ML24129A067: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF 1 | ||
Proposed Change to the PWR ECCS Mode 4 Requirements | |||
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Introduction | |||
* The PWR licensing basis for Mode 4 accident and transient mitigation is unclear. | |||
* The current TS Bases are contradictory regarding the events assumed to occur in Mode 4 and the required mitigating systems. | |||
* The PWR and TSTF are pursuing a project to establish a consistent licensing basis for Mode 4 accidents and transients, similar to the change made for BWRs in TSTF-542, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control, and TSTF-582, RPV WIC Enhancements. | |||
2 | |||
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Mode 4 | |||
* Mode 4 (hot shutdown), is defined in the TS as subcritical, all reactor vessel head closure bolts fully tensioned, RCS Temperature > [200] | |||
and < [350]. This temperature range is consistent with an RCS pressure 400 psig (< 20% of the ASME Code design pressure). | |||
* Some TS Bases state that DBAs can occur in Mode 4, while others state they cannot occur. | |||
* SRP Chapter 15 events applicable to a PWR were reviewed to determine which could reasonably occur in Mode 4. | |||
- Most events were not credible because of the low RCS pressure. | |||
- Most of the remaining events are adequately addressed by existing TS that are not being considered for revision. | |||
3 | |||
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Emergency Core Cooling System | |||
* The most operationally impactful Mode 4 TS is TS 3.5.3, ECCS - Shutdown, which requires one train of ECCS to be operable. | |||
- The requirement for a low pressure ECCS subsystem to be operable limits the ability to use both trains of the RHR system for a plant cooldown. | |||
* The Bases for TS 3.5.3 states that the ECCS - Operating Bases apply, but then make contrary statements regarding the plant conditions, automatic systems, single failure, etc. | |||
* A loss of reactor coolant system inventory from a small pipe break or inadvertent opening of a valve in Mode 4 is credible, but a double-guillotine large-break LOCA is not. | |||
- There is no accident analysis for a LOCA initiated in Mode 4. | |||
4 | |||
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Proposed Approach | |||
* Similar to the change made to the BWR TS in TSTF-542, the PWR is pursuing a revision to TS 3.5.3 to rename it Reactor Coolant System Water Inventory Control, and to revise the requirements to ensure equipment is available to respond to a loss of inventory in Mode 4. | |||
- A single ECCS subsystem (high pressure or low pressure) capable of being powered by emergency power. | |||
- A single failure is not assumed (as in the current TS 3.5.3). | |||
- Manual starting of the ECCS pump, and alignment of the water source can be performed from the control room using procedurally controlled actions (similar to some current TS 3.5.3 requirements). | |||
5 | |||
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Proposed Approach | |||
* As was done in TSTF-542, this change is not establishing a new DBA analysis, but will ensure that appropriate equipment is available to respond to credible events. | |||
* As a follow-on activity, the PWROG will examine all of the TS with Mode 4 applicability and propose TS and/or Bases changes as needed to establish a consistent licensing basis. | |||
* This project will start in late 2024 or 2025. | |||
6}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:24, 24 November 2024
| ML24129A067 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Technical Specifications Task Force |
| Issue date: | 05/08/2024 |
| From: | Technical Specifications Task Force |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML24129A067 (1) | |
Text
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF 1
Proposed Change to the PWR ECCS Mode 4 Requirements
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Introduction
- The current TS Bases are contradictory regarding the events assumed to occur in Mode 4 and the required mitigating systems.
- The PWR and TSTF are pursuing a project to establish a consistent licensing basis for Mode 4 accidents and transients, similar to the change made for BWRs in TSTF-542, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control, and TSTF-582, RPV WIC Enhancements.
2
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Mode 4
- Mode 4 (hot shutdown), is defined in the TS as subcritical, all reactor vessel head closure bolts fully tensioned, RCS Temperature > [200]
and < [350]. This temperature range is consistent with an RCS pressure 400 psig (< 20% of the ASME Code design pressure).
- Some TS Bases state that DBAs can occur in Mode 4, while others state they cannot occur.
- SRP Chapter 15 events applicable to a PWR were reviewed to determine which could reasonably occur in Mode 4.
- Most events were not credible because of the low RCS pressure.
- Most of the remaining events are adequately addressed by existing TS that are not being considered for revision.
3
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Emergency Core Cooling System
- The most operationally impactful Mode 4 TS is TS 3.5.3, ECCS - Shutdown, which requires one train of ECCS to be operable.
- The requirement for a low pressure ECCS subsystem to be operable limits the ability to use both trains of the RHR system for a plant cooldown.
- The Bases for TS 3.5.3 states that the ECCS - Operating Bases apply, but then make contrary statements regarding the plant conditions, automatic systems, single failure, etc.
- A loss of reactor coolant system inventory from a small pipe break or inadvertent opening of a valve in Mode 4 is credible, but a double-guillotine large-break LOCA is not.
- There is no accident analysis for a LOCA initiated in Mode 4.
4
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Proposed Approach
- Similar to the change made to the BWR TS in TSTF-542, the PWR is pursuing a revision to TS 3.5.3 to rename it Reactor Coolant System Water Inventory Control, and to revise the requirements to ensure equipment is available to respond to a loss of inventory in Mode 4.
- A single ECCS subsystem (high pressure or low pressure) capable of being powered by emergency power.
- A single failure is not assumed (as in the current TS 3.5.3).
- Manual starting of the ECCS pump, and alignment of the water source can be performed from the control room using procedurally controlled actions (similar to some current TS 3.5.3 requirements).
5
Technical Specifications Task Force A Joint Owners Group Activity TSTF Proposed Approach
- As was done in TSTF-542, this change is not establishing a new DBA analysis, but will ensure that appropriate equipment is available to respond to credible events.
- As a follow-on activity, the PWROG will examine all of the TS with Mode 4 applicability and propose TS and/or Bases changes as needed to establish a consistent licensing basis.
- This project will start in late 2024 or 2025.
6