ML19340F019: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:.- - _ _ .. . __ _ -. _ . - _ . - - _._ - . | {{#Wiki_filter:.- - _ _ .. . __ _ -. _ . - _ . - - _._ - . | ||
] CPSES/ER (0LS) | ] CPSES/ER (0LS) | ||
. COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION | . COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION | ||
! ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OPERATING LICENSE STAGE JANUARY 1981 AMENDMENT j INSTRUCTION SHEET I | ! ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OPERATING LICENSE STAGE JANUARY 1981 AMENDMENT j INSTRUCTION SHEET I | ||
Please remove the old sheets and insert the new sheets. | Please remove the old sheets and insert the new sheets. | ||
Remove Insert Front /Back Front /Back CHAPTER 8 | Remove Insert Front /Back Front /Back CHAPTER 8 | ||
: T8.1-21 (2 Sheets) T8.1-21 (1 Sheet) | : T8.1-21 (2 Sheets) T8.1-21 (1 Sheet) | ||
O i | O i | ||
i O | i O | ||
A3-1 | A3-1 | ||
-81 0116 0 501 | -81 0116 0 501 | ||
. - - - - - _ - _ _ P me , | . - - - - - _ - _ _ P me , | ||
CPSES/ER (0LS) | CPSES/ER (0LS) | ||
TABLE 8.1-21 PRINCIPAL BENEFITS OF COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Capacity, MWe 2,300 Average annual electrical energy generation 106MWhr 70% capacity factor 14.1 12.1 3 60% capacity factor 50% capacity factor 10.1 Other products Taxes Average Annual Local (property)(a) $628,651.56 State (a) 19,743.17 Federal (b) 0.00 | TABLE 8.1-21 PRINCIPAL BENEFITS OF COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Capacity, MWe 2,300 Average annual electrical energy generation 106MWhr 70% capacity factor 14.1 12.1 3 60% capacity factor 50% capacity factor 10.1 Other products Taxes Average Annual Local (property)(a) $628,651.56 State (a) 19,743.17 Federal (b) 0.00 | ||
$648,394.73 Regional Product Value added in value of output of businesses in project area corresponding to direct annual wages of employees, plus induced consumption and investment as result of multiplier | $648,394.73 Regional Product Value added in value of output of businesses in project area corresponding to direct annual wages of employees, plus induced consumption and investment as result of multiplier effect. (See Section 8.1.4). | ||
effect. (See Section 8.1.4). | |||
'' Environmental Enhancement Recreational uses of portion of shoreline and waters of Squaw Creek Reservoir. Reduced air pollution due to decrease in dependence upon use of fossil fuels for power generation. | '' Environmental Enhancement Recreational uses of portion of shoreline and waters of Squaw Creek Reservoir. Reduced air pollution due to decrease in dependence upon use of fossil fuels for power generation. | ||
Employment Estimated peak work force of 4,500 construction workers. | Employment Estimated peak work force of 4,500 construction workers. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 39: | ||
These values will be renegotiated with local authorities annually for future years. | These values will be renegotiated with local authorities annually for future years. | ||
(b) There is no significant net benefit in the form of increased federal taxes directly attributable to the CPSES project. CPSES is being constructed to replace a corresponding amount of oil and natural gas generation rather than to meet increased demand. | (b) There is no significant net benefit in the form of increased federal taxes directly attributable to the CPSES project. CPSES is being constructed to replace a corresponding amount of oil and natural gas generation rather than to meet increased demand. | ||
Net income from energy sales and the resultant federal taxes, would not be significantly affected if such demand were to be | Net income from energy sales and the resultant federal taxes, would not be significantly affected if such demand were to be met by use of existing generating capacity. See Section 1.3.1 4 | ||
met by use of existing generating capacity. See Section 1.3.1 4 | |||
for further discussion. | for further discussion. | ||
AMENDMENT 3 JANUARY 1981 (7) u}} | AMENDMENT 3 JANUARY 1981 (7) u}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:09, 31 January 2020
| ML19340F019 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/31/1981 |
| From: | TEXAS UTILITIES CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19340F018 | List: |
| References | |
| ENVR-810131, NUDOCS 8101160507 | |
| Download: ML19340F019 (2) | |
Text
.- - _ _ .. . __ _ -. _ . - _ . - - _._ - .
] CPSES/ER (0LS)
. COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
! ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OPERATING LICENSE STAGE JANUARY 1981 AMENDMENT j INSTRUCTION SHEET I
Please remove the old sheets and insert the new sheets.
Remove Insert Front /Back Front /Back CHAPTER 8
- T8.1-21 (2 Sheets) T8.1-21 (1 Sheet)
O i
i O
A3-1
-81 0116 0 501
. - - - - - _ - _ _ P me ,
CPSES/ER (0LS)
TABLE 8.1-21 PRINCIPAL BENEFITS OF COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Capacity, MWe 2,300 Average annual electrical energy generation 106MWhr 70% capacity factor 14.1 12.1 3 60% capacity factor 50% capacity factor 10.1 Other products Taxes Average Annual Local (property)(a) $628,651.56 State (a) 19,743.17 Federal (b) 0.00
$648,394.73 Regional Product Value added in value of output of businesses in project area corresponding to direct annual wages of employees, plus induced consumption and investment as result of multiplier effect. (See Section 8.1.4).
Environmental Enhancement Recreational uses of portion of shoreline and waters of Squaw Creek Reservoir. Reduced air pollution due to decrease in dependence upon use of fossil fuels for power generation.
Employment Estimated peak work force of 4,500 construction workers.
Nearly 200 permanent operating employees during life of plant.
(a) Based upon actual taxes paid in 1977 (see Section 8.1.2.3.1).
These values will be renegotiated with local authorities annually for future years.
(b) There is no significant net benefit in the form of increased federal taxes directly attributable to the CPSES project. CPSES is being constructed to replace a corresponding amount of oil and natural gas generation rather than to meet increased demand.
Net income from energy sales and the resultant federal taxes, would not be significantly affected if such demand were to be met by use of existing generating capacity. See Section 1.3.1 4
for further discussion.
AMENDMENT 3 JANUARY 1981 (7) u