05000483/FIN-2013005-04: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71124.08 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71124.08 | ||
| Inspector = B Baca, G George, J Braisted, J O, | | Inspector = B Baca, G George, J Braisted, J O'Donnell, J Patel, L Ricketson, M Williams, N O'Keefe, P Hernandez, S Alferink, T Hartman, Z Hollcraft | ||
| CCA = H.7 | | CCA = H.7 | ||
| INPO aspect = WP.3 | | INPO aspect = WP.3 | ||
| description = The inspectors reviewed a self-revealing non-cited violation of 10 CFR 71.5(a) for the failure to describe a radioactive material shipment correctly and the failure to include all required hazard communication information in a radioactive shipment document. The licensee entered this issue into the corrective action program as Callaway Action Request 201204454 and licensee representatives stated procedure guidance will be revised as a corrective action. Failure to correctly describe a radioactive material shipment correctly and to include all required hazard communication information in accordance with federal hazardous material transportation regulations was a performance deficiency. The performance deficiency was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the Public Radiation Safety Cornerstone attribute of program and process (transportation program) and adversely affected the associated cornerstone objective to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety from exposure to radioactive materials released into the public domain as a result of routine civilian nuclear reactor operation, in that it resulted in the incorrect identification and quantification of radioactive material transported in the public domain. Using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix D, ?Public Radiation Safety Significance Determination Process,? dated February 12, 2008, the inspectors determined this to be of very low safety significance (Green) because the violation did not involve the radioactive effluent release program or the radiological environmental monitoring program, but the violation did involve the transportation of radioactive material. The violation was not (1) in excess of radiation limits, (2) a breach of package during transit, (3) a certificate of compliance issue, (4) a low-level burial ground noncompliance, or (5) a failure to make notifications or provide emergency information. The violation has a human performance cross-cutting aspect associated with licensee resources, in that the licensee had insufficient instruction in its shipping guidance to ensure package contents were verified [H.2(c)]. | | description = The inspectors reviewed a self-revealing non-cited violation of 10 CFR 71.5(a) for the failure to describe a radioactive material shipment correctly and the failure to include all required hazard communication information in a radioactive shipment document. The licensee entered this issue into the corrective action program as Callaway Action Request 201204454 and licensee representatives stated procedure guidance will be revised as a corrective action. Failure to correctly describe a radioactive material shipment correctly and to include all required hazard communication information in accordance with federal hazardous material transportation regulations was a performance deficiency. The performance deficiency was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the Public Radiation Safety Cornerstone attribute of program and process (transportation program) and adversely affected the associated cornerstone objective to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety from exposure to radioactive materials released into the public domain as a result of routine civilian nuclear reactor operation, in that it resulted in the incorrect identification and quantification of radioactive material transported in the public domain. Using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix D, ?Public Radiation Safety Significance Determination Process,? dated February 12, 2008, the inspectors determined this to be of very low safety significance (Green) because the violation did not involve the radioactive effluent release program or the radiological environmental monitoring program, but the violation did involve the transportation of radioactive material. The violation was not (1) in excess of radiation limits, (2) a breach of package during transit, (3) a certificate of compliance issue, (4) a low-level burial ground noncompliance, or (5) a failure to make notifications or provide emergency information. The violation has a human performance cross-cutting aspect associated with licensee resources, in that the licensee had insufficient instruction in its shipping guidance to ensure package contents were verified [H.2(c)]. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:20, 22 February 2018
| Site: | Callaway  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000483/2013005 Section 2RS8 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2013 (2013Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Pr Safety |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71124.08 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | B Baca G George J Braisted J O'Donnell J Patel L Ricketson M Williams N O'Keefe P Hernandez S Alferink T Hartman Z Hollcraft |
| Violation of: | 10 CFR 71.5 |
| CCA | H.7, Documentation |
| INPO aspect | WP.3 |
| ' | |