ML24134A189: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: bonesjazz0@gmail.com To: Jeremy Mercer; Nick Trikouros; Gary Arnold | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
[External_Sender] OPPOSE EXTENDING OPERATION OF DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Date: | [External_Sender] OPPOSE EXTENDING OPERATION OF DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Date: Friday, May 10, 2024 2:40:08 PM | ||
I am opposed to the extended operation of Diablo Canyon because the risks are too high. The plant is old, Unit 1s reactor pressure vessel is embrittled, and the facility is surrounded by a network of active earthquake faults. The risk to the surrounding communities in central and southern California is too high and is unacceptable. | I am opposed to the extended operation of Diablo Canyon because the risks are too high. The plant is old, Unit 1s reactor pressure vessel is embrittled, and the facility is surrounded by a network of active earthquake faults. The risk to the surrounding communities in central and southern California is too high and is unacceptable. | ||
Michael Glick Santa Barbara, Ca.}} | Michael Glick Santa Barbara, Ca.}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:10, 4 October 2024
| ML24134A189 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 05/10/2024 |
| From: | Glick M - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Gary Arnold, Mercer J, Nicholas Trikouros Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| Download: ML24134A189 (1) | |
Text
From: bonesjazz0@gmail.com To: Jeremy Mercer; Nick Trikouros; Gary Arnold
Subject:
[External_Sender] OPPOSE EXTENDING OPERATION OF DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Date: Friday, May 10, 2024 2:40:08 PM
I am opposed to the extended operation of Diablo Canyon because the risks are too high. The plant is old, Unit 1s reactor pressure vessel is embrittled, and the facility is surrounded by a network of active earthquake faults. The risk to the surrounding communities in central and southern California is too high and is unacceptable.
Michael Glick Santa Barbara, Ca.