water uq/L Uranium (Natl mass 17.1 15.5 12.1-17.9 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Tritium 10000 10600 9220-11700 Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Strontium-89 47.3 52.1 41.2-59.6 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 26.7 32.4 23.7-37.5 Acceotable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Strontium-89 54.6 52.1 41.2-59.6 Acceptable ERA 1st/2015 02/23/15 RAD-100 Water oCi/L Strontium-90 24.6 32.4 23.7-37.5 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/26/15 RAD-101 Water pCi/L lodine-131 18.2 23.8 19.7-28.3 Not Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water pCi/L Barium-133 63.9 64.7 53.9-71.2 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water PCi/L Cesium-134 45.2 50.1 40.3-55.1 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water oCi/L Cesium-137 90.5 89.9 80.8-101 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water oCi/L Cobalt-60 58.7 59.9 53.9-68.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD -102 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 282 265 238-310 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD -102 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 37.1 34.5 17.7-44.5 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD -102 Water PCi/L Gross Beta 26.2 25.1 15.6-33.1 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD -102 Water PCi/L Gross Aloha 35.3 34.5 17.7-44.5 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water pCi/L Radium-226 15.9 15.2 11.3-17.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water PCi/L Radium-226 15.7 15.2 11.3-17.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water pCi/L Radium-226 15.1 15.2 11.3-17.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water pCi/L Radium-228 5.31 5.12 3.13-6.95 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water PCi/L Radium-228 5.14 5.12 3.13-6.95 Acceptable

- 119 -

Table D-6 2015 GEL ERA PROGRAM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS Report ,*. 'Sample

. 1 .Known * . ,Ac~eptance '*

PJ.,: /

I Provider.* Quartel'/

Year.:. * . Date ,., 1,,';Number

sample

...Media "Unit A.nafyte/Nuclide .*

. .GEL

Value' *,value . Rangel.Ratio Evaluation ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water oCi/L Uranium (Natl 24.2 24 19.3-27.0 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water uq/L Uranium (Nat) mass 37.9 35 28.1-39.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD -102 Water oCi/L Uranium (Natl 23.4 24 19.3-27.0 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD -102 Water uq/L Uranium (Nat) mass 34.9 35 28.1-39.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water oCi/L Tritium 14500 15600 13600-17200 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water oCi/L Strontium-89 24.1 42.1 32.3-49.2 Not Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD-102 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 27.7 26.8 19.4-31.2 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 08/25/15 RAD -102 Water pCi/L lodine-131 24.7 25.7 21.3-30.3 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/23/15 RAD -103 Water oCi/L Strontium-89 42 35.7 26.7-42.5 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/23/15 RAD -103 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 26.9 31.1 22.7-36.1 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/23/15 RAD -103 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 41.8 35.7 26.7-42.5 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/23/15 RAD-103 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 22 31.1 22.7-36.1 Not Accectable

- 120 -

Table D-7 2015 GEL ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS i"

PT" Quarter/ Report Sample Sample GEL Known, Acceptance Provider 1 Year .., Date Number Media Lin it Analyte t Nuclide; Value value.* *Ramie/Ratio" >Evaluation.*

ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ka Actinium-228 1090 1250 802-1730 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/kq Americium-241 1410 1500 878-1950 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ko Bismuth-212 1090 1780 474-2620 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ko Bismuth-214 4340 4430 2670-6380 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ko Cesium-134 6020 6390 4180-7680 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/kq Cesium-137 1540 1490 1140-1920 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/ko Cobalt-60 2010 1880 1270-2590 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/ko Lead-212 1200 1230 806-1710 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/ko Lead-214 4890 4530 2640-6760 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/ko Manoanese-54 <49.9 <1000 0-1000 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Sail pCi/ko Plutonium-238 978 998 600-1380 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 1240 1210 791-1670 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/ko Potassium-40 10900 10700 7810-14400 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/ko Strontium-90 1230 1940 740-3060 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 .Soil oCi/kq Thorium-234 3840 3890 1230-7320 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ka Zinc-65 8030 7130 5680-9470 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ka Uranium-234 3754 3920 2400-5050 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ka Uranium-238 3565 3890 2410-4930 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/kq Uranium-Total 7319 7990 4330-10500 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Totallmass\ 8030 7130 5680-9470 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 4040 3920 2400-5050 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ka Uranium-238 4230 3890 2410-4930 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil PCilka Uranium-Total 8477 7990 4330-10500 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil ua/ka Uranium-Tota11massl 8030 7130 5680-9470 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ka Uranium-234 4480 3920 2400-5050 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ka Uranium-238 4020 3890 2410-4930 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil oCi/ka Uranium-Total 8683 7990 4330-10500 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil ua/ka Uranium-Totallmass l 12000 7130 5680-9470 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Soil ua/ka Uranium-Totallmassl 12800 11600 6390-14600 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veaetation pCi/kq Uranium-234 3480 3150 2070-4050 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veaetation pCi/kg Uranium-238 3090 3130 2090-3980 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veaetation pCi/kq Uranium-Total 6716 6420 4350-7990 Acceptable 6280-ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veoetation uo/ka Uranium-Total{mass) 9370 11900 3540-6710 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veqetation pCi/kq Am-241 5130 4340 2650-5770 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-134 2210 2650 1700-3440 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veaetation oCi/kq Cesium-137 1790 1810 1310-2520 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veaetation oCi/ka Cobalt-60 1570 1540 1060-2150 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veqetation PCi/ka Curium-244 1370 1360 666-2120 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veqetation PCi/ka Manaanese-54 <31.1 <300 0-300 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veqetation pCi/kq Plutonium-238 4700 3680 2190-5040 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veqetation PCi/ka Plutonium-239 5120 4180 2570-5760 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veaetation oCi/ka Potassium-40 33100 30900 22300-43400 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veqetation pCi/kq Strontium-90 5920 6590 3760-8740 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veqetation pCi/kq Uranium-234 3230 3150 2070-4050 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veqetation pCi/kq Uranium-238 3340 3130 2090-3980 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veqetation pCi/ka Uranium-Total 6742 6420 4350-7990 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veaetation UQ/kq Uranium-Total(mass) 10000 9370 3540-6710 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Veoetation UQ/kQ Uranium-Total{mass) 8780 5280 3540-6710 AccePtable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Vegetation pCi/ko Uranium-Total 8780 6420 4350-7990 Not Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Vegetation pCi/kq Zinc-65 1250 1090 786-1530 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 50.2 49.8 30.7-67.4 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-134 951 909 578-1130 Acceotable

- 121 -

Table D-7 2015 GEL ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS PT Quarter I *Report. Sample Sample* GEL K11owri '

Acceptance

~9J(if!!l.!:.:- ~~- 'Date Number* Media ,~::;.Uni!:___ _,:Analy:!e I Nuclide' .. Value'* :_ value__:. ~<mge/Ratio ~aluatiQ!I.;__

ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-137 1320 1170 879-1540 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Cobalt-60 87.6 79.1 61.2-98.8 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter lron-55 879 836.0 259-1630 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Manaanese-54 <6.09 <50 0.00-50.0 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter ua/Filter Plutonium-238 57.1 52.1 35.7-68.5 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter oCi/Filter Plutonium-239 46.0 40.3 29.2-52.7 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter oCi/Filter Strontium-90 84.6 96.6 47.2-145 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter oCi/Filter Uranium-234 34.7 34.3 21.3-51.7 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 34.5 34.0 17.8-38.2 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 70.9 69.9 38.7-106 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter ua/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 103 102 65.3-144 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 1190 986 706-1360 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 39.2 34.3 21.3-51.7 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 34.9 34.0 17.8-38.2 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 75.7 69.9 38.7-106 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter ua/Filter Uranium-Total(massl 105 102 65.3-144 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter ua/Filter Uranium-Total(massl 95.5 102 52.9-116 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 . 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter oCi/Filter Gross Aloha 77.2 62.2 20.8-96.6 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Filter oCi/Filter Gross Beta 62.7 58.4 36.9-85.1 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Americium-241 48.5 46.0 31.0-61.7 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1180 1260 925-1450 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1410 1360 1150-1630 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Cobalt-60 1280 1250 1090-1460 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L lron-55 1080 1070 638-1450 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Manaanese-54 <5.41 <100 0.00-100 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Plutonium-238 81.0 72.4 53.6-90.1 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 205 184 143-232 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Strontium-90 865 912 594-1210 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Uranium-234 68.5 61.8 46.4-79.7 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Uranium-238 71.8 61.3 46.7-75.2 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 140 126 92.6-163 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water ua/L Uranium-Total(mass) 214 184 147-222 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 1310 1180 984-1490 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 60.7 61.8 46.4-79.7 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 58.0 61.3 46.7-75.2 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Uranium-Total 121 126 92.6-163 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water ua/L Uranium-Total(massl 174 184 147-222 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Uranium-234 64.1 61.8 46.4-79.7 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Uranium-238 60.4 61.3 46.7-75.2 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Uranium-Total 127 126 92.6-163 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water ua/L Uranium-Totallmassl 181 184 147-222 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water ua/L Uranium-Total(mass) 176 184 147-222 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Gross Aloha 128 119 42.2-184 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water oCi/L Gross Beta 155.0 158.0 90.5-234 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/19/15 MRAD-22 Water pCi/L Tritium 10600 10300 6900-14700 Acceotable ERA 2nd/2015 05/26/15 MRAD-22 Water pCi/L lodine-131 23.5 23.8 19.7-28.3 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil oCi/ka Actinium-228 1220 1240 795-1720 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil oCi/ka Americium-241 667 539 315-700 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil oCi/ka Bismuth-212 1240 1240 330-1820 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil oCi/ka Bismuth-214 1690 2660 1600-3830 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil oCi/ka Cesium-134 2250 2420 1580-2910 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil oCi/ka Cesium-137 5400 5120 3920-6590 Acceotable

- 122 -

Table D-7 2015 GEL ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS pf Quarter I ,Report sample Sample . GEL Known* Acceptance

_l19vidJ!L . Yea~~*~, .Date

- Number Media." . unit * <Ana!if!e uiucli~,-- -~l~L ___Y!l!l!L Rangel'Ratio .* Evaluation ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kq Cobalt-60 4290 3900 2640-5370 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/ko Lead-212 1290 1240 812-1730 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kQ Lead-214 2090 2800 1630-4180 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kq ManQanese-54 <29.7 <1000 0-1000 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kq Plutonium-238 934 864 519-1190 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kq Plutonium-239 982 969 633-1340 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kq Potassium-40 11700 10600 7740-14200 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kq Strontium-90 7490 8820 3360-13900 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kq Thorium-234 3760 3330 1050-6260 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil PCi/ka Zinc-65 4610 3620 2880-4810 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil PCi/ka Uranium-234 2659 3360 2050-4310 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kQ Uranium-238 2831 3330 2060-4220 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kQ Uranium-Total 5490 6850 3720-9040 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil UQ/kQ Uranium-Total(massl 8420 9990 5510-12600 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kQ Uranium-234 2970 3360 2050-4310 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kQ Uranium-238 3010 3330 2060-4220 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil pCi/kQ Uranium-Total 6091 6850 3720-9040 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil uq/kq Uranium-Total(massl 8990 9990 5510-12600 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Soil UQ/kQ Uranium-Total(mass) 8470 9990 5510-12600 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veoetation pCi/kq Am-241 1780 1590 972-2110 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veqetation pCi/kq Cesium-134 652 748 481-972 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veqetation pCi/kq Cesium-137 1140 1230 892-1710 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veoetation pCi/kq Cobalt-60 1870 1930 1330-2700 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Vei:ietation pCi/ko Curium-244 2910 3230 1580-5030 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veoetation pCi/ko Manoanese-54 <45.2 <300 0-300 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veoetation pCi/ko Plutonium-238 4720 3920 2340-5370 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veoetation pCi/ko Plutonium-239 2630 2390 1470-3290 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Vei:ietation PCi/ko Potassium-40 31200 31000 22400-43500 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Vei:ietation PCi/ka Strontium-90 7590 7160 4080-9490 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veaetation PCi/ka Uranium-234 4280 4010 2640-5150 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veoetation oCi/ko Uranium-238 4620 3970 2650-5040 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veqetation pCi/kq Uranium-Total 9155 8160 5530-10200 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 VeQetalion uo/ko Uranium-Total(mass) 13900 11900 3540-6710 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 VeQetation UQ/kQ Uranium-Total(mass) 13100 11900 7970-15100 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Veoetation pCi/ka Zinc-65 1530 1540 1110-2160 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 35.1 36.8 22.7-49.8 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter PCi/Filter Cesium-134 315 349.0 222-433 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter oCi/Filter Cesium-137 598 613 461-805 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter oCi/Filter Cobalt-60 509 521 403-651 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter oCi/Filter lron-55 546 595.0 184-1160 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Manaanese-54 <4.53 <50 0.00-50.0 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter LIQ/Filter Plutonium-238 43.6 42.6 29.2-56.0 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 63.6 63.8 46.2-83.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Strontium-90 37.1 45.7 22.3-68.5 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 38.4 43.0 26.7-64.8 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 39.3 42.7 27.6-59.0 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 80.1 87.7 48.6-133 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter LIQ/Filter Uranium-TotalCmassl 118 128 81.9-180 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 727 685 491-946 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 45.7 43.0 26.7-64.8 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter oCi/Filter Uranium-238 43.4 42.7 27.6-59.0 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 91.1 87.7 48.6-133 Acceptable

- 123 -

Table D-7 2015 GEL ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS PT Quarter[* Report , Sample 1

.. Sample GEL.. JnK~own . *;Acceptance Pr6vider Year~.~*-"r-~D~a=te~~ii~N=u=m=b=er~*~i-~M=ed=i=a_, 1 ,*~*~U~n=it~*i-~*A~*n=ii.JY!e I Nuclide * ~ i'." *.val.llil__ '."Range/. Rath:i ! _=E.v"=al=u=at=io=n~*_._,

ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter uq/Filter Uranium-Total(massl 130 128 81.9-180 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter uq/Filter Uranium-Total(massl 117 128 81.9-180 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter oCi/Filter Gross Aloha 98' 77.3 25.9-120 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Filter oCi/Filter Gross Beta 52.2 41.3 26.1-60.2 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Americium-241 114 113 76.1-152 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Cesium-134 702 759 557-872 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Cesium-137 622 623 529-747 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Cobalt-60 927 896 778-1050 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L lron-55 196 212 126-288 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Manaanese-54 <6.14 <100 0.00-100 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Plutonium-238 117 140 104-174 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Plutonium-239 88.5 114 88.5-144 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Strontium-90 505 544 354-719 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Uranium-234 49.2 48.5 36.4-62.6 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Uranium-238 49.7 48.1 36.7-59.0 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Uranium-Total 98.9 98.9 72.7-128 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water UQ/L Uranium-Total(massl 148 144 115-174 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Zinc-65 786 712 594-898 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Uranium-234 45.8 48.5 36.4-62.6 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 44.4 48.1 36.7-59.0

Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 92.8 98.9 72.7-128 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water UQ/L Uranium-Total(mass) 135.0 144.0 115-174 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 49.5 48.5 36.4-62.6 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 43.1 48.1 36.7'59.0 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 95 98.9 72.7-128 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water UQ/L Uranium-Total(mass) 129 144 115-174 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water UQ/L Uranium-Total(massl 135 144 115-174 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 104.0 136 48.3-211 Acceotable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Gross Beta 61.6 53.7 30.7-79.6 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2015 11/24/15 MRAD-23 Water oCi/L Tritium 20500 21500 14400-30700 Acceptable

- 124-

PSEG Nuclear* LLC P.O. Box 236, 'Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 0PSEG Nuclear LLC Technical Specification Section 6.9.1. 7 (Salem)

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.6 (Hope Creek)