Similar Documents at Ginna |
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20198Q4261998-12-14014 December 1998 Order Approving Application Re Restructuring of Rg&E Corp by Establishment of Holding Company Affecting License DPR-18, Ginna NPP ML17265A3931998-07-31031 July 1998 Request for Consent to Corporate Reorganization.Rg&E Is Restructuring to Adopt Holding Company Form of Corporate Organization as Authorized by New York State PSC ML20202D2301997-11-24024 November 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Change to 10CFR50.55a(h) to Incorporate Requirements of IEEE Std 603-1991,effective 980101 ML17309A6161997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment on Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,Suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. ML17263A9531995-02-28028 February 1995 Comments on Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20 Re Reduction in Seismic Hazard to Majority of Us NPP ML20077M8071995-01-0303 January 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low- Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20059F6811993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Clear Definition of Commerical Grade Items ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting ML17309A4711992-01-29029 January 1992 Comments on Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys, 10CFR50.72 & 50.73. ML17262A2311990-10-24024 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS ML17262A2111990-10-12012 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20245K8781989-04-25025 April 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Urges NRC to Consider Allowing Sufficient Time to Assess Impact of Current Maint Upgrade Efforts at Plant ML20235V6641989-03-0101 March 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Proposed Rule May Be Detrimental to Safety by Discouraging Potentially Superior Maint Practices ML20206M7861988-11-21021 November 1988 Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Re Substance Abuse.Urges Commission to Adopt Suggested Specific Changes Indicated by NUMARC Comments ML20196B3431988-06-20020 June 1988 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings for 90 Days & Order Thereon.* Stay of Proceedings,Including Time to File Suppl to Petition for Leave to Intervene Requested.W/Certificate of Svc ML20154H4571988-03-30030 March 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Alternative Method for Leakage Rate Testing.Suggests That Rulemaking Should Simply Establish Acceptability of Mass Point Method & Allow Analysis of Data to Determine Length of Testing IR 05000244/19860161986-11-12012 November 1986 Board Exhibit B-26,consisting of 861023 Insp Rept 50-244/86-16 & 861103 Forwarding Ltr ML20094C2341984-08-0303 August 1984 Motion to Terminate Proceeding Based on ML Slade 840724 Withdrawal of Outstanding Contentions.No Contentions Remain to Be Heard or Decided.Proceeding Should Be Terminated. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20090H6421984-07-24024 July 1984 Withdrawal of Contentions by Intervenor.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20093D5771984-07-13013 July 1984 Interrogatories Propounded to Intervenor MR Slade Re Contentions A,E & K.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20085H7221983-09-0909 September 1983 Response to ASLB 830819 Order Re Mi Slade 830715 Status Rept.All Regulatory Correspondence Provided to Slade or Available in Pdr.Proceeding Need Not Be Renoticed.No Basis Exists for Intervenor Reimbursement.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076M3041983-07-15015 July 1983 Status Rept as of 830715.Util Has No Further Issuances.Nrc Has Two Issuances Expected by 830901.Author Expects to File Revised/Addl Contentions.Prehearing Conference Unnecessary. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20076L6821983-07-15015 July 1983 Memorandum of Law Supporting Licensee Position Re Need to Renotice Opportunity to Intervene.Aslb Should Not Order Renotice,Since Neither Law Nor Policy Counsel Favor Renotice.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076L6731983-07-15015 July 1983 Response to ASLB 830615 Order,Recommending That Period of Discovery Not Commence Until All Future Issuances Re Integrated Plant Safety Assessment Rept (NUREG-0821) Available ML20073P9891983-04-25025 April 1983 Request to Amend Svc List.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071K7711982-07-30030 July 1982 Response to ASLB 820708 Order Re Status of Hearing. Discussion of Matters Re Discovery,Prehearing Conferences & Hearings Are Premature & Should Be Postponed Pending Issuance of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055B1041982-07-16016 July 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820721 for Commission to Act to Review 820522 Director'S Decision ML20054M7721982-07-0909 July 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820716 for Commission to Act to Review 820522 Director'S Decision ML20054M1921982-07-0808 July 1982 Order Directing Parties to Confer Re Further Proceedings & Directing Each Party Submit Status Rept to ASLB by 820731 on Listed Matters ML20054L2981982-07-0202 July 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820709 for Commission to Act to Review 820523 Director'S Decision ML20054G6401982-06-18018 June 1982 Transcript of 820618 Special Investigative Proceeding in White Plains,Ny.Pp 1,126-1,253 ML20054E6561982-06-0909 June 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820702 for Commission to Act to Review 820522 Director'S Decision ML17258A6371982-03-11011 March 1982 Petition for Order to Show Cause Why OL Should Not Be Suspended or Why Permission to Restart Reactor Should Not Be Withheld.Affidavit,Factual Basis for Petition & Excerpt of Weekly Info Rept for Wk Ending 820212 Encl ML17250A3281980-06-0202 June 1980 Status Rept in Response to ASLB 800429 Order.Recommends Schedule for Findings,Safety Evaluation Suppl,Discovery & Further Prehearing Conferences.Recommends Determination of SEP Progress in One Yr ML17250A3211980-05-30030 May 1980 Status Rept by Ny State Energy Ofc in Reponse to ASLB 800429 Order.Recommends That Parties Be Permitted to Identify Addl Contentions & That Prehearing Conference Be Held to Discuss Issues.W/Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML17249A3491979-12-10010 December 1979 Stipulation Terminating Proceeding as to Rochester Committee for Scientific Info,Inc.Rcsi Agrees That Applicant Has Fulfilled Paragraphs 1 & 4 Requirements of 740312 Stipulation.Certificate of Svc Encl ML17249A2521979-10-31031 October 1979 Notice of Withdrawal of ED Doane,Ae Upton & Hm Babcock as Counsel for Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Certificate of Svc Encl ML17249A2531979-10-31031 October 1979 Notice of Appearance on Behalf of Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079F4371973-01-0505 January 1973 Petition of State of Ny for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing 1998-07-31
[Table view] Category:OTHER LEGAL DOCUMENT
MONTHYEARML17265A3931998-07-31031 July 1998 Request for Consent to Corporate Reorganization.Rg&E Is Restructuring to Adopt Holding Company Form of Corporate Organization as Authorized by New York State PSC ML20076M3041983-07-15015 July 1983 Status Rept as of 830715.Util Has No Further Issuances.Nrc Has Two Issuances Expected by 830901.Author Expects to File Revised/Addl Contentions.Prehearing Conference Unnecessary. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20076L6731983-07-15015 July 1983 Response to ASLB 830615 Order,Recommending That Period of Discovery Not Commence Until All Future Issuances Re Integrated Plant Safety Assessment Rept (NUREG-0821) Available ML20071K7711982-07-30030 July 1982 Response to ASLB 820708 Order Re Status of Hearing. Discussion of Matters Re Discovery,Prehearing Conferences & Hearings Are Premature & Should Be Postponed Pending Issuance of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML17250A3281980-06-0202 June 1980 Status Rept in Response to ASLB 800429 Order.Recommends Schedule for Findings,Safety Evaluation Suppl,Discovery & Further Prehearing Conferences.Recommends Determination of SEP Progress in One Yr ML17250A3211980-05-30030 May 1980 Status Rept by Ny State Energy Ofc in Reponse to ASLB 800429 Order.Recommends That Parties Be Permitted to Identify Addl Contentions & That Prehearing Conference Be Held to Discuss Issues.W/Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML17249A3491979-12-10010 December 1979 Stipulation Terminating Proceeding as to Rochester Committee for Scientific Info,Inc.Rcsi Agrees That Applicant Has Fulfilled Paragraphs 1 & 4 Requirements of 740312 Stipulation.Certificate of Svc Encl ML17249A2531979-10-31031 October 1979 Notice of Appearance on Behalf of Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Certificate of Svc Encl ML17249A2521979-10-31031 October 1979 Notice of Withdrawal of ED Doane,Ae Upton & Hm Babcock as Counsel for Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Certificate of Svc Encl 1998-07-31
[Table view] |
Text
DOCKETED USHRC 80 o UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUN 21980'UCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of the Secretary Docketing 8 Service Branch BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Natter of ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION
,(R;E.Ginna Nuclear Power.Plant, Un it No.1)))))Docket No.50-244)))'ICENSEE'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR STATUS REPORT ON PROCEEDING By Order dated April 29, 1980, the Board ordered each of the parties to submit a report on the status of the captione'd proceeding.
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation
(" Licensee")replies as follows: 1.On August 15, 1972, Licensee filed an applica-tion dated August 9, 1972, entitled"Application to Convert Provisional Operating License to Full-Term Operating License Or Alternatively To Extend the Termination Date of the Provisional Operating Lic'ense" (" Application")for the R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No.1.Following public notice dated November 22, 1972, petitions to intervene P were filed by: the State of New York, as an interested state, on January 5, 1973;the Monroe County Conservation Council on January 5, 1973;the Rochester Committee for oooo>so~JR
/~ly l P Scientific Information
("RCSI")on January 8, 1973;Mr.Michael Slade on January 8, 1973.Licensee answered each of these petitions for leave to intervene on January 17 and 18, 1973.The Commission'.s Regulatory Staff filed answers to each of the petitions to intervene on January 18, 22,'nd 23, 1973.On April 18, 1973, notice of the availability of the Commission's Draft Environmental Statement relating g to the R.E.Ginna facility was published, inviting public comment.On May 15,'f973, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board was established.
By order dated June 8 the Board ordered a hearing and admitted petitioner Michael Slade.It denied the petition of RCSI, but.allowed RCSI leave to amend its petition.It denied the petition to intervene of Monroe County Conservation Council.The petition of the State of New York was granted.On July 3, 1973, RCSI filed an amended petition,.which was answered by Licensee on July 16, 1973 and by the Staff on July 26, 1973.By'order dated August 2, 1973, the amended petition of the RCSI was granted.The Board issued a notice of public hearing on August 2, 1973.Answers to the notice of hearing were.filed by Licensee and New York State on August 9, 1973.On December 11, 1973, the Board issued a notice and order for pre-hearing conference.
On December 19, 1973, notice of
h availability of the Commission's Final Environmental Statement for the Ginna facility was published.
On r December'20, 1973,.the first of ten amendments to the Application was filed.*On March 12, 1974, following several postponementsi a pre-hearing conference was held.That same day intervenor Michael Slade filed revisions-to his petition to intervene.
At the pre-hearing conference, the Board granted Mr.Slade the opportunity to revise,and resubmit his contentions.
Also on March 12, 1974, RCSI and Licensee.reached a stipula-tion terminating the proceeding.as to RCSI, which was filed with the Board on March 13, 1974.On March 26, 1974, the Staff filed a motion for Board approval of an attached, stipulation relating to admission of contentions between interven'or Michael Slade and the Staff.On April 5, 1974, Licensee opposed acceptance of the Staff's motion, moved to strike Mr.Slade's contentions, and moved to dismiss his intervention.
It also filed an answer to the Staff's motion for approval by the Board of the stipulation relating to the.admission of'ontentions.
On April 22, 1974, intervenor Michael Slade replied, to Applicant's motion of.April 5, 1974;', On April 24;1974, the Staff replied to*The latest amendment to the Application was f iled July 6, 1979.
Licensee's opposition to the stipulation and moved to deny Licensee's motion to dismiss.l On March 25, 1977, the Board issued its order ruling on the contentions of intervenor Michael Slade and denied Licensee's motion to dismiss Mr.Slade's intervention.
It set forth the contentions admitted in the proceeding and, t reaffirmed the participation of the State of New York as an , interested state pursuant to 10 C.F.R.52.715(c).
'n December 13, 1977, the Commission informed Licensee that the Ginna station was to be included in the Commission's, Systematic Evaluation Program ("SEP")for nuclear-powered facilities, results of which would provide an adequate basis for decisions regarding full-term licenses, and that the conversion of all remaining provisional operating licenses to full-term licenses would await completion of the SEP.By letter of December 13, 1977, to the Board, the Staff proposed to initiate discussions with Licensee and Mr.Slade on the impact of the SEP on the proceeding.
Licensee is unaware that there have been any such discussions.
On December 14, 1979, Licensee and RCSI filed with the Board a stipulation confirming their earlier stipulation terminating the proceeding as to RCSI dated March 12, 1974.This stipulation further relieved Licensee of certain requirements which were contained in, the earlier stipulation.
2.Based on the order of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board dated March 25, 1977, the following issues remain: I 1.Intervenor's Contention A concerning the'dequacy of Licensee's Quality Assurance Program;2.Intervenor's Contention B that Licensee has not demonstrated conformance with the amended ECCS criteria as determined by AEC Docket K1-50-1.3.Intervenor's Contention D concerning Licensee's alleged violation of applicable federal and New York State water quality standards.
4.Intervenor's Contention E that the environmental analysis for this facility is inadequate because it fails to consider thermal effects of discharged water on lake.biota.5.Intervenor's Contention F that the FES is inadequate because it fails to treat energy'conservation alternatives.
6..Intervenors Contention I that the site contingency plan is inadequate.
7.Intervenor's Contention J that Licensee has failed to provide adequate flood protection.
8.Intervenor's Contention K that Licensee's radwaste systems management program is inadequate.
I A copy of the Board's order, setting forth these contentions in detail, is attached.3.The parties remaining in this proceeding are: 1 a)Licensee;b)the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff;c)Mr.Michael Slade, Intervenor; and d)the State of New York.Pursuant to stipulations filed March 12, 1974, and December 14, 1979, the RCSI has indicated its intention to terminate its participation in the proceeding.
4.Licensee's understanding of the future'course of action in these proceedings is that the Staff will issue a Safety Evaluation Report ("SER")following completion of the SEP.Ne understand that the target date for such completion is April 1982.Accordingly, Licensee suggests the following schedule: a)two months following issuance of the Staff SER, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Saf eguards ("ACRS")meet, make its determinations", and issue its letter regarding its findings within two weeks thereafter; b).any necessary'supplement to the SER be issued by the Staff two months following receipt of the ACRS letter;
c)all discovery by parties be terminated within one month following the issuance of any necessary SER supplement; d)any further pre-hearing conferences.necessary at that time take place within one month following supplementation of the SER." e)the hearing should follow as soon t'hereaf ter, as possible;f)an initial decision be issued within two months following the completion of the hearing;and g)assuming that the initial decision is'favorable, a full-term operating license be issued immediately thereafter.
Licensee recommends.
that in li ht of'he 5 g g Staff's commitment to pursue completion of the SEP prior to issuance of an SER, nothing need be done in this matter until such date as the SEP review has been'completed.
Thereaf ter, Licensee recommends the schedule suggested in paragraph 4.be pursued.Licensee also recommends that the
Board may wish to review the status of this proceeding in about one year to determine the then-current progress of the SEP and its effect on the schedule for this proceeding.
Respectfully submitted, LeBOEUF, LAMB, LEIBY&NacRAE By P tner 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.Washington, D..C.20036 (202)457-7500 1 At torneys for Rochester Gas and Electric.Corporation Dated: June 2, 1980-8-