|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:P2oP 1 nf 1K,,/,? 7' of: September 03, 2014Received: | | {{#Wiki_filter:P2oP 1 nf 1 K,,/,? 7' of: September 03, 2014 Received: |
| August 29, 2014Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. ljy-8e21-26y7 Comments Due: August 29, 2014Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0109 | | August 29, 2014 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. ljy-8e21-26y7 Comments Due: August 29, 2014 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2014-0109 |
| ,License Renewal Application; Fermi 2Comment On: NRC-2014-0109-0003 DTE Electric Co., Fermi 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statem. 6iitDocument: | | , License Renewal Application; Fermi 2 Comment On: NRC-2014-0109-0003 DTE Electric Co., Fermi 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statem. 6iit Document: |
| NRC-2014-0109-DRAFT-0017 | | NRC-2014-0109-DRAFT-0017 |
| -Comment on FR Doc # 2014-15281 Submitter Information Name: Robert SimpsonGeneral CommentIt is reasonable to estimate that, during the 20-year License Renewal period, Fermi, Unit 2 would generate anamount of spent fuel from normal operations equal to about fifty percent (50%) of that which it produced duringthe original 40-year Operating License period. At the same time, the current "structured coordination" betweenthe Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) and the NRC appears to be heading towards potentially indefinite "continued storage" of spent fuel with no technical specifications in place, now or for the foreseeable future. This is theofficial language of those involved with trying to get Fermi closed. It means, in plain language: | | -Comment on FR Doc # 2014-15281 Submitter Information Name: Robert Simpson General Comment It is reasonable to estimate that, during the 20-year License Renewal period, Fermi, Unit 2 would generate an amount of spent fuel from normal operations equal to about fifty percent (50%) of that which it produced during the original 4 0-year Operating License period. At the same time, the current "structured coordination" between the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) and the NRC appears to be heading towards potentially indefinite "continued storage" of spent fuel with no technical specifications in place, now or for the foreseeable future. This is the official language of those involved with trying to get Fermi closed. It means, in plain language: "We still don't have any solution for the waste!" So why do we continue to produce it? Somebody is making a profit on it and I guess that's reason enough. If we could start up an atomic warhead plant, it would require only two things to make it a reality. Somebody to make a profit and the creation of some jobs. End of story.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= /.P61ý__I--C5 a&https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=0900006481850f6 1 &for... 09/03/2014}} |
| "We still don'thave any solution for the waste!" So why do we continue to produce it? Somebody is making a profit on it and Iguess that's reason enough. If we could start up an atomic warhead plant, it would require only two things tomake it a reality. | |
| Somebody to make a profit and the creation of some jobs. End of story.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate | |
| = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= /.P61ý__I--C5 a&https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=0900006481850f6 1 &for... 09/03/2014}} | |
Latest revision as of 13:04, 9 July 2018
Similar Documents at Fermi |
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML16313A5162016-10-27027 October 2016
Comment (51) of Kenneth A. Westlake, on Behalf of United States Environmental Protection Agency, on Final Plant-Specific Supplement 56 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Fermi 2 Nuc
ML16021A4362016-01-21021 January 2016
Comment (46) of Robert E. Wicke on Fermi, Unit 2 License Extension for 20 Years Operating
ML16011A0132016-01-0606 January 2016
Comment (20) of Michael J Keegan Opposing License Renewal of Fermi 2
ML16011A0322016-01-0606 January 2016
Comment (39) of Ron Lankford on Fermi 2 License Renewal Application
ML16011A0272016-01-0606 January 2016
Comment (34) of Anonymous Individual Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement to Extend for 20 Years
ML16011A0342016-01-0606 January 2016
Comment (41) of Jeanne Micka on Fermi 2 License Extension Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0142016-01-0505 January 2016
Comment (21) of Kevin Kamps Opposing Fermi 2 License Renewal
ML16011A0152016-01-0505 January 2016
Comment (22) of Michael J Keegan Opposing Fermi 2 License Renewal Application Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0112016-01-0404 January 2016
Comment (18) of Mark Muhich Regarding License Renewal for Fermi 2
ML16011A0122016-01-0404 January 2016
Comment (19) of Susan Michetti Opposing Fermi 2 License Renewal Extension
ML16011A0092016-01-0404 January 2016
Comment (15) of Valincia Darby Regarding License Renewal of the DTE Energy Fermi 2 Power Plant Located in Frenchtown Township, Monroe County, Michigan
ML16011A0362016-01-0404 January 2016
Comment (16) of Kathryn Barnes Opposing License Renewal of Fermi 2
ML16011A0102016-01-0404 January 2016
Comment (17) of Jessie Collins Opposing Fermi 2 License Renewal Application Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0082016-01-0101 January 2016
Comment (14) of Art Myatt Opposing the Construction of Fermi 3 and the Relicensing of Fermi 2 for the 2025-2045 Timeframe
ML16007A0052015-12-31031 December 2015
Comment (9) of Sandra M. Pierce on Behalf of the Monroe Center for Healthy Aging Supporting DTE Energy'S Request for License Renewal of Fermi, Unit 2
ML16011A0292015-12-28028 December 2015
Comment (36) of Barbara Loe on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0302015-12-28028 December 2015
Comment (37) of David Schonberger on Behalf of Alliance to Halt Fermi 3 on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16007A0092015-12-28028 December 2015
Comment (13) of Jessie P. Collins on Behalf of Citizens Resistance at Fermi Two (Craft) Opposing NRC Recommendation to Extend the Fermi, Unit 2, Reactor License for an Additional 20 Years
ML16011A0282015-12-27027 December 2015
Comment (35) of Pam Barker on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0212015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (28) of Gerald Lee Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Extension for 20 Years
ML16011A0252015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (32) of Mary Ann Baier on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0192015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (26) of Martina Barnard on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0262015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (33) of Anonymous Individual on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0242015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (31) of Anonymous Individual Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Extension for 20 Years
ML16011A0202015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (27) of Sarah Flum Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0232015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (30) of Michael Hormel Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Extension for 20 Years
ML16011A0222015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (29) of Sue Riopelle Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Extension for 20 Years
ML16011A0182015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (25) of Timothy Schacht on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0162015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (23) of Ralph Tuscher on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16011A0172015-12-20020 December 2015
Comment (24) of Gerald Vande Velde on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML16004A1452015-12-19019 December 2015
Comment (8) of Carolyn Doherty Opposing the Extension of Fermi, Unit 2 to 20 Years
ML15356A3682015-12-15015 December 2015
Comment (7) of Vito A. Kaminskas on Behalf of DTE Energy Company on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants Supplement 56 Regarding Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant
ML16029A0742015-12-0707 December 2015
Comment (48) of Scott Hicks on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Fermi 2 and Request for Concurrence Under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
ML16011A0332015-12-0202 December 2015
Comment (40) of Richard G. Micka on Fermi 2 License Extension Draff EIS
ML16011A0352015-12-0202 December 2015
Comment (42) of Kathleen Russeau on Behalf of Community Foundation of Monroe County Supporting the Fermi 2 License Extension Renewal Effort
ML15343A4202015-12-0202 December 2015
Comment (3) of Martha Gruelle on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
NRC-15-0100, Comment (10) of Craig A. Haugen on Behalf of Jefferson Schools Supporting DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of Fermi 22015-11-30030 November 2015
Comment (10) of Craig A. Haugen on Behalf of Jefferson Schools Supporting DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of Fermi 2
ML15356A3712015-11-30030 November 2015
Comment (6) of Jim Mcdevitt on Behalf of Frenchtown Charter Township on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants Supplement 56 Regarding Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant
ML15343A0142015-11-30030 November 2015
Comment (4) of Floreine Mentel Supporting DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of the Operating License for Enrico, Fermi, Unit 2
ML15345A4392015-11-30030 November 2015
Comment (5) of Jerome D. Sobczak on Behalf of DTE Energy Shareholders United on DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of the Operating License for Enrico Fermi Unit 2
ML16007A0062015-11-30030 November 2015
Comment (10) of Craig A. Haugen on Behalf of Jefferson Schools Supporting DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of Fermi 2
ML16020A3372015-11-24024 November 2015
Comment (44) of J. Henry Lievens on Behalf of Monroe County, Mi, Board of Commissioners for DTE Electric Company'S Application for 20 Year Extension of Operating License for Enrico Fermi, Unit 2
ML16011A0312015-11-18018 November 2015
Comment (38) of Michelle S. Dugan on Behalf of the Monroe County Chamber of Commerce Supporting the Fermi 2 License Renewal Application
ML15329A3032015-11-0606 November 2015
Comment (1) of Stephen J. Mcnew on Behalf of the Monroe County Intermediate School District, Supporting the DTE Energy Fermi 2 License Renewal Application
ML14252A1392014-08-29029 August 2014
Comment (12) of Jessie Pauline Collins Opposing Enrico Fermi Unit 2 License Extension Application
ML14252A1772014-08-29029 August 2014
Comment(00023) of Robert Simpson on DTE Electric Co., Fermi 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
ML14252A1862014-08-29029 August 2014
Comment (00026) of Mark Farris on DTE Electric Co., Fermi, Unit 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
ML14252A1782014-08-29029 August 2014
Comment (24) of David Schonberger Opposing 20-year Extension of the Operating License for Enrico Fermi Unit 2
ML14252A1762014-08-29029 August 2014
Comment (00022) of Carol Izant on DTE Electric Co., Fermi, Unit 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
ML14252A1382014-08-29029 August 2014
Comment (11) of Michael J. Keegan on Behalf of Don'T Waste Michigan on Fermi 2 Docket Id NRC-2014-0109 License Renewal Application
2016-10-27
[Table view] |
Text
P2oP 1 nf 1 K,,/,? 7' of: September 03, 2014 Received:
August 29, 2014 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. ljy-8e21-26y7 Comments Due: August 29, 2014 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2014-0109
, License Renewal Application; Fermi 2 Comment On: NRC-2014-0109-0003 DTE Electric Co., Fermi 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statem. 6iit Document:
NRC-2014-0109-DRAFT-0017
-Comment on FR Doc # 2014-15281 Submitter Information Name: Robert Simpson General Comment It is reasonable to estimate that, during the 20-year License Renewal period, Fermi, Unit 2 would generate an amount of spent fuel from normal operations equal to about fifty percent (50%) of that which it produced during the original 4 0-year Operating License period. At the same time, the current "structured coordination" between the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) and the NRC appears to be heading towards potentially indefinite "continued storage" of spent fuel with no technical specifications in place, now or for the foreseeable future. This is the official language of those involved with trying to get Fermi closed. It means, in plain language: "We still don't have any solution for the waste!" So why do we continue to produce it? Somebody is making a profit on it and I guess that's reason enough. If we could start up an atomic warhead plant, it would require only two things to make it a reality. Somebody to make a profit and the creation of some jobs. End of story.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= /.P61ý__I--C5 a&https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=0900006481850f6 1 &for... 09/03/2014
