ML16011A024: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1As of: 1/6/16 1:04 PMReceived: December 20, 2015PUBLC S BMISIONStatus: PendingPostTracking No. ljz-8mx7-iswtComments Due: December 28, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0109 License Renewal Application; Fermi 2 (!./Comment On: NRC-2014-0109-0033DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact StatementDocument: NRC-2014-0109-DRAFT-0043Comment on FR Doc # 20 15-28265Submitter InformationName: Anonymous Anonymous ...... .':,:'-... ... .... ...I -General Comment t =I urge you to reject the proposed extension of the license to operate Fermi 2 (Monroe, MI), is set toexpire in 2025.Actual demand for electricity in Michigan has declined, not grown, since 2007. Michigan does not needelectricity from Fermi 2, nor from the proposed Fermi 3 reactor.The GELS is flawed in a number of ways. It dismisses any viable alternative to nuclear reactors; the outdatedGELS ignores recent advances in renewable energy and the potential for increased efficiency in the residential,commercial and industrial-sectors. The extension would put at risk the shallow, warmest part of the GreatLakes, western Lake Erie, with thermal and radioactive discharges.In addition, the GE Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), of which Fermi 2 is one example, has seriousdesign flaws which increase the probability of catastrophic failure. Emergency planning for regionalevacuation is completely inadequate. A 50-mile evacuation zone should be the basis of planning, as evidencedby NRC evaluation of the Fukushima disaster. The lessons of the Fukushima nuclear disaster (according tothe NRC task force on this issue) have not been applied to Fermi 2, and there are no plans to apply thoselessons.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03file :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/PRM-20-28/NRC-20 14-01 09-DRAFT-0043 .html 1062101/06/2016 Page 1 of 1As of: 1/6/16 1:04 PMReceived: December 20, 2015PUBLC S BMISIONStatus: PendingPostTracking No. ljz-8mx7-iswtComments Due: December 28, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0109 License Renewal Application; Fermi 2 (!./Comment On: NRC-2014-0109-0033DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact StatementDocument: NRC-2014-0109-DRAFT-0043Comment on FR Doc # 20 15-28265Submitter InformationName: Anonymous Anonymous ...... .':,:'-... ... .... ...I -General Comment t =I urge you to reject the proposed extension of the license to operate Fermi 2 (Monroe, MI), is set toexpire in 2025.Actual demand for electricity in Michigan has declined, not grown, since 2007. Michigan does not needelectricity from Fermi 2, nor from the proposed Fermi 3 reactor.The GELS is flawed in a number of ways. It dismisses any viable alternative to nuclear reactors; the outdatedGELS ignores recent advances in renewable energy and the potential for increased efficiency in the residential,commercial and industrial-sectors. The extension would put at risk the shallow, warmest part of the GreatLakes, western Lake Erie, with thermal and radioactive discharges.In addition, the GE Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), of which Fermi 2 is one example, has seriousdesign flaws which increase the probability of catastrophic failure. Emergency planning for regionalevacuation is completely inadequate. A 50-mile evacuation zone should be the basis of planning, as evidencedby NRC evaluation of the Fukushima disaster. The lessons of the Fukushima nuclear disaster (according tothe NRC task force on this issue) have not been applied to Fermi 2, and there are no plans to apply thoselessons.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03file :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/PRM-20-28/NRC-20 14-01 09-DRAFT-0043 .html 1062101/06/2016}}
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1As of: 1/6/16 1:04 PMReceived:
December 20, 2015PUBLC S BMISIONStatus:
PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8mx7-iswt Comments Due: December 28, 2015 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0109 License Renewal Application; Fermi 2 (!./Comment On: NRC-2014-0109-0033 DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Document:
NRC-2014-0109-DRAFT-0043 Comment on FR Doc # 20 15-28265Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous  
...... .':,:'-... ... .... ...I -General Comment t =I urge you to reject the proposed extension of the license to operate Fermi 2 (Monroe, MI), is set toexpire in 2025.Actual demand for electricity in Michigan has declined, not grown, since 2007. Michigan does not needelectricity from Fermi 2, nor from the proposed Fermi 3 reactor.The GELS is flawed in a number of ways. It dismisses any viable alternative to nuclear reactors; the outdatedGELS ignores recent advances in renewable energy and the potential for increased efficiency in the residential, commercial and industrial-sectors.
The extension would put at risk the shallow, warmest part of the GreatLakes, western Lake Erie, with thermal and radioactive discharges.
In addition, the GE Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), of which Fermi 2 is one example, has seriousdesign flaws which increase the probability of catastrophic failure.
Emergency planning for regionalevacuation is completely inadequate.
A 50-mile evacuation zone should be the basis of planning, as evidenced by NRC evaluation of the Fukushima disaster.
The lessons of the Fukushima nuclear disaster (according tothe NRC task force on this issue) have not been applied to Fermi 2, and there are no plans to apply thoselessons.SUNSI Review Complete Template  
= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03file :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/PRM-20-28/NRC-20 14-01 09-DRAFT-0043  
.html 1062101/06/2016 Page 1 of 1As of: 1/6/16 1:04 PMReceived:
December 20, 2015PUBLC S BMISIONStatus:
PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8mx7-iswt Comments Due: December 28, 2015 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0109 License Renewal Application; Fermi 2 (!./Comment On: NRC-2014-0109-0033 DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Document:
NRC-2014-0109-DRAFT-0043 Comment on FR Doc # 20 15-28265Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous  
...... .':,:'-... ... .... ...I -General Comment t =I urge you to reject the proposed extension of the license to operate Fermi 2 (Monroe, MI), is set toexpire in 2025.Actual demand for electricity in Michigan has declined, not grown, since 2007. Michigan does not needelectricity from Fermi 2, nor from the proposed Fermi 3 reactor.The GELS is flawed in a number of ways. It dismisses any viable alternative to nuclear reactors; the outdatedGELS ignores recent advances in renewable energy and the potential for increased efficiency in the residential, commercial and industrial-sectors.
The extension would put at risk the shallow, warmest part of the GreatLakes, western Lake Erie, with thermal and radioactive discharges.
In addition, the GE Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), of which Fermi 2 is one example, has seriousdesign flaws which increase the probability of catastrophic failure.
Emergency planning for regionalevacuation is completely inadequate.
A 50-mile evacuation zone should be the basis of planning, as evidenced by NRC evaluation of the Fukushima disaster.
The lessons of the Fukushima nuclear disaster (according tothe NRC task force on this issue) have not been applied to Fermi 2, and there are no plans to apply thoselessons.SUNSI Review Complete Template  
= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03file :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/PRM-20-28/NRC-20 14-01 09-DRAFT-0043  
.html 1062101/06/2016}}

Revision as of 15:28, 30 June 2018

Comment (31) of Anonymous Individual Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Extension for 20 Years
ML16011A024
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/2015
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
80FR68881 00031, NRC-2014-0109
Download: ML16011A024 (1)
v • d • e


Text

Page 1 of 1As of: 1/6/16 1:04 PMReceived:

December 20, 2015PUBLC S BMISIONStatus:

PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8mx7-iswt Comments Due: December 28, 2015 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0109 License Renewal Application; Fermi 2 (!./Comment On: NRC-2014-0109-0033 DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Document:

NRC-2014-0109-DRAFT-0043 Comment on FR Doc # 20 15-28265Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous

...... .':,:'-... ... .... ...I -General Comment t =I urge you to reject the proposed extension of the license to operate Fermi 2 (Monroe, MI), is set toexpire in 2025.Actual demand for electricity in Michigan has declined, not grown, since 2007. Michigan does not needelectricity from Fermi 2, nor from the proposed Fermi 3 reactor.The GELS is flawed in a number of ways. It dismisses any viable alternative to nuclear reactors; the outdatedGELS ignores recent advances in renewable energy and the potential for increased efficiency in the residential, commercial and industrial-sectors.

The extension would put at risk the shallow, warmest part of the GreatLakes, western Lake Erie, with thermal and radioactive discharges.

In addition, the GE Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), of which Fermi 2 is one example, has seriousdesign flaws which increase the probability of catastrophic failure.

Emergency planning for regionalevacuation is completely inadequate.

A 50-mile evacuation zone should be the basis of planning, as evidenced by NRC evaluation of the Fukushima disaster.

The lessons of the Fukushima nuclear disaster (according tothe NRC task force on this issue) have not been applied to Fermi 2, and there are no plans to apply thoselessons.SUNSI Review Complete Template

= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03file :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/PRM-20-28/NRC-20 14-01 09-DRAFT-0043

.html 1062101/06/2016 Page 1 of 1As of: 1/6/16 1:04 PMReceived:

December 20, 2015PUBLC S BMISIONStatus:

PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8mx7-iswt Comments Due: December 28, 2015 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0109 License Renewal Application; Fermi 2 (!./Comment On: NRC-2014-0109-0033 DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Document:

NRC-2014-0109-DRAFT-0043 Comment on FR Doc # 20 15-28265Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous

...... .':,:'-... ... .... ...I -General Comment t =I urge you to reject the proposed extension of the license to operate Fermi 2 (Monroe, MI), is set toexpire in 2025.Actual demand for electricity in Michigan has declined, not grown, since 2007. Michigan does not needelectricity from Fermi 2, nor from the proposed Fermi 3 reactor.The GELS is flawed in a number of ways. It dismisses any viable alternative to nuclear reactors; the outdatedGELS ignores recent advances in renewable energy and the potential for increased efficiency in the residential, commercial and industrial-sectors.

The extension would put at risk the shallow, warmest part of the GreatLakes, western Lake Erie, with thermal and radioactive discharges.

In addition, the GE Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), of which Fermi 2 is one example, has seriousdesign flaws which increase the probability of catastrophic failure.

Emergency planning for regionalevacuation is completely inadequate.

A 50-mile evacuation zone should be the basis of planning, as evidenced by NRC evaluation of the Fukushima disaster.

The lessons of the Fukushima nuclear disaster (according tothe NRC task force on this issue) have not been applied to Fermi 2, and there are no plans to apply thoselessons.SUNSI Review Complete Template

= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03file :///C:/Users/CAG/Documents/XPMigratedFolders/PRM-20-28/NRC-20 14-01 09-DRAFT-0043

.html 1062101/06/2016

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16011A024&oldid=770161"