ML20126F981: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Georgia oower Company | APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Georgia oower Company Docket No. 50-50-366 Hatch 2 ' | ||
the following. violations were.identi.fied | License No. NPF-5 As a result of the inspection conducted on February 17-20, 1981, and in accordance with tne Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), | ||
A. Tec'.nical Specification 6.8.1 requires that procedures shall be implemented. | the following. violations were.identi.fied. | ||
A. | |||
Tec'.nical Specification 6.8.1 requires that procedures shall be implemented. | |||
KNP-3, " Maintenance Request (MR)", Revision 13 dated 3/20, paragraphs 12.c, c and e requires that when pacts for requested maintenance are obtained with an Inventory Material Request (IMR), a copy of the IMR will be attached to the MR or if an IMR is not used, the parts will be noted on the back of the MR. Also, the worker will attach any QA conformance tags, for parts used, to the MR. | KNP-3, " Maintenance Request (MR)", Revision 13 dated 3/20, paragraphs 12.c, c and e requires that when pacts for requested maintenance are obtained with an Inventory Material Request (IMR), a copy of the IMR will be attached to the MR or if an IMR is not used, the parts will be noted on the back of the MR. Also, the worker will attach any QA conformance tags, for parts used, to the MR. | ||
Contrary to the abcse, HNP-8 was not implemented in that: for the replace-ment of four Local Power Range Monitors, neither the IMR nor the notation on the back of the MR nor the QA conformance tags were attached to MR-2-50-4176 cated 12/2/80; and for the replacement of a control rod reed switch position indicating assembly, the QA tags were not attached to MR 2-80-4023 dated 12/11/80. Both MR's had been reviewed by' the appropriate foreman and by the station QC department. | Contrary to the abcse, HNP-8 was not implemented in that: for the replace-ment of four Local Power Range Monitors, neither the IMR nor the notation on the back of the MR nor the QA conformance tags were attached to MR-2-50-4176 cated 12/2/80; and for the replacement of a control rod reed switch position indicating assembly, the QA tags were not attached to MR 2-80-4023 dated 12/11/80. Both MR's had been reviewed by' the appropriate foreman and by the station QC department. | ||
This violation is applicable only' to Unit 2. | This violation is applicable only' to Unit 2. | ||
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.). A similiar item was brougnt to your attention in our letter to you dated August 22, D80. | This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.). | ||
B. Technical Specification 4.6.1.2.e requires that an error analyses shall be performed to select a balanced integrated leakage measurem.cnt system. | A similiar item was brougnt to your attention in our letter to you dated August 22, D80. | ||
B. | |||
Technical Specification 4.6.1.2.e requires that an error analyses shall be performed to select a balanced integrated leakage measurem.cnt system. | |||
Technical Specification 3.6.1.2.c requires a leakage of less than 11.5 scf per nour for any one main steam isolation valve when tested at 28.8 psig, be verified. | Technical Specification 3.6.1.2.c requires a leakage of less than 11.5 scf per nour for any one main steam isolation valve when tested at 28.8 psig, be verified. | ||
Contrary to the above, an error analyses was not done for the measured type C leakage for the main steam isolation valves in that the flow meter used for the testing was calibrated at 59 psig and used at 28.8 psig and no attempt was made.to confirm with the manufacturer or the calibration labo-ratory that the error of the. instrument was within. expected anc within allowable tolerances. This information is required for an error analysis. | Contrary to the above, an error analyses was not done for the measured type C leakage for the main steam isolation valves in that the flow meter used for the testing was calibrated at 59 psig and used at 28.8 psig and no attempt was made.to confirm with the manufacturer or the calibration labo-ratory that the error of the. instrument was within. expected anc within allowable tolerances. This information is required for an error analysis. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 36: | ||
gos240Y | gos240Y | ||
~.. - | |||
I Georgia Power Company 2 | |||
Docket No. 50-366 Notice of Violation License No. NPF-5 C. | |||
Georgia Power Company | 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII requires that records shall be identifiable and retrievable. The accepted Quality Assurance program (FSAR Section 17) states that requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.88 are complied with, which endorses ANSI N45.2.9-1974 which requires that document storage-systems shall provide fer. the accurate retrieval of information without undue delay. | ||
systems shall provide fer. the accurate retrieval of information without undue delay. | i Contrary to the above, records were not retrievable in that: | ||
i Contrary to the above, records were not retrievable in that: | (1).of o completed Maistenance Requests (MR) which were requested by the inspector, one was not ' retrieved (2-80-1873,) and 4 (2-80-1541, 2-80-1242, 2-80-1915 and 2-80-3145) required 2 days or longer to retrieve; (2) two completed procedures (HNP-2-5025 anc ~ HNP-2-6035) which were accompif shed with MR-2-80-4176 dated 12-2-80 were not retrieved; and (3).the alibration data for the flo < meter used in the type C leak' rate testirg of the Main Steam Isolation Valves required more than one day to retrieve. | ||
one was not ' retrieved (2-80-1873,) and 4 (2-80-1541, 2-80-1242, 2-80-1915 and 2-80-3145) required 2 days or longer to retrieve; (2) two completed procedures (HNP-2-5025 anc ~ HNP-2-6035) which were accompif shed with MR-2-80-4176 dated 12-2-80 were not retrieved; and (3).the alibration data for the flo < meter used in the type C leak' rate testirg of the Main Steam Isolation Valves required more than one day to retrieve. | |||
This violation is applicable only to Unit 2. | This violation is applicable only to Unit 2. | ||
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.). | This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.). | ||
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including; | Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including; (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if acmitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and.the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; 'and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.. | ||
corrective steps which have been taken and.the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; 'and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic | MAR 1 11981 Date: | ||
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.. | |||
MAR 1 11981 Date: | |||
P 1 | P 1 | ||
l' I | l ' | ||
i. | I i. | ||
l I | l I | ||
l l | l l | ||
l i | l i | ||
l | l | ||
..}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:51, 12 December 2024
| ML20126F981 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 03/11/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126F979 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-366-81-03, 50-366-81-3, NUDOCS 8103240807 | |
| Download: ML20126F981 (2) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Georgia oower Company Docket No. 50-50-366 Hatch 2 '
License No. NPF-5 As a result of the inspection conducted on February 17-20, 1981, and in accordance with tne Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980),
the following. violations were.identi.fied.
A.
Tec'.nical Specification 6.8.1 requires that procedures shall be implemented.
KNP-3, " Maintenance Request (MR)", Revision 13 dated 3/20, paragraphs 12.c, c and e requires that when pacts for requested maintenance are obtained with an Inventory Material Request (IMR), a copy of the IMR will be attached to the MR or if an IMR is not used, the parts will be noted on the back of the MR. Also, the worker will attach any QA conformance tags, for parts used, to the MR.
Contrary to the abcse, HNP-8 was not implemented in that: for the replace-ment of four Local Power Range Monitors, neither the IMR nor the notation on the back of the MR nor the QA conformance tags were attached to MR-2-50-4176 cated 12/2/80; and for the replacement of a control rod reed switch position indicating assembly, the QA tags were not attached to MR 2-80-4023 dated 12/11/80. Both MR's had been reviewed by' the appropriate foreman and by the station QC department.
This violation is applicable only' to Unit 2.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.).
A similiar item was brougnt to your attention in our letter to you dated August 22, D80.
B.
Technical Specification 4.6.1.2.e requires that an error analyses shall be performed to select a balanced integrated leakage measurem.cnt system.
Technical Specification 3.6.1.2.c requires a leakage of less than 11.5 scf per nour for any one main steam isolation valve when tested at 28.8 psig, be verified.
Contrary to the above, an error analyses was not done for the measured type C leakage for the main steam isolation valves in that the flow meter used for the testing was calibrated at 59 psig and used at 28.8 psig and no attempt was made.to confirm with the manufacturer or the calibration labo-ratory that the error of the. instrument was within. expected anc within allowable tolerances. This information is required for an error analysis.
This violation is a;olicable only to Unit 2.
This is a Severity Level V Violatfon (Succlement I.E.).
gos240Y
~.. -
I Georgia Power Company 2
Docket No. 50-366 Notice of Violation License No. NPF-5 C.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII requires that records shall be identifiable and retrievable. The accepted Quality Assurance program (FSAR Section 17) states that requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.88 are complied with, which endorses ANSI N45.2.9-1974 which requires that document storage-systems shall provide fer. the accurate retrieval of information without undue delay.
i Contrary to the above, records were not retrievable in that:
(1).of o completed Maistenance Requests (MR) which were requested by the inspector, one was not ' retrieved (2-80-1873,) and 4 (2-80-1541, 2-80-1242, 2-80-1915 and 2-80-3145) required 2 days or longer to retrieve; (2) two completed procedures (HNP-2-5025 anc ~ HNP-2-6035) which were accompif shed with MR-2-80-4176 dated 12-2-80 were not retrieved; and (3).the alibration data for the flo < meter used in the type C leak' rate testirg of the Main Steam Isolation Valves required more than one day to retrieve.
This violation is applicable only to Unit 2.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including; (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if acmitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and.the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; 'and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation..
MAR 1 11981 Date:
P 1
l '
I i.
l I
l l
l i
l
..