ML14069A084: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:0 January 29, 2014FPL. L-2014-024 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control DeskWashington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Turkey Point Nuclear Generating StationDocket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251License Renewal (LR) Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Inspection ProgramResponse to Request for Additional Information (RAI)
{{#Wiki_filter:0 January 29, 2014 FPL. L-2014-024 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 License Renewal (LR) Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Inspection Program Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)


==References:==
==References:==
: 1. Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) letter L-2012-438 to the USNRC, dated December14, 2012, License Renewal (LR) Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Commitment Implementation Report and Inspection Plan, Agencywide Documents and AccessManagement System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12363A103.
: 1. Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) letter L-2012-438 to the USNRC, dated December 14, 2012, License Renewal (LR) Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Commitment Implementation Report and Inspection Plan, Agencywide Documents and Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12363A103.
: 2. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Reliability Program Report 1022863(MRP-227-A),  
: 2. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Reliability Program Report 1022863 (MRP-227-A), "Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guidelines," ADAMS Accession Nos. ML12017A194, ML12017A196, ML12017A197, ML12017A191, ML12017A192, ML12017A195, and ML12017A199
"Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guidelines,"
: 3. Revision 1 to the Final Safety Evaluation of EPRI Materials Reliability Program Report 1016596 (MRP-227), Revision 0, "Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guidelines," dated December 16, 2011, ADAMS Accession No. ML11308A770
ADAMS Accession Nos. ML12017A194, ML12017A196, ML12017A197, ML12017A191, ML12017A192, ML12017A195, and ML12017A199
: 4. EPRI Report 1013234, "Materials Reliability Program: Screening, Categorization, and Ranking of Reactor Internals Components for Westinghouse and Combustion Engineering PWR Design (MRP-1 91)," ADAMS Accession No. ML091910130.
: 3. Revision 1 to the Final Safety Evaluation of EPRI Materials Reliability ProgramReport 1016596 (MRP-227),
: 5. NRC Email from Farideh Saba to Bob Tomonto, Olga Hanek, Stavroula Mihalakea, "RAIs for Turkey Point-MF1485/86," dated September 27, 2013, ADAMS Accession No.ML13274A144.
Revision 0, "Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guidelines,"
: 6. NRC email from Audrey Klett to Stavroula Mihalakea, "Turkey Point RAI Due Date for MF 1485/86," dated October 30, 2013.7. Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) letter L-2013-287 to the USNRC, License Renewal (LR) Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI), Response to Request for Additional Information, dated October 30, 2013, ADAMS Accession No. ML1 3325A973.8. NRC email from Audrey Klett to Stavroula Mihalakea, Request for Additional Information  
dated December 16, 2011, ADAMS Accession No. ML11308A770
-Turkey Point 3 & 4 RVI Inspection (TACs MF1485/86), dated January 22, 2014, ADAMS Accession No. ML14022A189.
: 4. EPRI Report 1013234, "Materials Reliability Program:
: 9. Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) letter L-2011-029 to the USNRC, dated March 9, 2011, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request 205 and Reactor Materials Issues, Round 1, ADAMS Accession No. ML1 10700068.Florida Power & Light Company 9760 S.W. 344" Street Homestead, FL 33035 L-2014-024 Page 2 By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated December 14, 2012 (Reference 1), Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) submitted its License Renewal Reactor Vessel Internals (RVIs) Commitment Implementation Report and Inspection Plan that credits the implementation of Materials Reliability Program (MRP)-227-A (Reference  
Screening, Categorization, andRanking of Reactor Internals Components for Westinghouse and Combustion Engineering PWR Design (MRP-1 91)," ADAMS Accession No. ML091910130.
: 2) at Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 for NRC staff review. The NRC staff reviewed Revision 0 of MRP-227 and issued a final safety evaluation on December 16, 2011 (Reference  
: 5. NRC Email from Farideh Saba to Bob Tomonto, Olga Hanek, Stavroula Mihalakea, "RAIsfor Turkey Point-MF1485/86,"
: 3) to incorporate technical changes required to ensure the final approved version of MRP-227 (i.e. MRP-227-A) included all NRC required changes. MRP-227-A was issued in December 2011.The NRC staff reviewed the information provided by FPL in its submittal and requested additional information to complete their review (Reference 5). FPL submitted the responses to RAIs 1-4 and RAI-6 (Reference 7). The response to RAI-5 was deferred for a later time (Reference  
dated September 27, 2013, ADAMS Accession No.ML13274A144.
: 6) due to FPL's participation in the joint industry program through the Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group to develop responses to RAI-5.The Staff issued a new request for additional information, RAI-7, and requested FPL to provide responses for RAI-5.b and RAI-7 by January 31, 2014. As discussed with the NRC on January 17, 2014, the due date for the response to RAI-5.a will be determined at a later time (Reference 8).The FPL responses to NRC's RAI-5.b and RAI-7 are provided in Attachment 1.The information provided herein does not change the conclusions stated in Reference 1.Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Robert J. Tomonto, Licensing Manager at 305 246-7327.Very truly yours, Michael Kiley Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant SM Attachment cc: USNRC Regional Administrator, Region II USNRC Project Manager, NRR USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant L-2014-024 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 3 NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND FPL RESPONSES RAI-5 As discussed in Section 3.2.5 of Reference 3, A/LAI 1 requires licensee verification that the detailed component state at the end of the period of extended operation is bounded by the detailed assumptions of the MRP. Please provide the following information related to verification of the applicability of MRP-227-A to Turkey Point 3 and 4: a. Identify whether the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RVIs include nonweld or bolting austenitic stainless steel components with 20 percent or greater cold work from fabrication and operating surface tensile stresses greater than 30 kilopound force per square inch. Provide a plant-specific evaluation to determine the aging management requirements for the identified components.
: 6. NRC email from Audrey Klett to Stavroula Mihalakea, "Turkey Point RAI Due Date for MF1485/86,"
: b. Identify whether Turkey Point 3 and 4 used an atypical fuel design or fuel management that could make the assumptions of MRP-227-A regarding core loading/core design nonrepresentative for that unit, including those during power changes and uprates. If so, describe how the differences were reconciled with the assumptions of MRP-227-A, or provide a plant-specific AMP for affected components as appropriate.
dated October 30, 2013.7. Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) letter L-2013-287 to the USNRC, License Renewal(LR) Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI), Response to Request for Additional Information, dated October 30, 2013, ADAMS Accession No. ML1 3325A973.
FPL Response to RAI-5.a The response to RAI-5.a will be provided at a later time (Reference 8).FPL Response to RAI-5.b RAI-5.b has previously been addressed by the following submittals to the NRC: 1. FPL provided the NRC with updated fluence values for the RVI components resulting from Extended Power Uprate (EPU), (Reference 9, RAI CVIB-1.5).
: 8. NRC email from Audrey Klett to Stavroula Mihalakea, Request for Additional Information  
The estimated fluence value for the upper core plate and upper portions of the BMI columns were elevated above lx1021 n/cm 2 as a result of the core design associated with the EPU.Changes in gamma heating rates of the RVI components resulting from EPU were also evaluated and determined to be less than the design heating rates for the RVI components.
-Turkey Point 3 & 4 RVI Inspection (TACs MF1485/86),
: 2. Subsequently, FPL evaluated the impact of the updated fluence values on the aging degradation of the upper core plate and BMI Columns in its response to MRP-227-A, LAI 1 (Reference 1). The updated fluence values exceeded the assumptions of MRP-191, a supporting document for MRP-227-A, for the upper core plate but not the BMI Columns. Irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC) concerns for the upper core plate were eliminated by considering a combination of stress and fluence at various regions of the plate. Irradiation embrittlement (IE) was added as a degradation mechanism of concern for the upper core plate in the Turkey Point RVI AMP and must be considered in any future flaw evaluation.
dated January 22, 2014, ADAMSAccession No. ML14022A189.
: 9. Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) letter L-2011-029 to the USNRC, dated March 9,2011, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Extended PowerUprate License Amendment Request 205 and Reactor Materials Issues, Round 1,ADAMS Accession No. ML1 10700068.
Florida Power & Light Company9760 S.W. 344" Street Homestead, FL 33035 L-2014-024 Page 2By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated December 14, 2012(Reference 1), Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) submitted its License Renewal ReactorVessel Internals (RVIs) Commitment Implementation Report and Inspection Plan that credits theimplementation of Materials Reliability Program (MRP)-227-A (Reference  
: 2) at Turkey Point Units3 and 4 for NRC staff review. The NRC staff reviewed Revision 0 of MRP-227 and issued a finalsafety evaluation on December 16, 2011 (Reference  
: 3) to incorporate technical changesrequired to ensure the final approved version of MRP-227 (i.e. MRP-227-A) included allNRC required changes.
MRP-227-A was issued in December 2011.The NRC staff reviewed the information provided by FPL in its submittal and requested additional information to complete their review (Reference 5). FPL submitted the responses to RAIs 1-4and RAI-6 (Reference 7). The response to RAI-5 was deferred for a later time (Reference  
: 6) dueto FPL's participation in the joint industry program through the Pressurized Water ReactorOwners Group to develop responses to RAI-5.The Staff issued a new request for additional information, RAI-7, and requested FPL to provideresponses for RAI-5.b and RAI-7 by January 31, 2014. As discussed with the NRC on January17, 2014, the due date for the response to RAI-5.a will be determined at a later time (Reference 8).The FPL responses to NRC's RAI-5.b and RAI-7 are provided in Attachment 1.The information provided herein does not change the conclusions stated in Reference 1.Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Robert J. Tomonto, Licensing Manager at 305246-7327.
Very truly yours,Michael KileyVice President Turkey Point Nuclear PlantSMAttachment cc: USNRC Regional Administrator, Region IIUSNRC Project Manager, NRRUSNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant L-2014-024 Attachment 1Page 1 of 3NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND FPL RESPONSES RAI-5As discussed in Section 3.2.5 of Reference 3, A/LAI 1 requires licensee verification that thedetailed component state at the end of the period of extended operation is bounded by thedetailed assumptions of the MRP. Please provide the following information related toverification of the applicability of MRP-227-A to Turkey Point 3 and 4:a. Identify whether the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RVIs include nonweld or bolting austenitic stainless steel components with 20 percent or greater cold work from fabrication andoperating surface tensile stresses greater than 30 kilopound force per square inch. Providea plant-specific evaluation to determine the aging management requirements for theidentified components.
: b. Identify whether Turkey Point 3 and 4 used an atypical fuel design or fuel management thatcould make the assumptions of MRP-227-A regarding core loading/core designnonrepresentative for that unit, including those during power changes and uprates.
If so,describe how the differences were reconciled with the assumptions of MRP-227-A, orprovide a plant-specific AMP for affected components as appropriate.
FPL Response to RAI-5.aThe response to RAI-5.a will be provided at a later time (Reference 8).FPL Response to RAI-5.bRAI-5.b has previously been addressed by the following submittals to the NRC:1. FPL provided the NRC with updated fluence values for the RVI components resulting from Extended Power Uprate (EPU), (Reference 9, RAI CVIB-1.5).
The estimated fluence value for the upper core plate and upper portions of the BMI columns wereelevated above lx1021 n/cm2 as a result of the core design associated with the EPU.Changes in gamma heating rates of the RVI components resulting from EPU were alsoevaluated and determined to be less than the design heating rates for the RVIcomponents.
: 2. Subsequently, FPL evaluated the impact of the updated fluence values on the agingdegradation of the upper core plate and BMI Columns in its response to MRP-227-A, LAI 1 (Reference 1). The updated fluence values exceeded the assumptions of MRP-191, a supporting document for MRP-227-A, for the upper core plate but not the BMIColumns.
Irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC) concerns for theupper core plate were eliminated by considering a combination of stress and fluence atvarious regions of the plate. Irradiation embrittlement (IE) was added as a degradation mechanism of concern for the upper core plate in the Turkey Point RVI AMP and mustbe considered in any future flaw evaluation.
No changes to the requirements of MRP-227-A were required to address the aging management of the BMI Columns.
No changes to the requirements of MRP-227-A were required to address the aging management of the BMI Columns.
L-2014-024 Attachment 1Page 2 of 3RAI-7As discussed in Section 3.3.7 of Revision 1 to the Safety Evaluation for MRP-227, A/LAI 7requires that the licensees of Westinghouse reactors develop plant-specific analyses to beapplied for their facilities to demonstrate that lower support column cast austenitic stainless steel (CASS) bodies will maintain their function during the extended period of operation.
L-2014-024 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 3 RAI-7 As discussed in Section 3.3.7 of Revision 1 to the Safety Evaluation for MRP-227, A/LAI 7 requires that the licensees of Westinghouse reactors develop plant-specific analyses to be applied for their facilities to demonstrate that lower support column cast austenitic stainless steel (CASS) bodies will maintain their function during the extended period of operation.
MRP-227-A Table 3-3 (Final disposition of Westinghouse internals) classifies CASS lower supportcolumns as Expansion Components based on susceptibility to irradiation embrittlement (IE) andirradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC).
MRP-227-A Table 3-3 (Final disposition of Westinghouse internals) classifies CASS lower support columns as Expansion Components based on susceptibility to irradiation embrittlement (IE) and irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC). In its letter dated December 14, 2012, the licensee stated that the lower support columns were not susceptible to thermal embrittlement (TE) based on calculated ferrite being well below the 20% threshold as described in NRC letter, "License Renewal Issue No. 98-0030, 'Thermal Aging Embrittlement of Cast Stainless Steel Components"'(ADAMS Accession No. ML003717179).
In its letter dated December 14, 2012,the licensee stated that the lower support columns were not susceptible to thermalembrittlement (TE) based on calculated ferrite being well below the 20% threshold as described in NRC letter, "License Renewal Issue No. 98-0030,  
In its letter dated December 14, 2012, the licensee provided the range of ferrite contents (4.29% to 14.83%) for the Turkey Point, Unit 3 and 4 lower support column bodies. To support its review, the staff requires the following additional information:
'Thermal Aging Embrittlement of CastStainless Steel Components"'(ADAMS Accession No. ML003717179).
* For the 136 CASS lower support columns discussed in Reference 1, provide the ferrite content for each lower support column.* Provide the casting method for the column (static or centrifugal), if known.
In its letter dated December 14, 2012, the licensee provided the range of ferrite contents(4.29% to 14.83%) for the Turkey Point, Unit 3 and 4 lower support column bodies. To supportits review, the staff requires the following additional information:
L-2014-024 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 3 FPL Response to RAI-7 As stated in L-2012-438, (Reference  
* For the 136 CASS lower support columns discussed in Reference 1, provide the ferritecontent for each lower support column.* Provide the casting method for the column (static or centrifugal),
: 1) the ferrite contents of the 136 CASS lower support columns of Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Reactor Vessel Internals were calculated using Hull's equivalent factors (Ref. NUREG/CR4513).
if known.
A complete listing of the calculated ferrite content for each of the columns is provided in the table below. The retrieved manufacturing records for the columns did not indicate the casting method (static or centrifugal) used during manufacturing.
L-2014-024 Attachment 1Page 3 of 3FPL Response to RAI-7As stated in L-2012-438, (Reference  
Lower Support Lower Support Column Column Hull's Serial Number Hull's Ferrite Serial Number Ferrite Turkey Point Unit 3 Turkey Point Unit 4 5,8,15 6.23 50 8.89 23 11.93 145,147 10.17 49,52,57 8.89 152 13.91 59,66 6.40 178,179 6.17 107,108 14.83 194 12.86 109,116,118 7.73 217 9.24 120 10.67 230,232,237 6.89 122-126 7.08 244-246,250 11.73 127,128,130-132 8.57 258,259 7.31 135,139,143,144 4.29 263,265 14.31 166 13.16 274 12.36 171,174,185 6.17 279,280 11.89 189,190-192 6.06 287-290,292,293 8.58 198-200,202,206,207 7.99 298,300-303,305 6.29 315, 316, 323,327, 210,220,221 9.24 330 9.95 6,10,12 6.23 332,334 10.72 17,19,21,24,25,28 11.93 337-339,342,345 10.00 29,33,34 14.33 70 6.40 56 8.89 133 4.29 64,68,71,72 6.40 149 10.17 93 8.14 165,169,170 13.16 105 14.83 173,186 6.17 111,113,117 7.73 189 6.06 195 12.86 199,204,208 7.99 209,212,223 9.24 234,236 6.89 252 11.73 260 7.31 269 14.31 276 11.89}}
: 1) the ferrite contents of the 136 CASS lower supportcolumns of Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Reactor Vessel Internals were calculated using Hull'sequivalent factors (Ref. NUREG/CR4513).
A complete listing of the calculated ferrite contentfor each of the columns is provided in the table below. The retrieved manufacturing records forthe columns did not indicate the casting method (static or centrifugal) used duringmanufacturing.
Lower Support Lower SupportColumn Column Hull'sSerial Number Hull's Ferrite Serial Number FerriteTurkey Point Unit 3 Turkey Point Unit 45,8,15 6.23 50 8.8923 11.93 145,147 10.1749,52,57 8.89 152 13.9159,66 6.40 178,179 6.17107,108 14.83 194 12.86109,116,118 7.73 217 9.24120 10.67 230,232,237 6.89122-126 7.08 244-246,250 11.73127,128,130-132 8.57 258,259 7.31135,139,143,144 4.29 263,265 14.31166 13.16 274 12.36171,174,185 6.17 279,280 11.89189,190-192 6.06 287-290,292,293 8.58198-200,202,206,207 7.99 298,300-303,305 6.29315, 316, 323,327,210,220,221 9.24 330 9.956,10,12 6.23 332,334 10.7217,19,21,24,25,28 11.93 337-339,342,345 10.0029,33,34 14.33 70 6.4056 8.89 133 4.2964,68,71,72 6.40 149 10.1793 8.14 165,169,170 13.16105 14.83 173,186 6.17111,113,117 7.73 189 6.06195 12.86199,204,208 7.99209,212,223 9.24234,236 6.89252 11.73260 7.31269 14.31276 11.89}}

Revision as of 22:32, 9 July 2018

Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station, Response to Request for Additional Information on License Renewal (Lr) Reactor Vessel Internals (Rvi) Inspection Program
ML14069A084
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/29/2014
From: Kiley M
Florida Power & Light Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2014-024
Download: ML14069A084 (5)


Text

0 January 29, 2014 FPL. L-2014-024 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 License Renewal (LR) Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Inspection Program Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)

References:

1. Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) letter L-2012-438 to the USNRC, dated December 14, 2012, License Renewal (LR) Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Commitment Implementation Report and Inspection Plan, Agencywide Documents and Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12363A103.
2. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Reliability Program Report 1022863 (MRP-227-A), "Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guidelines," ADAMS Accession Nos. ML12017A194, ML12017A196, ML12017A197, ML12017A191, ML12017A192, ML12017A195, and ML12017A199
3. Revision 1 to the Final Safety Evaluation of EPRI Materials Reliability Program Report 1016596 (MRP-227), Revision 0, "Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guidelines," dated December 16, 2011, ADAMS Accession No. ML11308A770
4. EPRI Report 1013234, "Materials Reliability Program: Screening, Categorization, and Ranking of Reactor Internals Components for Westinghouse and Combustion Engineering PWR Design (MRP-1 91)," ADAMS Accession No. ML091910130.
5. NRC Email from Farideh Saba to Bob Tomonto, Olga Hanek, Stavroula Mihalakea, "RAIs for Turkey Point-MF1485/86," dated September 27, 2013, ADAMS Accession No.ML13274A144.
6. NRC email from Audrey Klett to Stavroula Mihalakea, "Turkey Point RAI Due Date for MF 1485/86," dated October 30, 2013.7. Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) letter L-2013-287 to the USNRC, License Renewal (LR) Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI), Response to Request for Additional Information, dated October 30, 2013, ADAMS Accession No. ML1 3325A973.8. NRC email from Audrey Klett to Stavroula Mihalakea, Request for Additional Information

-Turkey Point 3 & 4 RVI Inspection (TACs MF1485/86), dated January 22, 2014, ADAMS Accession No. ML14022A189.

9. Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) letter L-2011-029 to the USNRC, dated March 9, 2011, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request 205 and Reactor Materials Issues, Round 1, ADAMS Accession No. ML1 10700068.Florida Power & Light Company 9760 S.W. 344" Street Homestead, FL 33035 L-2014-024 Page 2 By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated December 14, 2012 (Reference 1), Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) submitted its License Renewal Reactor Vessel Internals (RVIs) Commitment Implementation Report and Inspection Plan that credits the implementation of Materials Reliability Program (MRP)-227-A (Reference
2) at Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 for NRC staff review. The NRC staff reviewed Revision 0 of MRP-227 and issued a final safety evaluation on December 16, 2011 (Reference
3) to incorporate technical changes required to ensure the final approved version of MRP-227 (i.e. MRP-227-A) included all NRC required changes. MRP-227-A was issued in December 2011.The NRC staff reviewed the information provided by FPL in its submittal and requested additional information to complete their review (Reference 5). FPL submitted the responses to RAIs 1-4 and RAI-6 (Reference 7). The response to RAI-5 was deferred for a later time (Reference
6) due to FPL's participation in the joint industry program through the Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group to develop responses to RAI-5.The Staff issued a new request for additional information, RAI-7, and requested FPL to provide responses for RAI-5.b and RAI-7 by January 31, 2014. As discussed with the NRC on January 17, 2014, the due date for the response to RAI-5.a will be determined at a later time (Reference 8).The FPL responses to NRC's RAI-5.b and RAI-7 are provided in Attachment 1.The information provided herein does not change the conclusions stated in Reference 1.Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Robert J. Tomonto, Licensing Manager at 305 246-7327.Very truly yours, Michael Kiley Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant SM Attachment cc: USNRC Regional Administrator, Region II USNRC Project Manager, NRR USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant L-2014-024 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 3 NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND FPL RESPONSES RAI-5 As discussed in Section 3.2.5 of Reference 3, A/LAI 1 requires licensee verification that the detailed component state at the end of the period of extended operation is bounded by the detailed assumptions of the MRP. Please provide the following information related to verification of the applicability of MRP-227-A to Turkey Point 3 and 4: a. Identify whether the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RVIs include nonweld or bolting austenitic stainless steel components with 20 percent or greater cold work from fabrication and operating surface tensile stresses greater than 30 kilopound force per square inch. Provide a plant-specific evaluation to determine the aging management requirements for the identified components.
b. Identify whether Turkey Point 3 and 4 used an atypical fuel design or fuel management that could make the assumptions of MRP-227-A regarding core loading/core design nonrepresentative for that unit, including those during power changes and uprates. If so, describe how the differences were reconciled with the assumptions of MRP-227-A, or provide a plant-specific AMP for affected components as appropriate.

FPL Response to RAI-5.a The response to RAI-5.a will be provided at a later time (Reference 8).FPL Response to RAI-5.b RAI-5.b has previously been addressed by the following submittals to the NRC: 1. FPL provided the NRC with updated fluence values for the RVI components resulting from Extended Power Uprate (EPU), (Reference 9, RAI CVIB-1.5).

The estimated fluence value for the upper core plate and upper portions of the BMI columns were elevated above lx1021 n/cm 2 as a result of the core design associated with the EPU.Changes in gamma heating rates of the RVI components resulting from EPU were also evaluated and determined to be less than the design heating rates for the RVI components.

2. Subsequently, FPL evaluated the impact of the updated fluence values on the aging degradation of the upper core plate and BMI Columns in its response to MRP-227-A, LAI 1 (Reference 1). The updated fluence values exceeded the assumptions of MRP-191, a supporting document for MRP-227-A, for the upper core plate but not the BMI Columns. Irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC) concerns for the upper core plate were eliminated by considering a combination of stress and fluence at various regions of the plate. Irradiation embrittlement (IE) was added as a degradation mechanism of concern for the upper core plate in the Turkey Point RVI AMP and must be considered in any future flaw evaluation.

No changes to the requirements of MRP-227-A were required to address the aging management of the BMI Columns.

L-2014-024 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 3 RAI-7 As discussed in Section 3.3.7 of Revision 1 to the Safety Evaluation for MRP-227, A/LAI 7 requires that the licensees of Westinghouse reactors develop plant-specific analyses to be applied for their facilities to demonstrate that lower support column cast austenitic stainless steel (CASS) bodies will maintain their function during the extended period of operation.

MRP-227-A Table 3-3 (Final disposition of Westinghouse internals) classifies CASS lower support columns as Expansion Components based on susceptibility to irradiation embrittlement (IE) and irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC). In its letter dated December 14, 2012, the licensee stated that the lower support columns were not susceptible to thermal embrittlement (TE) based on calculated ferrite being well below the 20% threshold as described in NRC letter, "License Renewal Issue No. 98-0030, 'Thermal Aging Embrittlement of Cast Stainless Steel Components"'(ADAMS Accession No. ML003717179).

In its letter dated December 14, 2012, the licensee provided the range of ferrite contents (4.29% to 14.83%) for the Turkey Point, Unit 3 and 4 lower support column bodies. To support its review, the staff requires the following additional information:

  • For the 136 CASS lower support columns discussed in Reference 1, provide the ferrite content for each lower support column.* Provide the casting method for the column (static or centrifugal), if known.

L-2014-024 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 3 FPL Response to RAI-7 As stated in L-2012-438, (Reference

1) the ferrite contents of the 136 CASS lower support columns of Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Reactor Vessel Internals were calculated using Hull's equivalent factors (Ref. NUREG/CR4513).

A complete listing of the calculated ferrite content for each of the columns is provided in the table below. The retrieved manufacturing records for the columns did not indicate the casting method (static or centrifugal) used during manufacturing.

Lower Support Lower Support Column Column Hull's Serial Number Hull's Ferrite Serial Number Ferrite Turkey Point Unit 3 Turkey Point Unit 4 5,8,15 6.23 50 8.89 23 11.93 145,147 10.17 49,52,57 8.89 152 13.91 59,66 6.40 178,179 6.17 107,108 14.83 194 12.86 109,116,118 7.73 217 9.24 120 10.67 230,232,237 6.89 122-126 7.08 244-246,250 11.73 127,128,130-132 8.57 258,259 7.31 135,139,143,144 4.29 263,265 14.31 166 13.16 274 12.36 171,174,185 6.17 279,280 11.89 189,190-192 6.06 287-290,292,293 8.58 198-200,202,206,207 7.99 298,300-303,305 6.29 315, 316, 323,327, 210,220,221 9.24 330 9.95 6,10,12 6.23 332,334 10.72 17,19,21,24,25,28 11.93 337-339,342,345 10.00 29,33,34 14.33 70 6.40 56 8.89 133 4.29 64,68,71,72 6.40 149 10.17 93 8.14 165,169,170 13.16 105 14.83 173,186 6.17 111,113,117 7.73 189 6.06 195 12.86 199,204,208 7.99 209,212,223 9.24 234,236 6.89 252 11.73 260 7.31 269 14.31 276 11.89