ML051540101: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Palo Verde ,\\I-// | ||
-I M | |||
7I-,-I - W-- | |||
Station Black Out Presentation To The Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 24, 2005 | |||
Palo Verde Agenda | |||
* Introductions Carl Churchman/ | |||
Mel Fields | |||
* Description of Proposed M. Karbassian Changes to Station Blackout Coping Strategy | |||
* Closing Remarks C. Churchman/ | |||
M. Fields | |||
Palo Verde B ackground | |||
* APS Power Uprate License Amendment Request | |||
- Increase Power by 2.94% for U1 & U3 | |||
- 3876 MWt to 3990 MWt | |||
- Currently being reviewed by NRC Staff | |||
* June 14, 2004 Loss of Off-site Power | |||
- Unit 1,2 & 3 | |||
* NRC RAI to APS | |||
- SBO Category P3 Plant with 16 hour Coping Strategy | |||
Palo Verde 41 Purpose | |||
* Identify Actions Necessary to Comply With 16 Hour Coping Strategy | |||
Palo Verde What is PV's SBO Design Basis | |||
- Alternate AC (AAC) Plant Per Reg Guide 1.155 & | |||
NUMARC 87-00 | |||
* Ltr 161-04146-WFC/MEP, dated August 31, 1991 | |||
* SE Dated February 11, 1992 (section 2.2.2) | |||
- Requirement for an AAC Plant | |||
* Demonstrate Coping W/O Power for 1 Hour | |||
* 4.2 MW GTG On Line within 1 hour | |||
* Demonstrate Coping With GTG available for an additional 3 Hours (Now 16 hours) | |||
Palo Verde Existing Strategy (4 hr Coping) | |||
Existing Analysis | |||
- Assumes 120 GPM RCS Leak Rate | |||
- Uses ADVs for Heat Removal | |||
- Start GTG Within 1 hr | |||
- Load EW/SP/EC/HVAC/Battery Chargers | |||
- Establish Charging for Inventory Control | |||
- Maintain Hot Standby Using ADVs | |||
- Remain @ Hot Standby for the Following 3 Hours | |||
Palo Verde (Cor Credited Future Strategy (16 hr Coping | |||
* Revised Analysis | |||
- Assume 83 GPM RCS Leak Rate | |||
- Minimize Operator Action During 1St hr | |||
- Start GTG, Within 1 hr | |||
- Load EW/SP/EC/HVAC/Battery Chargers | |||
- Use ADV for Heat Removal | |||
- Use HPSI for RCS Inventory Control | |||
- Uses Pressurizer Vent for Pressure Control | |||
- Cool Down to SDC Condition in 16 hrs | |||
Palo Verde Evaluation of Design Basis RCS Inventory | |||
* 4 hr Coping | |||
* 16 hr Coping | |||
- Core Remains Covered - Core Remains Covered | |||
- Credits Reflux Boiling - Natural Circulation | |||
* Reviewed by NRC | |||
* February 11, 1992 | |||
Palo Verde Hot Leg Temperatures (OF) tL5s ja:- am0 31 CI., | |||
I-I U10 Wo. | |||
Palo Verde Cold Leg Temperatures (OF) 550 ARCl 450 2t~ 4cMJ. | |||
2CU n DO Time (seconds,) | |||
Palo VerdePressurizer Pressure | |||
-\\I /., | |||
Hawley (PSIA) 2500 2000 1500 1 000 SOD 0l Time (seconds) | |||
Palo Verde Pressurizer Level (ft) 25 - | |||
0 - 15 | |||
- - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . l ID 5 ---- ......... . . .. .. . .. | |||
15 0 1OOD 20000 30000 4000D 50000 0i000 lime (seconds) | |||
Palo Verde Leak Flow (per RCP) | |||
(Ibmlsec) 2 - - - - . . . . . .. - -.-- - - | |||
1.2j . . | |||
I | |||
Palo1Vrde Evaluation of Condensate Inventory | |||
* 4 hr Coping | |||
* 16 hr Coping | |||
* Required Condensate | |||
* Required Condensate | |||
- 156000 gallons - 266000 gallons | |||
- Decay Heat - Decay Heat (ANSI + 2a) | |||
- Sensible Heat - Sensible Heat | |||
- SG Inventory Recovery - RSG Inventory Recovery | |||
* Per NUMARC Guidelines | |||
* Analyzed Using CENTS | |||
* Reviewed By NRC Code | |||
* February 11, 1992 | |||
* Methodology Change | |||
Palo Verde Integrated AFWS Flow (Ibm) | |||
..' . . . . . . . . . ._ . . . .- . . . . _. . . . _ . . . . | |||
. ' liE l | |||
-15 ' - . | |||
_- /9 41 ~ I I* | |||
I X) | |||
Palo Verde -\ I/ | |||
Evaluation of Condensate Inventory | |||
* Available Condensate Inventory | |||
- CST 300,000 gallons (Minimum Tech Spec) | |||
- RMWT 300,000 gallons Available (Not Tech Spec) | |||
Palo Verde XW - | |||
Evaluation of Class IE Battery Capacity | |||
* No Effect on Class lE Battery Capacity From 16 hr Coping | |||
- Battery Chargers are Loaded on to GTG Within 1 hr | |||
- Original Analysis Sized the Batteries to Support SBO for 2 Hours | |||
- Equipment Credited in the First Hour Remains Bounding | |||
Palo Verde ,S I/ | |||
Evaluation of Compressed Air Capacity | |||
* 4 hr Coping | |||
* 16 hr Coping | |||
- ADVs - ADVs | |||
* Nitrogen Accumulator | |||
* Insufficient Margin with | |||
- RCP Seal Bleedoff Nitrogen Accumulator. | |||
* Nitrogen Backup | |||
* Portable Diesel Driven Air Compressor Will be | |||
- 3082 gallon Tank Available for Connection | |||
- 65000 ft3 HP Cylinder to Support 1 hr Duration to Instrument Air Header | |||
- RCP Seal Bleedoff | |||
* Reviewed By NRC | |||
* No Change to IA Backup | |||
- July 28, 1992 | |||
- April 13, 1994 | |||
Palo Verde Evaluation of Loss of Ventilation Control, AFWP, DC Equip and Battery Rooms | |||
* 4 hr Coping | |||
* 16 hr Coping | |||
- Cooling is Loaded on to GTG - No Effect on the Heat loads for the Following Rooms Due to 16 hr Coping or Power Within 1 hr. Uprate | |||
* Control Room - Cooling will Be Loaded on to | |||
* AFWP Room the GTG within 1 hr. | |||
* DC Equipment Room | |||
* Switchgear Room | |||
* Battery Room | |||
* Reviewed by the NRC | |||
* No Effect Due to 16 hr | |||
- Feb 11, 1992 Coping Strategy Change | |||
- July 28, 1992 | |||
Palo Verde Evaluation of Loss of Ventilation Charging Pump Room and MSSS Bldg Upper Elev. | |||
* 4 hi- Coping | |||
* 16 hr Coping | |||
* No Credit was Given for Room - No Credit is Given for Cooling for the Following: Room Cooling for the | |||
- Charging Pump Room Identified Rooms, | |||
- MSSS Upper Elevation - Steady State Temperature in | |||
* Review by the NRC Chg Pump Room &MSSS Building Remains Below | |||
- Feb 11, 1992 Equipment Qualification | |||
- July 28, 1992 Temperature Criteria | |||
Palo Verde X1/ | |||
Evaluation of Loss of Ventilation Containment | |||
* 4 hr Coping | |||
* 16 hr Coping | |||
* Containment Containment | |||
- In house Code - COPPATA Code | |||
- Utilizes NUMARC Criteria | |||
* NRC Approved | |||
- Heat Sinks Per NUMARC | |||
* Used for Containment | |||
- Perform Temperature P/T analysis for LOCA Transient Analysis Vs | |||
* Heat Sinks Per UFSAR Steady State Solution 6.2 | |||
- Results Demonstrate | |||
- Results Demonstrate containment P/T remains Containment P/T remains bounded by the LOCA bounded by the LOCA P/T - Methodology Change | |||
Palo Verde Comparson of Containment Vapor temperature 1-SBO and limiting LOCA 300 280 260 240 L. | |||
I-E1 80 160 140 120 100 0 10 20 Time (hr) | |||
Palo Verde Comparson of Containment pressure SBO and limiting LOCA 80 | |||
-SBO @120gpm leakage | |||
- LOCA 70-60 - | |||
50 1C) a 40-Max i 27.5 PSIA 16 hr 30-20 5 10 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 Time (hr) | |||
Palo Verde Evaluation of Containment Isolation | |||
* 4 hr Coping | |||
* 16 hr Coping | |||
* Containment Isolation Valves | |||
* Will Not Reach RAS at 16 hrs Were reviewed for the | |||
* No Impact to the Containment applicability or exclusion to Isolation capability due to NUMARC 87-00 Criteria and PUR Or 16 hr Coping found acceptable | |||
* Located in UFSAR Tables 6.2.4-1 & 6.2.4-2 | |||
* Reviewed by the NRC | |||
- April 13, 1994 | |||
Palo Verde Evaluation of Communication | |||
* EPABX (Telephone) 8 hr battery | |||
* Plant 2 Way Radio 4 hr battery, Transfer Switch | |||
* Sound Power Phones | |||
Palo Verde Evaluation of Communication | |||
* 4 hr Coping | |||
* 16 hr Coping | |||
* Primary Modes of | |||
* Primary Mode of Communication Communication | |||
- EPABX Telephone - EPABX Telephone | |||
- Sound Power Phone * (8 hr Battery back-up) | |||
- Radios - Radios | |||
* (4 hr Battery back-up) | |||
* (Transfer Switch) | |||
* Reviewed by the NRC | |||
- Sound Power Phone | |||
- April 13, 1994 | |||
* Sufficient Battery Back-up to Cope for 1 Hour Until GTG Loads the Radio System | |||
Palo Verde r Summary | |||
* Regulatory Guide 1.155 Acceptance Criteria for 16 hr Coping Can Be Successfully Demonstrated | |||
* Methodology Changes Will Be Introduced for Consistency With the Current Safety Analysis Methods | |||
* New Equipment and Procedure Changes Are Necessary for Implementation of the 16 hr Coping Strategy}} | |||
Revision as of 21:59, 22 December 2019
| ML051540101 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde |
| Issue date: | 05/24/2005 |
| From: | Arizona Public Service Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML051540101 (27) | |
Text
Palo Verde ,\\I-//
-I M
7I-,-I - W--
Station Black Out Presentation To The Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 24, 2005
Palo Verde Agenda
- Introductions Carl Churchman/
Mel Fields
- Description of Proposed M. Karbassian Changes to Station Blackout Coping Strategy
- Closing Remarks C. Churchman/
M. Fields
Palo Verde B ackground
- APS Power Uprate License Amendment Request
- Increase Power by 2.94% for U1 & U3
- 3876 MWt to 3990 MWt
- Currently being reviewed by NRC Staff
- June 14, 2004 Loss of Off-site Power
- Unit 1,2 & 3
- SBO Category P3 Plant with 16 hour1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> Coping Strategy
Palo Verde 41 Purpose
- Identify Actions Necessary to Comply With 16 Hour Coping Strategy
Palo Verde What is PV's SBO Design Basis
- Alternate AC (AAC) Plant Per Reg Guide 1.155 &
- Ltr 161-04146-WFC/MEP, dated August 31, 1991
- SE Dated February 11, 1992 (section 2.2.2)
- Requirement for an AAC Plant
- Demonstrate Coping W/O Power for 1 Hour
- 4.2 MW GTG On Line within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />
- Demonstrate Coping With GTG available for an additional 3 Hours (Now 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br />)
Palo Verde Existing Strategy (4 hr Coping)
Existing Analysis
- Assumes 120 GPM RCS Leak Rate
- Uses ADVs for Heat Removal
- Start GTG Within 1 hr
- Load EW/SP/EC/HVAC/Battery Chargers
- Establish Charging for Inventory Control
- Maintain Hot Standby Using ADVs
- Remain @ Hot Standby for the Following 3 Hours
Palo Verde (Cor Credited Future Strategy (16 hr Coping
- Revised Analysis
- Assume 83 GPM RCS Leak Rate
- Minimize Operator Action During 1St hr
- Start GTG, Within 1 hr
- Load EW/SP/EC/HVAC/Battery Chargers
- Use ADV for Heat Removal
- Use HPSI for RCS Inventory Control
- Uses Pressurizer Vent for Pressure Control
- Cool Down to SDC Condition in 16 hrs
Palo Verde Evaluation of Design Basis RCS Inventory
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Core Remains Covered - Core Remains Covered
- Credits Reflux Boiling - Natural Circulation
- Reviewed by NRC
- February 11, 1992
Palo Verde Hot Leg Temperatures (OF) tL5s ja:- am0 31 CI.,
I-I U10 Wo.
Palo Verde Cold Leg Temperatures (OF) 550 ARCl 450 2t~ 4cMJ.
2CU n DO Time (seconds,)
Palo VerdePressurizer Pressure
-\\I /.,
Hawley (PSIA) 2500 2000 1500 1 000 SOD 0l Time (seconds)
Palo Verde Pressurizer Level (ft) 25 -
0 - 15
- - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . l ID 5 ---- ......... . . .. .. . ..
15 0 1OOD 20000 30000 4000D 50000 0i000 lime (seconds)
Palo Verde Leak Flow (per RCP)
(Ibmlsec) 2 - - - - . . . . . .. - -.-- - -
1.2j . .
I
Palo1Vrde Evaluation of Condensate Inventory
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Required Condensate
- Required Condensate
- 156000 gallons - 266000 gallons
- Decay Heat - Decay Heat (ANSI + 2a)
- Sensible Heat - Sensible Heat
- SG Inventory Recovery - RSG Inventory Recovery
- Per NUMARC Guidelines
- Analyzed Using CENTS
- Reviewed By NRC Code
- February 11, 1992
- Methodology Change
Palo Verde Integrated AFWS Flow (Ibm)
..' . . . . . . . . . ._ . . . .- . . . . _. . . . _ . . . .
. ' liE l
-15 ' - .
_- /9 41 ~ I I*
I X)
Palo Verde -\ I/
Evaluation of Condensate Inventory
- Available Condensate Inventory
- CST 300,000 gallons (Minimum Tech Spec)
- RMWT 300,000 gallons Available (Not Tech Spec)
Palo Verde XW -
Evaluation of Class IE Battery Capacity
- No Effect on Class lE Battery Capacity From 16 hr Coping
- Battery Chargers are Loaded on to GTG Within 1 hr
- Original Analysis Sized the Batteries to Support SBO for 2 Hours
- Equipment Credited in the First Hour Remains Bounding
Palo Verde ,S I/
Evaluation of Compressed Air Capacity
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- ADVs - ADVs
- Insufficient Margin with
- RCP Seal Bleedoff Nitrogen Accumulator.
- Nitrogen Backup
- Portable Diesel Driven Air Compressor Will be
- 3082 gallon Tank Available for Connection
- 65000 ft3 HP Cylinder to Support 1 hr Duration to Instrument Air Header
- RCP Seal Bleedoff
- Reviewed By NRC
- No Change to IA Backup
- July 28, 1992
- April 13, 1994
Palo Verde Evaluation of Loss of Ventilation Control, AFWP, DC Equip and Battery Rooms
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Cooling is Loaded on to GTG - No Effect on the Heat loads for the Following Rooms Due to 16 hr Coping or Power Within 1 hr. Uprate
- Control Room - Cooling will Be Loaded on to
- AFWP Room the GTG within 1 hr.
- DC Equipment Room
- Switchgear Room
- Battery Room
- Reviewed by the NRC
- No Effect Due to 16 hr
- Feb 11, 1992 Coping Strategy Change
- July 28, 1992
Palo Verde Evaluation of Loss of Ventilation Charging Pump Room and MSSS Bldg Upper Elev.
- 4 hi- Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- No Credit was Given for Room - No Credit is Given for Cooling for the Following: Room Cooling for the
- Charging Pump Room Identified Rooms,
- MSSS Upper Elevation - Steady State Temperature in
- Review by the NRC Chg Pump Room &MSSS Building Remains Below
- Feb 11, 1992 Equipment Qualification
- July 28, 1992 Temperature Criteria
Palo Verde X1/
Evaluation of Loss of Ventilation Containment
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Containment Containment
- In house Code - COPPATA Code
- Utilizes NUMARC Criteria
- NRC Approved
- Heat Sinks Per NUMARC
- Used for Containment
- Perform Temperature P/T analysis for LOCA Transient Analysis Vs
- Heat Sinks Per UFSAR Steady State Solution 6.2
- Results Demonstrate
- Results Demonstrate containment P/T remains Containment P/T remains bounded by the LOCA bounded by the LOCA P/T - Methodology Change
Palo Verde Comparson of Containment Vapor temperature 1-SBO and limiting LOCA 300 280 260 240 L.
I-E1 80 160 140 120 100 0 10 20 Time (hr)
Palo Verde Comparson of Containment pressure SBO and limiting LOCA 80
-SBO @120gpm leakage
- LOCA 70-60 -
50 1C) a 40-Max i 27.5 PSIA 16 hr 30-20 5 10 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 Time (hr)
Palo Verde Evaluation of Containment Isolation
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Containment Isolation Valves
- Will Not Reach RAS at 16 hrs Were reviewed for the
- No Impact to the Containment applicability or exclusion to Isolation capability due to NUMARC 87-00 Criteria and PUR Or 16 hr Coping found acceptable
- Located in UFSAR Tables 6.2.4-1 & 6.2.4-2
- Reviewed by the NRC
- April 13, 1994
Palo Verde Evaluation of Communication
- EPABX (Telephone) 8 hr battery
- Plant 2 Way Radio 4 hr battery, Transfer Switch
- Sound Power Phones
Palo Verde Evaluation of Communication
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Primary Modes of
- Primary Mode of Communication Communication
- EPABX Telephone - EPABX Telephone
- Sound Power Phone * (8 hr Battery back-up)
- Radios - Radios
- (4 hr Battery back-up)
- (Transfer Switch)
- Reviewed by the NRC
- Sound Power Phone
- April 13, 1994
- Sufficient Battery Back-up to Cope for 1 Hour Until GTG Loads the Radio System
Palo Verde r Summary
- Regulatory Guide 1.155 Acceptance Criteria for 16 hr Coping Can Be Successfully Demonstrated
- Methodology Changes Will Be Introduced for Consistency With the Current Safety Analysis Methods
- New Equipment and Procedure Changes Are Necessary for Implementation of the 16 hr Coping Strategy