ML13317A649: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:2013 Clinton Initial Licensed Operator Examination Outline Review I. Operating Test A. RO Admin JPMs | {{#Wiki_filter:2013 Clinton Initial Licensed Operator Examination Outline Review I. Operating Test A. RO Admin JPMs | ||
: 1. JPM 513 - Perform a Locked High Radiation Area Entry Provide an explanation of how this JPM differs from JPM 410, | : 1. JPM 513 - Perform a Locked High Radiation Area Entry Provide an explanation of how this JPM differs from JPM 410, Read a Survey Map, which was used on the previous two exams. | ||
RESPONSE: The previous JPM simply required identification of information on the map. JPM 513 requires the examinee to determine requirements for entry based on information provided on the map. | RESPONSE: The previous JPM simply required identification of information on the map. JPM 513 requires the examinee to determine requirements for entry based on information provided on the map. | ||
B. SRO Admin JPMs | B. SRO Admin JPMs | ||
: 1. JPM 516 - Select Volunteers and Authorize an Emergency Exposurfor a Life-Saving Operation Provide an explanation of how this JPM differs from JPM 450, | : 1. JPM 516 - Select Volunteers and Authorize an Emergency Exposurfor a Life-Saving Operation Provide an explanation of how this JPM differs from JPM 450, Authorize an Emergency Dose for a Life-Saving Operation, used on the last examination. | ||
-Saving Operation, | |||
RESPONSE: Previous JPM authorize a single individual and included the required briefing. JPM 516 evaluates three individuals, one of whom cannot be authorized due to a previous emergency exposure. | RESPONSE: Previous JPM authorize a single individual and included the required briefing. JPM 516 evaluates three individuals, one of whom cannot be authorized due to a previous emergency exposure. | ||
: 2. JPM 514 - Determine Reporting Requirements per OP | : 2. JPM 514 - Determine Reporting Requirements per OP-AA-106-101 Provide an explanation of how this JPM differs from JPM 101, Prepare and Event Notification Worksheet, used on the 2009 SRO examination. | ||
-AA-106-101 Provide an explanation of how this JPM differs from JPM 101, | |||
RESPONSE: Previous JPM was for ROs who had to complete a notification of an Emergency Classification. JPM 514 requires SROs to determine the reporting requirements (50.72) for ERDS failure. | RESPONSE: Previous JPM was for ROs who had to complete a notification of an Emergency Classification. JPM 514 requires SROs to determine the reporting requirements (50.72) for ERDS failure. | ||
C. Control Room Systems | C. Control Room Systems | ||
: 1. JPM 414 - Parallel DG 1B with Offsite Power Replace of Modify | : 1. JPM 414 - Parallel DG 1B with Offsite Power Replace of Modify - This would be the third consecutive exam in which this JPM has been used. | ||
- This would be the third consecutive exam in which this JPM has been used. | |||
RESPONSE: JPM being replaced. | RESPONSE: JPM being replaced. | ||
: 2. JPM 517 - Turbine On | : 2. JPM 517 - Turbine On-Line Tests Provide and explanation of how this JPM was modified from JPM 415 used on the 2010 examination. | ||
-Line Tests Provide and explanation of how this JPM was modified from JPM 415 used on the 2010 examination. | RESPONSE: JPM 517 is an alternate path version of JPM 415. | ||
RESPONSE: JPM 517 is an | |||
D. Simulator Scenarios | D. Simulator Scenarios | ||
: 1. Scenario 1, Event 8 Why is the Terminate and Prevent Critical Task specific to HPCS only? Should include all applicable EOP | : 1. Scenario 1, Event 8 Why is the Terminate and Prevent Critical Task specific to HPCS only? | ||
-3 Detail F systems. | Should include all applicable EOP-3 Detail F systems. | ||
RESPONSE: Will be changed to include all applicable systems. | RESPONSE: Will be changed to include all applicable systems. | ||
: 2. Scenario 2, Event 8 Is there some sort of precursor, or indication for the loss of the RAT (e.g., a lightning strike or earthquake induced sudden pressure fault | : 2. Scenario 2, Event 8 Is there some sort of precursor, or indication for the loss of the RAT (e.g., | ||
a lightning strike or earthquake induced sudden pressure fault - see comment 4 below)? | |||
RESPONSE: Event 8 now Event 9. There is no specific precursor other than failure occurs during automatic bus transfer with corresponding alarms to indicate reason for lockout. | |||
: 3. Scenario 3, Event 7 Low discriminatory value event; Minimal manipulation involved in response to event. | : 3. Scenario 3, Event 7 Low discriminatory value event; Minimal manipulation involved in response to event. | ||
RESPONSE: Event modified to require start of standby pump to replace affected pump. | RESPONSE: Event modified to require start of standby pump to replace affected pump. | ||
: 4. Scenario 2/3 Add an additional Instrument/Component failure for either the BOP in Scenario 2 or the ATC in Scenario 3. This will give ROs 2 and 4 | : 4. Scenario 2/3 Add an additional Instrument/Component failure for either the BOP in Scenario 2 or the ATC in Scenario 3. This will give ROs 2 and 4 n+1 component failures (currently have only the minimum). Suggest adding the Scenario 4, Event 5 Earthquake to Scenario 2 (occurring simultaneously with the CD pump trip). | ||
Suggest adding the Scenario 4, Event 5 Earthquake to Scenario 2 (occurring simultaneously with the CD pump trip). | |||
RESPONSE: I/C failure added to Scenario 2 for BOP. | RESPONSE: I/C failure added to Scenario 2 for BOP. | ||
: 5. Scenario 3, Event 9 If not already designed as such, recommend starting the steam break small enough to allow the crew to exercise the RCS Leakage Off | : 5. Scenario 3, Event 9 If not already designed as such, recommend starting the steam break small enough to allow the crew to exercise the RCS Leakage Off-normal before being forced to initiate the SCRAM. | ||
- | |||
RESPONSE: Event modified to incorporate Off | RESPONSE: Event modified to incorporate Off-Normal implementation. | ||
-Normal implementation. | |||
II. Written Exam A. Rejected K/As | II. Written Exam A. Rejected K/As | ||
: 1. K/As should not be rejected solely because there is not a link in the K/A manual to 55.43(b). | : 1. K/As should not be rejected solely because there is not a link in the K/A manual to 55.43(b). | ||
RESPONSE: Discussed with facility author | RESPONSE: Discussed with facility author. | ||
: 2. At first glance the number of rejected K/As appears excessive (one or more K/As rejected on 23/75 questions and 14/25 SRO questions). A more detailed review indicated that only 9 (5 RO and 4 SRO) questions had K/As rejected during the initial outline preparation. Explanations provided by facility were evaluated and found to be acceptable. | |||
A more detailed review indicated that only 9 (5 RO and 4 SRO) questions had K/As rejected during the initial outline preparation. Explanations provided by facility were evaluated and found to be acceptable. | |||
RESPONSE: Discussed with facility. No additional action required.}} | RESPONSE: Discussed with facility. No additional action required.}} |
Latest revision as of 12:21, 4 November 2019
ML13317A649 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Clinton |
Issue date: | 06/21/2013 |
From: | David Reeser Operations Branch III |
To: | AmerGen Energy Co |
David Reeser | |
Shared Package | |
ML11354A433 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML13317A649 (3) | |
Text
2013 Clinton Initial Licensed Operator Examination Outline Review I. Operating Test A. RO Admin JPMs
- 1. JPM 513 - Perform a Locked High Radiation Area Entry Provide an explanation of how this JPM differs from JPM 410, Read a Survey Map, which was used on the previous two exams.
RESPONSE: The previous JPM simply required identification of information on the map. JPM 513 requires the examinee to determine requirements for entry based on information provided on the map.
- 1. JPM 516 - Select Volunteers and Authorize an Emergency Exposurfor a Life-Saving Operation Provide an explanation of how this JPM differs from JPM 450, Authorize an Emergency Dose for a Life-Saving Operation, used on the last examination.
RESPONSE: Previous JPM authorize a single individual and included the required briefing. JPM 516 evaluates three individuals, one of whom cannot be authorized due to a previous emergency exposure.
- 2. JPM 514 - Determine Reporting Requirements per OP-AA-106-101 Provide an explanation of how this JPM differs from JPM 101, Prepare and Event Notification Worksheet, used on the 2009 SRO examination.
RESPONSE: Previous JPM was for ROs who had to complete a notification of an Emergency Classification. JPM 514 requires SROs to determine the reporting requirements (50.72) for ERDS failure.
C. Control Room Systems
- 1. JPM 414 - Parallel DG 1B with Offsite Power Replace of Modify - This would be the third consecutive exam in which this JPM has been used.
RESPONSE: JPM being replaced.
- 2. JPM 517 - Turbine On-Line Tests Provide and explanation of how this JPM was modified from JPM 415 used on the 2010 examination.
RESPONSE: JPM 517 is an alternate path version of JPM 415.
D. Simulator Scenarios
- 1. Scenario 1, Event 8 Why is the Terminate and Prevent Critical Task specific to HPCS only?
Should include all applicable EOP-3 Detail F systems.
RESPONSE: Will be changed to include all applicable systems.
- 2. Scenario 2, Event 8 Is there some sort of precursor, or indication for the loss of the RAT (e.g.,
a lightning strike or earthquake induced sudden pressure fault - see comment 4 below)?
RESPONSE: Event 8 now Event 9. There is no specific precursor other than failure occurs during automatic bus transfer with corresponding alarms to indicate reason for lockout.
- 3. Scenario 3, Event 7 Low discriminatory value event; Minimal manipulation involved in response to event.
RESPONSE: Event modified to require start of standby pump to replace affected pump.
- 4. Scenario 2/3 Add an additional Instrument/Component failure for either the BOP in Scenario 2 or the ATC in Scenario 3. This will give ROs 2 and 4 n+1 component failures (currently have only the minimum). Suggest adding the Scenario 4, Event 5 Earthquake to Scenario 2 (occurring simultaneously with the CD pump trip).
RESPONSE: I/C failure added to Scenario 2 for BOP.
- 5. Scenario 3, Event 9 If not already designed as such, recommend starting the steam break small enough to allow the crew to exercise the RCS Leakage Off-normal before being forced to initiate the SCRAM.
RESPONSE: Event modified to incorporate Off-Normal implementation.
II. Written Exam A. Rejected K/As
- 1. K/As should not be rejected solely because there is not a link in the K/A manual to 55.43(b).
RESPONSE: Discussed with facility author.
- 2. At first glance the number of rejected K/As appears excessive (one or more K/As rejected on 23/75 questions and 14/25 SRO questions). A more detailed review indicated that only 9 (5 RO and 4 SRO) questions had K/As rejected during the initial outline preparation. Explanations provided by facility were evaluated and found to be acceptable.
RESPONSE: Discussed with facility. No additional action required.