ML20141J501: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:L-                                                                              4 74 A
{{#Wiki_filter:4 74 A
  ~
L-
                                            APR 22 G86
~
                                                        .
APR 22 G86
          Docket No. 50-454
.
          Commonwealth Edison Company
Docket No. 50-454
          ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed
Commonwealth Edison Company
                  Vice President
ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed
          Post Office Box 767
Vice President
          Chicago, IL 60690
Post Office Box 767
          Gentlemen:
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
1-
1-
          Thank you for your letter dated March 21, 1986, informing us of the steps you
Thank you for your letter dated March 21, 1986, informing us of the steps you
          have taken to correct the violations which we brought to ycur attention in
have taken to correct the violations which we brought to ycur attention in
          Inspection Report No. 50-454/86002 forwarded by our letter dated February 20,
Inspection Report No. 50-454/86002 forwarded by our letter dated February 20,
          1986. Your response appears adequate and we will examine these matters during
1986. Your response appears adequate and we will examine these matters during
          subsequent inspections.
subsequent inspections.
          With regards to your request for us to reconsider the classification of
With regards to your request for us to reconsider the classification of
          Violations 1 and 4, we have reviewed the violations and consider the severity
Violations 1 and 4, we have reviewed the violations and consider the severity
          levels assigned to be appropriate. While our inspection report summary indicated
levels assigned to be appropriate. While our inspection report summary indicated
          that these violations "were of minor safety significance," af ter the missed
that these violations "were of minor safety significance," af ter the missed
          surveillances were satisfactorily performed, this characterization was intended
surveillances were satisfactorily performed, this characterization was intended
          to appropriately reflect the immediate impact on public safety. The severity
to appropriately reflect the immediate impact on public safety. The severity
          level assigned to these violations is based on the safety significance of the
level assigned to these violations is based on the safety significance of the
          regulatory requirements involved. Thus, violations 1 and 4 are of Level IV
regulatory requirements involved.
          Severity as prescribed by 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, Supplement I.D. which
Thus, violations 1 and 4 are of Level IV
          states: " Violations involving for example: (1) A less significant violation
Severity as prescribed by 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, Supplement I.D. which
          of a Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation where the
states: " Violations involving for example: (1) A less significant violation
          appropriate Action Statement was not satisfied within the time allotment by
of a Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation where the
          the Action Statement.   .. ."
appropriate Action Statement was not satisfied within the time allotment by
          In the future, we will summarize our inspection findings in terms rore consistent
the Action Statement.
          with the terminology as contained in 10 CFR Part 2.
."
          I trust this is responsive to your concern.     Should you have any additional
..
          questions please call me.
In the future, we will summarize our inspection findings in terms rore consistent
with the terminology as contained in 10 CFR Part 2.
I trust this is responsive to your concern.
Should you have any additional
questions please call me.
,
,
'
'
                                                  Sincerely,
Sincerely,
                                                  807igind Si,"L'd 5 b " C' "       *
807igind Si,"L'd 5 b " C' "
                                                  Charles E. Norelius, Director
*
                                                  Division of Reactor Projects
Charles E. Norelius, Director
          See Attached Distribution                                                             .
Division of Reactor Projects
                                                                                            , lle
See Attached Distribution
                                                                                            ~
.
            86o4asoiss e604224$4
, lle
              DR   ADOCK o
~
                                                                                                  g\
g\\
                                  DR -
86o4asoiss e60422
    -
DR
ADOCK o
4$4
DR
-
-


    ',                                                       :-
',
  '
:-
                                                              .
'
,
,
        Commonwealth Edison                     2 APR 221986
.
        Distribution
Commonwealth Edison
        cc: D. L. Farrar, Director
2
                of Nuclear Licensing
APR 221986
            V. I. Schlosser, Project Manager
Distribution
            Gunner Sorensen, Site Project
cc:
                Superintendent
D. L. Farrar, Director
            R. E. Querio, Plant Manager
of Nuclear Licensing
            DCS/RSB (RIDS)
V. I. Schlosser, Project Manager
            Licensing Fee Management Branch
Gunner Sorensen, Site Project
            Resident Inspector, RIII Byron
Superintendent
            Resident Inspector, RIII
R. E. Querio, Plant Manager
                Braidwood
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
            Phyllis Dunton, Attorney
Licensing Fee Management Branch
                General's Office, Environmental
Resident Inspector, RIII Byron
                Control Division
Resident Inspector, RIII
            D. W. Cassel, Jr. , Esq.
Braidwood
            Diane Chavez, DAARE/ SAFE
Phyllis Dunton, Attorney
            Steve Lewis, ELD
General's Office, Environmental
            L. Olshan, NRR LPM
Control Division
            H. S. Taylor, Quality Assurance
D. W. Cassel, Jr. , Esq.
                Division
Diane Chavez, DAARE/ SAFE
      y'e s
Steve Lewis, ELD
        RIII             RII           RIII
L. Olshan, NRR LPM
      W^
H. S. Taylor, Quality Assurance
        Lerch/jlk         o se
Division
                                        K'fl0
y'e s
                                        Warnick
RIII
      du/n             y/>. ,r
RII
RIII
W^
K'fl0
Lerch/jlk
o
se
Warnick
du/n
y/>. ,r
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 14:33, 11 December 2024

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-454/86-02. Classification of Violations 1 & 4 Reviewed & Severity Levels Assigned Found to Be Appropriate
ML20141J501
Person / Time
Site: Byron 
Issue date: 04/22/1986
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8604280155
Download: ML20141J501 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000454/1986002

Text

4 74 A

L-

~

APR 22 G86

.

Docket No. 50-454

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed

Vice President

Post Office Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Gentlemen:

1-

Thank you for your letter dated March 21, 1986, informing us of the steps you

have taken to correct the violations which we brought to ycur attention in

Inspection Report No. 50-454/86002 forwarded by our letter dated February 20,

1986. Your response appears adequate and we will examine these matters during

subsequent inspections.

With regards to your request for us to reconsider the classification of

Violations 1 and 4, we have reviewed the violations and consider the severity

levels assigned to be appropriate. While our inspection report summary indicated

that these violations "were of minor safety significance," af ter the missed

surveillances were satisfactorily performed, this characterization was intended

to appropriately reflect the immediate impact on public safety. The severity

level assigned to these violations is based on the safety significance of the

regulatory requirements involved.

Thus, violations 1 and 4 are of Level IV

Severity as prescribed by 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, Supplement I.D. which

states: " Violations involving for example: (1) A less significant violation

of a Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation where the

appropriate Action Statement was not satisfied within the time allotment by

the Action Statement.

."

..

In the future, we will summarize our inspection findings in terms rore consistent

with the terminology as contained in 10 CFR Part 2.

I trust this is responsive to your concern.

Should you have any additional

questions please call me.

,

'

Sincerely,

807igind Si,"L'd 5 b " C' "

Charles E. Norelius, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

See Attached Distribution

.

, lle

~

g\\

86o4asoiss e60422

DR

ADOCK o

4$4

DR

-

-

',

-

'

,

.

Commonwealth Edison

2

APR 221986

Distribution

cc:

D. L. Farrar, Director

of Nuclear Licensing

V. I. Schlosser, Project Manager

Gunner Sorensen, Site Project

Superintendent

R. E. Querio, Plant Manager

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII Byron

Resident Inspector, RIII

Braidwood

Phyllis Dunton, Attorney

General's Office, Environmental

Control Division

D. W. Cassel, Jr. , Esq.

Diane Chavez, DAARE/ SAFE

Steve Lewis, ELD

L. Olshan, NRR LPM

H. S. Taylor, Quality Assurance

Division

y'e s

RIII

RII

RIII

W^

K'fl0

Lerch/jlk

o

se

Warnick

du/n

y/>. ,r

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20141J501&oldid=4184956"