ML17257A528: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
We have reviewed the draft evaluation of SEP Topic IX-4, provided by your letter dated July 27, 1981 and agree with the assessment and conclusions. We also offer the following comments: | We have reviewed the draft evaluation of SEP Topic IX-4, provided by your letter dated July 27, 1981 and agree with the assessment and conclusions. We also offer the following comments: | ||
We suggest that the second and third sentences of the Intro-duction be rewritten as follows: "In this initial injection mode, borated water is provided from the boric acid tanks, | We suggest that the second and third sentences of the Intro-duction be rewritten as follows: "In this initial injection mode, borated water is provided from the boric acid tanks, the refueling water storage tank, and the accumulators. | ||
the refueling water storage tank, and the accumulators. | |||
After this initial period, which will last at least'. 20 minutes for a large break LOCA, and longer for smaller breaks, the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) | After this initial period, which will last at least'. 20 minutes for a large break LOCA, and longer for smaller breaks, the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) | ||
: 2. The following additional documents should be referenced, although they do not change the conclusions of the assessment. | : 2. The following additional documents should be referenced, although they do not change the conclusions of the assessment. | ||
Revision as of 10:16, 4 February 2020
| ML17257A528 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna |
| Issue date: | 08/06/1981 |
| From: | Maier J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TASK-09-04, TASK-9-4, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8108130185 | |
| Download: ML17257A528 (4) | |
Text
REGULATORY ORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYS 8 (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR: 8108130185 DOC. DATE.: 81/08/06 NOTARIZED: No DOCKET 0 FACIL~:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant~ Unit ii Rocheste'r G 05000244 AUTH',NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MAIERp J.E'. Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corp.
RECIPe NAME~ RECIPIENT AFFILIATION CRUTCHF IELD g D ~ Operating Reactors Branch 5
SUBJECT:
Submits comments on NRC 810727 draft evaluation of SEP. Topic IX-4 re boron addition sys,L>>isted addi documents should be refer enced.
DISTRIBUTION CODE,: A035S COPIES RECEIVED: LTR Q ENCL' SIZE: J.
TITLE". SEP Topics NOTES: 1 copy;SEP Sect, Ldr. 050.00244 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME) LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ACTION: ORB 05 BC 04 INTERNALto A/D MATLEQUALi13>> CONT SYS A 07 HYD/GEO BR 10, I8E 06 NRC PDR 02 OR ASSESS BR 11. ENCL'XTERNALS:
01 SEP BR 12 ACRS 14 16 1 LPDR 03 NSIC 05 1 NTIS Q
TOTAL NUQBER OF COPIES R'EQUIRED: LTTR ENCL
l t
K ~ &% Ik .1 ll H
)l l
II
/////////////// ml/F p I( s>> YORK.'
l////","ill'OCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION o 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649 JOHN E. MAIER TEL N~
VICE PRESIDENT AREA C e CA ~
1$ Q August 6, 1981 -9' pUG 12198> I E(DO(ATOLL MI~ INmISSO<
~o Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (4 Attention: Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
SEP Topic IX-4, Boron Addition System R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket. No. 50-244
Dear Mr. Crutchfield:
We have reviewed the draft evaluation of SEP Topic IX-4, provided by your letter dated July 27, 1981 and agree with the assessment and conclusions. We also offer the following comments:
We suggest that the second and third sentences of the Intro-duction be rewritten as follows: "In this initial injection mode, borated water is provided from the boric acid tanks, the refueling water storage tank, and the accumulators.
After this initial period, which will last at least'. 20 minutes for a large break LOCA, and longer for smaller breaks, the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS)
- 2. The following additional documents should be referenced, although they do not change the conclusions of the assessment.
- a. Letter to B. C. Rusche, NRC, from L. D. White, Jr.,
RGK, dated April 1, 1975.
- b. Letter to T. M. Novak, NRC, from C. L. Caso, Westinghouse, CLC-NS-309, dated April 1, 1975.
- c. Letter to B. C. Rusche, NRC, from L. D. White, Jr.,
RGSE, dat:ed April 30, 1975.
- d. Letter to B. C. Rusche, NRC, from L. D. White, Jr.,
RG6E, dated May 13, 1975.
In addition, we have not, previously obtained a copy of Reference 1 and would appreciate receiving a copy.
Very truly yours, 8i080b 8i08i30185 05000244 Maier g$
0 tl ll ~ '4 t'f f
F