05000277/FIN-2008005-01: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| CCA = H.5 | | CCA = H.5 | ||
| INPO aspect = WP.1 | | INPO aspect = WP.1 | ||
| description = A self-revealing (Green) NCV of Technical Specification (TS) 5.4.1 was identified when operators inadequately implemented an abnormal operating (AO) procedure on two occasions. Specifically, an event where the Unit 2 Division II direct current (DC) electrical power subsystem was inoperable for longer than the allowed outage time specified in Unit 3 TS 3.8.4, resulted from PBAPS personnel not recognizing the existence of conflicting procedure guidance and the improper removal of a configuration control tool. This finding is more than minor because it was associated with the human performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone, and impacted the cornerstone objective of ensuring the reliability of the Unit 2, Division II, DC electrical power subsystem to respond to initiating events, in that, one of its associated battery chargers was being supplied from a non-qualified alternating current (AC) power source. The inspectors concluded that this finding affected the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and answered "No" to all relevant questions. Specifically, the supply of a non-qualified AC power source to the Unit 2, Division II DC electrical power system was a qualification issue confirmed not to result in a loss of functionality. Although the Unit 2, Division II DC electrical power system was inoperable for longer than its 12-hour TS allowed outage time, this qualification issue did not result in an actual loss of safety function. Therefore, this finding was considered to be of very low safety significance (Green). The inspectors determined that this finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance (work control component) because PBAPS personnel did not adequately coordinate work activities by incorporating actions to address: the impact of changes to the work scope or activity on the plant and human performance; nor the need to keep personnel apprised of the operational impact of work activities; and plant conditions that may affect work when conflicting procedures led to inadequate procedure adherence and the unplanned inoperability of the Unit 2 Division II DC electrical subsystem. [IMC 0305 aspect: H.3(b)]. (Section 4OA3.1 | | description = A self-revealing (Green) NCV of Technical Specification (TS) 5.4.1 was identified when operators inadequately implemented an abnormal operating (AO) procedure on two occasions. Specifically, an event where the Unit 2 Division II direct current (DC) electrical power subsystem was inoperable for longer than the allowed outage time specified in Unit 3 TS 3.8.4, resulted from PBAPS personnel not recognizing the existence of conflicting procedure guidance and the improper removal of a configuration control tool. This finding is more than minor because it was associated with the human performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone, and impacted the cornerstone objective of ensuring the reliability of the Unit 2, Division II, DC electrical power subsystem to respond to initiating events, in that, one of its associated battery chargers was being supplied from a non-qualified alternating current (AC) power source. The inspectors concluded that this finding affected the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and answered \"No\" to all relevant questions. Specifically, the supply of a non-qualified AC power source to the Unit 2, Division II DC electrical power system was a qualification issue confirmed not to result in a loss of functionality. Although the Unit 2, Division II DC electrical power system was inoperable for longer than its 12-hour TS allowed outage time, this qualification issue did not result in an actual loss of safety function. Therefore, this finding was considered to be of very low safety significance (Green). The inspectors determined that this finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance (work control component) because PBAPS personnel did not adequately coordinate work activities by incorporating actions to address: the impact of changes to the work scope or activity on the plant and human performance; nor the need to keep personnel apprised of the operational impact of work activities; and plant conditions that may affect work when conflicting procedures led to inadequate procedure adherence and the unplanned inoperability of the Unit 2 Division II DC electrical subsystem. [IMC 0305 aspect: H.3(b)]. (Section 4OA3.1 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:36, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000277/2008005 Section 4OA3 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2008 (2008Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | Self-revealing |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71153 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | R Fuhrmeister T Fish R Nimitz F Bower H Jones S Chaudhary P Krohn M Brown G Johnson |
| CCA | H.5, Work Management |
| INPO aspect | WP.1 |
| ' | |