ML16193A376: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ML16193A376 From:DeborahGrinnellSent:Thursday,July07,20161:06PMTo:Buford,Angela<Angela.Buford@nrc.gov>
==Subject:==
[External_Sender]NextEra'sASR Hi Angela,
Thank you for offering to answer C-10 questions on Seabrook's ASR unresolved issue. How long were you and audit NRC staff at Seabrook recently. What were the dates you were at Seabrook and where?? Containment in Unit 1 AND 2? The audit you and staff on October 27-29th 2015 you wrote:
Audit Results. Prior to the audit, by letter dated October 2, 2015 (Accession No. ML15251A333), the staff issued new and follow up RAIs to request information pertaining to concerns associated with the applicant's June 30, 2015, submittal. The staff's concerns documented in the RAIs included:  - Addressing recent operating experience concerning building deformation caused by global ASR expansion  - Representativeness between test specimens and methodology of measurement and correlation of testing program to Seabrook structures  - Uncertainties and variations associated with estimate of normalized modulus  - Representative sample for monitoring through-wall expansion  - Combined cracking index (CCI) as a surrogate for ASR expansion in the in-plane  direction  What are the NextEra answers to the questions above, as their responses were not providing a " sufficient technical basis" . NextEra withheld data in Seabrook's containment DONE by an MPR contractor, right? Or was it done be Texas staff.? After NextEra in 2010 did cores in Seabrook's control building, in 2012, two years later, NextEra NEVER WENT INSIDE CONTAINMENT. Thank you, Debbie 
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:19, 14 May 2018

Email from D. Grinnell to A. Buford Subj: Seabrook'S ASR
ML16193A376
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/07/2016
From: Grinnell D
NextEra Energy Seabrook
To: Angela Buford
NRC/NRR/DLR/RARB
References
Download: ML16193A376 (1)


Text

ML16193A376 From:DeborahGrinnellSent:Thursday,July07,20161:06PMTo:Buford,Angela<Angela.Buford@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender]NextEra'sASR Hi Angela,

Thank you for offering to answer C-10 questions on Seabrook's ASR unresolved issue. How long were you and audit NRC staff at Seabrook recently. What were the dates you were at Seabrook and where?? Containment in Unit 1 AND 2? The audit you and staff on October 27-29th 2015 you wrote:

Audit Results. Prior to the audit, by letter dated October 2, 2015 (Accession No. ML15251A333), the staff issued new and follow up RAIs to request information pertaining to concerns associated with the applicant's June 30, 2015, submittal. The staff's concerns documented in the RAIs included: - Addressing recent operating experience concerning building deformation caused by global ASR expansion - Representativeness between test specimens and methodology of measurement and correlation of testing program to Seabrook structures - Uncertainties and variations associated with estimate of normalized modulus - Representative sample for monitoring through-wall expansion - Combined cracking index (CCI) as a surrogate for ASR expansion in the in-plane direction What are the NextEra answers to the questions above, as their responses were not providing a " sufficient technical basis" . NextEra withheld data in Seabrook's containment DONE by an MPR contractor, right? Or was it done be Texas staff.? After NextEra in 2010 did cores in Seabrook's control building, in 2012, two years later, NextEra NEVER WENT INSIDE CONTAINMENT. Thank you, Debbie