ML062680103: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:000 NOT FOR PUBUC DISCLOSURE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR, OE 000 SDP/EA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM Case Data Disputed:[]
{{#Wiki_filter:000         NOT FOR PUBUC DISCLOSURE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR, OE 000 SDP/EA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM Case Data                                                       Disputed:[]                 Related Cases:         O3-06.
Related Cases: O3-06. SDPIE NoI: P3~nO Number: Docket No.:i500305..
SDPIE       NoI:     P3~nO               Number: *l.                Docket No.:i500305..
Request Date- 110WD Region: 13 Case Type. R Small Entity. E] No Qvest Licensee:
Request Date- 110WD           Region: 13           Case Type.           R                   Small Entity. E]No       Qvest Licensee:               ManyoeneftC           i-w                   Fa FauyearI City         m                   -   .
Fauyear ManyoeneftC i-w Fa I City m -. License No.: DPRM3 Lae Day of hnp.. m Insp. Rp No.: *. ..O "4 ....... ES:" ..D Facts AsecuId meupeiis ofa b IItIhvh oIrp FDooncem Dtussion (id rewied): Deliberate violation of 10 CFR 2620 fr failure to require testing for a reported FFD concm for a foreman SDP [lY Assessment
License No.:               DPRM3                             Lae Day of hnp..       m Insp.Rp No.:       *.   . .O     "4                     .......     ..                                                          ES:" D Facts         AsecuId meupeiis           ofa       b               oIrp IItIhvh FDooncem Dtussion (idrewied): Deliberate violation of 10 CFR 2620 fr failure to require testing for a reported FFD concm for a foreman SDP                     r'*No      [lY Assessment                                                                       [j                       NOV     [     Ye ] N]o Wrongdoing [-No [n]Yes 01Re. Date $2r0                   01 Rpt No ~2Q.:OO4* bel"-                       01 Rpt Date: W191O29 Da) Referral?           LjNo [EYes Ref. Date                     MUM           Action Date       11121M32                     rloD-e
[j NOV [ Ye ] [ N]o Wrongdoing
[Acpt Additional 01Status               nvestigafti I-C~                               004 needsioti entified                    E dispute memo needed Wl~
[-No [n]Yes 01Re. Date $2r0 01 Rpt No ~2Q.: OO4* bel"- 01 Rpt Date: W191O29 Da) Referral?
F]Akmiional coorinktion needed           []AmbVt~gDOJ                     ElNeeds wrdination w4th DOJ Escalated Action Consequence:               lAdcudlEl Potenia E]Reg.hImat                    0Wiruhiness Prior Esc. Action?       [j]No     El 'es           EA.       ____                     Date:____________
LjNo [EYes Ref. Date MUM Action Date 11121M32 rloD-e [Acpt Additional 01Status I-C~ nvestigafti 004 needsioti e ntified Wl~ E dispute memo needed F]Akmiional coorinktion needed []AmbVt~gDOJ ElNeeds wrdination w4th DOJ Escalated Action Consequence:
IDCredit?                 [R]No     []Yes           E]TmD                                 S&U :
lAdcudlEl Potenia E]Reg.h Imat 0Wiruhiness Prior Esc. Action? [j]No El 'es EA. ____ Date:____________
CA Credit                 E]No       EO es           ElTBD                                 Sp~~
ID Credit? [R]No []Yes E]TmD S&U : CA Credit E]No EO es ElTBD Sp~~ CP? []NoCw~j]ase Elooiteease Elcuier Discretion or Order? lX'No FlYesI Epla'T Future Action Coriedrence?
CP?           []NoCw~j]ase Elooiteease Elcuier Discretion or Order?                           lX'No     FlYesI Epla'T Future Action Coriedrence?             OlNO       MY.$ [ open                     E0 Closed       Additional       M/~OM Action?~     RAonP&dcae Revtew by M              DEDR Revte        l:Nv-t ConMnR,-n Cvnfki             ~     -n         NOV O d wAc tin?I Padrt             Region             B.Beison, C.Pederson, T. Madeda, B.Clayton OE                 J. Db=W-hr, N.Ilton                                         OGC/O M Fahey, G.Longo Program Oflice                                                                 0(1w Rema r               rotsLessons Learned: The panel determined that due to the nuiner of disagreements between the kdvidual statements, tka a deliberate violato could not be considered. Hcbever, there was testimony that two individuals had smelled a tinge of alcohol on the foreman's breath and enough klormation to determine that the i*criduals had hought itto their supervisors atenton Insome manner (ifoOly to bxing bward fie opinion that the indidual had a drinldng problem. The two togetr provided a basis r the supenvsor*to requir a fitness lfr duty test, but ftis test was nev per xmed. The supervisor was aware of tie reqtirements, so tie faure was considered as careless disregard.
OlNO MY.$ [ open E0 Closed Additional M/~OM Action?~ l:Nv-t ConMnR,-n RAon P&dcae Revtew by M DEDR Revte Cvnfki ~ -n NOV O d w A c tin ?I Padrt Region B. Beison, C. Pederson, T. Madeda, B. Clayton OE J. Db=W-hr, N. Ilton OGC/O M Fahey, G. Longo Program Oflice 0(1w Rema r rotsLessons Learned: The panel determined that due to the nuiner of disagreements between the kdvidual statements, tka a deliberate violato could not be considered.
ca J. Creed, J. Belanger, T. Vegel, J. Cameron, R.Paul, C.Well, F. LMngston, A.Sapountis, C.Nolan Approved, Dir. OE:       /RA! J. Luehman Date:   10/7/03}}
Hcbever, there was testimony that two individuals had smelled a tinge of alcohol on the foreman's breath and enough klormation to determine that the had hought it to their supervisors atenton In some manner (ifoOly to bxing bward fie opinion that the indidual had a drinldng problem. The two togetr provided a basis r the requir a fitness lfr duty test, but ftis test was nev per xmed. The supervisor was aware of tie reqtirements, so tie faure was considered as careless disregard.
ca J. Creed, J. Belanger, T. Vegel, J. Cameron, R. Paul, C. Well, F. LMngston, A. Sapountis, C. Nolan Approved, Dir. OE: /RA! J. Luehman Date: 10/7/03}}

Latest revision as of 13:51, 23 November 2019

Sdp/Ea Request & Strategy Form, Sdp/Ea No.03-105
ML062680103
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/07/2003
From: Luehman J
NRC/OE
To:
References
EA-03-105, EA-03-106, FOIA/PA-2006-0113, OI 3-2002-004
Download: ML062680103 (1)


Text

000 NOT FOR PUBUC DISCLOSURE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR, OE 000 SDP/EA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM Case Data Disputed:[] Related Cases: O3-06.

SDPIE NoI: P3~nO Number: *l. Docket No.:i500305..

Request Date- 110WD Region: 13 Case Type. R Small Entity. E]No Qvest Licensee: ManyoeneftC i-w Fa FauyearI City m - .

License No.: DPRM3 Lae Day of hnp.. m Insp.Rp No.: *. . .O "4 ....... .. ES:" D Facts AsecuId meupeiis ofa b oIrp IItIhvh FDooncem Dtussion (idrewied): Deliberate violation of 10 CFR 2620 fr failure to require testing for a reported FFD concm for a foreman SDP r'*No [lY Assessment [j NOV [ Ye [ ] N]o Wrongdoing [-No [n]Yes 01Re. Date $2r0 01 Rpt No ~2Q.:OO4* bel"- 01 Rpt Date: W191O29 Da) Referral? LjNo [EYes Ref. Date MUM Action Date 11121M32 rloD-e

[Acpt Additional 01Status nvestigafti I-C~ 004 needsioti entified E dispute memo needed Wl~

F]Akmiional coorinktion needed []AmbVt~gDOJ ElNeeds wrdination w4th DOJ Escalated Action Consequence: lAdcudlEl Potenia E]Reg.hImat 0Wiruhiness Prior Esc. Action? [j]No El 'es EA. ____ Date:____________

IDCredit? [R]No []Yes E]TmD S&U  :

CA Credit E]No EO es ElTBD Sp~~

CP? []NoCw~j]ase Elooiteease Elcuier Discretion or Order? lX'No FlYesI Epla'T Future Action Coriedrence? OlNO MY.$ [ open E0 Closed Additional M/~OM Action?~ RAonP&dcae Revtew by M DEDR Revte l:Nv-t ConMnR,-n Cvnfki ~ -n NOV O d wAc tin?I Padrt Region B.Beison, C.Pederson, T. Madeda, B.Clayton OE J. Db=W-hr, N.Ilton OGC/O M Fahey, G.Longo Program Oflice 0(1w Rema r rotsLessons Learned: The panel determined that due to the nuiner of disagreements between the kdvidual statements, tka a deliberate violato could not be considered. Hcbever, there was testimony that two individuals had smelled a tinge of alcohol on the foreman's breath and enough klormation to determine that the i*criduals had hought itto their supervisors atenton Insome manner (ifoOly to bxing bward fie opinion that the indidual had a drinldng problem. The two togetr provided a basis r the supenvsor*to requir a fitness lfr duty test, but ftis test was nev per xmed. The supervisor was aware of tie reqtirements, so tie faure was considered as careless disregard.

ca J. Creed, J. Belanger, T. Vegel, J. Cameron, R.Paul, C.Well, F. LMngston, A.Sapountis, C.Nolan Approved, Dir. OE: /RA! J. Luehman Date: 10/7/03