05000454/FIN-2008005-04: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = "10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected. Licensee Procedure LS-AA-125, Revision 12, Corrective Action Program (CAP) Procedure, was written in accordance with Criterion XVI. Step 2.12 of LS-AA-125 requires, in part, ...a Corrective Action is any action that meets any of the following.... Is necessary to restore a Significance Level 1, 2, or 3 Condition.... Contrary to the above, on October 22, 2008, licensee personnel failed to correct a condition adverse to quality as stated in IR 834410. Specifically, loose debris that had been left on the polar crane had not been removed prior to Unit 2 changing from Mode 5 to Mode 4. IR 834410 had been designated by the licensee as a Significance level 3 condition. This issue is of very low safety significance because this finding was not a design or qualification deficiency, did not result in loss of system or train safety function and was no | | description = \"10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected. Licensee Procedure LS-AA-125, Revision 12, Corrective Action Program (CAP) Procedure, was written in accordance with Criterion XVI. Step 2.12 of LS-AA-125 requires, in part, ...a Corrective Action is any action that meets any of the following.... Is necessary to restore a Significance Level 1, 2, or 3 Condition.... Contrary to the above, on October 22, 2008, licensee personnel failed to correct a condition adverse to quality as stated in IR 834410. Specifically, loose debris that had been left on the polar crane had not been removed prior to Unit 2 changing from Mode 5 to Mode 4. IR 834410 had been designated by the licensee as a Significance level 3 condition. This issue is of very low safety significance because this finding was not a design or qualification deficiency, did not result in loss of system or train safety function and was no | ||
safety significant due to external events. | safety significant due to external events.\ | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Byron  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000454/2008005 Section 4OA7 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2008 (2008Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | Licensee-identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | |
| Inspectors (proximate) | A Dunlop D Mcneil R Langstaff R Winter R Ng C Thompson B Bartlett J Cassidy D Jones R Skokowski J Gilliam B Jones |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |