ML111010612: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA   NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of                                                                                 Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application                                                             April 11 2011
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of                                                     Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application                                         April 11 2011 PILGRIM WATCH MEMORANDUM -ENTERGYS INCORRECT AND MISLEADING INFORMATION REGARDING PROVEN TESTS TO DETECT CABLE INSULATION DEGRADATION In this proceeding, Pilgrim Watch repeatedly said that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation.
At an April 6, 2011 Massachusetts General Court public hearing, Entergy said that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation, contradicting statements made in previous filings in this proceeding. The hearing was held by the Joint Committees of Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture; Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy; Public Health; Public Safety and Homeland Security.
Specifically, the Joint Committees asked Entergys panel if there were proven tests to assess submerged electric cable degradation at Pilgrim Station. Mr. S.J. Bethay,


PILGRIM WATCH MEMORANDUM -ENTERGYS INCORRECT AND MISLEADING INFORMATION REGARDING PROVEN TESTS TO DETECT CABLE INSULATION DEGRADATION In this proceeding, Pilgrim Watch repeatedly said that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation. At an April 6, 2011 Massachusetts General Court public hearing, Entergy said that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation, contradicting statements made in previous filings in this proceeding. The hearing was held by the Joint Committees of Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture; Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy; Public Health; Public Safety and Homeland Security.
Director Nuclear Safety Assurance Pilgrim Station, responded for Entergys panel. He testified that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation; but when they became available, Pilgrim would use them. (Emphasis added)
Specifically, the Joint Committees asked Entergys panel if there were proven tests to assess submerged electric cable degradation at Pilgrim Station. Mr. S.J. Bethay, 2  Director Nuclear Safety Assurance Pilgrim Station, responded for Entergys panel. He testified that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation; but when they became available, Pilgrim would use them. (Emphasis added) Mr. Bethay was accompanied at the table for presenting to the Joint Committees by Entergys top leadership personnel including Michael Balduzzi, Rick Smith and Michael Slobodian. They did not contradict or qualify Mr. Bethays statement Entergys Previous Claims To The Contrary
Mr. Bethay was accompanied at the table for presenting to the Joint Committees by Entergys top leadership personnel including Michael Balduzzi, Rick Smith and Michael Slobodian. They did not contradict or qualify Mr. Bethays statement Entergys Previous Claims To The Contrary
: 1. In the Declaration Of Vincent Fallacara And Roger B. Rucker In Support Of Entergys Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watchs Request For Hearing On A New Contention (Feb 14, 2011) Vincent Fallacara, Director of Engineering at Pilgrim, said in regard to the  
: 1.       In the Declaration Of Vincent Fallacara And Roger B. Rucker In Support Of Entergys Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watchs Request For Hearing On A New Contention (Feb 14, 2011) Vincent Fallacara, Director of Engineering at Pilgrim, said in regard to the adequacy of cable insulation test methods
: 12.      Mr. Blanch challenges the adequacy of the cable insulation test methods called for by the AMP. He contends that there is no proven test that will provide assurance that cables and splices that have been submerged will function when called upon. He claims to rely on findings from the NRC, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Sandia National Laboratory (Sandia), and Brookhaven National Laboratory (Brookhaven). Blanch Affidavit ¶¶ 29, 32-35, 45-46. See also PW Request at 27.
: 13.      These claims by Pilgrim Watch and Mr. Blanch are incorrectthere are many proven tests to determine the degradation of cable insulation from different aging mechanisms. Emphasis added.
: 2.      In Entergys Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watch Request For Hearing On A New Contention Feb 14, 2011, section (a) Proven Tests for Cable Insulation Degradation, Entergy again disputed the lack of proven tests.
: 3.      At the March 9, 2011 Plymouth hearing, Mr. Lewis, representing Entergy, said in his description of what the NRCs December 2010 Information Notice said:
2


adequacy of cable insulation test methods
( licensees should do         these type of tests that are capable of detecting degradation. (Transcript, pg., 881, lines 21-22, emphasis added). The clear implication was that there were tests capable of detecting degradation.
: 12. Mr. Blanch challenges the adequacy of the cable insulation test methods called for by the AMP. He contends that there is no proven test that will provide assurance that cables and splices that have been submerged will function when called upon. He claims to rely on findings from the NRC, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Sandia National Laboratory (Sandia), and Brookhaven National Laboratory (Brookhaven). Blanch Affidavit ¶¶ 29, 32-35, 45-46. See also PW Request at 27.
Conclusion Both Entergy and Pilgrim Watch now agree that there are no proven tests to detect cable insulation degradation.
: 13. These claims by Pilgrim Watch and Mr. Blanch are in correctthere are many proven tests to determine the degradation of cable insulation from different aging mechanisms. Emphasis added.
Respectfully signed, Mary lampert (Signed Electronically)
: 2. In Entergys Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watch Request For Hearing On A New Contention  Feb 14, 2011, section (a)  Proven Tests for Cable Insulation Degradation,  Entergy again disputed the lack of proven tests.
Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 Tel. 781-934-0389 Email mary.lampert@comcast.net 3
: 3. At the March 9, 2011 Plymouth hearing, Mr. Lewis, representing Entergy, said in his description of what the NRC s December 2010 Information Notice said:
( licensees should do these type of tests that are capable of detecting degradation. (Transcript, pg., 881, lines 21-22, emphasis added). The clear implication was that there were tests capable of detecting degradation.
Conclusion Both Entergy and Pilgrim Watch now agree that there are no proven tests to detect cable insulation degradation.  


Respectfully signed,
ATTACHMENT Declaration Rebecca J. Chin (Please note that additional declarations may be provided, upon request)


Mary lampert
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before The Atomic Safety And Licensing Board In the Matter of                                            Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application April 11, 2011 Declaration Rebecca J. Chin I, Rebecca J. Chin, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct.
I have been appointed by the Town of Duxbury Emergency Management Director to represent the town at the ASLB hearings regarding proceedings in Pilgrims license renewal application. I was present at the April 6, 2011 Massachusetts General Court public hearing held by the Joint Committees of Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture; Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy; Public Health; Public Safety and Homeland Security in response to the ongoing nuclear reactor tragedy in Fukushima.
At the hearing, I heard Mr. S.J. Bethay, Entergy spokesperson, respond to a question from the committee panel. He said that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation; but when they became available, Pilgrim would use them. Mr. Bethay was accompanied at Entergys presentation table by other Entergy Pilgrim personnel including Michael Balduzzi, Rick Smith and Michael Slobodian. They did not contradict or qualify Mr. Bethays statement.
Rebecca J. Chin (Electonically signed) 31 DeerPath Trl North Duxbury, MA 02332 Tel. 781-837-0009 Email: rebeccajchin@hotmail.com


(Signed Electronically)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before The Atomic Safety And Licensing Board In the Matter of                                          Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application April 11, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that Pilgrim Watch Memorandum Regarding Entergys Incorrect &
Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 Tel. 781-934-0389 Email mary.lampert@comcast.net                           
Misleading Information Regarding Proven Tests To Detect Cable Insulation Degradation and Certiciate of Service were served April 11, 2011 in the above captioned proceeding to the following persons by the Electronic Information Exchange and complimentary copies sent via email to the service list Secretary of the Commission                    Administrative Judge Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications            Richard F. Cole Staff                                          Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop 0-16 C1                              Mail Stop -T-3-F23 United States Nuclear Regulatory                US NRC Commission                                      Washington, DC 20555-0001 Office of Commission Appellate Administrative Judge                            Adjudication Ann Marshall Young, Chair                      Mail Stop 0-16 C1 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board              United States Nuclear Regulatory Mail Stop - T-3 F23                            Commission US NRC                                          Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Administrative Judge                            Mail Stop T-3 F23 Paul B. Abramson                                United States Nuclear Regulatory Atomic Safety and Licensing Board              Commission Mail Stop T-3 F23                              Washington, DC 20555-0001 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001


ATTACHMENT Declaration Rebecca J. Chin (Please note that additional declarations may be provided, upon request)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission    Mark Stankiewicz Office of Commission Appellate        Town Manager, Town of Plymouth Adjudication                          11 Lincoln Street Mail Stop: 0-16C1                      Plymouth MA 02360 Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission    Sheila Slocum Hollis, Esq.
Office of General Counsel              Town of Plymouth MA Mail Stop: 0-15 D21                    Duane Morris, LLP Washington DC 20555-0001              505 9th Street, N.W. 1000 Susan L. Uttal, Esq.                  Washington D.C. 20004-2166 Andrea Jones, Esq.
Brian Harris, Esq.                    Richard R. MacDonald Michael Dreher, Esq.                  Town Manager, Town of Duxbury Brian Newell, Paralegal                878 Tremont Street Duxbury, MA 02332 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  Fire Chief & Director DEMA, Mail Stop: 011-F1                      Town of Duxbury Washington, DC 20555-0001              688 Tremont Street P.O. Box 2824 Lisa Regner, Project Mgr. Plant Lic. Duxbury, MA 02331 Branch 1-1, Operator Reactor Licensing Washington, DC 20555-0001              Terence A. Burke, Esq.
Entergy Nuclear Paul A. Gaukler, Esq.                  Mail Stop M-ECH-62 David R. Lewis, Esq.                  Jackson, MS 39213 Jason B. Parker, Esq.
Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman,    Katherine Tucker, Esq.
LLP - 2300 N Street, N.W.              Law Clerk, Atomic Safety and Licensing Washington, DC 20037-1128              Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Martha Coakley, Attorney General      11545 Rockville Pike, Mail Stop T3-E2a Matthew Brock, Assistant Attorney      Rockville, MD 20852 General Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Attorney General One Ashburton Place                    Signed (electronically) by Boston, MA 02108 Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington St.
Duxbury, MA 023332 Tel: 781-934-0389 Email: mary.lampert@comcast.net April 11,2011


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before The Atomic Safety And Licensing Board In the Matter of      Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application April 11, 2011 Declaration Rebecca J. Chin I, Rebecca J. Chin, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct. I have been appointed by the Town of Duxbury Emergency Management Director to represent the town at the ASLB hearings regarding proceedings in Pilgrims li cense renewal application. I was present at the April 6, 2011 Massachusetts General Court public hearing held by the Joint Committees of Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture; Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy; Public Health; Public Safety and Homeland Security in response to the ongoing nuclear reactor tragedy in Fukushima. At the hearing, I heard Mr. S.J. Bethay, Entergy spokesperson, respond to a question from the committee panel. He said that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation; but when they became available, Pilgrim would use them. Mr. Bethay was accompanied at Entergys presentation table by other Entergy Pilgrim personnel including Michael Balduzzi, Rick Smith and Michael Slobodian. They did not contradict or qualify Mr. Bethays statement.
.}}
Rebecca J. Chin
 
(Electonically signed)
 
31 DeerPath Trl North Duxbury, MA 02332 Tel. 781-837-0009 Email: rebeccajchin@hotmail.com UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before The Atomic Safety And Licensing Board In the Matter of      Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application                    April 11, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE  I hereby certify that Pilgrim Watch Memorandum Regarding Entergys Incorrect &
Misleading Information Regarding Proven Tests To Detect Cable Insulation Degradation and Certiciate of Service were served April 11, 2011 in the above captioned proceeding to the following persons by the Electronic Information Exchange and complimentary copies sent via email to the service list Secretary of the Commission Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications
 
Staff Mail Stop 0-16 C1 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
 
Administrative Judge Ann Marshall Young, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
 
Mail Stop
- T-3 F23 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
Administrative Judge Paul B. Abramson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
Administrative Judge Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
 
Mail Stop
-T-3-F23 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop 0-16 C1 United States Nuclear Regulatory
 
Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 United States Nuclear Regulatory
 
Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop: 0-16C1 Washington, DC 20555-0001
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of General Counsel
 
Mail Stop: 0-15 D21 Washington DC 20555-0001 Susan L. Uttal, Esq.
Andrea Jones, Esq.
Brian Harris, Esq. Michael Dreher, Esq. Brian Newell, Paralegal
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mail Stop: 011-F1 Washington, DC 20555-0001
 
Lisa Regner, Project Mgr. Plant Lic.
Branch 1-1, Operator Reactor Licensing Washington, DC 20555-0001
 
Paul A. Gaukler, Esq. David R. Lewis, Esq. Jason B. Parker, Esq.
Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP - 2300 N Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037-1128 
 
Martha Coakley, Attorney General Matthew Brock, Assistant Attorney General Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Attorney General One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108
 
Mark Stankiewicz  Town Manager, Town of Plymouth 11 Lincoln Street Plymouth MA 02360
 
Sheila Slocum Hollis, Esq.
Town of Plymouth MA Duane Morris, LLP
 
505 9 th Street, N.W. 1000 Washington D.C. 20004-2166
 
Richard R. MacDonald Town Manager, Town of Duxbury 878 Tremont Street Duxbury, MA 02332
 
Fire Chief & Director DEMA, Town of Duxbury 688 Tremont Street P.O. Box 2824 Duxbury, MA 02331
 
Terence A. Burke, Esq.
Entergy Nuclear Mail Stop M-ECH-62 Jackson, MS 39213
 
Katherine Tucker, Esq.
Law Clerk, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11545 Rockville Pike, Mail Stop T3-E2a
 
Rockville, MD 20852
 
Signed (electronically) by Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington St.
Duxbury, MA 023332 Tel: 781-934-0389 Email: mary.lampert@comcast.net April 11,2011 
 
      .}}

Latest revision as of 02:04, 13 November 2019

Watch Memorandum-Entergy's Incorrect and Misleading Information Regarding Proven Tests to Detect Cable Insulation Degradation
ML111010612
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 04/11/2011
From: Lampert M
Pilgrim Watch
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 19900, 50-293-LR, ASLBP 06-848-02-LR
Download: ML111010612 (9)


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application April 11 2011 PILGRIM WATCH MEMORANDUM -ENTERGYS INCORRECT AND MISLEADING INFORMATION REGARDING PROVEN TESTS TO DETECT CABLE INSULATION DEGRADATION In this proceeding, Pilgrim Watch repeatedly said that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation.

At an April 6, 2011 Massachusetts General Court public hearing, Entergy said that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation, contradicting statements made in previous filings in this proceeding. The hearing was held by the Joint Committees of Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture; Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy; Public Health; Public Safety and Homeland Security.

Specifically, the Joint Committees asked Entergys panel if there were proven tests to assess submerged electric cable degradation at Pilgrim Station. Mr. S.J. Bethay,

Director Nuclear Safety Assurance Pilgrim Station, responded for Entergys panel. He testified that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation; but when they became available, Pilgrim would use them. (Emphasis added)

Mr. Bethay was accompanied at the table for presenting to the Joint Committees by Entergys top leadership personnel including Michael Balduzzi, Rick Smith and Michael Slobodian. They did not contradict or qualify Mr. Bethays statement Entergys Previous Claims To The Contrary

1. In the Declaration Of Vincent Fallacara And Roger B. Rucker In Support Of Entergys Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watchs Request For Hearing On A New Contention (Feb 14, 2011) Vincent Fallacara, Director of Engineering at Pilgrim, said in regard to the adequacy of cable insulation test methods
12. Mr. Blanch challenges the adequacy of the cable insulation test methods called for by the AMP. He contends that there is no proven test that will provide assurance that cables and splices that have been submerged will function when called upon. He claims to rely on findings from the NRC, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Sandia National Laboratory (Sandia), and Brookhaven National Laboratory (Brookhaven). Blanch Affidavit ¶¶ 29, 32-35, 45-46. See also PW Request at 27.
13. These claims by Pilgrim Watch and Mr. Blanch are incorrectthere are many proven tests to determine the degradation of cable insulation from different aging mechanisms. Emphasis added.
2. In Entergys Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watch Request For Hearing On A New Contention Feb 14, 2011, section (a) Proven Tests for Cable Insulation Degradation, Entergy again disputed the lack of proven tests.
3. At the March 9, 2011 Plymouth hearing, Mr. Lewis, representing Entergy, said in his description of what the NRCs December 2010 Information Notice said:

2

( licensees should do these type of tests that are capable of detecting degradation. (Transcript, pg., 881, lines 21-22, emphasis added). The clear implication was that there were tests capable of detecting degradation.

Conclusion Both Entergy and Pilgrim Watch now agree that there are no proven tests to detect cable insulation degradation.

Respectfully signed, Mary lampert (Signed Electronically)

Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 Tel. 781-934-0389 Email mary.lampert@comcast.net 3

ATTACHMENT Declaration Rebecca J. Chin (Please note that additional declarations may be provided, upon request)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before The Atomic Safety And Licensing Board In the Matter of Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application April 11, 2011 Declaration Rebecca J. Chin I, Rebecca J. Chin, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct.

I have been appointed by the Town of Duxbury Emergency Management Director to represent the town at the ASLB hearings regarding proceedings in Pilgrims license renewal application. I was present at the April 6, 2011 Massachusetts General Court public hearing held by the Joint Committees of Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture; Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy; Public Health; Public Safety and Homeland Security in response to the ongoing nuclear reactor tragedy in Fukushima.

At the hearing, I heard Mr. S.J. Bethay, Entergy spokesperson, respond to a question from the committee panel. He said that there were no proven commercially available tests to detect cable insulation degradation; but when they became available, Pilgrim would use them. Mr. Bethay was accompanied at Entergys presentation table by other Entergy Pilgrim personnel including Michael Balduzzi, Rick Smith and Michael Slobodian. They did not contradict or qualify Mr. Bethays statement.

Rebecca J. Chin (Electonically signed) 31 DeerPath Trl North Duxbury, MA 02332 Tel. 781-837-0009 Email: rebeccajchin@hotmail.com

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before The Atomic Safety And Licensing Board In the Matter of Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application April 11, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that Pilgrim Watch Memorandum Regarding Entergys Incorrect &

Misleading Information Regarding Proven Tests To Detect Cable Insulation Degradation and Certiciate of Service were served April 11, 2011 in the above captioned proceeding to the following persons by the Electronic Information Exchange and complimentary copies sent via email to the service list Secretary of the Commission Administrative Judge Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Richard F. Cole Staff Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop 0-16 C1 Mail Stop -T-3-F23 United States Nuclear Regulatory US NRC Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Office of Commission Appellate Administrative Judge Adjudication Ann Marshall Young, Chair Mail Stop 0-16 C1 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board United States Nuclear Regulatory Mail Stop - T-3 F23 Commission US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Administrative Judge Mail Stop T-3 F23 Paul B. Abramson United States Nuclear Regulatory Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Commission Mail Stop T-3 F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mark Stankiewicz Office of Commission Appellate Town Manager, Town of Plymouth Adjudication 11 Lincoln Street Mail Stop: 0-16C1 Plymouth MA 02360 Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Sheila Slocum Hollis, Esq.

Office of General Counsel Town of Plymouth MA Mail Stop: 0-15 D21 Duane Morris, LLP Washington DC 20555-0001 505 9th Street, N.W. 1000 Susan L. Uttal, Esq. Washington D.C. 20004-2166 Andrea Jones, Esq.

Brian Harris, Esq. Richard R. MacDonald Michael Dreher, Esq. Town Manager, Town of Duxbury Brian Newell, Paralegal 878 Tremont Street Duxbury, MA 02332 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Fire Chief & Director DEMA, Mail Stop: 011-F1 Town of Duxbury Washington, DC 20555-0001 688 Tremont Street P.O. Box 2824 Lisa Regner, Project Mgr. Plant Lic. Duxbury, MA 02331 Branch 1-1, Operator Reactor Licensing Washington, DC 20555-0001 Terence A. Burke, Esq.

Entergy Nuclear Paul A. Gaukler, Esq. Mail Stop M-ECH-62 David R. Lewis, Esq. Jackson, MS 39213 Jason B. Parker, Esq.

Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, Katherine Tucker, Esq.

LLP - 2300 N Street, N.W. Law Clerk, Atomic Safety and Licensing Washington, DC 20037-1128 Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Martha Coakley, Attorney General 11545 Rockville Pike, Mail Stop T3-E2a Matthew Brock, Assistant Attorney Rockville, MD 20852 General Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Attorney General One Ashburton Place Signed (electronically) by Boston, MA 02108 Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington St.

Duxbury, MA 023332 Tel: 781-934-0389 Email: mary.lampert@comcast.net April 11,2011

.