|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| #REDIRECT [[05000245/LER-1996-061]] | | {{Adams |
| | | number = ML20133A906 |
| | | issue date = 12/23/1996 |
| | | title = :on 961121,containment Isolation Function in Design Basis Accident Concurrent W/Loss of One Train of Dc Sys Failed.Caused by Inappropriate Exclusion in Past of Operation Conditions.Requirements Documented |
| | | author name = Walpole R |
| | | author affiliation = NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
| | | addressee name = |
| | | addressee affiliation = |
| | | docket = 05000245 |
| | | license number = |
| | | contact person = |
| | | document report number = LER-96-061, LER-96-61, NUDOCS 9701020160 |
| | | package number = ML20133A898 |
| | | document type = LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (SEE ALSO AO RO), TEXT-SAFETY REPORT |
| | | page count = 3 |
| | }} |
| | {{LER |
| | | Title = :on 961121,containment Isolation Function in Design Basis Accident Concurrent W/Loss of One Train of Dc Sys Failed.Caused by Inappropriate Exclusion in Past of Operation Conditions.Requirements Documented |
| | | Plant = |
| | | Reporting criterion = |
| | | Power level = |
| | | Mode = |
| | | Docket = 05000245 |
| | | LER year = 1996 |
| | | LER number = 61 |
| | | LER revision = 0 |
| | | Event date = |
| | | Report date = |
| | | ENS = |
| | | abstract = |
| | }} |
| | |
| | =text= |
| | {{#Wiki_filter:. |
| | ''NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATC,RY COMMISSION APPROYED BY oMB No. 31t>o-0104 (4-95) |
| | ExPtREs 04/30/98 |
| | ' fof?#"o'a/c'1J'aTJs?& "Us"1AA"o^"iG8,"7s J |
| | n^c"??o'L'"#"P"*MKel'oJSM.* Ja?We'ns LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) l'E'u'! '"u'c%fre*"#&"'caJ "s'o?"#!s";~*!'s* e |
| | !,?Rc'3"M '#J3E!*r'l~^n"se"1' "'a%?r"oi"8fM'"* |
| | u (See reverse for required number of digits / characters for each block) |
| | F ACluTV NAME (1) |
| | DOCKET NUMBER (2) |
| | PAGE (3) |
| | Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 1 of 3 TITLE (46 Failure of Containment Isolation Function in a Design Basis Accident Concurrent with a Loss of One Train of DC System EVENT DATE (5) |
| | LER NUMBER (6) |
| | REPOF:T DATE (7) |
| | OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8) |
| | MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENilAL REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR FACIUTY NAME DOCKET NUMBER NUMBER 11 2i 96 96 061 00 12 23 96 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 5: (Check one or more) (11) |
| | MODE (9) |
| | N 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 50.73(aH2)(i) 50.73(aH2Hviii) |
| | LEVEL (10) 000 20.2203(aH3)(i) |
| | X 60.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2Hx) |
| | POWER 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(aH2Hi) 20.2203(a)(3Hii) 50.73(aH2Hiii) 73.71 20.2203(aH2)(ii) 4 20.2203(aH4) 50.73(aH2Hiv) |
| | OTHER 20.2203(aH2Hiii) 50.36(C)(1) 50.73(aH2)(v) specify m Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 20.2203(aH2)(iv) 50.36(C)(2) 50.73(aH2)(vii) |
| | LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12) |
| | NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (include Area Codel Robert W. Walpole, MP1 Nuclear Licensing Manager (860)440-2191 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) |
| | |
| | ==CAUSE== |
| | SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE |
| | |
| | ==CAUsE== |
| | SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTUHER REPORTABLE To NPRDs To NPRDS |
| | [ |
| | SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) |
| | EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR SUBMISSloN YES NO Uf yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). |
| | ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16) |
| | On November 21,1996, with L plant shutdown, the reactor in the cold shutdown condition and the fuel off-loaded, it was found that the function of containment isolation for penetration X-14, Reactor Water Clean-up (RWCU) system, would not have been available postulating a loss of S2 DC train concurrent with a design basis accident consisting of a simultaneous loss of coolant accident (LOCA) with a loss of offsite power (LNP). The loss of containment isolation function under this scenario would occur only during heat-up or cool-down of the reactor with the reactor pressure under 100 psig, when the RWCU system is operating in the auxiliary pump line up. Under this condition, the reactor may be critical but the core power is only a few percent and the turbine is off-line. This event was reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(1)(ii)(B) as a condition that is outside the design basis of the plant. There were no automatic nor manually initiated safety system responses as a result of this event. The cause of this event is the inappropriate exclusion in the past of some operating conditions, such as the auxiliary valve line-ups, from the requirements of the containment isolation function. There were no actual safety consequences. The safety implications of the event are minimal since the event could only take place under a short duration window in the start-up or cool down of the reactor, the probability of the postulated failure to happen simultaneously with the design basis accident is extremely low and the existing procedures in place would mitigate the consequences of such event. The containment isolation design requirements for RWCU system auxiliary pump operation mode will be determined and, if required, a plant modification such as changing the power source to the RWCU system containment isolation valves will be implemented. |
| | 9701020160 961223 PDR ADOCK 05000245 S |
| | PDR |
| | |
| | m. |
| | i |
| | 'NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (445) |
| | LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) |
| | TEXT CONTINUATION FActLITY NAME 10 DOCKET NUMBER (2) |
| | LER NUMBER (6) |
| | PAGE (3) |
| | YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION i |
| | Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 NUMBER NUMBER 2 of 3 96 061 00 i |
| | TEXT (if more space is required, use additional copies of NRC form 366A) (17) |
| | I. |
| | |
| | ==Description of Event== |
| | l l |
| | On November 21, 1996, with the plant in cold shutdown and fuel off-loaded, during re-evaluation of the j |
| | limiting single failure for Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) and containment isolation function for the auxiliary valve line-ups that was being performed to address Commitment No. B15926-4 per LER 96-050, it was found that the function of containment isolation required when the reactor is critical or the coolant temperature is at or above 212 degree F would not have been available with a single failure of one DC train concurrent with the design basis accident. The design basis accident that is being considered is LOCA simultaneous with an LNP. The penetration involved is X 14 for the RWCU system. |
| | There were no automatic not manually initiated safety system responses as a result of this event. This event was reported on November 21,1996, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(1)(ii)(B) as a condition that is outside the design basis of the plant. |
| | |
| | ==11. Cause of Event== |
| | The cause of this event is an inappropriate exclusion in the past of some operating conditions, such as auxiliary valve line ups from the requirements of containment isolation function. |
| | Ill. Analysis of Event During the reactor heat-up or cool-down when the reactor pressure is below 100 psig, the RWCU flow is established by placing the auxiliary pump in service. Operation of the auxiliary pump requires opening of a containment isolation motor operated valve (MOV) (1-CU-5) located in the pump suction line in this scenario, the reactor is either subcritical (cool-down) or critical with the power being less than a few percent. In both situations, the turbine is off line. |
| | The two valves providing the containment isolation function in these scenarios are powered from the S2 division of the plant electrical system. The inboard MOV (1-CU 2) is AC powered while the outboard MOV is DC. A postulated failure of the S2 DC system would disable the inboard AC valve only if LNP is postulated coincidentally. The assumed loss of the DC bus would disable the diesel generator, which could provide power to the inboard AC valve. |
| | This issue was brought to the forefront during an evaluation for the corrective action for LER 96-050. |
| | There were no actual safety consequences. The RWCU system operates with 1-CU-5 open when the reactor is starting-up from cold shutdown or cooling-down. The turbine is off-line and the plant electrical loads are energized through the start-up transformer (RSST). Under this condition, the probability of an LNP event is much reduced. The RWCU system piping and the secondary containment also are barriers to any release of radioactive material. Therefore, the safety implication of the failure of containment isolation function at this penetration under the postulated condition is minimal. |
| | |
| | ==IV. Corrective Action== |
| | As a result of this event and the subsequent investigation, the following corrective actions are required: |
| | GdRC FORM 366A (4-95) |
| | |
| | _. = _ _._.- _.- _ _._._. __. _ ____._.._. _ _____ _._ _.._...-. _. _. _ --. |
| | .U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 14.ts> |
| | LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) |
| | TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) |
| | DOCKET NUMBER (2) |
| | LER NUMBER (6) |
| | PAGE (3) |
| | YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION I |
| | Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 NUMBER NUMBER 3 of 3 96 061 00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (11) |
| | I l |
| | Document the containment isolation design requirements for RWCU system auxiliary pump operation e |
| | j mode if required, a plant modification such as changing the power source to the RWCU system l |
| | containment isolation MOVs will be implemented prior to startup for operating cycle 16. |
| | l l |
| | The ongoing 10 CFR 50.54(f) review of the systems will address the containment isolation function requirements prior to startup for cycle 16. |
| | V. |
| | |
| | ==Additional Information== |
| | Sitnitar Events LER 96-050-00, "LOCA Concurrent with LNP, and Loss of DC Power Prevents Closure of LPCI Torus Test L |
| | Return Valves." The condition discussed in this LER was discovered during a review that is in progress as a result of Commitment No. B15926-4 from LER 96-050-00. |
| | Manufacturer Data i |
| | None. |
| | ? |
| | l r |
| | 1 i! |
| | I |
| | }} |
| | |
| | {{LER-Nav}} |
:on 961121,containment Isolation Function in Design Basis Accident Concurrent W/Loss of One Train of Dc Sys Failed.Caused by Inappropriate Exclusion in Past of Operation Conditions.Requirements Documented| ML20133A906 |
| Person / Time |
|---|
| Site: |
Millstone  |
|---|
| Issue date: |
12/23/1996 |
|---|
| From: |
Robert Walpole NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
|---|
| To: |
|
|---|
| Shared Package |
|---|
| ML20133A898 |
List: |
|---|
| References |
|---|
| LER-96-061, LER-96-61, NUDOCS 9701020160 |
| Download: ML20133A906 (3) |
|
text
.
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATC,RY COMMISSION APPROYED BY oMB No. 31t>o-0104 (4-95)
ExPtREs 04/30/98
' fof?#"o'a/c'1J'aTJs?& "Us"1AA"o^"iG8,"7s J
n^c"??o'L'"#"P"*MKel'oJSM.* Ja?We'ns LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) l'E'u'! '"u'c%fre*"#&"'caJ "s'o?"#!s";~*!'s* e
!,?Rc'3"M '#J3E!*r'l~^n"se"1' "'a%?r"oi"8fM'"*
u (See reverse for required number of digits / characters for each block)
F ACluTV NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
PAGE (3)
Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 1 of 3 TITLE (46 Failure of Containment Isolation Function in a Design Basis Accident Concurrent with a Loss of One Train of DC System EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBER (6)
REPOF:T DATE (7)
OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENilAL REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR FACIUTY NAME DOCKET NUMBER NUMBER 11 2i 96 96 061 00 12 23 96 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 5: (Check one or more) (11)
MODE (9)
N 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 50.73(aH2)(i) 50.73(aH2Hviii)
LEVEL (10) 000 20.2203(aH3)(i)
X 60.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2Hx)
POWER 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(aH2Hi) 20.2203(a)(3Hii) 50.73(aH2Hiii) 73.71 20.2203(aH2)(ii) 4 20.2203(aH4) 50.73(aH2Hiv)
OTHER 20.2203(aH2Hiii) 50.36(C)(1) 50.73(aH2)(v) specify m Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 20.2203(aH2)(iv) 50.36(C)(2) 50.73(aH2)(vii)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (include Area Codel Robert W. Walpole, MP1 Nuclear Licensing Manager (860)440-2191 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE
CAUsE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTUHER REPORTABLE To NPRDs To NPRDS
[
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR SUBMISSloN YES NO Uf yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
On November 21,1996, with L plant shutdown, the reactor in the cold shutdown condition and the fuel off-loaded, it was found that the function of containment isolation for penetration X-14, Reactor Water Clean-up (RWCU) system, would not have been available postulating a loss of S2 DC train concurrent with a design basis accident consisting of a simultaneous loss of coolant accident (LOCA) with a loss of offsite power (LNP). The loss of containment isolation function under this scenario would occur only during heat-up or cool-down of the reactor with the reactor pressure under 100 psig, when the RWCU system is operating in the auxiliary pump line up. Under this condition, the reactor may be critical but the core power is only a few percent and the turbine is off-line. This event was reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(1)(ii)(B) as a condition that is outside the design basis of the plant. There were no automatic nor manually initiated safety system responses as a result of this event. The cause of this event is the inappropriate exclusion in the past of some operating conditions, such as the auxiliary valve line-ups, from the requirements of the containment isolation function. There were no actual safety consequences. The safety implications of the event are minimal since the event could only take place under a short duration window in the start-up or cool down of the reactor, the probability of the postulated failure to happen simultaneously with the design basis accident is extremely low and the existing procedures in place would mitigate the consequences of such event. The containment isolation design requirements for RWCU system auxiliary pump operation mode will be determined and, if required, a plant modification such as changing the power source to the RWCU system containment isolation valves will be implemented.
9701020160 961223 PDR ADOCK 05000245 S
PDR
m.
i
'NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (445)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FActLITY NAME 10 DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION i
Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 NUMBER NUMBER 2 of 3 96 061 00 i
TEXT (if more space is required, use additional copies of NRC form 366A) (17)
I.
Description of Event
l l
On November 21, 1996, with the plant in cold shutdown and fuel off-loaded, during re-evaluation of the j
limiting single failure for Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) and containment isolation function for the auxiliary valve line-ups that was being performed to address Commitment No. B15926-4 per LER 96-050, it was found that the function of containment isolation required when the reactor is critical or the coolant temperature is at or above 212 degree F would not have been available with a single failure of one DC train concurrent with the design basis accident. The design basis accident that is being considered is LOCA simultaneous with an LNP. The penetration involved is X 14 for the RWCU system.
There were no automatic not manually initiated safety system responses as a result of this event. This event was reported on November 21,1996, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(1)(ii)(B) as a condition that is outside the design basis of the plant.
11. Cause of Event
The cause of this event is an inappropriate exclusion in the past of some operating conditions, such as auxiliary valve line ups from the requirements of containment isolation function.
Ill. Analysis of Event During the reactor heat-up or cool-down when the reactor pressure is below 100 psig, the RWCU flow is established by placing the auxiliary pump in service. Operation of the auxiliary pump requires opening of a containment isolation motor operated valve (MOV) (1-CU-5) located in the pump suction line in this scenario, the reactor is either subcritical (cool-down) or critical with the power being less than a few percent. In both situations, the turbine is off line.
The two valves providing the containment isolation function in these scenarios are powered from the S2 division of the plant electrical system. The inboard MOV (1-CU 2) is AC powered while the outboard MOV is DC. A postulated failure of the S2 DC system would disable the inboard AC valve only if LNP is postulated coincidentally. The assumed loss of the DC bus would disable the diesel generator, which could provide power to the inboard AC valve.
This issue was brought to the forefront during an evaluation for the corrective action for LER 96-050.
There were no actual safety consequences. The RWCU system operates with 1-CU-5 open when the reactor is starting-up from cold shutdown or cooling-down. The turbine is off-line and the plant electrical loads are energized through the start-up transformer (RSST). Under this condition, the probability of an LNP event is much reduced. The RWCU system piping and the secondary containment also are barriers to any release of radioactive material. Therefore, the safety implication of the failure of containment isolation function at this penetration under the postulated condition is minimal.
IV. Corrective Action
As a result of this event and the subsequent investigation, the following corrective actions are required:
GdRC FORM 366A (4-95)
_. = _ _._.- _.- _ _._._. __. _ ____._.._. _ _____ _._ _.._...-. _. _. _ --.
.U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 14.ts>
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION I
Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 NUMBER NUMBER 3 of 3 96 061 00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (11)
I l
Document the containment isolation design requirements for RWCU system auxiliary pump operation e
j mode if required, a plant modification such as changing the power source to the RWCU system l
containment isolation MOVs will be implemented prior to startup for operating cycle 16.
l l
The ongoing 10 CFR 50.54(f) review of the systems will address the containment isolation function requirements prior to startup for cycle 16.
V.
Additional Information
Sitnitar Events LER 96-050-00, "LOCA Concurrent with LNP, and Loss of DC Power Prevents Closure of LPCI Torus Test L
Return Valves." The condition discussed in this LER was discovered during a review that is in progress as a result of Commitment No. B15926-4 from LER 96-050-00.
Manufacturer Data i
None.
?
l r
1 i!
I
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000336/LER-1996-001, :on 960625,discovered Reactor Coolant Sys Heatup Rate Exceeded Tech Spec.Caused by Design & Procedural Weaknesses Re Plant Heatup Controls.Revised Plant Operating Procedures & Heatup/Cooldown Computer Program |
- on 960625,discovered Reactor Coolant Sys Heatup Rate Exceeded Tech Spec.Caused by Design & Procedural Weaknesses Re Plant Heatup Controls.Revised Plant Operating Procedures & Heatup/Cooldown Computer Program
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-001-02, :on 960120,supplementary Leak Collection & Release Sys Declared Inoperable Due to Equipment Failure of Door Latch.Door Repaired & Plant Returned to 100% Power |
- on 960120,supplementary Leak Collection & Release Sys Declared Inoperable Due to Equipment Failure of Door Latch.Door Repaired & Plant Returned to 100% Power
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-002, :on 960108,determined That Ice Plug in Common Line Resulted in Inability to Backwash Svc Water Strainers. Caused by Mod to Backwash Line Piping.Ice Plug Removed, Restoring Ability to Backwash |
- on 960108,determined That Ice Plug in Common Line Resulted in Inability to Backwash Svc Water Strainers. Caused by Mod to Backwash Line Piping.Ice Plug Removed, Restoring Ability to Backwash
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat | | 05000423/LER-1996-002-02, :on 960310,inadequate Surveillance for Determining Shutdown Margin When Unisolating Rcl Identified. Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedures Revised |
- on 960310,inadequate Surveillance for Determining Shutdown Margin When Unisolating Rcl Identified. Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) | | 05000423/LER-1996-002, :on 960310,inadequate Surveillance for Determining Shutdown Margin When Unisolating Rcl Occurred Due to Procedure Inadequacy.Changes Will Be Made to Technical Requirements Manual |
- on 960310,inadequate Surveillance for Determining Shutdown Margin When Unisolating Rcl Occurred Due to Procedure Inadequacy.Changes Will Be Made to Technical Requirements Manual
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000245/LER-1996-003, :on 960111,discovered Existing Anchorage of EDG Day Tank Not Seismically Adequate.Caused by Original Design Deficiency.Anchorage of EDG Tank Will Be Graded to Meet Design Basis of Seismic Load Requirements |
- on 960111,discovered Existing Anchorage of EDG Day Tank Not Seismically Adequate.Caused by Original Design Deficiency.Anchorage of EDG Tank Will Be Graded to Meet Design Basis of Seismic Load Requirements
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(viii) | | 05000336/LER-1996-003-01, :on 960205,failed to Recognize Requirement to Enter TS LCO 3.0.3 Following Discovery of Ice Blockage. Caused by Inadequate Problem Identification Methods.Design Basis Summary Documents Have Been Prepared Re TS Safety Sys |
- on 960205,failed to Recognize Requirement to Enter TS LCO 3.0.3 Following Discovery of Ice Blockage. Caused by Inadequate Problem Identification Methods.Design Basis Summary Documents Have Been Prepared Re TS Safety Sys
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000245/LER-1996-003-02, Forwards LER 96-003-02 Which Documents an Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 1 on 960111,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i) & 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Commitments Made in Ltr,Submitted | Forwards LER 96-003-02 Which Documents an Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 1 on 960111,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i) & 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Commitments Made in Ltr,Submitted | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-003-01, :on 960312,temporary I-Beams Located Overhead of Recirculation Spray Sys HXs Discovered.Caused by Inadequate Work Control.Work Control Procedures Revised |
- on 960312,temporary I-Beams Located Overhead of Recirculation Spray Sys HXs Discovered.Caused by Inadequate Work Control.Work Control Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-004-01, :on 960319,determined That Auxiliary Feedwater Isolation Valves Were in Noncompliance W/Ts.Caused by Misinterpretation of Ts.Revised Operating Procedure to Preclude cross-connected Sys Alignment |
- on 960319,determined That Auxiliary Feedwater Isolation Valves Were in Noncompliance W/Ts.Caused by Misinterpretation of Ts.Revised Operating Procedure to Preclude cross-connected Sys Alignment
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-004, :on 960131,svc Water Strainer Backwash Sys Susceptibility to Freezing Following Loss of Intake Structure non-vital Heating Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Original Design.Design Change Implemented |
- on 960131,svc Water Strainer Backwash Sys Susceptibility to Freezing Following Loss of Intake Structure non-vital Heating Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Original Design.Design Change Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-004-02, :on 960316,auxiliary Feedwater Isolation Valves Noncompliance W/Ts Occurred.Caused by Misinterpretation of Ts.Event Reviewed W/Station Personnel to Caution Others on TS Surveillance Requirements |
- on 960316,auxiliary Feedwater Isolation Valves Noncompliance W/Ts Occurred.Caused by Misinterpretation of Ts.Event Reviewed W/Station Personnel to Caution Others on TS Surveillance Requirements
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000336/LER-1996-005-01, :on 960212,discovered PEO Improperly Utilized to Replace Automatic Backwash Function of Svc Water Strainer Backwash Sys.Caused by Failure to Enter TS Action Statement. Revise Procedures for IST SWS Pump Operability |
- on 960212,discovered PEO Improperly Utilized to Replace Automatic Backwash Function of Svc Water Strainer Backwash Sys.Caused by Failure to Enter TS Action Statement. Revise Procedures for IST SWS Pump Operability
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-005-02, :on 960321,service Water Booster Pump Auto Start Discovered Disable.Caused by Inadequate Review.C/A: Bypass Jumper Removed & Mod Initiated |
- on 960321,service Water Booster Pump Auto Start Discovered Disable.Caused by Inadequate Review.C/A: Bypass Jumper Removed & Mod Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-005-03, :on 960321,design Noncompliance Noted for High Temp Automatic Start Feature of SWS Booster Pumps.Caused by Weakness in Design Control Process.Operating Procedures Revised |
- on 960321,design Noncompliance Noted for High Temp Automatic Start Feature of SWS Booster Pumps.Caused by Weakness in Design Control Process.Operating Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-006-01, :on 960207,service Water Pump Motor Flood Protection Not Provided.Caused by Inadequate Administrative Controls.Administrative Controls Established |
- on 960207,service Water Pump Motor Flood Protection Not Provided.Caused by Inadequate Administrative Controls.Administrative Controls Established
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-006-02, :on 960330,plant Shutdown Required by TS for AFW Containment Isolation Valves Declared Inoperable.Caused by Opened Valves Outside Containment.Unit Was Shutdown in Orderly Manner |
- on 960330,plant Shutdown Required by TS for AFW Containment Isolation Valves Declared Inoperable.Caused by Opened Valves Outside Containment.Unit Was Shutdown in Orderly Manner
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | | 05000423/LER-1996-007, :on 960403,containment Recirculation Spray, Quench Spray & Safety Injection Sys Were Outside Design Basis Due to Design Errors.Design Reviews of Rss,Qss,Si & Other Sys Will Be Performed |
- on 960403,containment Recirculation Spray, Quench Spray & Safety Injection Sys Were Outside Design Basis Due to Design Errors.Design Reviews of Rss,Qss,Si & Other Sys Will Be Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000336/LER-1996-007, :on 960220,discovered RCS C/D Rate Exceeded TS Limit.Caused by Use of Wrong Temp Sensor.Plant Operating Procedures,Heatup/C/D Monitoring Computer Program & Operator Training Involving These Events Revised |
- on 960220,discovered RCS C/D Rate Exceeded TS Limit.Caused by Use of Wrong Temp Sensor.Plant Operating Procedures,Heatup/C/D Monitoring Computer Program & Operator Training Involving These Events Revised
| | | 05000423/LER-1996-007-01, :on 960403,CRS & Qs Sys Found Outside Design Basis Due to Design Errors.Restored Sys to Appropriate Design Basis Requirements Prior to Declaring Sys Inoperable |
- on 960403,CRS & Qs Sys Found Outside Design Basis Due to Design Errors.Restored Sys to Appropriate Design Basis Requirements Prior to Declaring Sys Inoperable
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability | | 05000423/LER-1996-007-02, Forwards LER 96-007-02 Which Supplements Rept Submitted on 960502,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B),10CFR50.73(a)(2)(v)(B&D), 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(vii)(B&D).Commitments in Response to Event, Encl | Forwards LER 96-007-02 Which Supplements Rept Submitted on 960502,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B),10CFR50.73(a)(2)(v)(B&D), 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(vii)(B&D).Commitments in Response to Event, Encl | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-008, :on 960222,concluded That Condition of Wire Mesh Screen Encl Over Two Containment Recirculation Suction Pipes Outside Design Basis.Caused by Const/Installation Error.Screen Encl Being Replaced |
- on 960222,concluded That Condition of Wire Mesh Screen Encl Over Two Containment Recirculation Suction Pipes Outside Design Basis.Caused by Const/Installation Error.Screen Encl Being Replaced
| | | 05000423/LER-1996-008-01, :on 960412,reactor Protection Sys Lead/Lag Time Constants Found non-conservative.Caused by Failure of Vendor to Identify Conservative Calibr Requirements.Tss Changed to Correctly Identify Direction of Conservatism |
- on 960412,reactor Protection Sys Lead/Lag Time Constants Found non-conservative.Caused by Failure of Vendor to Identify Conservative Calibr Requirements.Tss Changed to Correctly Identify Direction of Conservatism
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000423/LER-1996-009, :on 960423,inoperable Shutdown Margin Monitors from Low Count Rate Occurred Due to Inadequate Design Control.Reduced SMM Setpoint |
- on 960423,inoperable Shutdown Margin Monitors from Low Count Rate Occurred Due to Inadequate Design Control.Reduced SMM Setpoint
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000245/LER-1996-009-01, :on 960109,isolation Condenser Makeup Water Temperature Below Design Basis Limit,Determined.Caused by Inadequate Design Specification.Preliminary Assessment of non-ductile Failure of Isolation Condenser Sys Performed |
- on 960109,isolation Condenser Makeup Water Temperature Below Design Basis Limit,Determined.Caused by Inadequate Design Specification.Preliminary Assessment of non-ductile Failure of Isolation Condenser Sys Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-009-01, :on 960216,post LOCA Contianment Pressure Prevented Timely Extraction of PASS Air Sample & H Sample. Caused by Inadequate Assessment of Revised Post LOCA Response Analysis.Implemented Design Change |
- on 960216,post LOCA Contianment Pressure Prevented Timely Extraction of PASS Air Sample & H Sample. Caused by Inadequate Assessment of Revised Post LOCA Response Analysis.Implemented Design Change
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-009-02, Submits Table of Commitments Re LER 96-009-02 Per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii) | Submits Table of Commitments Re LER 96-009-02 Per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii) | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1996-010, :on 960222,identified That Containment Hydrogen Monitor Flow Could Not Be Established W/Containment at Atmospheric Pressure Due to Improper Setting of Sys Pressure Regulators.Sys Calib Procedure Will Be Revised |
- on 960222,identified That Containment Hydrogen Monitor Flow Could Not Be Established W/Containment at Atmospheric Pressure Due to Improper Setting of Sys Pressure Regulators.Sys Calib Procedure Will Be Revised
| | | 05000423/LER-1996-010-02, :on 960425,determined That Potential Failure Mode of Rod Control Sys Acopian Power Supplies Could Create Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Inadequate Design Review. Reset Feature Will Be Deleted |
- on 960425,determined That Potential Failure Mode of Rod Control Sys Acopian Power Supplies Could Create Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Inadequate Design Review. Reset Feature Will Be Deleted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded | | 05000336/LER-1996-011-01, :on 960222,required Time to Enter Mode 5 Exceeded.Caused by Effective Action Not Being Initiated to Revise SDC & Cooldown Rate Monitoring Procedures.Operating & Surveillance Procedures Will Be Revised |
- on 960222,required Time to Enter Mode 5 Exceeded.Caused by Effective Action Not Being Initiated to Revise SDC & Cooldown Rate Monitoring Procedures.Operating & Surveillance Procedures Will Be Revised
| | | 05000423/LER-1996-011-02, :on 960512,determined That Both Trains of CR Envelope Pressurization Sys Inoperable Due to Imbalance in air-conditioning Sys.Cr air-conditioning Sys Rebalanced.W/ |
- on 960512,determined That Both Trains of CR Envelope Pressurization Sys Inoperable Due to Imbalance in air-conditioning Sys.Cr air-conditioning Sys Rebalanced.W/
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-012, :on 960515,containment Leakage in Excess of TS Limits Noted,Due to Valve Leakage.Containment Spray Line Penetration 100 Flushed to Remove Any Boron Deposits.W/ |
- on 960515,containment Leakage in Excess of TS Limits Noted,Due to Valve Leakage.Containment Spray Line Penetration 100 Flushed to Remove Any Boron Deposits.W/
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1996-012-01, :on 960228,SIS Drain Stop Valves Failed to Meet Functional Requirements of Ts.Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Retest Requirements.C/A:Valve 2-SI-618 Modified & Safety Related Solenoid Valves Inspected |
- on 960228,SIS Drain Stop Valves Failed to Meet Functional Requirements of Ts.Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Retest Requirements.C/A:Valve 2-SI-618 Modified & Safety Related Solenoid Valves Inspected
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-012-02, :on 960515,containment Leakage Exceeded Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Boric Acid Residue.Performed Flush of Line to Remove Boron Deposits |
- on 960515,containment Leakage Exceeded Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Boric Acid Residue.Performed Flush of Line to Remove Boron Deposits
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded | | 05000423/LER-1996-013, :on 960612,design Deficiency in Rhrs.Caused by Inconsideration That Failure Mode of RHS Flow Control Valves Could Create High RHS Heat Exchanger CCP Discharge Temps. Actuators for Heat Exchanger Valves,Modified |
- on 960612,design Deficiency in Rhrs.Caused by Inconsideration That Failure Mode of RHS Flow Control Valves Could Create High RHS Heat Exchanger CCP Discharge Temps. Actuators for Heat Exchanger Valves,Modified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000336/LER-1996-013-01, :on 960314,assessed Wide Range Logarithmic Neutron Flux Monitors Nuclear Instrumentation Channels A,B,C & D as Inoperable Due to Potential Susceptability to Common Mode Failure.Replaced Failed Power Supply |
- on 960314,assessed Wide Range Logarithmic Neutron Flux Monitors Nuclear Instrumentation Channels A,B,C & D as Inoperable Due to Potential Susceptability to Common Mode Failure.Replaced Failed Power Supply
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-013-02, :on 960515,determined Design Deficiency in Residual Heat Removal System (Rhs).Caused by Original Plant Design.Corrective Actions Will Be Described in Supplement |
- on 960515,determined Design Deficiency in Residual Heat Removal System (Rhs).Caused by Original Plant Design.Corrective Actions Will Be Described in Supplement
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability | | 05000336/LER-1996-014-01, :on 960311,weekly TS Surveillances Missed. Caused by Personnel Error W/Respect to Scheduling.C/A: Implemented Requirements of Surveillance Procedure Sp 2614A-3 |
- on 960311,weekly TS Surveillances Missed. Caused by Personnel Error W/Respect to Scheduling.C/A: Implemented Requirements of Surveillance Procedure Sp 2614A-3
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000423/LER-1996-014-02, :on 960516,surveillances for Emergency Diesel Generator Performed During Operation,Versus Shutdown.Caused by Misinterpretation of Shutdown Stipulation.Surveillances Performed During Shutdown |
- on 960516,surveillances for Emergency Diesel Generator Performed During Operation,Versus Shutdown.Caused by Misinterpretation of Shutdown Stipulation.Surveillances Performed During Shutdown
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-015-05, Forwards LER 96-015-05,documenting Event That Occurred at Plant,Unit 3 on 960610,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B). Commitments Made within Ltr Submitted | Forwards LER 96-015-05,documenting Event That Occurred at Plant,Unit 3 on 960610,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B). Commitments Made within Ltr Submitted | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-015-04, Forwards LER 96-015-04,documenting Condition Determined at Unit 3 on 960610.Util Commitments in Response to Event Contained within Attachment 1 to Ltr | Forwards LER 96-015-04,documenting Condition Determined at Unit 3 on 960610.Util Commitments in Response to Event Contained within Attachment 1 to Ltr | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000336/LER-1996-015-01, :on 960312,failed to Perform Action Requirement for TS LCO 3.3.1.1.Caused by Failure to Recognize Applicability of TS During Abnormal Equipment Configuration. Revised Procedures |
- on 960312,failed to Perform Action Requirement for TS LCO 3.3.1.1.Caused by Failure to Recognize Applicability of TS During Abnormal Equipment Configuration. Revised Procedures
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-015-02, Forwards LER 96-015-02 Re Inadequate Electrical Separation Between Redundant Protection Trains Associated W/Reactor Trip Switches & Reactor Trip Breaker Indicating Lights | Forwards LER 96-015-02 Re Inadequate Electrical Separation Between Redundant Protection Trains Associated W/Reactor Trip Switches & Reactor Trip Breaker Indicating Lights | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability | | 05000423/LER-1996-016-02, :on 960619,switchgear Cabinet in Noncompliance W/Seismic Design Basis & Subsequently Inadvertent Esfa Signal Occurred.Personnel Did Not Latch Known Seismic Latches as Required.Engaged Latches |
- on 960619,switchgear Cabinet in Noncompliance W/Seismic Design Basis & Subsequently Inadvertent Esfa Signal Occurred.Personnel Did Not Latch Known Seismic Latches as Required.Engaged Latches
| | | 05000336/LER-1996-016-01, :on 960312,common Power Supply Cable to 4 Condenser Pit Level Switches Found Improperly Connected. Caused by Inadequate Work Control.Cable Properly Connected & Trip Circuits Tested |
- on 960312,common Power Supply Cable to 4 Condenser Pit Level Switches Found Improperly Connected. Caused by Inadequate Work Control.Cable Properly Connected & Trip Circuits Tested
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-017, :on 960320,discovered That Hydrogen Monitoring Sys Does Not Meet Single Failure Criterion by Reg Guide 1.97.Caused by Failure to Adequately Consider Sys Design Basis Requirements.Design Change Modified |
- on 960320,discovered That Hydrogen Monitoring Sys Does Not Meet Single Failure Criterion by Reg Guide 1.97.Caused by Failure to Adequately Consider Sys Design Basis Requirements.Design Change Modified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-017-02, :on 960621,determined Design Deficiency Existed in Tornado Protection Ventilation Dampers,Could Have Affected EDGs Following Tornado.Caused by Inadequate Original Plant Const Design.Procedure Revised |
- on 960621,determined Design Deficiency Existed in Tornado Protection Ventilation Dampers,Could Have Affected EDGs Following Tornado.Caused by Inadequate Original Plant Const Design.Procedure Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat | | 05000336/LER-1996-018-01, Forwards LER 96-018-01,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Unit 2 on 960319.LER Suppl Provides Update on Analyses & Investigation of Condition.Attachment 1 Is Clarification of Original Commitment Associated W/Ler | Forwards LER 96-018-01,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Unit 2 on 960319.LER Suppl Provides Update on Analyses & Investigation of Condition.Attachment 1 Is Clarification of Original Commitment Associated W/Ler | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000336/LER-1996-018, :on 960316,gaps Discovered in Encls Door Seals for Motor Control Ctrs B51 & B61.Caused by Weakness in Existing Program to Inspect & Verify Integrity of Environ Protective Barriers.Doors for MCC B51 & MCC B61 Replaced |
- on 960316,gaps Discovered in Encls Door Seals for Motor Control Ctrs B51 & B61.Caused by Weakness in Existing Program to Inspect & Verify Integrity of Environ Protective Barriers.Doors for MCC B51 & MCC B61 Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-019-02, :on 960627,RCS PORV Block Valves Were Determined to Be Unable to Perform Intended Safety Functions.Caused by Structural Design Deficiency.C/A Will Be Provided in Supplement to Rept |
- on 960627,RCS PORV Block Valves Were Determined to Be Unable to Perform Intended Safety Functions.Caused by Structural Design Deficiency.C/A Will Be Provided in Supplement to Rept
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) |
|