ML16053A207: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:NWMI-201 6-RAI-001Rev. 0Appendix B -EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive DustDuring Construction Activities from Construction EquipmentB-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0004Revision ID: 1Effective Date: February 3, 2015Engineering Design FileCalculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during ConstructionActivities From Construction EquipmentPortage Project No.: 3124Title: NWMI Environmental ReportProject4PortageTEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0 TEM-9(X0209I29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 1 of 52. ProjectfTask: NWMI Environmental Report1. Portage Project No.: 31243. DCN #4. Title: Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A *16. SSC Safety Category: N/A7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, timeoperated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, theamount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval (A) SignauresaPrinte Naniel:Author/Design Agent A Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__Independent Review RProject Manager R/A John Belier /////2/3/15Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) N/A TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-000409/29109 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5Introduction and PurposeTo determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material movedwas estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.MethodologyEarthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methodsfor calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5(updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100)where:E = Emissions (pound [lb])A = Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)EF = Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)ER = Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)AssumptionsTable I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations. The assumptions include the type ofactivities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities,and the amount of material moved.Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust CalculationsBulldozing 1 100 N/IA' N/IA'Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120: 1o,8...Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1 60 10,886 b 12,000 bCompacting 1 80 N/A' N/A'Moto grading 1 80N/Ac /Aa Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIRadioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm3).SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.N/A = not applicable.Other assumptions include the following.* Silt content: 25 percent* Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42* Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour [hr]): 8.86 mi/hr* Material moisture content: 20 percent* Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hrVehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles TEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 3 of 5Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 andSection 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote. Theequations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying theresults of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.Table 2. Emission Factors Equations-.9 9 ---S. -9. -.* -S ~* S -S0.- * -- SBulldozing8c2ompacting8:Motor grading8excavatorsb'Loading earth haulers fromfront loadersbUlanglf tralfrom0i.3 (Mj)1.40.040 (s)25  0.051 (s)2°k(0.0032).*(U/5)l.3/(M/2)1.4(0 0032Y'(U/5)10.75
* EF<_IS0.75 EF5,0.6
* E<0.350.105* EFTsp0.031
* EFTn,0.053Ib/lirlb/VMTlb/toni!03!5,:0.053lb/toni i r .....i I'i *n ............EFkMsa AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.= emission factor. S =mean vehicle speed (mi/br).= scaling factor for particle size. TSP = total suspended particulate.=material moisture content (%) U = mean wind spe (mi/br).= silt content (%). VMT =vehicle miles traveled.Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown inTable 3 through Table 8.Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours)EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)(0.20)'48.92E-_ l/hTotal =EF<zi0um
* 100 hrEFTotemission factor.9.19E-01 lb/hr9.19E+01 lbEF = emission factor.
TEM-900209129109Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 4 of 5Table 4. Compacting (80 hours)EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)(0.20)' "9.19E-01 lb/hr: Tolal 1b05~ = EFi7~ *80'/1V~ hr ff.35E+0l lbEF = emission factor.Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours at 2.5 miles/hour)I~b iEF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)Total Ib_<1o0= EF<1oum(2.5)(80)1E.01lb/V-MT:3.8Ea ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80)1 .23E-022.45E+00Ib/VMTlbEF = emission factor. VMT = vehicle miles traveled.Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I3s lb/ton(M/2)' 45.2-2l/tonTotal lb<l~n = *IEF = emission factor.8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal ...... E~25~m1 .08E+02 lbEF emission factor.
TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-000409I/29/9 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton(M/2)14~5.92E,02 lb/tonTotal lb.1= EF_<iopx *12,000I II I= 0.53 '0. O 2)(I3). l ..... ...8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal EF~2.=
* 12,00001.08E+02 lbEF =emission factor.Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton(M/2)'.4Total = EF_<io
* 24,0008.96E-03 lb/ton2.15E+02 lbEF = emission factor.The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction ActivitiesBulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators 7. lE+02 l.IE-+02Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.ReferencesEDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3,Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and AreaSources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.
NWMI-201 6-RAI-001Rev. 0Appendix B -EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive DustDuring Construction Activities from Construction EquipmentB-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0004Revision ID: 1Effective Date: February 3, 2015Engineering Design FileCalculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during ConstructionActivities From Construction EquipmentPortage Project No.: 3124Title: NWMI Environmental ReportProject4PortageTEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0 TEM-9(X0209I29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 1 of 52. ProjectfTask: NWMI Environmental Report1. Portage Project No.: 31243. DCN #4. Title: Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A *16. SSC Safety Category: N/A7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, timeoperated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, theamount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval (A) SignauresaPrinte Naniel:Author/Design Agent A Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__Independent Review RProject Manager R/A John Belier /////2/3/15Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) N/A TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-000409/29109 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5Introduction and PurposeTo determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material movedwas estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.MethodologyEarthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methodsfor calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5(updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100)where:E = Emissions (pound [lb])A = Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)EF = Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)ER = Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)AssumptionsTable I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations. The assumptions include the type ofactivities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities,and the amount of material moved.Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust CalculationsBulldozing 1 100 N/IA' N/IA'Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120: 1o,8...Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1 60 10,886 b 12,000 bCompacting 1 80 N/A' N/A'Moto grading 1 80N/Ac /Aa Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIRadioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm3).SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.N/A = not applicable.Other assumptions include the following.* Silt content: 25 percent* Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42* Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour [hr]): 8.86 mi/hr* Material moisture content: 20 percent* Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hrVehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles TEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 3 of 5Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 andSection 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote. Theequations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying theresults of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.Table 2. Emission Factors Equations-.9 9 ---S. -9. -.* -S ~* S -S0.- * -- SBulldozing8c2ompacting8:Motor grading8excavatorsb'Loading earth haulers fromfront loadersbUlanglf tralfrom0i.3 (Mj)1.40.040 (s)25  0.051 (s)2&deg;k(0.0032).*(U/5)l.3/(M/2)1.4(0 0032Y'(U/5)10.75
* EF<_IS0.75 EF5,0.6
* E<0.350.105* EFTsp0.031
* EFTn,0.053Ib/lirlb/VMTlb/toni!03!5,:0.053lb/toni i r .....i I'i *n ............EFkMsa AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.= emission factor. S =mean vehicle speed (mi/br).= scaling factor for particle size. TSP = total suspended particulate.=material moisture content (%) U = mean wind spe (mi/br).= silt content (%). VMT =vehicle miles traveled.Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown inTable 3 through Table 8.Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours)EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)(0.20)'48.92E-_ l/hTotal =EF<zi0um
* 100 hrEFTotemission factor.9.19E-01 lb/hr9.19E+01 lbEF = emission factor.
TEM-900209129109Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 4 of 5Table 4. Compacting (80 hours)EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)(0.20)' "9.19E-01 lb/hr: Tolal 1b05~ = EFi7~ *80'/1V~ hr ff.35E+0l lbEF = emission factor.Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours at 2.5 miles/hour)I~b iEF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)Total Ib_<1o0= EF<1oum(2.5)(80)1E.01lb/V-MT:3.8Ea ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80)1 .23E-022.45E+00Ib/VMTlbEF = emission factor. VMT = vehicle miles traveled.Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I3s lb/ton(M/2)' 45.2-2l/tonTotal lb<l~n = *IEF = emission factor.8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal ...... E~25~m1 .08E+02 lbEF emission factor.
TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-000409I/29/9 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton(M/2)14~5.92E,02 lb/tonTotal lb.1= EF_<iopx *12,000I II I= 0.53 '0. O 2)(I3). l ..... ...8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal EF~2.=
* 12,00001.08E+02 lbEF =emission factor.Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton(M/2)'.4Total = EF_<io
* 24,0008.96E-03 lb/ton2.15E+02 lbEF = emission factor.The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction ActivitiesBulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators 7. lE+02 l.IE-+02Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.ReferencesEDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3,Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and AreaSources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.}}

Revision as of 22:17, 28 May 2018

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC - NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Revision 0, Appendix B, EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities from Construction Equipment
ML16053A207
Person / Time
Site: Northwest Medical Isotopes
Issue date: 02/03/2015
From: McManus G
Northwest Medical Isotopes, Portage
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16053A221 List:
References
NWMI-LTR-2016-002 EDF-3124-0004, NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Rev. 0
Download: ML16053A207 (7)


Text

NWMI-201 6-RAI-001Rev. 0Appendix B -EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive DustDuring Construction Activities from Construction EquipmentB-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0004Revision ID: 1Effective Date: February 3, 2015Engineering Design FileCalculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during ConstructionActivities From Construction EquipmentPortage Project No.: 3124Title: NWMI Environmental ReportProject4PortageTEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0 TEM-9(X0209I29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 1 of 52. ProjectfTask: NWMI Environmental Report1. Portage Project No.: 31243. DCN #4. Title: Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A *16. SSC Safety Category: N/A7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, timeoperated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, theamount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval (A) SignauresaPrinte Naniel:Author/Design Agent A Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__Independent Review RProject Manager R/A John Belier /////2/3/15Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) N/A TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-000409/29109 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5Introduction and PurposeTo determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material movedwas estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.MethodologyEarthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methodsfor calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5(updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100)where:E = Emissions (pound [lb])A = Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)EF = Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)ER = Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)AssumptionsTable I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations. The assumptions include the type ofactivities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities,and the amount of material moved.Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust CalculationsBulldozing 1 100 N/IA' N/IA'Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120: 1o,8...Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1 60 10,886 b 12,000 bCompacting 1 80 N/A' N/A'Moto grading 1 80N/Ac /Aa Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIRadioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm3).SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.N/A = not applicable.Other assumptions include the following.* Silt content: 25 percent* Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42* Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour [hr]): 8.86 mi/hr* Material moisture content: 20 percent* Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hrVehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles TEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 3 of 5Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 andSection 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote. Theequations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying theresults of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.Table 2. Emission Factors Equations-.9 9 ---S. -9. -.* -S ~* S -S0.- * -- SBulldozing8c2ompacting8:Motor grading8excavatorsb'Loading earth haulers fromfront loadersbUlanglf tralfrom0i.3 (Mj)1.40.040 (s)25 0.051 (s)2°k(0.0032).*(U/5)l.3/(M/2)1.4(0 0032Y'(U/5)10.75

  • EF<_IS0.75 EF5,0.6
  • EFTn,0.053Ib/lirlb/VMTlb/toni!03!5,:0.053lb/toni i r .....i I'i *n ............EFkMsa AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.= emission factor. S =mean vehicle speed (mi/br).= scaling factor for particle size. TSP = total suspended particulate.=material moisture content (%) U = mean wind spe (mi/br).= silt content (%). VMT =vehicle miles traveled.Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown inTable 3 through Table 8.Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />)EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)(0.20)'48.92E-_ l/hTotal =EF<zi0um
  • 100 hrEFTotemission factor.9.19E-01 lb/hr9.19E+01 lbEF = emission factor.

TEM-900209129109Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 4 of 5Table 4. Compacting (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />)EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)(0.20)' "9.19E-01 lb/hr: Tolal 1b05~ = EFi7~ *80'/1V~ hr ff.35E+0l lbEF = emission factor.Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> at 2.5 miles/hour)I~b iEF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)Total Ib_<1o0= EF<1oum(2.5)(80)1E.01lb/V-MT:3.8Ea ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80)1 .23E-022.45E+00Ib/VMTlbEF = emission factor. VMT = vehicle miles traveled.Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I3s lb/ton(M/2)' 45.2-2l/tonTotal lb<l~n = *IEF = emission factor.8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal ...... E~25~m1 .08E+02 lbEF emission factor.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-000409I/29/9 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton(M/2)14~5.92E,02 lb/tonTotal lb.1= EF_<iopx *12,000I II I= 0.53 '0. O 2)(I3). l ..... ...8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal EF~2.=

  • 12,00001.08E+02 lbEF =emission factor.Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton(M/2)'.4Total = EF_<io
  • 24,0008.96E-03 lb/ton2.15E+02 lbEF = emission factor.The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction ActivitiesBulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators 7. lE+02 l.IE-+02Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.ReferencesEDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3,Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and AreaSources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.

NWMI-201 6-RAI-001Rev. 0Appendix B -EDF-3124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive DustDuring Construction Activities from Construction EquipmentB-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0004Revision ID: 1Effective Date: February 3, 2015Engineering Design FileCalculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during ConstructionActivities From Construction EquipmentPortage Project No.: 3124Title: NWMI Environmental ReportProject4PortageTEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0 TEM-9(X0209I29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 1 of 52. ProjectfTask: NWMI Environmental Report1. Portage Project No.: 31243. DCN #4. Title: Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust during Constnuction Activities5. NPH PCor SDC:N/A *16. SSC Safety Category: N/A7 Summary: To determine particulate emissions during construction, the types and number of equipment, timeoperated, and material moved was estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, theamount of PM-10 and PM-2.5 was estimated for the project. The results are presented in this document.8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval (A) SignauresaPrinte Naniel:Author/Design Agent A Gary MeManus 2/3/15,__Independent Review RProject Manager R/A John Belier /////2/3/15Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) N/A TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-000409/29109 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 2 of 5Introduction and PurposeTo determine particulate emissions during construction of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)Radioisotope Production Facility, the types and number of equipment, time operated, and material movedwas estimated. Using these estimates and equations developed in the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, the amount of PM-i10 and PM-2.5was estimated for the RPF project. The results are presented in this document.MethodologyEarthmoving activities involve operation of heavy construction equipment on exposed soil. The methodsfor calculating fugitive dust emissions for earthmoving activities are outlined in AP-42, Section 13.2.5(updated 2006). Emissions were calculated based on the following equation.E = Ax EF x (1-ER/100)where:E = Emissions (pound [lb])A = Activity (lb, tons, vehicle, miles traveled)EF = Emission factor (lb/hour [hr], tons, vehicle miles traveled)ER = Overall emission reduction efficiency, percentage (0 unless control factors are used)AssumptionsTable I provides assumptions used in the fugitive dust calculations. The assumptions include the type ofactivities performed, the number of units performing the activities, the number of hours of the activities,and the amount of material moved.Table 1. Construct Activities for Fugitive Dust CalculationsBulldozing 1 100 N/IA' N/IA'Laigerhalesfoexaaos1 120: 1o,8...Loading earth haulers from front loaders 1 60 10,886 b 12,000 bCompacting 1 80 N/A' N/A'Moto grading 1 80N/Ac /Aa Fugitive dust calculations are based on hours of operation.b Tonnage based on excavation of 9,000 cubic yards (yd3) (EDF-3124-000l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIRadioisotope Production Facility) and a swell factor of 25 percent and density of 1.27 grams (g)/cubic centimeter (cm3).SFugitive dust calculation based on vehicle miles traveled.N/A = not applicable.Other assumptions include the following.* Silt content: 25 percent* Scaling factor (k) for particle size from AP-42* Mean wind speed (miles [mi]/hour [hr]): 8.86 mi/hr* Material moisture content: 20 percent* Mean vehicle speed: 2.5 mi/hrVehicle miles traveled is assumed to be = 2.5 mi/hr x 80 hr =200 miles TEM-900209/29/09Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 3 of 5Emission factors: Emission factors equations were obtained from AP-42, Section 13.2.5 andSection 11.9 (updated 1998). The specific equation used is noted for each operation as a footnote. Theequations used for each activity are shown in Table 2. The emission fa~ctor is obtained by multiplying theresults of the emission factor equation by the appropriate scaling factor.Table 2. Emission Factors Equations-.9 9 ---S. -9. -.* -S ~* S -S0.- * -- SBulldozing8c2ompacting8:Motor grading8excavatorsb'Loading earth haulers fromfront loadersbUlanglf tralfrom0i.3 (Mj)1.40.040 (s)25 0.051 (s)2°k(0.0032).*(U/5)l.3/(M/2)1.4(0 0032Y'(U/5)10.75

  • EF<_IS0.75 EF5,0.6
  • EFTn,0.053Ib/lirlb/VMTlb/toni!03!5,:0.053lb/toni i r .....i I'i *n ............EFkMsa AP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-I for bulldozing overburd~en.b AP-42, Section 13.2.4.3, Equation #1.cAP-42, Section 11.9, Table 11.9-1 for grading.= emission factor. S =mean vehicle speed (mi/br).= scaling factor for particle size. TSP = total suspended particulate.=material moisture content (%) U = mean wind spe (mi/br).= silt content (%). VMT =vehicle miles traveled.Using the above equations, the following releases for each operation were calculated and are shown inTable 3 through Table 8.Table 3. Bulldozing (100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />)EF_<i0um = 1.0 (0.25)' 5 (0.75)(0.20)'48.92E-_ l/hTotal =EF<zi0um
  • 100 hrEFTotemission factor.9.19E-01 lb/hr9.19E+01 lbEF = emission factor.

TEM-900209129109Rev. 0ENGINEERING DESIGN FILEEDF-31 24-0004Rev. 1Page 4 of 5Table 4. Compacting (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />)EF_<ioum = 1.0 (0.25)l's (0.75)(0.20)' "9.19E-01 lb/hr: Tolal 1b05~ = EFi7~ *80'/1V~ hr ff.35E+0l lbEF = emission factor.Table 5. Motor Grading (80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> at 2.5 miles/hour)I~b iEF<ioum = 0.0 15(0.25)2(0.6)Total Ib_<1o0= EF<1oum(2.5)(80)1E.01lb/V-MT:3.8Ea ~1031(0~,O5lXO,259~(0.031)Total lb<z~u EF~2s(2~5)(80)1 .23E-022.45E+00Ib/VMTlbEF = emission factor. VMT = vehicle miles traveled.Table 6. Loading of Earth Haulers from Excavators (12,000 tons)F_1m= 0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)I3s lb/ton(M/2)' 45.2-2l/tonTotal lb<l~n = *IEF = emission factor.8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal ...... E~25~m1 .08E+02 lbEF emission factor.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-000409I/29/9 Rev. 1Rev. 0 Page 5 of 5Table 7. Loading of Earth Haulers from Front Loaders (12,000tons)EF<O=m- 0.35"(0.0032)*(O15)1I I b/ton(M/2)14~5.92E,02 lb/tonTotal lb.1= EF_<iopx *12,000I II I= 0.53 '0. O 2)(I3). l ..... ...8.96E-03 lb/tonTotal EF~2.=

  • 12,00001.08E+02 lbEF =emission factor.Table 8. Unloading of Fill Material from Earth Haulers (24,00 tons) (2 pages)0.35"(0.0032)*(U/5)l 3 lb/ton(M/2)'.4Total = EF_<io
  • 24,0008.96E-03 lb/ton2.15E+02 lbEF = emission factor.The total particulate emissions are listed in Table 9.Table 9. Total Particulate Releases from Construction ActivitiesBulldozing 8.9E+01 9.2E+01ea...h haulers 11m exca-vators 7. lE+02 l.IE-+02Loading of earth haulers from front loaders 7.1lE+02 1.1lE+02Unladn of fill material 11m eat haulers 1.4E+03 2.E0Compacting 7.1E+01 7.4E-t01otrgaig3E+l2.5E+00)Total release (Ib) 3.0E+03 6.0E+02a Final numbers have been adjusted to significant figures.ReferencesEDF-3 124-0001l, Estimate of Excavation for the NWMIlRadioisotope Production Facility, Rev. 3,Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 2, 2015.EPA AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1, Stationary Point and AreaSources, Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1995.