ML20137H912: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20137H912
| number = ML20137H912
| issue date = 02/04/1997
| issue date = 02/04/1997
| title = Supports Commission'S Preliminary Decision on DSI-4, Nrc'S Relationship W/Agreement States, Subject to Listed Mods
| title = Supports Commissions Preliminary Decision on DSI-4, NRCs Relationship W/Agreement States, Subject to Listed Mods
| author name = Jackson S, The Chairman
| author name = Jackson S, The Chairman
| author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
| author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- -           . -.          . _ .  .  .              -      - -            - _ - - -    _      .. .
{{#Wiki_filter:- -
  ' [pwa         *,
' [pwa
NUCLEAR RE           TO         OMMISSION
* I NUCLEAR RE TO OMMISSION RELEASED TO THE PDR WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555. @ 01 E
* RELEASED TO THE PDR
+h/N MJ j.;
* I WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555. @ 01 E
February 4,1997 k...../
February 4,1997                      +h/N             MJ         j.;
dato initials CHARMAN MEMORANDUM TO:
k...../
Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan 5
CHARMAN
FROM:
                                                                                  . dato         initials MEMORANDUM TO:       Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan FROM:                 Shirley Ann Jackson                       Q,                       5
Shirley Ann Jackson Q,


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
COMSECY-96-054, NRC'S RELATION HIP WITH AGREEMENT STATES (DSI-4)
COMSECY-96-054, NRC'S RELATION HIP WITH AGREEMENT STATES (DSI-4)
I continue to support the Commission's preliminary decision on this Direction-Setting Issue (DSI) subject to the following                                                 i modifications.
I continue to support the Commission's preliminary decision on this Direction-Setting Issue (DSI) subject to the following i
With regard to the funding of Agreement State travel and technical assistance, I am in. favor of the staff developing                                               ;
modifications.
criteria, for the Commission's consideration, for determining whether the NRC should fund Agreement States if stat.e funds are                                             !
With regard to the funding of Agreement State travel and technical assistance, I am in. favor of the staff developing criteria, for the Commission's consideration, for determining whether the NRC should fund Agreement States if stat.e funds are either unavailable for such purposes or state funds cannot be used for such purposes.
either unavailable for such purposes or state funds cannot be used for such purposes.
I agree with the comments of Commissioner McGaffigan on the issue of whether the NRC should use either intangible incentives or
I agree with the comments of Commissioner McGaffigan on the issue of whether the NRC should use either intangible incentives or
          " seed" money to encourage States to become Agreement States.                           The public comments received on this issue did not support the concept of providing either tangible benefits or " seed" money for this purpose.
" seed" money to encourage States to become Agreement States.
I I would also like the staff to examine cost-effective alternatives for providing Agreement State training and technical assistance.
The public comments received on this issue did not support the concept of providing either tangible benefits or " seed" money for this purpose.
I would also like the staff to examine cost-effective alternatives for providing Agreement State training and technical assistance.
In the longer term, I believe that NRC should request Congrens to enact legislation that would exclude Agreement State funding from l
In the longer term, I believe that NRC should request Congrens to enact legislation that would exclude Agreement State funding from l
the NRC's user base and provide a separate appropriation to cover these costs. The Agreement States themselves need to be more proactive on this matter, and more forthcoming with methodologies                                         i I
the NRC's user base and provide a separate appropriation to cover these costs.
for having the Agreement States shoulder a larger share of the expense of travel and technical assistance.
The Agreement States themselves need to be more proactive on this matter, and more forthcoming with methodologies i
!          cc:   EDO OGC                                                                                                   l
I for having the Agreement States shoulder a larger share of the expense of travel and technical assistance.
;                SECY                                                                                                 J
cc:
;                                                                                                                      f 1
EDO OGC SECY J
1 9704030155 970401 PD84     NRCSA I
f 1
\   4                 PDR                                                                                             l
1 9704030155 970401 PD84 NRCSA I
        's           -              ,                                ,    _ - . ,}}
\\
4 PDR
's
_ -.,}}

Latest revision as of 23:17, 11 December 2024

Supports Commissions Preliminary Decision on DSI-4, NRCs Relationship W/Agreement States, Subject to Listed Mods
ML20137H912
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/04/1997
From: Shirley Ann Jackson, The Chairman
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Diaz N, Dicus G, Mcgaffigan E, Rogers K
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20137H889 List:
References
COMSECY-96-054, COMSECY-96-54, DSI-4, SECY-96-054-C, SECY-96-54-C, NUDOCS 9704030155
Download: ML20137H912 (1)


Text

- -

' [pwa

  • I NUCLEAR RE TO OMMISSION RELEASED TO THE PDR WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555. @ 01 E

+h/N MJ j.;

February 4,1997 k...../

dato initials CHARMAN MEMORANDUM TO:

Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan 5

FROM:

Shirley Ann Jackson Q,

SUBJECT:

COMSECY-96-054, NRC'S RELATION HIP WITH AGREEMENT STATES (DSI-4)

I continue to support the Commission's preliminary decision on this Direction-Setting Issue (DSI) subject to the following i

modifications.

With regard to the funding of Agreement State travel and technical assistance, I am in. favor of the staff developing criteria, for the Commission's consideration, for determining whether the NRC should fund Agreement States if stat.e funds are either unavailable for such purposes or state funds cannot be used for such purposes.

I agree with the comments of Commissioner McGaffigan on the issue of whether the NRC should use either intangible incentives or

" seed" money to encourage States to become Agreement States.

The public comments received on this issue did not support the concept of providing either tangible benefits or " seed" money for this purpose.

I would also like the staff to examine cost-effective alternatives for providing Agreement State training and technical assistance.

In the longer term, I believe that NRC should request Congrens to enact legislation that would exclude Agreement State funding from l

the NRC's user base and provide a separate appropriation to cover these costs.

The Agreement States themselves need to be more proactive on this matter, and more forthcoming with methodologies i

I for having the Agreement States shoulder a larger share of the expense of travel and technical assistance.

cc:

EDO OGC SECY J

f 1

1 9704030155 970401 PD84 NRCSA I

\\

4 PDR

's

_ -.,