ML17250A328: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
c)alldiscoverybypartiesbeterminatedwithinonemonthfollowingtheissuanceofanynecessarySERsupplement;d)anyfurtherpre-hearingconferences.necessaryatthattimetakeplacewithinonemonthfollowingsupplementationoftheSER."e)thehearingshouldfollowassoont'hereafter,aspossible;f)aninitialdecisionbeissuedwithintwomonthsfollowingthecompletionofthehearing;andg)assumingthattheinitialdecisionis'favorable,afull-termoperatinglicensebeissuedimmediatelythereafter.Licenseerecommends.thatinlihtof'he5ggStaff'scommitmenttopursuecompletionoftheSEPpriortoissuanceofanSER,nothingneedbedoneinthismatteruntilsuchdateastheSEPreviewhasbeen'completed.Thereafter,Licenseerecommendstheschedulesuggestedinparagraph4.bepursued.Licenseealsorecommendsthatthe | c)alldiscoverybypartiesbeterminatedwithinonemonthfollowingtheissuanceofanynecessarySERsupplement;d)anyfurtherpre-hearingconferences.necessaryatthattimetakeplacewithinonemonthfollowingsupplementationoftheSER."e)thehearingshouldfollowassoont'hereafter,aspossible;f)aninitialdecisionbeissuedwithintwomonthsfollowingthecompletionofthehearing;andg)assumingthattheinitialdecisionis'favorable,afull-termoperatinglicensebeissuedimmediatelythereafter.Licenseerecommends.thatinlihtof'he5ggStaff'scommitmenttopursuecompletionoftheSEPpriortoissuanceofanSER,nothingneedbedoneinthismatteruntilsuchdateastheSEPreviewhasbeen'completed.Thereafter,Licenseerecommendstheschedulesuggestedinparagraph4.bepursued.Licenseealsorecommendsthatthe | ||
Boardmaywishtoreviewthestatusofthisproceedinginaboutoneyeartodeterminethethen-currentprogressoftheSEPanditseffectonthescheduleforthisproceeding.Respectfullysubmitted,LeBOEUF,LAMB,LEIBY&NacRAEByPtner1333NewHampshireAvenue,N.W.Washington,D..C.20036(202)457-75001AttorneysforRochesterGasandElectric.CorporationDated:June2,1980 | Boardmaywishtoreviewthestatusofthisproceedinginaboutoneyeartodeterminethethen-currentprogressoftheSEPanditseffectonthescheduleforthisproceeding.Respectfullysubmitted,LeBOEUF,LAMB,LEIBY&NacRAEByPtner1333NewHampshireAvenue,N.W.Washington,D..C.20036(202)457-75001AttorneysforRochesterGasandElectric.CorporationDated:June2,1980-8-}} | ||
}} |
Revision as of 15:23, 18 May 2018
ML17250A328 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Ginna |
Issue date: | 06/02/1980 |
From: | VOIGT H H LEBOEUF, LAMB, LEIBY & MACRAE, ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML17250A329 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 8006180006 | |
Download: ML17250A328 (16) | |
Text
DOCKETEDUSHRC80oUNITEDSTATESOFAMERICAJUN21980'UCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIONOfficeoftheSecretaryDocketing8ServiceBranchBEFORETHEATOMICSAFETYANDLICENSINGBOARDIntheNatterofROCHESTERGASANDELECTRICCORPORATION,(R;E.GinnaNuclearPower.Plant,UnitNo.1)))))DocketNo.50-244)))'ICENSEE'SRESPONSETOREQUESTFORSTATUSREPORTONPROCEEDINGByOrderdatedApril29,1980,theBoardorderedeachofthepartiestosubmitareportonthestatusofthecaptione'dproceeding.RochesterGasandElectricCorporation("Licensee")repliesasfollows:1.OnAugust15,1972,Licenseefiledanapplica-tiondatedAugust9,1972,entitled"ApplicationtoConvertProvisionalOperatingLicensetoFull-TermOperatingLicenseOrAlternativelyToExtendtheTerminationDateoftheProvisionalOperatingLic'ense"("Application")fortheR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant,UnitNo.1.FollowingpublicnoticedatedNovember22,1972,petitionstointervenePwerefiledby:theStateofNewYork,asaninterestedstate,onJanuary5,1973;theMonroeCountyConservationCouncilonJanuary5,1973;theRochesterCommitteeforoooo>so~JR
/~lylP ScientificInformation("RCSI")onJanuary8,1973;Mr.MichaelSladeonJanuary8,1973.LicenseeansweredeachofthesepetitionsforleavetointerveneonJanuary17and18,1973.TheCommission'.sRegulatoryStafffiledanswerstoeachofthepetitionstointerveneonJanuary18,22,'nd23,1973.OnApril18,1973,noticeoftheavailabilityoftheCommission'sDraftEnvironmentalStatementrelatinggtotheR.E.Ginnafacilitywaspublished,invitingpubliccomment.OnMay15,'f973,theAtomicSafetyandLicensingBoardwasestablished.ByorderdatedJune8theBoardorderedahearingandadmittedpetitionerMichaelSlade.ItdeniedthepetitionofRCSI,but.allowedRCSIleavetoamenditspetition.ItdeniedthepetitiontointerveneofMonroeCountyConservationCouncil.ThepetitionoftheStateofNewYorkwasgranted.OnJuly3,1973,RCSIfiledanamendedpetition,.whichwasansweredbyLicenseeonJuly16,1973andbytheStaffonJuly26,1973.By'orderdatedAugust2,1973,theamendedpetitionoftheRCSIwasgranted.TheBoardissuedanoticeofpublichearingonAugust2,1973.Answerstothenoticeofhearingwere.filedbyLicenseeandNewYorkStateonAugust9,1973.OnDecember11,1973,theBoardissuedanoticeandorderforpre-hearingconference.OnDecember19,1973,noticeof
havailabilityoftheCommission'sFinalEnvironmentalStatementfortheGinnafacilitywaspublished.OnrDecember'20,1973,.thefirstoftenamendmentstotheApplicationwasfiled.*OnMarch12,1974,followingseveralpostponementsiapre-hearingconferencewasheld.ThatsamedayintervenorMichaelSladefiledrevisions-tohispetitiontointervene.Atthepre-hearingconference,theBoardgrantedMr.Sladetheopportunitytorevise,andresubmithiscontentions.AlsoonMarch12,1974,RCSIandLicensee.reachedastipula-tionterminatingtheproceeding.astoRCSI,whichwasfiledwiththeBoardonMarch13,1974.OnMarch26,1974,theStafffiledamotionforBoardapprovalofanattached,stipulationrelatingtoadmissionofcontentionsbetweeninterven'orMichaelSladeandtheStaff.OnApril5,1974,LicenseeopposedacceptanceoftheStaff'smotion,movedtostrikeMr.Slade'scontentions,andmovedtodismisshisintervention.ItalsofiledananswertotheStaff'smotionforapprovalbytheBoardofthestipulationrelatingtothe.admissionof'ontentions.OnApril22,1974,intervenorMichaelSladereplied,toApplicant'smotionof.April5,1974;',OnApril24;1974,theStaffrepliedto*ThelatestamendmenttotheApplicationwasfiledJuly6,1979.
Licensee'soppositiontothestipulationandmovedtodenyLicensee'smotiontodismiss.lOnMarch25,1977,theBoardissueditsorderrulingonthecontentionsofintervenorMichaelSladeanddeniedLicensee'smotiontodismissMr.Slade'sintervention.Itsetforththecontentionsadmittedintheproceedingand,treaffirmedtheparticipationoftheStateofNewYorkasan,interestedstatepursuantto10C.F.R.52.715(c).'nDecember13,1977,theCommissioninformedLicenseethattheGinnastationwastobeincludedintheCommission's,SystematicEvaluationProgram("SEP")fornuclear-poweredfacilities,resultsofwhichwouldprovideanadequatebasisfordecisionsregardingfull-termlicenses,andthattheconversionofallremainingprovisionaloperatinglicensestofull-termlicenseswouldawaitcompletionoftheSEP.ByletterofDecember13,1977,totheBoard,theStaffproposedtoinitiatediscussionswithLicenseeandMr.SladeontheimpactoftheSEPontheproceeding.Licenseeisunawarethattherehavebeenanysuchdiscussions.OnDecember14,1979,LicenseeandRCSIfiledwiththeBoardastipulationconfirmingtheirearlierstipulationterminatingtheproceedingastoRCSIdatedMarch12,1974.ThisstipulationfurtherrelievedLicenseeofcertainrequirementswhichwerecontainedin,theearlierstipulation.
2.BasedontheorderoftheAtomicSafetyandLicensingBoarddatedMarch25,1977,thefollowingissuesremain:I1.Intervenor'sContentionAconcerningthe'dequacyofLicensee'sQualityAssuranceProgram;2.Intervenor'sContentionBthatLicenseehasnotdemonstratedconformancewiththeamendedECCScriteriaasdeterminedbyAECDocketK1-50-1.3.Intervenor'sContentionDconcerningLicensee'sallegedviolationofapplicablefederalandNewYorkStatewaterqualitystandards.4.Intervenor'sContentionEthattheenvironmentalanalysisforthisfacilityisinadequatebecauseitfailstoconsiderthermaleffectsofdischargedwateronlake.biota.5.Intervenor'sContentionFthattheFESisinadequatebecauseitfailstotreatenergy'conservationalternatives.6..IntervenorsContentionIthatthesitecontingencyplanisinadequate.7.Intervenor'sContentionJthatLicenseehasfailedtoprovideadequatefloodprotection.8.Intervenor'sContentionKthatLicensee'sradwastesystemsmanagementprogramisinadequate.
I AcopyoftheBoard'sorder,settingforththesecontentionsindetail,isattached.3.Thepartiesremaininginthisproceedingare:1a)Licensee;b)theNuclearRegulatoryCommissionStaff;c)Mr.MichaelSlade,Intervenor;andd)theStateofNewYork.PursuanttostipulationsfiledMarch12,1974,andDecember14,1979,theRCSIhasindicateditsintentiontoterminateitsparticipationintheproceeding.4.Licensee'sunderstandingofthefuture'courseofactionintheseproceedingsisthattheStaffwillissueaSafetyEvaluationReport("SER")followingcompletionoftheSEP.NeunderstandthatthetargetdateforsuchcompletionisApril1982.Accordingly,Licenseesuggeststhefollowingschedule:a)twomonthsfollowingissuanceoftheStaffSER,theAdvisoryCommitteeonReactorSafeguards("ACRS")meet,makeitsdeterminations",andissueitsletterregardingitsfindingswithintwoweeksthereafter;b).anynecessary'supplementtotheSERbeissuedbytheStafftwomonthsfollowingreceiptoftheACRSletter;
c)alldiscoverybypartiesbeterminatedwithinonemonthfollowingtheissuanceofanynecessarySERsupplement;d)anyfurtherpre-hearingconferences.necessaryatthattimetakeplacewithinonemonthfollowingsupplementationoftheSER."e)thehearingshouldfollowassoont'hereafter,aspossible;f)aninitialdecisionbeissuedwithintwomonthsfollowingthecompletionofthehearing;andg)assumingthattheinitialdecisionis'favorable,afull-termoperatinglicensebeissuedimmediatelythereafter.Licenseerecommends.thatinlihtof'he5ggStaff'scommitmenttopursuecompletionoftheSEPpriortoissuanceofanSER,nothingneedbedoneinthismatteruntilsuchdateastheSEPreviewhasbeen'completed.Thereafter,Licenseerecommendstheschedulesuggestedinparagraph4.bepursued.Licenseealsorecommendsthatthe
Boardmaywishtoreviewthestatusofthisproceedinginaboutoneyeartodeterminethethen-currentprogressoftheSEPanditseffectonthescheduleforthisproceeding.Respectfullysubmitted,LeBOEUF,LAMB,LEIBY&NacRAEByPtner1333NewHampshireAvenue,N.W.Washington,D..C.20036(202)457-75001AttorneysforRochesterGasandElectric.CorporationDated:June2,1980-8-