ML20205K629: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20205K629 | |||
| issue date = 10/20/1988 | |||
| title = Discusses Equipment Qualification Insp Repts 50-334/86-12 & 50-334/88-21 on 860609-13 & 880509-13 & Forwards Notice of Violation.Util Also Requested to Address Deficiency Re Handling of Victoreen Cable Assemblies | |||
| author name = Martin T | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) | |||
| addressee name = Sieber J | |||
| addressee affiliation = DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. | |||
| docket = 05000334 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = EA-88-178, NUDOCS 8811010264 | |||
| package number = ML20205K632 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | |||
| page count = 4 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000334/1986012]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
__ | |||
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
._ | |||
_ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
'. | |||
* | |||
, | |||
. | |||
. | |||
OCT 2 01988 | |||
Docket No. 50-334 | |||
License No. DPR-66 | |||
EA No. 88-178 | |||
Duquesne Light Company | |||
ATTN: Mr. J. O. Sieber | |||
Vice President | |||
Nuclear Group | |||
Post Office Box 4 | |||
Shippingport, Pennsylvania | |||
15077 | |||
Gentlemen: | |||
Subject: | |||
Inspection Report Nos: 50-334/36-12, 50-334/88-21 | |||
This letter refers to equipment qualification inspections conducted on | |||
June 9-13, 1986 and May 9-13, 1988 at the Beaver Valley 1 Power Plant. | |||
The | |||
in vection reports were sent to you on October 31, 1986 and August 3, 1983 | |||
respectively. | |||
Based on the results of these inspections it appears that certain of your | |||
' | |||
activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as | |||
set forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A. | |||
At the | |||
time of these inspections, several items (50-334/86-12-03 and 50-334/88-21-02) | |||
were identified as potential enforcement i* ems. | |||
Based on subsequent informa- | |||
tion furnished by you at the Enforcement Jenference on August 12, 1988, the | |||
NRC has categorized these as a Severity Level IV violation in accordance with | |||
the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," | |||
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C. | |||
With regard to the violation relating to unqualified | |||
wire in Motor Operated Valves (MOV) (50-334/88-21-02), it appears that certain | |||
of the MOVs with deftetent wire did not have to be on the EQ master list at the | |||
time of the inspection. These MOVs are associated with satisfying Regulatory | |||
Guide 1.97 guidance. However, it 15 noted that the identification of these | |||
deficiencies lead to your staff's identification of unqualified wire in 11 | |||
MOVs in the charging and safety injection system. The NRC notes that this | |||
' | |||
wire issue, which was identified by the NRC in May 1988, was not evaluated | |||
under the n.odified EQ enforcement policy set forth in Generic letter 88-07 | |||
because that policy applies only to those violations that existed prior to | |||
l | |||
November 30, 1985, which were identified prior to completion of the first | |||
round of EQ inspections in mid April 1988. One potential violation discussed | |||
, | |||
at the enforcement conference (50-334/86-12-01) relating to the qualification | |||
of Continental Silicone Rubber insulated cable is no longer considered to be a | |||
violation. | |||
I.i addition to the above, se identified deficiencies in Duquesne Light's | |||
handling of the Victoreen HRRM cable assembly qualification. | |||
Based on | |||
r | |||
informaticn provided at the enforcement conference, we determined that you | |||
were aware of generic qualification problems with the cable assembly prior | |||
4 | |||
to November 1985. However, it does not appear that you had analyzed the | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
IR BV1 88-12/21 - 0001.0.0 | |||
10/17/88 | |||
i | |||
8911010264 881020 | |||
{DR | |||
ADOCK 0500g 4 | |||
X E '. C. ) h | |||
. | |||
-_ | |||
-. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
__ | |||
, | |||
-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ | |||
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ | |||
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
, | |||
. | |||
* | |||
* | |||
' | |||
OCT a 01908 | |||
g, | |||
i | |||
Ouquesne Light Company | |||
2 | |||
I | |||
magnitude of potential HRRM errors at that time or that you had made your | |||
operators specifically aware of these deficiencies to guide them in their | |||
use. | |||
In addition, there is no indication that you requested NRC relief from | |||
the accuracy requirements of RG 1.47 as they apply to the HRRM. With regard | |||
to the unidentified wires in the MOVs, we determined that a number of these | |||
deficiencies were a result of inadequate training of the individuals performing | |||
the first round of MOV EQ inspections and inade wate inspection criteria. | |||
You are required to respond to this letter. | |||
In preparing your response you | |||
should follow the instructions in Appendix A. | |||
In addition to your response to | |||
the violation, you should address the reason for the above deficiencies and | |||
your actions to prevent a recurrence of these deficiencies. | |||
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying notice are not | |||
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as | |||
required by the Paper Wo.k Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511. | |||
Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Origin:1 Si:nc:1 By: | |||
Thomas T. Martin | |||
Thomas T. Martin, Director | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Enclosure: Appendix A, Notice of Violation | |||
cc w/ enc 1: | |||
J. J. Carey, Executive Vice President, Operations | |||
J. O. Crockett, General Manager, Corporate Nuclear Services | |||
W. S. Lacey, General Manager, Nuclear Operations | |||
N. R. Tonet, Managar Nuclear Engineering | |||
T. P. Noonan, Plant Manager | |||
C. E. Ewing, QA Manager | |||
K. D. Grada, Manager, Nuclear Safety | |||
Public Document Room (POR) | |||
local Public Document Room (LPOR) | |||
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC) | |||
NRC Resident Inspector | |||
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania | |||
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
IR BV1 88-12/21 - 0002.0.0 | |||
10/17/88 | |||
. | |||
. | |||
' | |||
* | |||
OCT 2 01983 | |||
. | |||
. | |||
Duquesne light Company | |||
3 | |||
bec w/ encl: | |||
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences) | |||
Management Assistant, ORMA (w/o encl) | |||
L. Tripp, ORP | |||
0. Limroth, ORP | |||
P. Tam, LPM, NRR | |||
R. Bores, DRSS | |||
U. Potapovs | |||
H. Wong | |||
PAO-(-10)- | |||
_ . . _ . _ _d k .l.' | |||
d .. f .t., | |||
9 ,' (' 1 _ | |||
_ _ __ _ _ _ _ | |||
s., | |||
_ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . - - - . _ | |||
_ | |||
. _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . | |||
/k:DRS | |||
RI:DRS | |||
RI:DRS | |||
RI:NRR | |||
RI: | |||
I:RA | |||
/ | |||
Anderson /pmb/rw | |||
Durr | |||
Martin | |||
Potapovs | |||
Holody | |||
Russell | |||
0/ /88 | |||
__ | |||
10/_ /88 10/ /88 | |||
20/-/Bk l0/ /38 10/ .88 | |||
' | |||
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
IR BV1 88-12/21 - 0003.0.0 | |||
10/17/88 | |||
- | |||
- _ _ _ _ | |||
007 2 0 1933 | |||
. | |||
Ouquesne Light Company | |||
3 | |||
. | |||
e | |||
of | |||
gh | |||
.In | |||
p,k. 4.. .t.6 9 . | |||
n... A .. | |||
A ,. - | |||
ca r '' n . ,, | |||
l | |||
l | |||
cfC | |||
cja (>f wv'Y | |||
O]Q, | |||
RI:0RS | |||
RI:0RS | |||
RI:DRS | |||
RI:NRR | |||
RI:E0' | |||
RI:RA | |||
Anderson /pmb/rw | |||
Durr | |||
l'Hartin | |||
Potapovs | |||
Holody | |||
Russell | |||
9//(/88 | |||
9// f/88 | |||
9// s'/88 | |||
9/-78 f~ | |||
9/l4 88 | |||
9/ /88 | |||
/ | |||
/ +//3/55 | |||
0FFICTAL RECORD COPY | |||
IR BV1 8S-12/21 - 0002.0.0 | |||
l | |||
09/15/88 | |||
l | |||
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - - _ _ _ _ | |||
_ | |||
j | |||
}} | |||
Latest revision as of 21:24, 23 May 2025
| ML20205K629 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 10/20/1988 |
| From: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Sieber J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205K632 | List: |
| References | |
| EA-88-178, NUDOCS 8811010264 | |
| Download: ML20205K629 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000334/1986012
Text
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
._
_ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'.
,
.
.
OCT 2 01988
Docket No. 50-334
License No. DPR-66
Duquesne Light Company
ATTN: Mr. J. O. Sieber
Vice President
Nuclear Group
Post Office Box 4
Shippingport, Pennsylvania
15077
Gentlemen:
Subject:
Inspection Report Nos: 50-334/36-12, 50-334/88-21
This letter refers to equipment qualification inspections conducted on
June 9-13, 1986 and May 9-13, 1988 at the Beaver Valley 1 Power Plant.
The
in vection reports were sent to you on October 31, 1986 and August 3, 1983
respectively.
Based on the results of these inspections it appears that certain of your
'
activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as
set forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.
At the
time of these inspections, several items (50-334/86-12-03 and 50-334/88-21-02)
were identified as potential enforcement i* ems.
Based on subsequent informa-
tion furnished by you at the Enforcement Jenference on August 12, 1988, the
NRC has categorized these as a Severity Level IV violation in accordance with
the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
With regard to the violation relating to unqualified
wire in Motor Operated Valves (MOV) (50-334/88-21-02), it appears that certain
of the MOVs with deftetent wire did not have to be on the EQ master list at the
time of the inspection. These MOVs are associated with satisfying Regulatory
Guide 1.97 guidance. However, it 15 noted that the identification of these
deficiencies lead to your staff's identification of unqualified wire in 11
MOVs in the charging and safety injection system. The NRC notes that this
'
wire issue, which was identified by the NRC in May 1988, was not evaluated
under the n.odified EQ enforcement policy set forth in Generic letter 88-07
because that policy applies only to those violations that existed prior to
l
November 30, 1985, which were identified prior to completion of the first
round of EQ inspections in mid April 1988. One potential violation discussed
,
at the enforcement conference (50-334/86-12-01) relating to the qualification
of Continental Silicone Rubber insulated cable is no longer considered to be a
violation.
I.i addition to the above, se identified deficiencies in Duquesne Light's
handling of the Victoreen HRRM cable assembly qualification.
Based on
r
informaticn provided at the enforcement conference, we determined that you
were aware of generic qualification problems with the cable assembly prior
4
to November 1985. However, it does not appear that you had analyzed the
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
IR BV1 88-12/21 - 0001.0.0
10/17/88
i
8911010264 881020
{DR
ADOCK 0500g 4
X E '. C. ) h
.
-_
-.
.
.
.
.
__
,
-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,
.
'
OCT a 01908
g,
i
Ouquesne Light Company
2
I
magnitude of potential HRRM errors at that time or that you had made your
operators specifically aware of these deficiencies to guide them in their
use.
In addition, there is no indication that you requested NRC relief from
the accuracy requirements of RG 1.47 as they apply to the HRRM. With regard
to the unidentified wires in the MOVs, we determined that a number of these
deficiencies were a result of inadequate training of the individuals performing
the first round of MOV EQ inspections and inade wate inspection criteria.
You are required to respond to this letter.
In preparing your response you
should follow the instructions in Appendix A.
In addition to your response to
the violation, you should address the reason for the above deficiencies and
your actions to prevent a recurrence of these deficiencies.
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paper Wo.k Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Origin:1 Si:nc:1 By:
Thomas T. Martin
Thomas T. Martin, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosure: Appendix A, Notice of Violation
cc w/ enc 1:
J. J. Carey, Executive Vice President, Operations
J. O. Crockett, General Manager, Corporate Nuclear Services
W. S. Lacey, General Manager, Nuclear Operations
N. R. Tonet, Managar Nuclear Engineering
T. P. Noonan, Plant Manager
C. E. Ewing, QA Manager
K. D. Grada, Manager, Nuclear Safety
Public Document Room (POR)
local Public Document Room (LPOR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
NRC Resident Inspector
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
IR BV1 88-12/21 - 0002.0.0
10/17/88
.
.
'
OCT 2 01983
.
.
Duquesne light Company
3
bec w/ encl:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Management Assistant, ORMA (w/o encl)
L. Tripp, ORP
0. Limroth, ORP
P. Tam, LPM, NRR
R. Bores, DRSS
U. Potapovs
H. Wong
PAO-(-10)-
_ . . _ . _ _d k .l.'
d .. f .t.,
9 ,' (' 1 _
_ _ __ _ _ _ _
s.,
_ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . - - - . _
_
. _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ .
/k:DRS
RI:DRS
RI:DRS
RI:NRR
RI:
I:RA
/
Anderson /pmb/rw
Durr
Martin
Potapovs
Holody
Russell
0/ /88
__
10/_ /88 10/ /88
20/-/Bk l0/ /38 10/ .88
'
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
IR BV1 88-12/21 - 0003.0.0
10/17/88
-
- _ _ _ _
007 2 0 1933
.
Ouquesne Light Company
3
.
e
of
gh
.In
p,k. 4.. .t.6 9 .
n... A ..
A ,. -
ca r n . ,,
l
l
cfC
cja (>f wv'Y
O]Q,
RI:0RS
RI:0RS
RI:DRS
RI:NRR
RI:E0'
RI:RA
Anderson /pmb/rw
Durr
l'Hartin
Potapovs
Holody
Russell
9//(/88
9// f/88
9// s'/88
9/-78 f~
9/l4 88
9/ /88
/
/ +//3/55
0FFICTAL RECORD COPY
IR BV1 8S-12/21 - 0002.0.0
l
09/15/88
l
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - - _ _ _ _
_
j