05000269/FIN-2010005-06: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = Licensee | | identified by = Licensee | ||
| Inspection procedure = | | Inspection procedure = | ||
| Inspector = A Sabisch, G Ottenberg, C Even, J Hamman, M Coursey, K Ellis, J Bartley, J Rivera | | Inspector = A Sabisch, G Ottenberg, C Even, J Hamman, M Coursey, K Ellis, J Bartley, J Rivera-Ortiz | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions or procedures appropriate to the circumstances. Contrary to the above, on September 23, 2010, during post maintenance testing following the stator repair of Keowee Hydro Unit (KHU) 1, the licensee identified that post maintenance test procedure, PT/0/A/0610/024, Keowee Emergency Start for Troubleshooting and Post Maintenance Checkouts, did not properly verify that TS SR 3.8.1.9 acceptance criteria was met. The same deficiency was also found to exist in the routine emergency start surveillance test procedure, PT/0/A/0620/016, Keowee Hydro Emergency Start Test. Based on subsequent analysis of the actual test data, the licensee concluded that operability of the KHUs had been maintained. Following identification of the procedural deficiency, the licensee developed corrective actions to revise the procedures to ensure the test acceptance criteria is appropriately defined so that future tests ensure operability was verified during their performance. The licensee entered the finding into their CAP as PIP O-10-7357. | | description = 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions or procedures appropriate to the circumstances. Contrary to the above, on September 23, 2010, during post maintenance testing following the stator repair of Keowee Hydro Unit (KHU) 1, the licensee identified that post maintenance test procedure, PT/0/A/0610/024, Keowee Emergency Start for Troubleshooting and Post Maintenance Checkouts, did not properly verify that TS SR 3.8.1.9 acceptance criteria was met. The same deficiency was also found to exist in the routine emergency start surveillance test procedure, PT/0/A/0620/016, Keowee Hydro Emergency Start Test. Based on subsequent analysis of the actual test data, the licensee concluded that operability of the KHUs had been maintained. Following identification of the procedural deficiency, the licensee developed corrective actions to revise the procedures to ensure the test acceptance criteria is appropriately defined so that future tests ensure operability was verified during their performance. The licensee entered the finding into their CAP as PIP O-10-7357. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Oconee  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000269/2010005 Section 4OA7 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2010 (2010Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | No Cornerstone |
| Identified by: | Licensee-identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | |
| Inspectors (proximate) | A Sabisch G Ottenberg C Even J Hamman M Coursey K Ellis J Bartley J Rivera-Ortiz |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |