ML042940196: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:C N()P-LP2001-01 CONDITION REPORT | {{#Wiki_filter:C N()P-LP2001-01 CONDITION REPORT CR Number TITLE: | ||
2128/2002 | CRDM NOZZLE CRACK INDICATIONS 02-00932 DISCOVERY DATE I TME EVENT DATE TIME SYSTEM / ASSET# | ||
0 | 2128/2002 1500 02/28/02 1500 064-02 NA EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Reactor Vessel Head DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION and PROBABLE CAUSE (If known) Summarize any attachments. Identify what, when, where, why, how. | ||
N | 0 Completion of Ultrasonic Testing (UT) on all 69 Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) Nozzles, R | ||
A | using the 'under-head' circumferential probe, and subsequent confirmatory testing using the "top-I down" tool under Framatome procedure 54-ISI-100-08 has revealed additional CRDM cracks l | ||
o | beyond those on CRDM nozzle # 3 as described and reported under CR 02-00891. | ||
N | In total, there G | ||
are indications of cracks on 5 nozzles: | |||
N NOZLE #1 (location H8): Axial cracks, some with pressure boundary leakage. | |||
A NOZZLE #2 (location G7): Axial cracks, some with pressure boundary leakage, and a partial depth T | |||
circumferential crack of approx. 30 degrees. (Note: this crack is sufficiently small that there was no I | |||
risk of nozzle failure - stresses had substantial margin before reaching.ASME code allowable values.) | |||
o NOZZLE #3 (location G9): Axial cracks, some with pressure boundary leakage (CR 02-00891) | |||
N NOZZLE #5 (location K7): Small axial cracks, predominantly below the weld, no leakage but requiring repair NOZZLE #47 (location D12): Small axial cracks, predominantly below the weld, no leakage but requiring repair Nozzles #1, 2, and 3 have leakage paths apparent on UT, which is corroborated by boric acid deposits on the reactor head. UT results with the 'top-down' tool also provide some evidence of carbon steel base metal corrosion at nozzles 2 and 3. Nozzle 2 also exhibits channeling of the alloy 600 material to a maximum depth of approximately 0.050 inches to form part of the leakage flow path. These effects must be considered during repair of the nozzles. | |||
(There was initial suspicion of a small axial crack below the weld on nozzle #58 from output using the circumferential probe. However, the top-down tool, which is more comprehensive due to a greater number of probes, confirmed that there was no actual defect.) | (There was initial suspicion of a small axial crack below the weld on nozzle #58 from output using the circumferential probe. However, the top-down tool, which is more comprehensive due to a greater number of probes, confirmed that there was no actual defect.) | ||
SUPV COMMENTS I IMMEDIATE ACTIONS TAKEN (Discuss CORRECTIVE ACTIONS completed, basis for closure.) | SUPV COMMENTS I IMMEDIATE ACTIONS TAKEN (Discuss CORRECTIVE ACTIONS completed, basis for closure.) | ||
Unlike the axial crack indications, the observed circumferential crack on CRDM nozzle #2 Is the type indentified In NRC bulletin 2001-01. However, due to its small size, the circumferential crack is not a safety concern. The 3 nozzles with pressure boundary leakage noted in this CR, i.e. nozzles #1, 2, and 3 are reportable per T.S. 3.4.6.2.a. This Issue was already reported under CR02-0891 on 2127/02 for nozzle #3, however, an update of that report will be needed. This CR will ensure the reporting requirements are satisfied. | Unlike the axial crack indications, the observed circumferential crack on CRDM nozzle #2 Is the type indentified In NRC bulletin 2001-01. However, due to its small size, the circumferential crack is not a safety concern. The 3 nozzles with pressure boundary leakage noted in this CR, i.e. nozzles #1, 2, and 3 are reportable per T.S. 3.4.6.2.a. This Issue was already reported under CR02-0891 on 2127/02 for nozzle #3, however, an update of that report will be needed. This CR will ensure the reporting requirements are satisfied. | ||
Resolution of the issues will be addressed by CR 02-00891, which was classified as OSignificant-Root Cause". | Resolution of the issues will be addressed by CR 02-00891, which was classified as OSignificant-Root Cause". | ||
QUALITY ORGANIZATION USE ONLY | QUALITY ORGANIZATION USE ONLY IDENTIFIED BY (Check one) | ||
LANG, T | El Seol-Revealed ATTACHMENTS Quality Org. Initiated E Yes 2 | ||
IndividuaVlWork Group E | |||
Internal Oversight Quality Org. Follow-up El Yes El No El Supervision/Management El External Oversight g Yes E No ORIGINATOR ORGANIZATION I DATE SUPERVISOR DATE PHONE EXT. | |||
LANG, T LCM 2128/2002 LANG, T 3/5/2002 8116 Page 1 of 2 H53 | |||
NOP-LP-2001-01 CONDITION REPORT | NOP-LP-2001-01 CONDITION REPORT JoCR Number TITLE: | ||
A | CRDM NOZZLE CRACK INDICATIONS 02-00932 SRO EQUIPMENT E | ||
N | VALUATION IMMEDIATE ORGANIZATIO0N MODE CHANGE REVIEW OPERABLEREQUIRED INVESTIGATION REQUIRED NOIID RESTRAINT L | ||
o | g3 Yes 0 No El Yes 10 No a3 WA 0 Yes i] | ||
CF | No | ||
ORPATREND CODES | [] Yes il No NIA EdYes 0 No MODE ASSOCIATED TECH SPEC NUMBER(S) | ||
ASSOCIATED LCO ACTION STATEMENT(S) | |||
A L | |||
-g~ | |||
ij#~ | |||
N | |||
-1WI DECLARED REPORTABLE? | |||
One Hour W1AAPPLICABLE UNIT(S) 0 NOPERABLE (Date/Time) | |||
RYes EINo 1 | |||
} | |||
P 2/27/02 / 1330 | |||
]Evat Required Other 8 hour Ul E0 U2 E0 Both E | |||
COMMENTS R | |||
Refer to CR 02-0891. Made 8 hour Non-Emergency update to the initial report (Event Number A | |||
38732) to the NRC. Update was made via ENS at 1921, 3/5/02. The disposition of this CR will be T | |||
tied to that of CR 02-0891. NRC Resident Inspector was also notified, as well as the applicable I | |||
personnel listed in DB-OP-00002. | |||
o Current Mode - Unit I Power Level - Unit 1 Current Mode - Unit 2 l Power Level - Unit 2 N | |||
6 0 | |||
S SRO-UNIT 1 SRO - UNIT 2 DATE Ploeger, T Steenbergen, C 3/5/2002 CATEGORY/ EVAL ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION DUE DATE R REPORTABLE? | |||
CF DBE 4/14/2002 E | |||
Yes O]No EO LERNNo. | |||
ORPATREND CODES Comp Type I ID Resp u | |||
REPORTASILITY REVIEWER I | |||
Process I Activity/ Cause Code(s) | |||
(If Cause T or W) | |||
Org A Wolf, G SUPV HDW 0600 T | |||
0 DATE MRS y | |||
03/08/02 INVESTIGATION OPTIONS CLOSED BY DATE E Generic Impliations El Part 21 | |||
[ MaintRule OE Evaluation Page 2 of 2}} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:40, 16 January 2025
| ML042940196 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse |
| Issue date: | 03/05/2002 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2003-0187 02-00932 | |
| Download: ML042940196 (2) | |
Text
C N()P-LP2001-01 CONDITION REPORT CR Number TITLE:
CRDM NOZZLE CRACK INDICATIONS 02-00932 DISCOVERY DATE I TME EVENT DATE TIME SYSTEM / ASSET#
2128/2002 1500 02/28/02 1500 064-02 NA EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Reactor Vessel Head DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION and PROBABLE CAUSE (If known) Summarize any attachments. Identify what, when, where, why, how.
0 Completion of Ultrasonic Testing (UT) on all 69 Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) Nozzles, R
using the 'under-head' circumferential probe, and subsequent confirmatory testing using the "top-I down" tool under Framatome procedure 54-ISI-100-08 has revealed additional CRDM cracks l
beyond those on CRDM nozzle # 3 as described and reported under CR 02-00891.
In total, there G
are indications of cracks on 5 nozzles:
N NOZLE #1 (location H8): Axial cracks, some with pressure boundary leakage.
A NOZZLE #2 (location G7): Axial cracks, some with pressure boundary leakage, and a partial depth T
circumferential crack of approx. 30 degrees. (Note: this crack is sufficiently small that there was no I
risk of nozzle failure - stresses had substantial margin before reaching.ASME code allowable values.)
o NOZZLE #3 (location G9): Axial cracks, some with pressure boundary leakage (CR 02-00891)
N NOZZLE #5 (location K7): Small axial cracks, predominantly below the weld, no leakage but requiring repair NOZZLE #47 (location D12): Small axial cracks, predominantly below the weld, no leakage but requiring repair Nozzles #1, 2, and 3 have leakage paths apparent on UT, which is corroborated by boric acid deposits on the reactor head. UT results with the 'top-down' tool also provide some evidence of carbon steel base metal corrosion at nozzles 2 and 3. Nozzle 2 also exhibits channeling of the alloy 600 material to a maximum depth of approximately 0.050 inches to form part of the leakage flow path. These effects must be considered during repair of the nozzles.
(There was initial suspicion of a small axial crack below the weld on nozzle #58 from output using the circumferential probe. However, the top-down tool, which is more comprehensive due to a greater number of probes, confirmed that there was no actual defect.)
SUPV COMMENTS I IMMEDIATE ACTIONS TAKEN (Discuss CORRECTIVE ACTIONS completed, basis for closure.)
Unlike the axial crack indications, the observed circumferential crack on CRDM nozzle #2 Is the type indentified In NRC bulletin 2001-01. However, due to its small size, the circumferential crack is not a safety concern. The 3 nozzles with pressure boundary leakage noted in this CR, i.e. nozzles #1, 2, and 3 are reportable per T.S. 3.4.6.2.a. This Issue was already reported under CR02-0891 on 2127/02 for nozzle #3, however, an update of that report will be needed. This CR will ensure the reporting requirements are satisfied.
Resolution of the issues will be addressed by CR 02-00891, which was classified as OSignificant-Root Cause".
QUALITY ORGANIZATION USE ONLY IDENTIFIED BY (Check one)
El Seol-Revealed ATTACHMENTS Quality Org. Initiated E Yes 2
IndividuaVlWork Group E
Internal Oversight Quality Org. Follow-up El Yes El No El Supervision/Management El External Oversight g Yes E No ORIGINATOR ORGANIZATION I DATE SUPERVISOR DATE PHONE EXT.
LANG, T LCM 2128/2002 LANG, T 3/5/2002 8116 Page 1 of 2 H53
NOP-LP-2001-01 CONDITION REPORT JoCR Number TITLE:
CRDM NOZZLE CRACK INDICATIONS 02-00932 SRO EQUIPMENT E
VALUATION IMMEDIATE ORGANIZATIO0N MODE CHANGE REVIEW OPERABLEREQUIRED INVESTIGATION REQUIRED NOIID RESTRAINT L
g3 Yes 0 No El Yes 10 No a3 WA 0 Yes i]
No
[] Yes il No NIA EdYes 0 No MODE ASSOCIATED TECH SPEC NUMBER(S)
ASSOCIATED LCO ACTION STATEMENT(S)
A L
-g~
ij#~
N
-1WI DECLARED REPORTABLE?
One Hour W1AAPPLICABLE UNIT(S) 0 NOPERABLE (Date/Time)
RYes EINo 1
}
P 2/27/02 / 1330
]Evat Required Other 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> Ul E0 U2 E0 Both E
COMMENTS R
Refer to CR 02-0891. Made 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> Non-Emergency update to the initial report (Event Number A
38732) to the NRC. Update was made via ENS at 1921, 3/5/02. The disposition of this CR will be T
tied to that of CR 02-0891. NRC Resident Inspector was also notified, as well as the applicable I
personnel listed in DB-OP-00002.
o Current Mode - Unit I Power Level - Unit 1 Current Mode - Unit 2 l Power Level - Unit 2 N
6 0
S SRO-UNIT 1 SRO - UNIT 2 DATE Ploeger, T Steenbergen, C 3/5/2002 CATEGORY/ EVAL ASSIGNED ORGANIZATION DUE DATE R REPORTABLE?
Yes O]No EO LERNNo.
ORPATREND CODES Comp Type I ID Resp u
REPORTASILITY REVIEWER I
Process I Activity/ Cause Code(s)
(If Cause T or W)
Org A Wolf, G SUPV HDW 0600 T
0 DATE MRS y
03/08/02 INVESTIGATION OPTIONS CLOSED BY DATE E Generic Impliations El Part 21
[ MaintRule OE Evaluation Page 2 of 2