ML051540101: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
Palo Verde Integrated AFWS Flow (Ibm) | Palo Verde Integrated AFWS Flow (Ibm) | ||
. ' liE l | . ' liE l | ||
-15 ' - . | -15 ' - . | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 14 March 2020
| ML051540101 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde |
| Issue date: | 05/24/2005 |
| From: | Arizona Public Service Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML051540101 (27) | |
Text
Palo Verde ,\\I-//
-I M
7I-,-I - W--
Station Black Out Presentation To The Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 24, 2005
Palo Verde Agenda
- Introductions Carl Churchman/
Mel Fields
- Description of Proposed M. Karbassian Changes to Station Blackout Coping Strategy
- Closing Remarks C. Churchman/
M. Fields
Palo Verde B ackground
- APS Power Uprate License Amendment Request
- Increase Power by 2.94% for U1 & U3
- 3876 MWt to 3990 MWt
- Currently being reviewed by NRC Staff
- June 14, 2004 Loss of Off-site Power
- Unit 1,2 & 3
- SBO Category P3 Plant with 16 hour1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> Coping Strategy
Palo Verde 41 Purpose
- Identify Actions Necessary to Comply With 16 Hour Coping Strategy
Palo Verde What is PV's SBO Design Basis
- Alternate AC (AAC) Plant Per Reg Guide 1.155 &
- Ltr 161-04146-WFC/MEP, dated August 31, 1991
- SE Dated February 11, 1992 (section 2.2.2)
- Requirement for an AAC Plant
- Demonstrate Coping W/O Power for 1 Hour
- 4.2 MW GTG On Line within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />
- Demonstrate Coping With GTG available for an additional 3 Hours (Now 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br />)
Palo Verde Existing Strategy (4 hr Coping)
Existing Analysis
- Assumes 120 GPM RCS Leak Rate
- Uses ADVs for Heat Removal
- Start GTG Within 1 hr
- Load EW/SP/EC/HVAC/Battery Chargers
- Establish Charging for Inventory Control
- Maintain Hot Standby Using ADVs
- Remain @ Hot Standby for the Following 3 Hours
Palo Verde (Cor Credited Future Strategy (16 hr Coping
- Revised Analysis
- Assume 83 GPM RCS Leak Rate
- Minimize Operator Action During 1St hr
- Start GTG, Within 1 hr
- Load EW/SP/EC/HVAC/Battery Chargers
- Use ADV for Heat Removal
- Use HPSI for RCS Inventory Control
- Uses Pressurizer Vent for Pressure Control
- Cool Down to SDC Condition in 16 hrs
Palo Verde Evaluation of Design Basis RCS Inventory
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Core Remains Covered - Core Remains Covered
- Credits Reflux Boiling - Natural Circulation
- Reviewed by NRC
- February 11, 1992
Palo Verde Hot Leg Temperatures (OF) tL5s ja:- am0 31 CI.,
I-I U10 Wo.
Palo Verde Cold Leg Temperatures (OF) 550 ARCl 450 2t~ 4cMJ.
2CU n DO Time (seconds,)
Palo VerdePressurizer Pressure
-\\I /.,
Hawley (PSIA) 2500 2000 1500 1 000 SOD 0l Time (seconds)
Palo Verde Pressurizer Level (ft) 25 -
0 - 15
- - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . l ID 5 ---- ......... . . .. .. . ..
15 0 1OOD 20000 30000 4000D 50000 0i000 lime (seconds)
Palo Verde Leak Flow (per RCP)
(Ibmlsec) 2 - - - - . . . . . .. - -.-- - -
1.2j . .
I
Palo1Vrde Evaluation of Condensate Inventory
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Required Condensate
- Required Condensate
- 156000 gallons - 266000 gallons
- Decay Heat - Decay Heat (ANSI + 2a)
- Sensible Heat - Sensible Heat
- SG Inventory Recovery - RSG Inventory Recovery
- Per NUMARC Guidelines
- Analyzed Using CENTS
- Reviewed By NRC Code
- February 11, 1992
- Methodology Change
Palo Verde Integrated AFWS Flow (Ibm)
. ' liE l
-15 ' - .
_- /9 41 ~ I I*
I X)
Palo Verde -\ I/
Evaluation of Condensate Inventory
- Available Condensate Inventory
- CST 300,000 gallons (Minimum Tech Spec)
- RMWT 300,000 gallons Available (Not Tech Spec)
Palo Verde XW -
Evaluation of Class IE Battery Capacity
- No Effect on Class lE Battery Capacity From 16 hr Coping
- Battery Chargers are Loaded on to GTG Within 1 hr
- Original Analysis Sized the Batteries to Support SBO for 2 Hours
- Equipment Credited in the First Hour Remains Bounding
Palo Verde ,S I/
Evaluation of Compressed Air Capacity
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- ADVs - ADVs
- Insufficient Margin with
- RCP Seal Bleedoff Nitrogen Accumulator.
- Nitrogen Backup
- Portable Diesel Driven Air Compressor Will be
- 3082 gallon Tank Available for Connection
- 65000 ft3 HP Cylinder to Support 1 hr Duration to Instrument Air Header
- RCP Seal Bleedoff
- Reviewed By NRC
- No Change to IA Backup
- July 28, 1992
- April 13, 1994
Palo Verde Evaluation of Loss of Ventilation Control, AFWP, DC Equip and Battery Rooms
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Cooling is Loaded on to GTG - No Effect on the Heat loads for the Following Rooms Due to 16 hr Coping or Power Within 1 hr. Uprate
- Control Room - Cooling will Be Loaded on to
- AFWP Room the GTG within 1 hr.
- DC Equipment Room
- Switchgear Room
- Battery Room
- Reviewed by the NRC
- No Effect Due to 16 hr
- Feb 11, 1992 Coping Strategy Change
- July 28, 1992
Palo Verde Evaluation of Loss of Ventilation Charging Pump Room and MSSS Bldg Upper Elev.
- 4 hi- Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- No Credit was Given for Room - No Credit is Given for Cooling for the Following: Room Cooling for the
- Charging Pump Room Identified Rooms,
- MSSS Upper Elevation - Steady State Temperature in
- Review by the NRC Chg Pump Room &MSSS Building Remains Below
- Feb 11, 1992 Equipment Qualification
- July 28, 1992 Temperature Criteria
Palo Verde X1/
Evaluation of Loss of Ventilation Containment
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Containment Containment
- In house Code - COPPATA Code
- Utilizes NUMARC Criteria
- NRC Approved
- Heat Sinks Per NUMARC
- Used for Containment
- Perform Temperature P/T analysis for LOCA Transient Analysis Vs
- Heat Sinks Per UFSAR Steady State Solution 6.2
- Results Demonstrate
- Results Demonstrate containment P/T remains Containment P/T remains bounded by the LOCA bounded by the LOCA P/T - Methodology Change
Palo Verde Comparson of Containment Vapor temperature 1-SBO and limiting LOCA 300 280 260 240 L.
I-E1 80 160 140 120 100 0 10 20 Time (hr)
Palo Verde Comparson of Containment pressure SBO and limiting LOCA 80
-SBO @120gpm leakage
- LOCA 70-60 -
50 1C) a 40-Max i 27.5 PSIA 16 hr 30-20 5 10 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 Time (hr)
Palo Verde Evaluation of Containment Isolation
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Containment Isolation Valves
- Will Not Reach RAS at 16 hrs Were reviewed for the
- No Impact to the Containment applicability or exclusion to Isolation capability due to NUMARC 87-00 Criteria and PUR Or 16 hr Coping found acceptable
- Located in UFSAR Tables 6.2.4-1 & 6.2.4-2
- Reviewed by the NRC
- April 13, 1994
Palo Verde Evaluation of Communication
- EPABX (Telephone) 8 hr battery
- Plant 2 Way Radio 4 hr battery, Transfer Switch
- Sound Power Phones
Palo Verde Evaluation of Communication
- 4 hr Coping
- 16 hr Coping
- Primary Modes of
- Primary Mode of Communication Communication
- EPABX Telephone - EPABX Telephone
- Sound Power Phone * (8 hr Battery back-up)
- Radios - Radios
- (4 hr Battery back-up)
- (Transfer Switch)
- Reviewed by the NRC
- Sound Power Phone
- April 13, 1994
- Sufficient Battery Back-up to Cope for 1 Hour Until GTG Loads the Radio System
Palo Verde r Summary
- Regulatory Guide 1.155 Acceptance Criteria for 16 hr Coping Can Be Successfully Demonstrated
- Methodology Changes Will Be Introduced for Consistency With the Current Safety Analysis Methods
- New Equipment and Procedure Changes Are Necessary for Implementation of the 16 hr Coping Strategy