ML20137R334

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:56, 30 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Proposed Rev to 10CFR35, Human Use of Byproduct Matl & Proposals for Streamlining Medical Licensing Process.Proposed Rule Should Reduce Paper Work,Decrease Backlog & Support Regionalization.W/O Encl
ML20137R334
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/11/1983
From: Jennifer Davis, Minogue R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS), NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
To: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML20136D915 List: ... further results
References
FRN-50FR30616, RULE-PR-35 AA73-1, NUDOCS 8509230476
Download: ML20137R334 (4)


Text

.

AR7F/

-R[ ..,,

l

,(og UNITED STATES

(([

.y g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

y WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 ,[

Q ..c

/ .

JAN 111963 MEMORANDUM FOR: William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations FROM: John G. Davis, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED REVISION OF 10 CFR PART 35 Enclosed is a major revision to 10 CFR Part 35, " Human Use of Byproduct Material," and proposals for streamlining the medical licensing process. As indicated at a briefing on December 15, 1982, the proposed rule is expected to reduce paper work, decrease backlog, support regionalization, and facilitate computerized management of the review process. It is consistent with the Commission's FY 1983 through 1987 Policy and Planning Guidance. It is also a key step in our continuing effort to improve the materials licensing process.

It will not reduce safety requirements.

NRC offices affected by the paper's implementation concurred in its publication for public comment at this time. However, the Office of State Programs stated that several Agreement States were in favor of continuing the practice of having applicants submit specific radiation safety procedures to NRC for review and approval. This practice was deliberately excluded from the proposed revision for reasons detailed in the paper.

The Office of Policy Evaluation has been kept informed of the task force's progress, and has been sent copies of draft proposals as they have been completed.

h92g476 850906 35 50pa3og3g pyg

r

,::.-s

t. .

William J. Dircks 2 This-paper represents a major effort by the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards and the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research and is jointly sponsored by both.

N fJohnG. Davis, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety

, and Safeguards

/[,.f,-) (h yt.c~ O Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Enclosure:

Proposed Revision of 10 CFR Part 35 I

, ,.r JAN 11 1993 MEMORANDUM FOR: William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations FROM: John G. Davis, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED REVISION OF 10 CFR PART 35 Enclosed is a major revision to 10 CFR Part 35, " Human Use of Byproduct Material," and proposals for streamlining the medical licensing process. As indicated at a briefing on December 15, 1982, the proposed rule is expected to reduce paper work, decrease backlog, support regionalization, and facilitate computerized management of the review process. It is consistent with the Commission's FY 1983 through 1987 Policy and Planning Guidance. It is also a key step in our continuing effort to improve the materials licensing process.

It will not red're safety requirements.

NRC offices affected by the paper's implementation concurred in its publication for public comment at this time. However, the Office of State Programs stated that several Agreement States were in favor of continuing the practice of having applicants submit specific radiation safety procedures to NRC for review and approval. This practice was deliberately excluded from the proposed revision for reasons detailed in the paper.

The Office of Policy Evaluation has been_kept informed of the task force's progress, and has been sent copies of draft proposals as they have been completed.

r .

William J. Dircks 2 UAN 11 G83 This paper represents a major effort by the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards and the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research and is jointly sponsored by both.

John G. Davis, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Oricia.cl 31Cnod byg ROEIRTB.I!EOGW j Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Enclosure:

Proposed Revision of 10 CFR Part 35 DISTRIBUTION NMSS #821090

@Mielketg VLMiller RECunningham DMausshardt JGDavis RBMinogue NMSS r/f FCML r/f FC Central File ABentley BClausser CRESS FC L FCML I FC #C, - - 'MMSS N 5520 WJWalker:cf VLMi DRChapell-RECunn n am DMauss ardt is F'B{nogue 12/15 12//6/82 12/j/82 12/ /82 12////82 12/$/82 ,82jg/\(/82